AMEN! The righteous graphic king has been crowned! (crysis2)

] Agreed, But the way the glass shatters is pretty amazing, wouldnt you say so? Also, whether the artic sea is pre-rendered, it still looks really good and very realistic. BUT I was talking about the water physics of the small bodies of water shown in the comparison video. It surpasses Crysis 2 water physics. And also judging from the video, Killzone 3 character models look a lot better up close. To me Killzone 3 is still the most technically advanced looking game that I've played on consoles.actionjunkie10

Meh, glass shatters aren't amazing. I don't even remember those since it's been months since I played it.

It's not good at all. It's very much unrealistic. It's also really flat as well. The water might fool you from a distance, but up close it's rather ugly. Even small bodies of water don't surpass what Crysis 2 offers though. C2 has much more advanced water physics. I believe C2's water actually interacts with objects rather than just playing splash puddle sprites when it comes into contact with an object.

KZ3 character models are rather ugly up close as well. I'm guessing they just couldn't squeeze anymore power out of them though. Crytek somehow manages to pull off really good facial models, but I think they looked better in Crysis 1.

I still think that you don't get more advanced than Uncharted 3. (Except for fire, which looks PS2-era in UC3 :lol: )

I prefer BF3.

[QUOTE="polFdrawykS"]lol ps3 lose againCanYouDiglt

Fuel for the fire.

Results of meta-analysis:

• Number of equivalent publications sampled: 42
• Average score (U3): 93.86
• Average score (G3): 91.07
• Number of publications scoring U3 higher: 21
• Number of publications scoring both equally: 16
• Number of publications scoring G3 higher: 5

Averages didn't end up very far off the metacritic interestingly.

shinrabanshou

crysis 2 on PC looks better than UC3 and is Far more technically advanced than UC3.delta3074

The same was said for GoW3 vs Metro 2033, and look at who won.

2. Uncharted 3 could sell 5 copies total world wide, and it would still be the more polished, higher quality, and far more enjoyable game(then Gears) Sales aren't inductive of quality, because if it were, then U3 would at the least be over 20 million sold lol... But still...Uncharted 3(with less the promotion) is a lot closer in world wide sales to Gears then M$ would like you to believe. 3. Skyrim is the SAME buggy mess on the PS3 that it is on the 360 4. No body cares about Gamespot. They are a joke. 5. And the 360 is in second to last place! BOTH are in a dog fight for second place. Its so.close that you cant even call a definite wimner. And even then, its still a battle for SECOND PLACE. 6. You are a raging lemming. Sorry but your opinion are therefore irrelevant.

actionjunkie10

Why do you keep bringing that spreadsheet up? There are around 40 publications on there and Gears 3 and Uncharted 3 both have 90+ reviews on Meta.

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="polFdrawykS"]I have to say I am loving the cow meltdown also. Year of the PS3 ...not so much. Gears 3 scored higher then any PS3 exclusive Gears 3 sold better then any PS3 exclusive GOTY is Skyrim which is awful on the PS3 No PS3 exclusive even up for GOTY but there was a 360 exclusive. Still last place in hardware sales The list could go on but ya not much of the so called year of the PS3 lolactionjunkie10

Fuel for the fire.

Results of meta-analysis:

• Number of equivalent publications sampled: 42
• Average score (U3): 93.86
• Average score (G3): 91.07
• Number of publications scoring U3 higher: 21
• Number of publications scoring both equally: 16
• Number of publications scoring G3 higher: 5

Averages didn't end up very far off the metacritic interestingly.

shinrabanshou

Damn, fanboys have gone into overdrive with PowerPoint presentations and crap :lol:

[QUOTE="delta3074"] crysis 2 on PC looks better than UC3 and is Far more technically advanced than UC3.ChubbyGuy40

The same was said for GoW3 vs Metro 2033, and look at who won.

