Best Killzone 2 vs CoD4 comparison

[QUOTE="Forza_2"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

makingmusic476

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

It has an unrealistic shinyness to it that resembles the glare coming off of plastic action figures. Look at the all the light reflecting off of the soldiers' clothes. Cloth isn't reflective. Sure, parts ofthe uniformshould be lit up if they are in the light, but it looks damn near radioactive. Also, while I can't tel specifically what type fo gun the guy is holding, M4s, MP5s, etc.with a black coating aren'tnear asreflective as that gun is, despite being metal.

too bad all those complaints really ruin the gameplay right?

It has an unrealistic shinyness to it the resembles the glare coming off of plastic action figures. Look at the all the light reflecting off of the soldiers' clothes. Cloth isn't reflective. Sure, parts of it should be lit up if it is in thelight, but it looks damn near radioactive. Also, while I can't tel specifically what type fo gun the guy is holding, M4s, MP5s, etc.with a black coating aren'tnear asreflective as that gun is, despite being metal. makingmusic476

http://download.gametrailers.com/gt_vault/t_cod4_e32k7_seaandland_gp_gt_h264.wmv

Do the characters look like plastic to you ?

:|

Killzone obviously wins the crappy digital camera shot of TV with downloaded PSN videos contest.subject117

lol. So true.

Gears of War destroys them character-model-wise.

Pro_wrestler

Wow, KZ2 and CoD4 still have a ways to go before dethroning the current champ. I could have sworn I seen better pics of CoD4. That one just looks crappy.

Gears of War destroys them character-model-wise.

Pro_wrestler

ninja please...

[QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

Forza_2

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

[QUOTE="Pro_wrestler"]Gears of War destroys them character-model-wise.Dualshockin

This Two Characters on screen alone doing nothing doesn't really impress that much anymore, lets see some Warzone action

Thank you. Finally a thread thats not Halo 3 vs Killzone 2. COD4 vs Killzone 2 is more like it. That being said, I'll go for Infinity Ward, because from time to time they've delivered excellent games. Guerrilla Games should get at least a look, bravo.

When people say plastic and shiny, it must be too close to call. I think they are too close to call, I'll end up having them both anyways.I wonder if the PS3 fans say KZ is better, because of it exclusiveness? I think both consoles when developed to their full 'potential', offer similar experiences in the graphics department. Heil68

I wonder if you say all these things because you are a fanboy? Yea, that's it, i've seen you post. Maybe they say that because it's obvious? Can't you tell, look at the gun in KZ2, look at the overall atmosphere, clouds, the detail in the backround, it looks cinematic. It's gorgeous, and it's in pre alpha. Now look at CoD 4. First, we notice the ugly buildings in the backrounds, the clouds fail in contrast to KZ2 and the overall backround looks lackluster. Also, it seems like it has quite a few jaggies in it. You're blind if you think KZ2 does not look better, even in this early stage.

The most important part of it,the gun,looks too plastic-ish because of the excessive shine on it.Dualshockin

I'm not take anyone who says that "Killzone was only bad because of the limitations of the PS2's hardware" seriously. Sorry.

Thank you. Finally a thread thats not Halo 3 vs Killzone 2. COD4 vs Killzone 2 is more like it. That being said, I'll go for Infinity Ward, because from time to time they've delivered excellent games. Guerrilla Games should get at least a look, bravo.

ReverseCycology

Exact same goes to you, i've seen you post as well, 100% fanboy. KZ2 tramps CoD 4.

This Two Characters on screen alone doing nothing doesn't really impress that much anymore, lets see some Warzone actionBlinblingthing

[QUOTE="The_Kills"]

Killzone looks more, i dunno how to say it, but in-depth. COD looks fine and all, but a bit too plastic like and reflective...

Berserker_2

The "plastic" and "reflective" stuff is called normal mapping, which KZ2 severely lacks for some reason.

sorry but guns dont reflect and shine that much, an m4 isnt made of chrome lol, most guns are a composite of dense metals and high grade hard plastics, i cant name a gun that shines like that cod4 pic, it may sound like im bashing but im not i am beyond excited to play cod4 i just had to put down ur argument

[QUOTE="Heil68"]When people say plastic and shiny, it must be too close to call. I think they are too close to call, I'll end up having them both anyways.I wonder if the PS3 fans say KZ is better, because of it exclusiveness? I think both consoles when developed to their full 'potential', offer similar experiences in the graphics department. BrownWalrus

I wonder if you say all these things because you are a fanboy? Yea, that's it, i've seen you post. Maybe they say that because it's obvious? Can't you tell, look at the gun in KZ2, look at the overall atmosphere, clouds, the detail in the backround, it looks cinematic. It's gorgeous, and it's in pre alpha. Now look at CoD 4. First, we notice the ugly buildings in the backrounds, the clouds fail in contrast to KZ2 and the overall backround looks lackluster. Also, it seems like it has quite a few jaggies in it. You're blind if you think KZ2 does not look better, even in this early stage.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]The most important part of it,the gun,looks too plastic-ish because of the excessive shine on it.Forza_2

I'm not take anyone who says that "Killzone was only bad because of the limitations of the PS2's hardware" seriously. Sorry.

