At this point can we consider Team Fortress 2 a PC "Exclusive"?

  • 196 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#151 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

PC's don't have exclusives.

lundy86_4

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

because pc's aren't a solid 'platform', rather combination of lots of hardware i guess you could say GPU multiplats or a similar term..
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#152 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62046 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

PC's don't have exclusives.

Ravensmash

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

because pc's aren't a solid 'platform', rather combination of lots of hardware i guess you could say GPU multiplats or a similar term..

Well, that's a little crazy. The PC is a system. Regardless of what hardware is going into it, it's going to have access to the same games. If games were limited to different brands of hardware, the argument may hold more water.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#153 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Has the fundamental experience or gameplay changed? If no, then it remains a multiplat. A game that gets more content is merely the "better" version.
Avatar image for Just-Breathe
Just-Breathe

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#154 Just-Breathe
Member since 2011 • 3130 Posts
Well, its on both the 360 and the PS3, so thats a no.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Has the fundamental experience or gameplay changed? If no, then it remains a multiplat. A game that gets more content is merely the "better" version.

Yes it has, the gameplay has been evolved so much that the PC version could be considered a sequel.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#156 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yes it has, the gameplay has been evolved so much that the PC version could be considered a sequel. meetroid8
So it is something drastically different than what it started as?
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Has the fundamental experience or gameplay changed? If no, then it remains a multiplat. A game that gets more content is merely the "better" version.

Yes it has, the gameplay has been evolved so much that the PC version could be considered a sequel.

In what sense? The mechanics and core gameplay is the same - just with an added wardrobe.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Yes it has, the gameplay has been evolved so much that the PC version could be considered a sequel. foxhound_fox
So it is something drastically different than what it started as?

Yes, it has the same basic gameplay of course, they share the same classes, as well as the standard weapons. But those classes and weapons have been updated so many times that they've become something very different than what they were when the game was first released. The way the game is played has changed.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#159 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

PC's don't have exclusives.

TF2 was ok but there's better stuff out there.

LazySloth718
Like...?
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

PC's don't have exclusives.

Ravensmash

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

because pc's aren't a solid 'platform', rather combination of lots of hardware i guess you could say GPU multiplats or a similar term..

That has got to be the dumbest thing I've heard come out of you.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#161 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Yes, it has the same basic gameplay of course, they share the same classes, as well as the standard weapons. But those classes and weapons have been updated so many times that they've become something very different than what they were when the game was first released. The way the game is played has changed. meetroid8
So the answer to my question is no? Weapons add variety to the classes and how they are played =/= changing the fundamental structure of the gameplay.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#162 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

PC's don't have exclusives.

Ravensmash

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

because pc's aren't a solid 'platform', rather combination of lots of hardware i guess you could say GPU multiplats or a similar term..

That's ridiculous, dumbass.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Yes, it has the same basic gameplay of course, they share the same classes, as well as the standard weapons. But those classes and weapons have been updated so many times that they've become something very different than what they were when the game was first released. The way the game is played has changed. foxhound_fox
So the answer to my question is no? Weapons add variety to the classes and how they are played =/= changing the fundamental structure of the gameplay.

Could you define fundamental structure of the gameplay? How classes are used and the way the game is played has been changed. For example, the engineer's vanilla version isn't even recognizable anymore, because, due to updates, the strategies for using the engineer have been completely turned on their head. You literally can't play the engineer as it was in the original version anymore.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#164 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Could you define fundamental structure of the gameplay? How classes are used and the way the game is played has been changed. For example, the engineer's vanilla version isn't even recognizable anymore, because, due to updates, the strategies for using the engineer have been completely turned on their head. You literally can't play the engineer as it was in the original version anymore. meetroid8
The fundamental structure of the gamelplay is two teams facing off against one another, capturing points and draining spawn tickets (from what I recall of it when I first played it back when it came out). What VALVe has done is essentially just changed the superficial structure of the gameplay, like adding more guns to Doom.
Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Could you define fundamental structure of the gameplay? How classes are used and the way the game is played has been changed. For example, the engineer's vanilla version isn't even recognizable anymore, because, due to updates, the strategies for using the engineer have been completely turned on their head. You literally can't play the engineer as it was in the original version anymore. foxhound_fox
The fundamental structure of the gamelplay is two teams facing off against one another, capturing points and draining spawn tickets (from what I recall of it when I first played it back when it came out). What VALVe has done is essentially just changed the superficial structure of the gameplay, like adding more guns to Doom.

