Battlefield 3 - Caspian Border "Warning contains Jets" 1080P

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

How dare people compare COD Modern Rehash 3 to this masterpiece?

26whitewolf



no ones comparing BF3 to MW3, because no footage of mW3 has been show cased as of yet.

There was that one trailer, supposedly spec ops from mw3, but it was later revealed that it was just an expansion of MW2 ;). Right? lol.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts
[QUOTE="viper-kid"]you 'elites' need to calm your approach to casual gamers since they are the one funding gaming that's the reason games are being 'casualised' because developers have bigger fish to fry than 'hardcore' gamers moaning about 'consolisation.skrat_01
The problem is gamers value games far more than what is commonly associated with 'casuals' . Gamers *care* about games. Now anyway that 'casual' audience is financing it's own market - the mainstream, and a good deal of web based and iOS. Gaming itself is autonomous, look at how many games on the PC are made specifically for an audience of gamers or niches.

But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.
Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="26whitewolf"]

How dare people compare COD Modern Rehash 3 to this masterpiece?

Ribnarak



no ones comparing BF3 to MW3, because no footage of mW3 has been show cased as of yet.

There was that one trailer, supposedly spec ops from mw3, but it was later revealed that it was just an expansion of MW2 ;). Right? lol.

I wonder how many views the MW3 MP trailer will get compared to BF3 on Youtube. Now that's going to be lol worthy

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

And yet halo has sold more than any BF has... not the best argument lol

viper-kid

Reach has not received 9 million copies sold. BC2 has.

So...yeah.

Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="Jagged3dge"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] Because it wont... if halo a much bigger couldn't how will BF3?viper-kid

So people can't say that "because it wont", gameplay wise this game runs laps around CoD. Which is evident since it will take a lot more to run BF than any CoD game.

And to the statement that I bolded, lol what? Try again, this time in english.

At the end of the day the internet says Cod sucks but the real world doesn't and you 'elites' need to calm your approach to casual gamers since they are the one funding gaming that's the reason games are being 'casualised' because developers have bigger fish to fry than 'hardcore' gamers moaning about 'consolisation. Remember casuals pay the same amount as you for games so why is your opinion better? why do BF fans need to bash Cod at every chance even in a unrelated thread? answer those questions.

I don't remember stating that my opinion was better. And I'm sure BF fans find it funny to bash CoD because they know a CoD fanboy like you will coming rushing in with your superman cape. :lol: In fact, your the one that said your opinion was fact due to sales...

And Battlefield even comes up in CoD threads, it happens both ways.

Casual gamers don't fund the entire market, just some selected games. There are more games out there besides CoD.

Lastly, your kind of bashing BF every chance you get with your sig. But when people respond then you can't seem to take it. Hypocrites ftw.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I wonder how many views the MW3 MP trailer will get compared to BF3 on Youtube. Now that's going to be lol worthy

viper-kid

So you still can't tell us how much quality Modern Rehash 3 has.

Nice to know.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#207 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="26whitewolf"]

How dare people compare COD Modern Rehash 3 to this masterpiece?

viper-kid



no ones comparing BF3 to MW3, because no footage of mW3 has been show cased as of yet.

There was that one trailer, supposedly spec ops from mw3, but it was later revealed that it was just an expansion of MW2 ;). Right? lol.

I wonder how many views the MW3 MP trailer will get compared to BF3 on Youtube. Now that's going to be lol worthy

Why do you need so many other people to like a game for you to enjoy it? I mean the only thing you've really said is that MW3 will be more popular. Is that the reason why you want to enjoy so much?

Avatar image for -ArchAngeL-777-
-ArchAngeL-777-

3840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#208 -ArchAngeL-777-
Member since 2007 • 3840 Posts
you know it looks good, but I want to see this play out for real...nothing staged. Ive seen "awesome" footage before just to be disappointed when the game comes out. Remember, alpha players were less than impressed. Granted this is a different map, but the game speed and intensity could be different. Also, is this 64 player or console footage?
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="26whitewolf"]

How dare people compare COD Modern Rehash 3 to this masterpiece?

viper-kid



no ones comparing BF3 to MW3, because no footage of mW3 has been show cased as of yet.

