Are you expecting a significant graphical leap with next-gen consoles?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Skyrim on Ultra was hardly a leap at all. ActionRemix

Come on man. Just because the ToU changed doesn't mean you gotta stop trying in all posts.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#252 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="mitu123"] In 2005 the PC had the Geforce 7800 GTX, not sure how 360's gpu was 10x stronger...seeing how the PS3 had that gpu...and PS3 had more best graphics on consoles awards as well.

mitu123

The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth

So basically loosingends is wrong.

Is that surprising ?
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#253 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]Skyrim on Ultra was hardly a leap at all. ChubbyGuy40

Come on man. Just because the ToU changed doesn't mean you gotta stop trying in all posts.

Well, it was nighttime in the game so that might have had something to do with it. If daytime looks way better than the console version I might check it out again to be sure. And wow at the user interfaces for both. I totally understand now why consolization is such a buzzword among PC gamers. Overall the experience was a lot less impressive than I was expecting and it didn't help that it took Origin a half hour to install the newest patch correctly. In BF3 there was this weird glitch where the keybindings in the option menu were replaced with the word 'Hello.' I was considering investing in a gaming PC next gen, but my experience makes me less enthusiastic about getting into PC gaming. I might stick with consoles for multiplats/console exclusives and a laptop for indie PC exclusives.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#254 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth 04dcarraher

So basically loosingends is wrong.

Is that surprising ?

In short, nope, lol.

Avatar image for spookykid143
spookykid143

10393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#255 spookykid143
Member since 2009 • 10393 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="mitu123"] In 2005 the PC had the Geforce 7800 GTX, not sure how 360's gpu was 10x stronger...seeing how the PS3 had that gpu...and PS3 had more best graphics on consoles awards as well.

mitu123

The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth

So basically loosingends is wrong.

Like always.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#256 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

Why not ? Xbox 360 was 10x stronger then the best PC hardware 2 years before its release

Why would 720 be any different ?

04dcarraher

In 2005 the PC had the Geforce 7800 GTX, not sure how 360's gpu was 10x stronger...seeing how the PS3 had that gpu...and PS3 had more best graphics on consoles awards as well.

The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="mitu123"] In 2005 the PC had the Geforce 7800 GTX, not sure how 360's gpu was 10x stronger...seeing how the PS3 had that gpu...and PS3 had more best graphics on consoles awards as well.

loosingENDS

The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

lol what, 7800 GTX will run both Witcher 2 and Crysis 2 fine

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth HaloinventedFPS

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

lol what, 7800 GTX will run both Witcher 2 and Crysis 2 fine

I see, then the whole 8 years of hardware advances is completely meanigless and useless afterall, i mean if the best games can run fine on 8 years old hardware on PC

I dont think these games even start with such a card TBH

Avatar image for JETS-JETS-JETS
JETS-JETS-JETS

225

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 JETS-JETS-JETS
Member since 2011 • 225 Posts

I don't know when there has ever been a time that console graphics were not a leap from last gen. Thats the main selling point is the grapics other then the games. Except Nintendo but I don't even see them as viable anymore cuz they take the we will stay one gen behind the rest approach.

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#260 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

loosingENDS

lol what, 7800 GTX will run both Witcher 2 and Crysis 2 fine

I see, then the whole 8 years of hardware advances is completely meanigless and useless afterall, i mean if the best games can run fine on 8 years old hardware on PC

I dont think these games even start with such a card TBH

Dude seriously.

You ever watch that movie Gladiator? Remmember the opening scene when Russell crow is face palming at the stupid barbarian hordes smashing themselves at the roman lines over and over again? His lieutenant comments that "How is it that these people don't not know they've been beaten?"

Well, you're the barbarian hordes and pretty much everyone else on this thread are the Romans.

Give it up.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#261 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

loosingENDS

lol what, 7800 GTX will run both Witcher 2 and Crysis 2 fine

I see, then the whole 8 years of hardware advances is completely meanigless and useless afterall, i mean if the best games can run fine on 8 years old hardware on PC

I dont think these games even start with such a card TBH

Not maxed out obviously...