By that logic, BF3 and TF2 are pretty much the same game. And they are enormously different.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#166 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="Am_Confucius"]By that logic, BF3 and TF2 are pretty much the same game. And they are enormously different.

Are they, really? Other than the guns and vehicles, what makes them THAT much different?
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Could you define fundamental structure of the gameplay? How classes are used and the way the game is played has been changed. For example, the engineer's vanilla version isn't even recognizable anymore, because, due to updates, the strategies for using the engineer have been completely turned on their head. You literally can't play the engineer as it was in the original version anymore. foxhound_fox
The fundamental structure of the gamelplay is two teams facing off against one another, capturing points and draining spawn tickets (from what I recall of it when I first played it back when it came out). What VALVe has done is essentially just changed the superficial structure of the gameplay, like adding more guns to Doom.

I don't think spawn tickets are involved in any of the game modes. The classes that make up the teams are much more important than the teams themselves. They haven't simply added a new weapons and stopped there. they've changed the way classes are controlled, what they can and can't do, what they're strengths and weaknesses are. When they do add new weapons they aren't just reskins, they evolve the gameplay. For example the Spy's Deadringer functions so differently from the normal cloak, they can hardly be considered to be in the same category.
Avatar image for BibiMaghoo
BibiMaghoo

4018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#168 BibiMaghoo
Member since 2009 • 4018 Posts
Lol, I cant believe this thread has reached 9 pages. Valve, the people that make the game, say its multiplatform. You simply cannot argue with this unless you fail as basic logic. The ONLY valid arguement I have seen in this whole thread for it being exclusive is the fact that is can be purchased as a stand alone game on PC, but must be purchased with other games on other platforms. Doesnt matter though, Valve say its multiplat. More over, If we are now playing the game where by any game with additional content over other platforms is an 'exclusive' then PS3 just shot up a mile in the exclusive section. So Bioshock is a PS3 exclusive, as is LA Noire........ Its a foolish argument, and one that no matter what people believe, doesnt make it an exclusive at all. It is available on other platforms /thread.
Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="meetroid8"]Yes it has, the gameplay has been evolved so much that the PC version could be considered a sequel. foxhound_fox
So it is something drastically different than what it started as?

Is any Madden or COD game drastically different from the last?

Avatar image for Am_Confucius
Am_Confucius

3229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 Am_Confucius
Member since 2011 • 3229 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Am_Confucius"]By that logic, BF3 and TF2 are pretty much the same game. And they are enormously different.

Are they, really? Other than the guns and vehicles, what makes them THAT much different?

Eh, to start with, guns and vehicles are a huge difference. They are also very different in graphics and map-design, as well as how the scoring and classes work. Health and ammo also works differently. TF2 has no campaign. The weapons in TF2 are much more different from the other weapons.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#171 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
I don't think spawn tickets are involved in any of the game modes. The classes that make up the teams are much more important than the teams themselves. They haven't simply added a new weapons and stopped there. they've changed the way classes are controlled, what they can and can't do, what they're strengths and weaknesses are. When they do add new weapons they aren't just reskins, they evolve the gameplay. For example the Spy's Deadringer functions so differently from the normal cloak, they can hardly be considered to be in the same category. meetroid8
How does that justify calling it an "exclusive" though? I asked for the ways in which the game has been improved, you provided them, now tell me why that makes it a drastically different game, enough to call it exclusive. Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes was a drastically different game from Metal Gear Solid... but it still rode on the basic structure of the PS original.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#172 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Is any Madden or COD game drastically different from the last?vtoshkatur
Definitely not.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#173 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="meetroid8"]I don't think spawn tickets are involved in any of the game modes. The classes that make up the teams are much more important than the teams themselves. They haven't simply added a new weapons and stopped there. they've changed the way classes are controlled, what they can and can't do, what they're strengths and weaknesses are. When they do add new weapons they aren't just reskins, they evolve the gameplay. For example the Spy's Deadringer functions so differently from the normal cloak, they can hardly be considered to be in the same category. foxhound_fox
How does that justify calling it an "exclusive" though? I asked for the ways in which the game has been improved, you provided them, now tell me why that makes it a drastically different game, enough to call it exclusive. Metal Gear Solid: The Twin Snakes was a drastically different game from Metal Gear Solid... but it still rode on the basic structure of the PS original.