2. Uncharted 3 could sell 5 copies total world wide, and it would still be the more polished, higher quality, and far more enjoyable game(then Gears). Sales aren't inductive of quality, because if it were, then U3 would ..at the least... be over 20 million sold lol... But still...Uncharted 3(with less the promotion) is a lot closer in world wide sales to Gears then M$ would like you to believe. 3. Skyrim is the SAME buggy mess on the PS3 that it is on the 360. 4. No body cares about Gamespot. They are a joke. 5. And the 360 is in second to last place! BOTH are in a dog fight for second place. Its so close that you cant even call a definite winner, and even then, its still a battle for SECOND PLACE. 6. You are a raging lemming. Sorry sir but your opinions are therefore irrelevant.

actionjunkie10

2. Gears 3 3m sales in 1st week > uc3 sales

3. UMAD?

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]] Agreed, But the way the glass shatters is pretty amazing, wouldnt you say so? Also, whether the artic sea is pre-rendered, it still looks really good and very realistic. BUT I was talking about the water physics of the small bodies of water shown in the comparison video. It surpasses Crysis 2 water physics. And also judging from the video, Killzone 3 character models look a lot better up close. To me Killzone 3 is still the most technically advanced looking game that I've played on consoles.ChubbyGuy40

Meh, glass shatters aren't amazing. I don't even remember those since it's been months since I played it.

It's not good at all. It's very much unrealistic. It's also really flat as well. The water might fool you from a distance, but up close it's rather ugly. Even small bodies of water don't surpass what Crysis 2 offers though. C2 has much more advanced water physics. I believe C2's water actually interacts with objects rather than just playing splash puddle sprites when it comes into contact with an object.

KZ3 character models are rather ugly up close as well. I'm guessing they just couldn't squeeze anymore power out of them though. Crytek somehow manages to pull off really good facial models, but I think they looked better in Crysis 1.

I still think that you don't get more advanced than Uncharted 3. (Except for fire, which looks PS2-era in UC3 :lol: )

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]Because what Gamespot says totally goes! LOL "wha wha wha" cry me a river that gamespot's awards are viewed as a joke by a majority of gamers You must be mad that Gears 3 wasnt even nominated for the VGA's though while U3 won it! So better yet, you can go cry about that. LMAOwaltefmoney

Saying Gamespot has no credibility while you're on Gamespot and then bringing up the VGA's :lol:

"buh buh the pinnacle"

And ill say it again. Gamespot has NO credibility. lol does that make you want to cry?

actionjunkie10

Okay, then what are you doing on Gamespot?

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="polFdrawykS"]I have to say I am loving the cow meltdown also. Year of the PS3 ...not so much. Gears 3 scored higher then any PS3 exclusive Gears 3 sold better then any PS3 exclusive GOTY is Skyrim which is awful on the PS3 No PS3 exclusive even up for GOTY but there was a 360 exclusive. Still last place in hardware sales The list could go on but ya not much of the so called year of the PS3 lolactionjunkie10

Fuel for the fire.

Results of meta-analysis:

• Number of equivalent publications sampled: 42
• Average score (U3): 93.86
• Average score (G3): 91.07
• Number of publications scoring U3 higher: 21
• Number of publications scoring both equally: 16
• Number of publications scoring G3 higher: 5

Averages didn't end up very far off the metacritic interestingly.

shinrabanshou

The 360 and the PS3 version of Skyrim are not the same and anyone that thinks that is a idiot pure and simple.

If you do not care about Gamespot at all then by all means leave I am rather sure no one will miss you. Just dismissing the website you are on does not help your case...dumbass.

The 360 is in second place and by saying it is second to last place does not change that it is ahead of the PS3. The PS3 is last and it has always been last since the day it launched. It is the least wanted console and it always has been. The Wii and 360 have always been ahead of the PS3.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CBd6QX8npsPeredith

Killzone 3 looks a tiny bit better in that comparison, except for textures. In my opinion, ofcourse :P

TW2? I'm little disappoint it even got nominated, a game in boxed environment that is even smaller scale than your standard action games

GameFan1983

I find it hilarious how you first praise crysis 2,a linear corridor shooter that has little more freedom than call of duty and then criticise TW2 for having small levels.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]

And ill say it again. Gamespot has NO credibility. lol does that make you want to cry?

waltefmoney

Okay, then what are you doing on Gamespot?

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] And its clear to see that Killzone 3 destroys console Crysis 2 in character model detail up close. In factactionjunkie10

P.s come clean, what have you been smoking ? The fire in U3 looks amazing! Name me some console games that do fire better! Let me guess? Far Cry 2? actionjunkie10

I don't smoke anything since my lungs are a little weaker than average. I hate to bring this picture up again, but it seems I must.