There was that one trailer, supposedly spec ops from mw3, but it was later revealed that it was just an expansion of MW2 ;). Right? lol.

I wonder how many views the MW3 MP trailer will get compared to BF3 on Youtube. Now that's going to be lol worthy



oh yeah because people's views on a certain trailer really means that the game isgoing to be thebest game everrrrrr. Right?

Nice logic there bud. Its like saying, "YES MW3 got so many votes, it makes me soooo happy inside!! YES!!."

Anyways.

its a fact that

BF3 > MW3 in technical terms (technology, physics, game engine, frosbite 2.0 destruction, sound quality).

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#210 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

no ones comparing BF3 to MW3, because no footage of mW3 has been show cased as of yet.

There was that one trailer, supposedly spec ops from mw3, but it was later revealed that it was just an expansion of MW2 ;). Right? lol.

Wasdie

I wonder how many views the MW3 MP trailer will get compared to BF3 on Youtube. Now that's going to be lol worthy

Why do you need so many other people to like a game for you to enjoy it? I mean the only thing you've really said is that MW3 will be more popular. Is that the reason why you want to enjoy so much?



damn! you beat me to it, but yeah i was sayin the exact same thing

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#211 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

I have been sick to death of shooters here of late, but good god that looks awesome.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#212 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

you know it looks good, but I want to see this play out for real...nothing staged. Ive seen "awesome" footage before just to be disappointed when the game comes out. Remember, alpha players were less than impressed. Granted this is a different map, but the game speed and intensity could be different. Also, is this 64 player or console footage?-ArchAngeL-777-

64 players are only for the PC. Also none of this was staged, that was real alpha-testing gameplay they slapped together in a trailer. That's what's really impressive about it.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

And yet halo has sold more than any BF has... not the best argument lol

ChubbyGuy40

Reach has not received 9 million copies sold. BC2 has.

So...yeah.

Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#215 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

:o

Holy.....CRAP.

This is making me think really hard about an SLI setup in my rig.

heretrix
I'm doing SLI in my next rig.
Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#216 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] The problem is gamers value games far more than what is commonly associated with 'casuals' . Gamers *care* about games. Now anyway that 'casual' audience is financing it's own market - the mainstream, and a good deal of web based and iOS. Gaming itself is autonomous, look at how many games on the PC are made specifically for an audience of gamers or niches.

But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.

Oh shut up with the victim crap, you've done your fair share of the same thing. They claim quality over quantity (which rightfully so for gaming enthusiasts) and you say the opposite. Its hypocrisy, from whats been shown so far its pretty damn factual which game has had a lot more enthusiasm/high production value/care/effort in, that's Battlefield 3. The variety, graphics, classes, gameplay options, sound and scale are all much better. then you act elitest because a bunch of casual sheep buy one product over another in hight quanitities. Quality in game production is SUBJECTIVE, its factual. BF3 is going to dominate gamescon awards over MW3 and in enthusiasts minds. The gap will be alot closer than you would like to believe anyway. theres no rule stating that MW3 fans wont drop off after playing both.... but then the console version is gimped.... quite funny that a gimped console port is going to be higher quality than MW3... says alot for the series.

And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

And yet halo has sold more than any BF has... not the best argument lol

viper-kid

Reach has not received 9 million copies sold. BC2 has.

So...yeah.

Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.

Why dont you just play both?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#218 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

you know it looks good, but I want to see this play out for real...nothing staged. Ive seen "awesome" footage before just to be disappointed when the game comes out. Remember, alpha players were less than impressed. Granted this is a different map, but the game speed and intensity could be different. Also, is this 64 player or console footage?-ArchAngeL-777-
I'll be surprised if consoles could handle these graphics with 64 players...

It's PC BTW and not staged.

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

And yet halo has sold more than any BF has... not the best argument lol

viper-kid

Reach has not received 9 million copies sold. BC2 has.

So...yeah.

Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.



answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#220 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

My god...PC version looks fantastic :o

I wish this was a next gen consoles launch game!

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"] But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.

Oh shut up with the victim crap, you've done your fair share of the same thing. They claim quality over quantity (which rightfully so for gaming enthusiasts) and you say the opposite. Its hypocrisy, from whats been shown so far its pretty damn factual which game has had a lot more enthusiasm/high production value/care/effort in, that's Battlefield 3. The variety, graphics, classes, gameplay options, sound and scale are all much better. then you act elitest because a bunch of casual sheep buy one product over another in hight quanitities. Quality in game production is SUBJECTIVE, its factual. BF3 is going to dominate gamescon awards over MW3 and in enthusiasts minds. The gap will be alot closer than you would like to believe anyway. theres no rule stating that MW3 fans wont drop off after playing both.... but then the console version is gimped.... quite funny that a gimped console port is going to be higher quality than MW3... says alot for the series.

And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best

Didnt say anything about sales going down prior to launch. point is the gap will be MUCH closer this time around..... and with boths release there is no reason why CoD MW3 cant become the next Halo... I guess McDonals is better that resteraunt food.... since it sells loads more.
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"] But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.viper-kid
Oh shut up with the victim crap, you've done your fair share of the same thing. They claim quality over quantity (which rightfully so for gaming enthusiasts) and you say the opposite. Its hypocrisy, from whats been shown so far its pretty damn factual which game has had a lot more enthusiasm/high production value/care/effort in, that's Battlefield 3. The variety, graphics, classes, gameplay options, sound and scale are all much better. then you act elitest because a bunch of casual sheep buy one product over another in hight quanitities. Quality in game production is SUBJECTIVE, its factual. BF3 is going to dominate gamescon awards over MW3 and in enthusiasts minds. The gap will be alot closer than you would like to believe anyway. theres no rule stating that MW3 fans wont drop off after playing both.... but then the console version is gimped.... quite funny that a gimped console port is going to be higher quality than MW3... says alot for the series.

And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best



Oh so you dofeel that wii is the best console of this generation.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts
[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Oh shut up with the victim crap, you've done your fair share of the same thing. They claim quality over quantity (which rightfully so for gaming enthusiasts) and you say the opposite. Its hypocrisy, from whats been shown so far its pretty damn factual which game has had a lot more enthusiasm/high production value/care/effort in, that's Battlefield 3. The variety, graphics, classes, gameplay options, sound and scale are all much better. then you act elitest because a bunch of casual sheep buy one product over another in hight quanitities. Quality in game production is SUBJECTIVE, its factual. BF3 is going to dominate gamescon awards over MW3 and in enthusiasts minds. The gap will be alot closer than you would like to believe anyway. theres no rule stating that MW3 fans wont drop off after playing both.... but then the console version is gimped.... quite funny that a gimped console port is going to be higher quality than MW3... says alot for the series.

And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best

Didnt say anything about sales going down prior to launch. point is the gap will be MUCH closer this time around..... and with boths release there is no reason why CoD MW3 cant become the next Halo... I guess McDonals is better that resteraunt food.... since it sells loads more.

Again that Mcdonalds analogy. Mc Donalds' food costs less than a restaurant and is also quicker. Where as Cod and BF are the same price.Find a better analogy.
Avatar image for slimjimbadboy
slimjimbadboy

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 slimjimbadboy
Member since 2006 • 1731 Posts

Alright, I got your six.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="Birdy09"] Oh shut up with the victim crap, you've done your fair share of the same thing. They claim quality over quantity (which rightfully so for gaming enthusiasts) and you say the opposite. Its hypocrisy, from whats been shown so far its pretty damn factual which game has had a lot more enthusiasm/high production value/care/effort in, that's Battlefield 3. The variety, graphics, classes, gameplay options, sound and scale are all much better. then you act elitest because a bunch of casual sheep buy one product over another in hight quanitities. Quality in game production is SUBJECTIVE, its factual. BF3 is going to dominate gamescon awards over MW3 and in enthusiasts minds. The gap will be alot closer than you would like to believe anyway. theres no rule stating that MW3 fans wont drop off after playing both.... but then the console version is gimped.... quite funny that a gimped console port is going to be higher quality than MW3... says alot for the series.Ribnarak

And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best



Oh so you dofeel that wii is the best console of this generation.

There is a difference in price between the wii and other systems meaning the wii is cheaper and will get more sales. while Cod and BF are the same price, so the price ain't a factor. Insert coin and try again

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="viper-kid"]you 'elites' need to calm your approach to casual gamers since they are the one funding gaming that's the reason games are being 'casualised' because developers have bigger fish to fry than 'hardcore' gamers moaning about 'consolisation.viper-kid
The problem is gamers value games far more than what is commonly associated with 'casuals' . Gamers *care* about games. Now anyway that 'casual' audience is financing it's own market - the mainstream, and a good deal of web based and iOS. Gaming itself is autonomous, look at how many games on the PC are made specifically for an audience of gamers or niches.

But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.

Course' they can. Doesn't mean the people who legitimately care about gaming aren't going to babble and rant about the games. Same in anything, film, art, literature or sports, anything with their own dedicated communities.
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their bestviper-kid



Oh so you dofeel that wii is the best console of this generation.

There is a difference in price between the wii and other systems meaning the wii is cheaper and will get more sales. while Cod and BF are the same price, so the price ain't a factor. Insert coin and try again



I love how you completely ignore what i asked you earlier. I think you need to insert a coin and try again, because you can't comprehend nor answer a simple question.

before i start arguing with you. I need to know whether or not you're just ignorant or actually trying to present an arguemen there.

NOW. WHat game (BF3 OR MW3) IS better in technology: Graphics, destruction, sound quality, lighting, physics.?

Answer that, then ill take your arguements a little more seriously.

Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#229 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their bestviper-kid



Oh so you dofeel that wii is the best console of this generation.

There is a difference in price between the wii and other systems meaning the wii is cheaper and will get more sales. while Cod and BF are the same price, so the price ain't a factor. Insert coin and try again

Weren't you just playing the victim? Now your saying that opinions don't matter and CoD is the better game because of sales? :lol:

CoD fanboys are soo entertaining.

Avatar image for slimjimbadboy
slimjimbadboy

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 slimjimbadboy
Member since 2006 • 1731 Posts

Again that Mcdonalds analogy. Mc Donalds' food costs less than a restaurant and is also quicker. Where as Cod and BF are the same price.Find a better analogy.viper-kid

A big mac mealand a burger basketfrom apple bees are both under $10. I think the analogy works great.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts
[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] The problem is gamers value games far more than what is commonly associated with 'casuals' . Gamers *care* about games. Now anyway that 'casual' audience is financing it's own market - the mainstream, and a good deal of web based and iOS. Gaming itself is autonomous, look at how many games on the PC are made specifically for an audience of gamers or niches.

But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.

Course' they can. Doesn't mean the people who legitimately care about gaming aren't going to babble and rant about the games. Same in anything, film, art, literature or sports, anything with their own dedicated communities.

What makes you 'legitimately' care about gaming? how did you become legit? they pay the same amount as you so why do you get some special legitimacy? To developers Casuals are equal, if not more important, to hardcore gamers. That's why devs are 'casualising' and 'consolisaing' your games because casual support the developers more. FACT
Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#232 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
lol yeah even I'll admit that the jets do look good!!
Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="viper-kid"] But they are entitled to enjoy what they want, what makes you the judge of what games should be like? At least they are not like the 'elite' who need to bash games that don't appeal to them constantly on forums.viper-kid
Course' they can. Doesn't mean the people who legitimately care about gaming aren't going to babble and rant about the games. Same in anything, film, art, literature or sports, anything with their own dedicated communities.

