Battlefield 3 - Caspian Border "Warning contains Jets" 1080P

[QUOTE="t1no87"]

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

Not sure if serious!?

Wont know until the game comes out or beta. By why does it have to be max?

[QUOTE="t1no87"]

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

Not sure if serious!?

About $1000-$1500.

But on medium less..

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

lostrib

Well you know COD is also on PC...

[QUOTE="Kantus_Mage"]

:lol:

slvrraven9

[QUOTE="t1no87"]

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

Not sure if serious!?

Not sure, but they've said it's been running off a quad-core Intel CPU and GTX 580 for all footage shown. At E3 during the Thunder Run/tank demo, thats the machine they were using.

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

Well you know COD is also on PC...

Well BF3 is also on consoles...so you could play both?

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

[QUOTE="slvrraven9"][QUOTE="Kantus_Mage"]

:lol:

Deadbeatcobra

I don't understand why people find this so funny? You do realize the pictures were probably taken at the complete different times of the day. For all we know that MW3 picture could be taken early in the morning when the place wasn't even open yet.

[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="skrat_01"] Course' they can. Doesn't mean the people who legitimately care about gaming aren't going to babble and rant about the games. Same in anything, film, art, literature or sports, anything with their own dedicated communities. skrat_01

To casual gamers this really isn't, it's entertainment more often than not.

Developers are catering to a general market because there is money to be made; the market itself is extremely diverse so do keep this in mind. That's not to say there isn't a huge percentage of the market that's still slanted towards gamers, as much as accommodating those not used to the level of intricacies.

It's business triple A big budget usually demmands it.

You'd have to be extremely immature to go about proclaiming our own rough speculation and assumptions as a fact

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

Modern Warfare 3 hasn't shown its multiplayer until then I will reserve judgement of which is better, but that trailer looked cool.

slvrraven9

In the real world are the more casual gamers than hardcore gamers? the answer to this is why its FACT.viper-kid

What about a kid who casually plays guitar? Would he know more about what makes good music than a professional musician?

IW has always changed up the formula compare MW1 to 2 viper-kid

They made the game even worse and more imbalanced.

found this on youtube..... Its from the PS3 version coop.... not very good quality.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwEhfvt2ayM

[QUOTE="Rockman999"]:lol: at :31, the dude actually takes the dogtags off after knifing him. Man I'm going to have to end up buying all three versions of this game, that's no bueno,. :( [QUOTE="viper-kid"] Multiplayer footage MW3 has not been released yet so calm down and reserve judgement until multi for both games is out. The trailer looked cool don't get be wrong but I have a feeling Cod has something under its sleeves.Ace6301

I never played BF2, only 2142, and it seems to me that BF3 has more in common with 2142 than BF2. The cl@ss system for example is exactly the same.

My jaw literally fell to the floor after watching that.

[QUOTE="campzor"] excuse my ignorance but what "innovations" is bf3 doing?Wasdie

individual crew members can get killed in a vehicle depending on where it got hit

I noticed this post way back on the 3rd page.

Anyways I'm pretty certain this was in Bad Company 2.......at least for helicopters. I know on a few occasions I actually sniped the pilots out of a helicopter, and watched it crash with multiple people still inside.

My jaw literally fell to the floor after watching that.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="campzor"] excuse my ignorance but what "innovations" is bf3 doing?Ly_the_Fairy

individual crew members can get killed in a vehicle depending on where it got hit

I noticed this post way back on the 3rd page.

Anyways I'm pretty certain this was in Bad Company 2.......at least for helicopters. I know on a few occasions I actually sniped the pilots out of a helicopter, and watched it crash with multiple people still inside.

Actually this is more if a BMP loaded with guys get's hit, only the guy nearest to the impact is likely to die.

[QUOTE="Omega-316"]

[QUOTE="t1no87"]

Not sure if serious!?

Kantus_Mage

About $1000-$1500.

But on medium less..

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

My jaw literally fell to the floor after watching that.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

individual crew members can get killed in a vehicle depending on where it got hit

Wasdie

I noticed this post way back on the 3rd page.

Anyways I'm pretty certain this was in Bad Company 2.......at least for helicopters. I know on a few occasions I actually sniped the pilots out of a helicopter, and watched it crash with multiple people still inside.

Actually this is more if a BMP loaded with guys get's hit, only the guy nearest to the impact is likely to die.

Oh, well that makes a bit more sense.

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] IW has always changed up the formula compare MW1 to 2 ChubbyGuy40

They made the game even worse and more imbalanced.

[QUOTE="Deadbeatcobra"]

:lol: LMAO :lol:slvrraven9

I don't understand why people find this so funny? You do realize the pictures were probably taken at the complete different times of the day. For all we know that MW3 picture could be taken early in the morning when the place wasn't even open yet.

[QUOTE="mrmusicman247"][QUOTE="Ace6301"] All you got to do is download some more RAM onto your PS3 and you're set!gamer-adam1

that could happen, don't joke about it. its already happening to CPUs

It wouldn't happen to PS3.

These Intel CPUs already includes the locked hardware features.

This is like unlocking my AMD Radeon HD 6950 into 6870. Unlike Intel, AMD haven't employed security restrictions for 6950-to-6970 patch.

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="slvrraven9"]OMFG.....OMFG>......HOLY ****!!!!! and those jets and tanks and missles and rockets.....are not kill streak rewards!!!!! how can COD still be relevant with all this crammed into one game? the only thing that would bring B3 down at this point is a short SP campaign...Randoggy

This is true for me as well. Regardless of how bad the SP is *Black ops* Cough *BC2* Cough*

This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.ActionRemix

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.UCF_Knight

This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.ActionRemix

Nice catch. This particular detail eluded me :/

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] IW has always changed up the formula compare MW1 to 2 viper-kid

They made the game even worse and more imbalanced.

Rinse and repeat for the last 5 games. Major formula change. :roll:

This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.ActionRemix

MW3 may sell more, but BF3 is the real game I will just shut up and let this trailer do the talking.

This is similar to how jets explode in Battlefield play4free. There is an explosion effect and the jet is immediately replaced with a black rock. I wish they went with debris or something. Use the f*cking destruction engine!ActionRemix

[QUOTE="UCF_Knight"][QUOTE="ActionRemix"]This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.Ace6301

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

The car explosions in Saints Row 1/2 are pretty damn good. Some of the best I would say as far as vehicle explosions go. The explosion itself might not look the best but the modle does change like almost all other games. Parts of the car come flying off in the explosion like the wheels and the doors and hood.

[QUOTE="Ace6301"][QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] It is just alpha footage...DragonfireXZ95

Its all about the tradeoffs and the visual fidelity that comes with the choice. Doing 'ultra-realistic particle physics explosion' is totally possible, but if it costs so much less cpu calculations to just replace the model with a burnt version of the vehicle and add some smoke to cover out and they both will look believable or largely the same, why not do it?

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.ActionRemix

yeah but dat tank explosion was awesome.

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]This trailer is absolutely phenomenal, of course, but the jet explosion at the end is pathetic by last-gen standards.Kantus_Mage

yeah but dat tank explosion was awesome.

amazing game. but not worth 2000$ for a computer just to play it. ill stick to COD.

Omega-316

I watched the tank explosion again and you can see the model skip there too. They have the model change before the explosion can cover it up. Why can't the good model animate into the destroyed model? Everything else in this game has smooth transitions. That destroyed jet model still sucks, though. Even if they hide or animate the transition it will still look pretty bad. No, I don't believe "it's just an alpha." They wouldn't end their bomb-dropping trailer with a filler explosion. They're debugging, not reworking everything.ActionRemix

Welcome to every game in existance.

I watched the tank explosion again and you can see the model skip there too. They have the model change before the explosion can cover it up. Why can't the good model animate into the destroyed model? Everything else in this game has smooth transitions. That destroyed jet model still sucks, though. Even if they hide or animate the transition it will still look pretty bad. No, I don't believe "it's just an alpha." They wouldn't end their bomb-dropping trailer with a filler explosion. They're debugging, not reworking everything.ActionRemix

Becuase the amount of processing power and memory space to have 3-5 models would be far to costly on the PC for so little of an effect. You're really not looking at the bigger picture with that one at all.

It's not that it is just alpha, it's that they are managing resources. Even on a high-end PC you don't want to waste. Having to store 5-6 models and their LoDs for a single tank is a waste of valuable resources. No game, not even the biggest PC excluisves would waste resources like that on something so small.

[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]I watched the tank explosion again and you can see the model skip there too. They have the model change before the explosion can cover it up. Why can't the good model animate into the destroyed model? Everything else in this game has smooth transitions. That destroyed jet model still sucks, though. Even if they hide or animate the transition it will still look pretty bad. No, I don't believe "it's just an alpha." They wouldn't end their bomb-dropping trailer with a filler explosion. They're debugging, not reworking everything.Wasdie

Becuase the amount of processing power and memory space to have 3-5 models would be far to costly on the PC for so little of an effect. You're really not looking at the bigger picture with that one at all.

It's not that it is just alpha, it's that they are managing resources. Even on a high-end PC you don't want to waste. Having to store 5-6 models and their LoDs for a single tank is a waste of valuable resources. No game, not even the biggest PC excluisves would waste resources like that on something so small.

Give the tank model bones and move the bones when it explodes.ActionRemix

That's a whole different animation system that also requires tons of processing power of the CPU. You're talking about some pretty in-depth physics simulations that are pointless for video games for such a small effect.

You're the only one who seems to care. Every game under the sun does this for vehicle destruction. There is no reason not to. You don't need tons of intermediate models. Just tons of particles and a destroyed model. Good to go. Looks good enough.

In real life, an explosion that destroys a tank would happen so fast you wouldn't be able to see it actually happening without a high-speed camera.

It's been a very long time since I've wanted a game this bad, I've already upgraded my PC and I think it will handle this game just fine if I need more I may Xfire.

But this game....@#$# WOW! Just WOW!

Im trying to make some GIF's but GIMP is locking up.

RAAAGEEEEEEE