That is not amazing or good looking. I think I might of saw fire like that when I played Resident Evil 2. :D

Even Far Cry 2 looks better. Hell fire in SMG looks better. :P

so friggin what? in this case it's the truth , neither console has games that can touch any game on the PC that runs in DX11 and that's a fact

console games run at DX9c tops, UC3 is the best looking game on consoles but modern PC's running DX 11 make them look about as powerful as pocket calculators

i have seen nothing on consoles that comes remotely close to BF3 and Crysis 2 in DX 11, there is so much detail in games running on DX11 it's insane

i am primarily a 360 gamer and i am not a graphics w**** by any account but i am not blind mate and it's pretty obvious that crysis 2 on PC wipes the floor with anything on consoles when it comes to graphics, gameplay is a different matter but this thread is about technical graphics.delta3074

The excuse Gamespot's staff gave us is, yes it backlast was that huge, was that it what the game brought to the platform. Not what actually had the best-of-the-best.

Not true at all. One, console games don't abide to DirectX variations. Secondly, consoles used some more advanced features found in later variations of DirectX, such as tessellation, deferred shading, and more.

Yeah, no. That small "detail" is nothing and you know it. Developers still aren't truly utilizing DX11. We won't see it for awhile I'm guessing until games only support DX11. I agree nothing comes close to BF3 on consoles, or Crysis 2 (on a purely technical scale,) but Crysis 2 was a freakin' console port and Battlefield 3 got held back by console development again. (EA wanted it out this year instead of next, thus they switched from PC to console earlier this year.)

It took performance and utilization into account as well, which Crysis 2 DX11 sucks balls in. It uses some elements well, but then it completely falls flat on its ugly face in others. I'm a pretty vocal hermit, so I'm not bashing PC.

[QUOTE="delta3074"]so friggin what? in this case it's the truth , neither console has games that can touch any game on the PC that runs in DX11 and that's a fact

console games run at DX9c tops, UC3 is the best looking game on consoles but modern PC's running DX 11 make them look about as powerful as pocket calculators

i have seen nothing on consoles that comes remotely close to BF3 and Crysis 2 in DX 11, there is so much detail in games running on DX11 it's insane

i am primarily a 360 gamer and i am not a graphics w**** by any account but i am not blind mate and it's pretty obvious that crysis 2 on PC wipes the floor with anything on consoles when it comes to graphics, gameplay is a different matter but this thread is about technical graphics.ChubbyGuy40

The excuse Gamespot's staff gave us is, yes it backlast was that huge, was that it what the game brought to the platform. Not what actually had the best-of-the-best.

Not true at all. One, console games don't abide to DirectX variations. Secondly, consoles used some more advanced features found in later variations of DirectX, such as tessellation, deferred shading, and more.

Yeah, no. That small "detail" is nothing and you know it. Developers still aren't truly utilizing DX11. We won't see it for awhile I'm guessing until games only support DX11. I agree nothing comes close to BF3 on consoles, or Crysis 2 (on a purely technical scale,) but Crysis 2 was a freakin' console port and Battlefield 3 got held back by console development again. (EA wanted it out this year instead of next, thus they switched from PC to console earlier this year.)

It took performance and utilization into account as well, which Crysis 2 DX11 sucks balls in. It uses some elements well, but then it completely falls flat on its ugly face in others. I'm a pretty vocal hermit, so I'm not bashing PC.

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"] 1. [QUOTE="shinrabanshou"]

Fuel for the fire.

Results of meta-analysis:

• Number of equivalent publications sampled: 42
• Average score (U3): 93.86
• Average score (G3): 91.07
• Number of publications scoring U3 higher: 21
• Number of publications scoring both equally: 16
• Number of publications scoring G3 higher: 5

Averages didn't end up very far off the metacritic interestingly.

CanYouDiglt

The 360 and the PS3 version of Skyrim are not the same and anyone that thinks that is a idiot pure and simple.

If you do not care about Gamespot at all then by all means leave I am rather sure no one will miss you. Just dismissing the website you are on does not help your case...dumbass.

The 360 is in second place and by saying it is second to last place does not change that it is ahead of the PS3. The PS3 is last and it has always been last since the day it launched. It is the least wanted console and it always has been. The Wii and 360 have always been ahead of the PS3.

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

SecretPolice

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] P.s come clean, what have you been smoking ? The fire in U3 looks amazing! Name me some console games that do fire better! Let me guess? Far Cry 2? ChubbyGuy40

I don't smoke anything since my lungs are a little weaker than average. I hate to bring this picture up again, but it seems I must.

That is not amazing or good looking. I think I might of saw fire like that when I played Resident Evil 2. :D

Even Far Cry 2 looks better. Hell fire in SMG looks better. :P

I believe that Crysis 2 is graphics king and agree with the gamespot choice in this matter, though I would say the fire does look a lot better in motion than the picture you showed, and it gets even better when playing UC3 in 3D. Is this the best fire in games, I dont know but I do know its pretty good.

I believe that Crysis 2 is graphics king and agree with the gamespot choice in this matter, though I would say the fire does look a lot better in motion than the picture you showed, and it gets even better when playing UC3 in 3D. Is this the best fire in games, I dont know but I do know its pretty good.

ccagracing

I've played a good bit of UC3 so I do know what it looks like in person. It looks really fugly. I'm not saying that to bash it, because I really like the visausl of UC3, but I'm saying it because I can't defend that. The fire really is ugly as sin. :lol:

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

actionjunkie10

Just sayin. :P

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

sts106mat

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

actionjunkie10

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] And why should we care about what you...a major lemming....thinks!?actionjunkie10

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

SecretPolice

Just sayin. :P

Are you trying to say that you are friends with the mods sir! actionjunkie10

No, he's talking about me.

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] And why should we care about what you...a major lemming....thinks!?actionjunkie10

Just sayin. :P

Anyway, just go with your business of trolling but c'mon, lets get a bit more creative, effective, entertaining when doing so please.. sheesh !! :P

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

delta3074

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"] And why should we care about what you...a major lemming....thinks!?actionjunkie10

Just sayin. :P

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Eh, unlike under the bridge dwellers like yourself; people in high places care very much about what I think & say :cool:

Just sayin. :P

SecretPolice

Anyway, just go with your business of trolling but c'mon, lets get a bit more creative, effective, entertaining when doing so please.. sheesh !! :P

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]Eh, unlike under the bridge dwellers like yourself; people in high places care very much about what I think & say :cool:

Just sayin. :P

delta3074

I think if we're crowning a technical graphics king, scale should come into play. Crytek sacrificed any edge they had in that department long ago.

what I like is that our old tech consoles is in the same runnings with the pcs best.

[QUOTE="sts106mat"]fanboyism aside, i agree with this, it looked great on my HDTV and i recently got the chance to see it again on a 3D TV, it is the best looking and visually impressive game on 360 IMO, the explosions are phenomenal..parkurtommo

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"]] Agreed, But the way the glass shatters is pretty amazing, wouldnt you say so? Also, whether the artic sea is pre-rendered, it still looks really good and very realistic. BUT I was talking about the water physics of the small bodies of water shown in the comparison video. It surpasses Crysis 2 water physics. And also judging from the video, Killzone 3 character models look a lot better up close. To me Killzone 3 is still the most technically advanced looking game that I've played on consoles.actionjunkie10

Meh, glass shatters aren't amazing. I don't even remember those since it's been months since I played it.

It's not good at all. It's very much unrealistic. It's also really flat as well. The water might fool you from a distance, but up close it's rather ugly. Even small bodies of water don't surpass what Crysis 2 offers though. C2 has much more advanced water physics. I believe C2's water actually interacts with objects rather than just playing splash puddle sprites when it comes into contact with an object.

KZ3 character models are rather ugly up close as well. I'm guessing they just couldn't squeeze anymore power out of them though. Crytek somehow manages to pull off really good facial models, but I think they looked better in Crysis 1.

I still think that you don't get more advanced than Uncharted 3. (Except for fire, which looks PS2-era in UC3 :lol: )

Crysis 2 has great character models

[QUOTE="actionjunkie10"][QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

Still prefer Gears 3 & FM4 :o especially if it's a combination ...graphics / game-play king. :P

SecretPolice

Just sayin. :P