What makes you 'legitimately' care about gaming? how did you become legit? they pay the same amount as you so why do you get some special legitimacy? To developers Casuals are equal, if not more important, to hardcore gamers. That's why devs are 'casualising' and 'consolisaing' your games because casual support the developers more. FACT



keep avoiding: Ill post this until i get an answer. VIPER KID:

before i start arguing with you. I need to know whether or not you're just ignorant or actually trying to present an arguemen there.

NOW. WHat game (BF3 OR MW3) IS better in technology: Graphics, destruction, sound quality, lighting, physics.?

Answer that, then ill take your arguements a little more seriously.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

Reach has not received 9 million copies sold. BC2 has.

So...yeah.

Ribnarak

Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.



answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Since you wanted me to answer I will be honest. BF3 is better than Cod at all those things but Cod wins to me because of FUN which I value more.

Noticed you posted this again calm down I had missed it to many posts for me to reply

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

[QUOTE="jonathant5"][QUOTE="Chris_Williams"] and BF3 players are going to be scientists and doctors? i played a couple of bf bad company games on my friends pc and their were people cursing, people singing and yelling, people who didn't help you out when your were dying. Their are douchebags on consoles as well as pcChris_Williams
I never said or mentioned anything about PC vs Console, it was BF3 vs MW3, and the community of the two games. BC2 on PS3 has a decent/good community (from my experience). And yeah obviously playing BF3 wont make a doctor or a scientist. Hell I'd argue that the chance of your average "hardcore" gamer of becoming stressful in life and making something if himself is lower than that of your average "casual" gamer. But thats another story entirely and not really a part of this discussion.

fine, we'll keep it MW3 versus BF3, you seem to think people having fun with MW3 are below average on the intelligent scale while BF3 players are above average, that is the most silliest thing i've ever heard. BF3 and MW3 are freaking videogames, they for fun, these games will never be able to truly capture the essence of military war, i know they say this is the closest to military fighting but its not. Trust me, their videogames, also what about the people who play BOTH which i'm sure alot of people are going to do. I mean this is getting way to silly, where people say people who play this game is smarter then people who play this game...really

i bet the average starcraft player is smarter than the average cod player

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.viper-kid



answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Since you wanted me to answer I will be honest. BF3 is better than Cod at all those things but Cod wins to me because of FUN which I value more.

Noticed you posted this again calm down I had missed it to many posts for me to reply



ok, thats good i can acknowledge that and i respect your opinion of you liking COD. COD and bf are different games (VERY different ). I like BF more because i like more variety and strategic gameplay, along with the other perks of graphics, experiencing vehicles, destruction, etc. But hey thats just me. So yeah thats all i gotta say, and im done.

Avatar image for Shirokishi_
Shirokishi_

11206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 Shirokishi_
Member since 2009 • 11206 Posts

Jaw dropping.... holy crap.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
Looks nice, but I still don't have time for more than one FPS this year, and this year belongs to MW3, which most likely is going to be the superior game.
Avatar image for Jagged3dge
Jagged3dge

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 Jagged3dge
Member since 2008 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] Halo 3? that was also Xbox 360 only. Guess why halo reach didn't sell much? Call of duty? Halo 3 was lucky to come before the amazing cod 4 which started the take over.viper-kid



answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Since you wanted me to answer I will be honest. BF3 is better than Cod at all those things but Cod wins to me because of FUN which I value more.

Noticed you posted this again calm down I had missed it to many posts for me to reply

Yeah but Fun is an opinion based term.

You basically just said the BF is the superior game.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

[QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"] And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their bestviper-kid
Didnt say anything about sales going down prior to launch. point is the gap will be MUCH closer this time around..... and with boths release there is no reason why CoD MW3 cant become the next Halo... I guess McDonals is better that resteraunt food.... since it sells loads more.