Is that Geese Howard. I remember the days of Fatal Fury. I'm playing KOF 02 right now.

[QUOTE="makingmusic476"][QUOTE="Forza_2"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

rocktimusprime

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

It has an unrealistic shinyness to it that resembles the glare coming off of plastic action figures. Look at the all the light reflecting off of the soldiers' clothes. Cloth isn't reflective. Sure, parts ofthe uniformshould be lit up if they are in the light, but it looks damn near radioactive. Also, while I can't tel specifically what type fo gun the guy is holding, M4s, MP5s, etc.with a black coating aren'tnear asreflective as that gun is, despite being metal.

too bad all those complaints really ruin the gameplay right?

Umm are you blind? This entire thread is comparing graphics, no one is talkign about gameplay.

[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]

Thank you. Finally a thread thats not Halo 3 vs Killzone 2. COD4 vs Killzone 2 is more like it. That being said, I'll go for Infinity Ward, because from time to time they've delivered excellent games. Guerrilla Games should get at least a look, bravo.

BrownWalrus

Exact same goes to you, i've seen you post as well, 100% fanboy. KZ2 tramps CoD 4.

Is that Geese Howard. I remember the days of Fatal Fury. I'm playing KOF 02 right now.

Blackbond

Yup.

Gears of War destroys them character-model-wise.

Pro_wrestler

yeah and thats a still image from a cutscene when shown in motion has extreme slowdown, all gears cut scenes framerate goes into like the teens and i play the game in hd so im not some hater trying to bash it

[QUOTE="Forza_2"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

Dualshockin

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

You should put into account that CoD4 is at 60FPS whereas Killzone, well seems 30 and down. Not saying optimization wont happen, but as it's currently standing. It's a dumb argument to present now anyway, wait until they're both out.Mystic_Legend

Is COD4 really 60fps ? If so, then that's impressive.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]The most important part of it,the gun,looks too plastic-ish because of the excessive shine on it.Forza_2

I'm not take anyone who says that "Killzone was only bad because of the limitations of the PS2's hardware" seriously. Sorry.

[QUOTE="Mystic_Legend"]You should put into account that CoD4 is at 60FPS whereas Killzone, well seems 30 and down. Not saying optimization wont happen, but as it's currently standing. It's a dumb argument to present now anyway, wait until they're both out.Forza_2

Is COD4 really 60fps ? If so, then that's impressive.

Yeah, it was confirmed in some magazine, I forget by Infinity Ward, they said that the game must run at a fixed 60FPS. Impressive indeed.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Forza_2"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

Heil68

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

KZ2 just off style

[QUOTE="Berserker_2"][QUOTE="The_Kills"]

Killzone looks more, i dunno how to say it, but in-depth. COD looks fine and all, but a bit too plastic like and reflective...

blues3531

The "plastic" and "reflective" stuff is called normal mapping, which KZ2 severely lacks for some reason.

sorry but guns dont reflect and shine that much, an m4 isnt made of chrome lol, most guns are a composite of dense metals and high grade hard plastics, i cant name a gun that shines like that cod4 pic, it may sound like im bashing but im not i am beyond excited to play cod4 i just had to put down ur argument

[QUOTE="Heil68"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Forza_2"][QUOTE="makingmusic476"]

CoD4 looks too plasticy

Dualshockin

What is too "plasticy" about COD4 ?

[QUOTE="Forza_2"]

[QUOTE="Mystic_Legend"]You should put into account that CoD4 is at 60FPS whereas Killzone, well seems 30 and down. Not saying optimization wont happen, but as it's currently standing. It's a dumb argument to present now anyway, wait until they're both out.Mystic_Legend

Is COD4 really 60fps ? If so, then that's impressive.

Yeah, it was confirmed in some magazine, I forget by Infinity Ward, they said that the game must run at a fixed 60FPS. Impressive indeed.

Guys, don't compare graphics from these two bad, low resolution screenshots. Go watch the videos, then decide. The videos make it obvious the characters and guns aren't as shiny as in that pick, that is just a very bad picture. Please, either post some high quality images or don't post anything.SiegeTanksFTW

very true, but in motion kz2 still wins cuz its amazing animations, and they havent even put them all in yet, i heard somewhere theyre only using half the animations in taht trailer that = insane

[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]

Killzone

all it takes is that one scene where the helghast jumps over the fence

the lighting is fantastic, unreal, superb, then when they get shot, omg, the animation

Killzone is unreal

Choga

Crysis has better lighting.

They're both so amazing they make me cry inside, I'm a big Halo fan but its kinda dissapointing in compariosn now :(tomarlyn

haha exactly, halo i guess is popular for the story and online but it isnt teh technical marvel taht these games are ill be shocked if halo gets above an 8.5 with gs new rating system that means no 9's and up

[QUOTE="tomarlyn"]They're both so amazing they make me cry inside, I'm a big Halo fan but its kinda dissapointing in compariosn now :(blues3531

haha exactly, halo i guess is popular for the story and online but it isnt teh technical marvel taht these games are ill be shocked if halo gets above an 8.5 with gs new rating system that means no 9's and up