I'm not saying it is an exclusive. It isn't, I know that. I'm just saying that it is a different game now than it was five years ago. The way you play the game has been changed, the classes have been changed, the weapons have been changed, the maps have been changed. Everything has been changed. Nothing of the original version truly remains. Hence why I think it could now be considered a sequel. It isn't, but the argument could be made.
Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#174 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts

Whilst I don't particularly give a sh1t about it, no it's not exclusive. There's another version, it's not exclusive.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="15strong"]

You can still get plenty of games in the PS3 version and there is a small dedicated communtiy, so I would stop talking as you know literally nothing.

15strong

Massive, Thriving, User envolved Community>>>>>>>>>Small niche community.

Yes, but the size of the community has nothing to do with whether a game is exclusive or not. And you asked how big the community was and implied that console gamers don't care about the console version, so I was kind enough to point out that a small dedicated community cares.

No the guy he quoted implied console gamers don't care. At this point you are only making yourself look like an ignorant ass. You aren't even paying attention to who is saying what when you reply.
Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]Is any Madden or COD game drastically different from the last?foxhound_fox
Definitely not.

I think the PC version is far more drasticaly a different game then its console counterpart then say the difference from MW2 to MW3.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#177 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts

Lets see

the PC has

Motion Controller support (Razer Hydra)

ITS FREEE TO PLAY!

The many mods that give the game extra content

dem hats

the fact we actually get updates

and that pretty much no one plays it on consoles

NoodleFighter
The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

Jebus213

because pc's aren't a solid 'platform', rather combination of lots of hardware i guess you could say GPU multiplats or a similar term..

That has got to be the dumbest thing I've heard come out of you.

Truth is stranger than fiction.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

Lets see

the PC has

Motion Controller support (Razer Hydra)

ITS FREEE TO PLAY!

The many mods that give the game extra content

dem hats

the fact we actually get updates

and that pretty much no one plays it on consoles

Androvinus
The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.

Yes they do, Valve servers are always full. :?
Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

Lets see

the PC has

Motion Controller support (Razer Hydra)

ITS FREEE TO PLAY!

The many mods that give the game extra content

dem hats

the fact we actually get updates

and that pretty much no one plays it on consoles

Androvinus

The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.

LOL WUT? Most of Valve servers are filled to the brim. Sometimes it's hard to even get a spot on these servers.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#181 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts

[QUOTE="Androvinus"][QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

Lets see

the PC has

Motion Controller support (Razer Hydra)

ITS FREEE TO PLAY!

The many mods that give the game extra content

dem hats

the fact we actually get updates

and that pretty much no one plays it on consoles

vtoshkatur

The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.

LOL WUT? Most of Valve servers are filled to the brim. Sometimes it's hard to even get a spot on these servers.

Dont know what you guys are talking about. Most of the Valve servers were empty when I was going on. There of course are a few that have players and a few that are full, but thats not a large amount. Even the players on the steam forums acknowledge that the Valve servers aren't played on a lot.
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="Androvinus"] The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.Androvinus

LOL WUT? Most of Valve servers are filled to the brim. Sometimes it's hard to even get a spot on these servers.

Dont know what you guys are talking about. Most of the Valve servers were empty when I was going on. There of course are a few that have players and a few that are full, but thats not a large amount. Even the players on the steam forums acknowledge that the Valve servers aren't played on a lot.

I have several in my favorite list that I almost never seem to be able to get on. I'm not entirely sure about others, but I don't see why they would ever be empty. Only clan hosted servers are ever empty. And even those usually have a few people playing.
Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#183 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="Androvinus"] The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.Androvinus

LOL WUT? Most of Valve servers are filled to the brim. Sometimes it's hard to even get a spot on these servers.

Dont know what you guys are talking about. Most of the Valve servers were empty when I was going on. There of course are a few that have players and a few that are full, but thats not a large amount. Even the players on the steam forums acknowledge that the Valve servers aren't played on a lot.

Are you sure your actually playing TF2 and not the TF2 beta. Because TF2 beta is pretty dead unless theres an upcoming update.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#184 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
Yea i just checked and there are a lot of people playing on them. There werent many people playing on them about four weeks ago. Or maybe it had to do with the time difference.
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#185 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

If PS3/PSP games can be considered exclusive based on offering different features (such as MLB The Show), than I don't see why the same can't be applied between PC/console games. The same technical gap is still there

Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

If any mods out there are still reading this thread I think it's time we make a sticky of this and a offical system wars poll to decide offically if TF2 PC is a exclusive or not.

Avatar image for el3m2tigre
el3m2tigre

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#187 el3m2tigre
Member since 2007 • 4232 Posts

There's TF2 and TF2 vanilla...

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="Androvinus"] The PC version also has tons of bot servers. Hacked servers (see NightTeam). And tons of 24/7 fast respawn 2fort/dustbowl servers. Oh yea and almost no one plays on the good clean Valve official servers.Androvinus

LOL WUT? Most of Valve servers are filled to the brim. Sometimes it's hard to even get a spot on these servers.

Dont know what you guys are talking about. Most of the Valve servers were empty when I was going on. There of course are a few that have players and a few that are full, but thats not a large amount. Even the players on the steam forums acknowledge that the Valve servers aren't played on a lot.

Use your filters.
Avatar image for Ross_the_Boss6
Ross_the_Boss6

4056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#189 Ross_the_Boss6
Member since 2009 • 4056 Posts

I played the game on my X360 first for years and I consider the PC version an exclusive. It's not the same game.

That's probably why I'm able to see such a big difference. I wasn't slowly introduced to the changes made in the PC version. I went from vanilla TF2 to a whole new game.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#190 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

If it's on another system then it isn't exclusive. The consoles may not have all of the bells and whistles but the core game still exists on another platform. Get over it.

Avatar image for LazySloth718
LazySloth718

2345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#191 LazySloth718
Member since 2011 • 2345 Posts

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

PC's don't have exclusives.

lundy86_4

Well, I fail to see the logic behind that.

Exclusive denotes a legal contract keeping something on a platform.

Programs are not exclusive simply because nobody has bothered to port them.

Secondly "PC" is not a "platform" it's shorthand for "bunch of hardware meant to be used as a personal computer" it could be Windows, Mac, Linux or anything else.

%99 of "PC" in the world are not capable of running any games.

Most so-called "PC gamers" understand zilch about technology, its uses, definitions, standards, they sit on Gamespot with the idea that PC's "compete" against consoles.

A "console" is a cheap, pre-fabricated HTPC that uses %99 of the same parts as a "PC." Companies like Sony and MS and Ninty exploit their idiotic fanbase with delusions of "next gen hardware" and "quality online service."

A console is a tool that any PC user/enthusiast can benefit from, just like most of us own smartphones and ipods, we also own consoles.

"PC gamers" as a gamespot social group are clowns, I wouldn't trust you morons to defrag my hard drive much less discuss tech.

If you don't own multiple digital devices, if all you know is Windows, if you don't think the HD twins are amazing for their size and cost, then you are in no way shape or form a tech-head. You're basically the equivalent of a PC "bro gamer" and your opinions are worthless.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#192 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62046 Posts

Exclusive denotes a legal contract keeping something on a platform.

Programs are not exclusive simply because nobody has bothered to port them.

Secondly "PC" is not a "platform" it's shorthand for "bunch of hardware meant to be used as a personal computer" it could be Windows, Mac, Linux or anything else.

%99 of "PC" in the world are not capable of running any games.

Most so-called "PC gamers" understand zilch about technology, its uses, definitions, standards, they sit on Gamespot with the idea that PC's "compete" against consoles.

A "console" is a cheap, pre-fabricated HTPC that uses %99 of the same parts as a "PC." Companies like Sony and MS and Ninty exploit their idiotic fanbase with delusions of "next gen hardware" and "quality online service."

A console is a tool that any PC user/enthusiast can benefit from, just like most of us own smartphones and ipods, we also own consoles.

"PC gamers" as a gamespot social group are clowns, I wouldn't trust you morons to defrag my hard drive much less discuss tech.

If you don't own multiple digital devices, if all you know is Windows, if you don't think the HD twins are amazing for their size and cost, then you are in no way shape or form a tech-head. You're basically the equivalent of a PC "bro gamer" and your opinions are worthless.

LazySloth718

Is this an alt account? Yep, you used to have an account with the Splinter Cell picture.

Anyway, no, it does not denote a legal contract keeping something on a platform. If you wish to show any kind of evidence for this, you're more than welcome to. Now, this evidence must strictly show that the term "exclusive", within the industry, is used as solely a legally-binding term. Exclusivity means it's only on a single platform or group of platforms.

Here, in System Wars, an exclusive is something released solely for one system.

Yes, the PC is a platform. Especially here, where we list Mac/Linux under PC with Windows. Hence why games released on Mac (Starcraft II for example) are still exclusive. In terms of "outside" System Wars, it's typically a Windows-based PC which is a platform (as "platform" typically determines the OS used for the system). WB-PC is a fairly common term. PC's don't directly compete within the industry with consoles. However, they receive enough games that they compete within GS and SW more specifically. Regardless of how many PC's can actually run games, we still see it as a gaming platform (as do many developers and publishers).

Don't refer to me as a clown. Especially when you do not understand who I am, nor my level of intelligence. It's a poor debating method when you have to resort to insults.

Avatar image for LustForSoul
LustForSoul

6404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 LustForSoul
Member since 2011 • 6404 Posts
The console version are just plain bad compared to PC.
Avatar image for BlbecekBobecek
BlbecekBobecek

2949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#194 BlbecekBobecek
Member since 2006 • 2949 Posts

I dont care if you actually use the word "exclusive" or not. Its the only version of the game that is worth playing.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#195 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60835 Posts
Not if it's on other platforms.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#196 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="LazySloth718"]

Exclusive denotes a legal contract keeping something on a platform.

Programs are not exclusive simply because nobody has bothered to port them.

Secondly "PC" is not a "platform" it's shorthand for "bunch of hardware meant to be used as a personal computer" it could be Windows, Mac, Linux or anything else.

%99 of "PC" in the world are not capable of running any games.

Most so-called "PC gamers" understand zilch about technology, its uses, definitions, standards, they sit on Gamespot with the idea that PC's "compete" against consoles.

A "console" is a cheap, pre-fabricated HTPC that uses %99 of the same parts as a "PC." Companies like Sony and MS and Ninty exploit their idiotic fanbase with delusions of "next gen hardware" and "quality online service."

A console is a tool that any PC user/enthusiast can benefit from, just like most of us own smartphones and ipods, we also own consoles.

"PC gamers" as a gamespot social group are clowns, I wouldn't trust you morons to defrag my hard drive much less discuss tech.

If you don't own multiple digital devices, if all you know is Windows, if you don't think the HD twins are amazing for their size and cost, then you are in no way shape or form a tech-head. You're basically the equivalent of a PC "bro gamer" and your opinions are worthless.

lundy86_4

Is this an alt account? Yep, you used to have an account with the Splinter Cell picture.

Anyway, no, it does not denote a legal contract keeping something on a platform. If you wish to show any kind of evidence for this, you're more than welcome to. Now, this evidence must strictly show that the term "exclusive", within the industry, is used as solely a legally-binding term. Exclusivity means it's only on a single platform or group of platforms.

Here, in System Wars, an exclusive is something released solely for one system.

Yes, the PC is a platform. Especially here, where we list Mac/Linux under PC with Windows. Hence why games released on Mac (Starcraft II for example) are still exclusive. In terms of "outside" System Wars, it's typically a Windows-based PC which is a platform (as "platform" typically determines the OS used for the system). WB-PC is a fairly common term. PC's don't directly compete within the industry with consoles. However, they receive enough games that they compete within GS and SW more specifically. Regardless of how many PC's can actually run games, we still see it as a gaming platform (as do many developers and publishers).

Don't refer to me as a clown. Especially when you do not understand who I am, nor my level of intelligence. It's a poor debating method when you have to resort to insults.

Don't waste your time with him, have you seen his posts? Every single one is a terrible attempt at trolling.