Again that Mcdonalds analogy. Mc Donalds' food costs less than a restaurant and is also quicker. Where as Cod and BF are the same price.Find a better analogy.

beiber sells more cd's than great bands like tool and porcupine tree. sales mean nothing

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="Jagged3dge"]Yeah but Fun is an opinion based term. You basically just said the BF is the superior game.

The objective of a game is to be fun. Being technologically superior doesn't mean the game as a whole is superior :!:
Avatar image for brandontwb
brandontwb

4325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 brandontwb
Member since 2008 • 4325 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Jagged3dge

Since you wanted me to answer I will be honest. BF3 is better than Cod at all those things but Cod wins to me because of FUN which I value more.

Noticed you posted this again calm down I had missed it to many posts for me to reply

Yeah but Fun is an opinion based term.

You basically just said the BF is the superior game.

Graphics are too very subjective. There is more detail in MW2's level design, it has better performance. If you want to get technical, you can't actually argue one is 'technolgically more advanced' than the other game. Anways, if he thinks MW2 is the superior game because he likes it more he can, now stop being such a god-damn troll.
Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

[QUOTE="Ribnarak"]

answer this one question:

Which game (bf3 vs mw3) is superior in terms of sound quality, graphics - includes destruction, physics, ? Please answer that to let me know were on the same terms, otherwise i have no point in replying back to you.

Jagged3dge

Since you wanted me to answer I will be honest. BF3 is better than Cod at all those things but Cod wins to me because of FUN which I value more.

Noticed you posted this again calm down I had missed it to many posts for me to reply

Yeah but Fun is an opinion based term.

You basically just said the BF is the superior game.

Because it is don't let my posts confuse you I m already building a PC for BF3 lol. It's only that I like Cod that is all BF is superior, but even if cod is a rehash series its still fun but I will admit that BO got boring didn't manage to get to 10 prestige like the other cods. I have faith in IW to restore fun.

Avatar image for Birdy09
Birdy09

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244 Birdy09
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts
[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="Birdy09"][QUOTE="viper-kid"] And the sales go UP so try again friend because sales are FACT not the 'Cod sux'. Elites at their best

Didnt say anything about sales going down prior to launch. point is the gap will be MUCH closer this time around..... and with boths release there is no reason why CoD MW3 cant become the next Halo... I guess McDonals is better that resteraunt food.... since it sells loads more.

Again that Mcdonalds analogy. Mc Donalds' food costs less than a restaurant and is also quicker. Where as Cod and BF are the same price.Find a better analogy.

You could easily make the same analogy with "intelectual property" and the idea that things that are easy to get into dont automatically give the best experience.
Avatar image for klusps
klusps

10386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#245 klusps
Member since 2005 • 10386 Posts

Looks awesome!!! This was what I've been waiting for.:D

Avatar image for Lief_Ericson
Lief_Ericson

7082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 Lief_Ericson
Member since 2005 • 7082 Posts

Jets are cool and all but I know everytime I attempt to fly one i will nose dive and explode, the vehicle charge was siiiiiick

Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#247 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Whats this Skyrim game people keep saying is going to be GOTY?

Uncharted 3? Whats that?

That footage was amazing, well beyond any game I have seen in my life. The action looks so intense, and beutiful aswell.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#248 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Looks nice, but I still don't have time for more than one FPS this year, and this year belongs to MW3, which most likely is going to be the superior game.IronBass

What are your reasons for MW3 being the superior game? From what we have seen it's just like MW2 in terms of general gameplay.

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#249 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
I'm so happy this damn video came out. I was really pushing off buying this game after seeing early GP, but now, now I want this game so damn bad. Thank you for showing me you still have it Dice. I was a fool to ever doubt you.
Avatar image for The_Pacific
The_Pacific

1804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#250 The_Pacific
Member since 2011 • 1804 Posts
Looks awesome.