Best fps controller

[QUOTE="Microsoft1234"]

i have medoal of honor heroes two, it wasn't that great and the aiming took some getting used to.

loco145

i know its another ww2 fps but i played with the controls and they were nothign "spectacular" it was interesting yes, but then u go back to other analog controllers and it feels better, especially because wiimote rumble isn't that great.

[QUOTE="xXHackettXx"]

I wasn't telling you to leave I was saying I'm so positive that your showing a Halo 1 PC clip to show why the 360 has bad controls, that I'd leave if I was wrong, and you just agreed that it was on the PC... So why'd you use a bad PC clip to show that the 360 had bad FPS controls?

loco145

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

loco145

LMAO so TRUE

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="Microsoft1234"]

i have medoal of honor heroes two, it wasn't that great and the aiming took some getting used to.

Microsoft1234

i know its another ww2 fps but i played with the controls and they were nothign "spectacular" it was interesting yes, but then u go back to other analog controllers and it feels better, especially because wiimote rumble isn't that great.

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

nickmat_tycoon

[QUOTE="nickmat_tycoon"]

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

loco145

yes we are, and isnt have the value of a games score the control scheme? if halo 3 or gow had terrible controls they wouldnt have gotten a 9.5 plus while if mp3 and far cry had better controls, wouldnt they get better then what they got?

The Wii-mote by far. Is not even a contest.loco145

Obviously, it is. And it looks like the 360 is winning.

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="nickmat_tycoon"]

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

nickmat_tycoon

yes we are, and isnt have the value of a games score the control scheme? if halo 3 or gow had terrible controls they wouldnt have gotten a 9.5 plus while if mp3 and far cry had better controls, wouldnt they get better then what they got?

The polls don't lie, 360 controller ftw.BudsMcGreen

What if more people would've voted for the PS3 controller? Would that automatically make it the better controller? NO!

It's all just a matter of what people prefer, and it just happens that more people ITT like the 360 controller more...

In other words, which one has the most autoaim? Even the Wiimote uses autoaim in all shooters for the most part. Nothing even begins to compare to a KB/Mouse. Thread title made me laugh, sorry, had to respond. ;)Puckhog04

[QUOTE="xXHackettXx"] Well your wrong that is the PC version, since that multiplayer level isnt in Halo 1 (xbox), and the slayer symbol at the top right is a dead give away that its the PC version, nice try though.loco145

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]The polls don't lie, 360 controller ftw._Brennan_

What if more people would've voted for the PS3 controller? Would that automatically make it the better controller? NO!

It's all just a matter of what people prefer, and it just happens that more people ITT like the 360 controller more...

the one problem with that is, only more people would vote for it if it was better

[QUOTE="nickmat_tycoon"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="nickmat_tycoon"]

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

loco145

yes we are, and isnt have the value of a games score the control scheme? if halo 3 or gow had terrible controls they wouldnt have gotten a 9.5 plus while if mp3 and far cry had better controls, wouldnt they get better then what they got?

wow so like 1 game out of like 20 got a 6?!?!?! Boy i guess that meanss wii is better, because it has more then one game with a 6 or less!

[QUOTE="_Brennan_"]

[QUOTE="BudsMcGreen"]The polls don't lie, 360 controller ftw.nickmat_tycoon

What if more people would've voted for the PS3 controller? Would that automatically make it the better controller? NO!

It's all just a matter of what people prefer, and it just happens that more people ITT like the 360 controller more...

the one problem with that is, only more people would vote for it if it was better

Or more people in this thread just prefer the 360 controller. That doesn't make it better as BudMcgreen said, nor does it mean that the PS3 controller is bad. Its all a matter of opinion. This could be argued all day, but there really is no controller that is better. Its just a matter of what someone prefers. :P

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

loco145

[QUOTE="nickmat_tycoon"]

wow too bad no wii shooter even has goten more then an 8.5 and xbox 360 has halo 3, GOW, Cod4 and soon to be gow2, maybe cod waw that are going to be 9+ games.

also no one is even online on any wii fps, that is if it even has online and halo 2, which was released back in 2004 for the xbox has more people online every 24 hours then the wii has ever had online.

So you are really ignorant, or huge fanboy

loco145

Yeah, we are. So why do you post a vid of HALO 1 on PC and claim it's Halo 2? And obviously both of those games are not made for 360 so you and your argument is an EPIC FAIL.:lol:

[QUOTE="loco145"]

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

II-FBIsniper-II

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="loco145"]

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

loco145

How would you know what Halo 3 is? You thought Halo:CE PC was Halo 2 Xbox!:lol:

And no it doesn't.

And no it doesn't.

BudsMcGreen

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: LOL!

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="loco145"]

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

loco145

I would have to go with the 360s controller. Simply because I played most console FPSes on it. But I later traded it in for a PS3, which I'm happy about. The only FPS I've played on ps3 is Resistance, and wasn't satisfied with the controls. The ps3 R2 L2 triggers are very very bad for FPS's, if used for shooting...