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#262 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="mitu123"] In 2005 the PC had the Geforce 7800 GTX, not sure how 360's gpu was 10x stronger...seeing how the PS3 had that gpu...and PS3 had more best graphics on consoles awards as well.

loosingENDS

The 360 gpu the Xenos was the first marketed unified shader based gpu. Its performance rating is 240 GFLOPS while only having 22Gb/s memory bandwidth and uses on average only 256mb of memory for video. Now the 7800GTX had a performance rating around 210 GFLOPS, having 53 GB/s memory bandwidth with 512mb of video memory. The PS3's gpu the RSX uses the G70 chipset (7800), but only has 256mb and 25gb/s memory bandwidth and does only 180 GFLOPS. While the 7900GTX does 255 GFLOPS... The same month the PS3 came out the Geforce 8800GTX came out being 3x faster, with 3x the memory and bandwidth

But the 7800GTX was not out 2 years before 360, plus it cant even start Crysis 2 and Witcher 2, while 360 runs them fine, how do ou explain that ?

Maybe raw power is the last thing that matters afterall

Explain what? that they spending the time to trim the game down to make it work for consoles so that they can earn more profit. You can trim down anything and make it work it dont mean that its going to equal to Pc's version in anyway. You are so clueless, the hardware is what allows what the devs can do with an engine . Without that processing power to wouldnt be able to do higher resolutions, more polygons and better effects. Every single multiplat game from 2005 to 2009 the 7800GTX surpassed the 360's and PS3's ability because of memory. The main reason why dev's have stop support of the 7800GTX is because its old just like the consoles PC moves forward looking ahead why spend the time in creating settings on a 5 year old card when a 4 year old card is 2x faster and more people have those type of gpus. RE 5 is a perfect example of a well done multiplatform game where an old Pc using a Geforce 7 out did the console versions.

Now with newer gpu's the current consoles dont even hold a candle to high end gpu's from 2006 onward. Optimization is not magic where they can get games to look as good a Pc with hardware thats multiple times slower and less memory. Since 2007 it's been all about compromises what can we cut to make this section look better or how to hide this flaw and so on.

Crysis 2 was downgraded in all areas because of Console limitations, Crysis 1 redone on consoles proves this point also, The Witcher 2 will also follow the same path of triming down the detail and resolution.

Avatar image for mike_on_mic
mike_on_mic

886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#263 mike_on_mic
Member since 2004 • 886 Posts
There will be a leap. I would say that it won't be as big as going from SD to HD but there will be one. The consoles are already in development so my belief is there will be about the same as what PCs will be at this moment. They will run every game in True 1080p will possibly support full 1080p 3D. Will this be a huge leap in comparions from last gen to now, no. But like Carmack says that games like Skyrim and Uncharted 3, they look great. And I don't think anyone can deny that they do look great (no compare PC to these as it is apples and oranges as far as I am concerned.) Wii U, Wii HD, I think the Wii U will not be much better than the 360 or PS3, why, because Nintendo figure that the possible drop in sales of the Wii console is due to the fact that it doesn't support HD and with the uptake now of HD televisions and console reach all time highs, people are wanting that better looking game. I think that the PS4 and the XBOXNext are released they will surpass the Wii U and Nintendo will behind the grade again. What I think will exist is, 4GB of RAM 2GB min, but 4 seems decent. PS4 will still have blu-ray, not sure if MS will adopt it, if they are looking more and more at entertainment and integrating the console into everyday life then they need to look at Blu-ray since nothing new other than digital (and that isn't new) has come out they will most likely support it. Processing, well I think we might see, either much the same in terms of speed, but more cores. Since the Cell has proven that desite the step learning curve that when you manage to get the most out of the way the Cell is meant to work you can create fantastic looking games, despite the GPU being medicore. Though, the GPU will be an interesting side since there has been some HUGE advancements in GPU technology since the release of these consoles now.