Though they are prefered for driving games etc. The shoulder buttons are as good as always though and subsistute as triggers for shooters pretty well. I must say though that the DS2 was much better in the trigger area. The 360 has great triggers for FPS... but then again it's D-pad is probably the worst thing I've ever encountered, really really inacurate and sloppy.

[QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="loco145"]

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

II-FBIsniper-II

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="loco145"][QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="loco145"]

This is why people believe that the 360 have good fps controls...

LOL.

loco145

Dude you're playing PC Halo:CE. Go away shermit:lol:

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash

For me its K&M and Wiimote

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash For me its K&M and Wiimote

Fawlcon_Pawnch

[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash For me its K&M and Wiimote

II-FBIsniper-II

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash For me its K&M and Wiimote

loco145

:lol::lol::lol::lol:

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"][QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash For me its K&M and Wiimote

loco145

Why would I care about on rail shooters? I have no idea why any one would actually buy one for a console.II-FBIsniper-II

:lol:

And some of you people call yourselves "hardcore" lol. Riiight...

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"] Why would I care about on rail shooters? I have no idea why any one would actually buy one for a console.Fawlcon_Pawnch

:lol:

And some of you people call yourselves "hardcore" lol. Riiight...

lol Dual Stick aiming is complete trash

For me its K&M and Wiimote

Fawlcon_Pawnch

Lols! built in Aimbots ftw!

Really? How come when I aim towards the side of the screens the reticule moves faster/slower(Depending on exactly where)? I'm pretty sure that falls under aim assist. Why would I care about on rail shooters? I have no idea why any one would actually buy one for a console.II-FBIsniper-II

That's to move the camera pal. Notice how you are talking about the "screen" and no the target. Also, what about the recoil and sight aiming? On PC fps, sights aiming give you reduced recoil and a smaller aim to improve accuracy. On dual analog fps, sights aiming give you a bigger image and better auto-aming/aim-assist since there isn't much recoil to begin with.. The MoH:H2 wii uses the former.

In MoH:h2, the reticule is (relative) big not to compensate the bad aiming (like in dual analog) but to reduce your accuracy.SInce the real damage is in the center of the circle. Just read how many people were complaining about wasting full mags without killing the target even though the reticule was always red.

BTW, i mentioned on-rails shooters because the camera isn't a factor there. They show how fast is the wii-mote aiming without factoring-in the camera.

Do you have a point or was that an attempt to troll?II-FBIsniper-II

No, its my reaction to you dissmissing the entire rail shooting genre.

A genre very appreciated by the real hardcore crowd

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Do you have a point or was that an attempt to troll?Fawlcon_Pawnch

No, its my reaction to you dissmissing the entire rail shooting genre.

A genre very appreciated by the real hardcore crowd

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Really? How come when I aim towards the side of the screens the reticule moves faster/slower(Depending on exactly where)? I'm pretty sure that falls under aim assist. Why would I care about on rail shooters? I have no idea why any one would actually buy one for a console.loco145

That's to move the camera pal. Notice how you are talking about the "screen" and no the target. Also, what about the recoil and sight aiming? On PC fps, sights aiming give you less recoil and a smaller aim to improve accuracy. On dual analog fps sights aiming give you a bigger image and better auto-aming/aim-assist since there isn't much recoild to begin with.. The MoH:H2 wii uses the former.

[QUOTE="Fawlcon_Pawnch"]

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Do you have a point or was that an attempt to troll?II-FBIsniper-II

No, its my reaction to you dissmissing the entire rail shooting genre.

A genre very appreciated by the real hardcore crowd

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Really? How come when I aim towards the side of the screens the reticule moves faster/slower(Depending on exactly where)? I'm pretty sure that falls under aim assist. Why would I care about on rail shooters? I have no idea why any one would actually buy one for a console.loco145

That's to move the camera pal. Notice how you are talking about the "screen" and no the target. Also, what about the recoil and sight aiming? On PC fps, sights aiming give you less recoil and a smaller aim to improve accuracy. On dual analog fps sights aiming give you a bigger image and better auto-aming/aim-assist since there isn't much recoild to begin with.. The MoH:H2 wii uses the former.

um... dude. there's no point in arguing over Aim Assist if you dont know what it actually does

The using of the genre to show "good" fps controls was ridiculous, hence me dismissing it. I don't care who appreciates what, rail shooters in this generation of consoles are not good.II-FBIsniper-II

No, YOU say they are no good, Umbrella Chronicles and House of the Dead 2 & 3 (both million seller games) say otherwise. Upcoming ones like House of the dead Overkill and Sin and Punishment 2 show there is lots of interest

I know what it's for. Does it matter what its for? Aim assist is aim assist, no matter how you spin it.loco145

Dual Stick FPS's aim assist is garbage, no matter how you spin it .

Lol. THAT isn't to asist you aim (aim assist), thats to move your camera. How come on-rail shooters doesn't need to slowdown/speedup anywhere to assist your aim? Because you don't need to move the camera there... :roll: