Because everybody in the world knows that if a game flops on GS and gets anything under AAA, it's total crap and not worth playing! Wahahahaha!Almost 70 posts in ten minutes. Nice.
And why aren't people playing on the server?!?
AndyAlfredo
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="sanim02"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] :lol: *wishes to be black just to say it too*BrunoBRS
HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!:lol:
Bruno, u mad this flopped and not Uncharted 3?:P
dude, i predicted uncharted 3 would get AAA. it's like saying CoD won't score 9+. totally underserving, but that's the kind of stuff that happens.I'm sure in the inside you were hoping for an 8.5 though.:P Ahhhh Bruno!:P
I wish I was here for the fallout from that...[QUOTE="charizard1605"]With an 8.9 for the Gamecube version as well. Don't forget!
shinrabanshou
Oh well... I have Skyward Sword to look forward to... :twisted:
If Skyward Sword gets an 8.8 (or even an 8.5), then I swear I shall worship the reviewer forever :lol:MW3 is going to 9.5 here.
CoD is the standard of this industry.
No wonder why FPS games suck today. I'm rather disappointed that GS couldn't see the bigger picture. You spend 5 hours in campaign, 300 in multiplayer and apparently that doesn't mean squat.
Wasdie
You have to buy that SP with the MP though. You don't as many MP maps as you could have had if had been 100% MP. Everyone says BF is about the multiplayer, so why let such a huge waste of gigabytes like this on-rails campaign slide?
if everyone spoke up, you could get a better single player experience that had more effort put into it, or a bigger better pure MP game.
IT GOT A 8.5 IT IS NOT A BAD SCORE
This is the prime example of why gamers today are being spoiled.
Last I checked a 8.5 a 7.5 a 7 were GOOD SCORESfueled-system
This is System Wars and anything below AAA is not worth our time.
You heard it here first folks. Black Ops PC > Battlefield 3
>
IT GOT A 8.5 IT IS NOT A BAD SCORE[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Yeah, the BF3 campaign isn't disappointing or anything, it's just average, like CoD black Ops. Yet people called it disappointing and bad for no reason.
Even BC2 apparently is the better game than this. Absolutly terrible.
lawlessx
This is the prime example of why gamers today are being spoiled.
Last I checked a 8.5 a 7.5 a 7 were GOOD SCORES
His point is every COD is evil and everything battlefield is great
Am I right? judging by his post I am
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
IT GOT A 8.5 IT IS NOT A BAD SCORE
This is the prime example of why gamers today are being spoiled.
Last I checked a 8.5 a 7.5 a 7 were GOOD SCORESWasdie
Apparently it's still a worse game than BC2 by the scores.
It's hard to even comprehend that.
When you say it like that ..... :|
It got an 8.5 for it's single player...the other half of the game that BF vents didn't want and never really cared for.Just another typical military shooter. All those annoying BF fanboys praising the game like it's the second coming of the Christ... what a flop.
And already killed the hype thread eh?
It seems that Adobe is not the only mod using his power for his own agenda.
commonfate
[QUOTE="gamebreakerz__"]If MW3 scores more than this I will never view another GS review ever again.Wasdie
It will. It will be just as linear and scripted as any CoD, but that's the standard. CoD does it right apparently. While any other agme that is very scripted and linear can never be as good as CoD, CoD gets a free pass.
Look at Black Ops. The campaign was average at best yet it was praised so damn highly. Unbelieveable.
I really am losing faith in the gaming industry if CoD is our damn standard.
Free pass? I didn't realise that BF3 campaign was open world and non-linear, open world games are not automatically better. You prefer BF to COD, nothing more to it. We haven't played MW3 campaign so we can't judge it, but we can guess:Do you like BF3? Is COD the standard? Did it stop BF3 from being great? I don't see the problem, it just got an 8.5 score, for anything else we'd be saying it's a great score. It should never have been compared to COD.
I'm sorry, but Caspian Border feels anything but like Bad Company 2.
Caspian border has sort of a magic that I have never seen before in a MP game. I cant believe that people think that this game is like BC2. Even how the destruction is works so much differently.[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]
Yep, just another military shooter. It was well designed I'm sure, but that can only get you so far.
Wasdie
CoD MW3 is guarenteed AAA here and it's a military shooter.
Maybe that's because CoD comes with a full package(Great SP, Great MP, and Great Co-op).he only played tehran, the poor guy. and maybe grand bazaar too, which is the closest to CoD DICE can get without being sued."Battlefield 3 may be a successor in name to Battlefield 2, but in spirit, the competitive multiplayer is a refined version of that offered in Bad Company 2."
I'm sorry, but Caspian Border feels anything but like Bad Company 2.
ChubbyGuy40
Just a reminder, this means
Resistance 2, Resistance: Fall of Man, Halo 3 ODST, Halo Reach, Halo 3,CoD4, MW2, Black Ops, Bad Company 2, and Killzone 2 >>> Battlefield 3
and to add insult to injury
Resistance 3, Killzone 3, and World at War = Battlefield 3
WTF is going on :shock:
BPoole96
This day makes me happy.:lol:
Just read the review and it it is actually super positive, aside from the parts concerning the campaign (though he didn't totally hate that, either). I'm also glad that Chris Watters actually understands vehicle use and their tactical advantage in BF3, unlike that Destroctoid guy who sounded like he should be playing CoD with its complete focus on infantry fights. Vehicles and how to use them effectively and deal with them when they show up is one of the many things that makes BF3 unique and more exciting than other games in its overcrowded genre, especially since it is done so damn well. Complaining about it just makes me think you should be playing something else.
I know this is System Wars and all and that everyone is just going to leap all over that score and ***** or feel vindicated about it, but let us be honest here, game is a great game and has a mulitplayer like what no other game will offer this year. Guess admitting that just isn't as satisfying, though. :P
Just sayin'.
Maybe Gamespot is as sick and tired of multiplayer oriented shooters as I am? In which case, it shall reflect in their MW3 review too. And I don't see why we should complain, 8.5 is a great score.[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
MW3 is going to 9.5 here.
CoD is the standard of this industry.
No wonder why FPS games suck today. I'm rather disappointed that GS couldn't see the bigger picture. You spend 5 hours in campaign, 300 in multiplayer and apparently that doesn't mean squat.
Wasdie
No they aren't.
MW3 is guarenteed AAA here. Guarenteed. Running on a 12 year old engine with recycled everything, it doesn't matter, it's CoD.
You sure love talking about CoD, Wasdie.Maybe that's because CoD comes with a full package(Great SP, Great MP, and Great Co-op).Luxen90
That's odd. I haven't gotten any of those things with the past 4 entries.
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
[QUOTE="sanim02"]
Woooooooooow!:lol: It got the same score as Resistance 3 by the same reviewer!:lol:
sanim02
That is absolute ****, especially when it had a mediocre SP just like Battlefield and a piss-poor CoD clone MP.
:lol:
To be honest, I thought R3 had a pretty good SP.:P
Yea R3 has a great campaign :?
In fact, IMO, it's better than 99% of shooters that come out now-a-days. The only two games that are probably better than it are BioShock and Deus Ex.
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
IT GOT A 8.5 IT IS NOT A BAD SCORE
This is the prime example of why gamers today are being spoiled.
Last I checked a 8.5 a 7.5 a 7 were GOOD SCORESWasdie
Apparently it's still a worse game than BC2 by the scores.
It's hard to even comprehend that.
Yeah, I agree. But there's no doubt that BF3 is a better game than BC2. I think BF3 will crush BC2, which I thought to be overrated in the first place.[QUOTE="commonfate"]It got an 8.5 for it's single player...the other half of the game that BF vents didn't want and never really cared for. Did anyone expect anything out of the single player though? :P Seems like the MP is good which is what everyone will spend 99% of the time doing anyways. But it's still a flop.Just another typical military shooter. All those annoying BF fanboys praising the game like it's the second coming of the Christ... what a flop.
And already killed the hype thread eh?
It seems that Adobe is not the only mod using his power for his own agenda.
lawlessx
dude, i predicted uncharted 3 would get AAA. it's like saying CoD won't score 9+. totally underserving, but that's the kind of stuff that happens.[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="sanim02"]
HAHAHAHHAHAHA!!!!:lol:
Bruno, u mad this flopped and not Uncharted 3?:P
sanim02
I'm sure in the inside you were hoping for an 8.5 though.:P Ahhhh Bruno!:P
if it's anything like U2, and you know it is, then 8.5 is the most the game can be scored with a serious face. watered down gears with awful, arbitrary platforming and two or three puzzles to pretend it's not a shooter, all using an indiana jones disguise.[QUOTE="Wasdie"][QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]
Yep, just another military shooter. It was well designed I'm sure, but that can only get you so far.
Luxen90
CoD MW3 is guarenteed AAA here and it's a military shooter.
Maybe that's because CoD comes with a full package(Great SP, Great MP, and Great Co-op). been playing near the same MP for years now...wonder why reviewers seem to ignore that.BF2 = 9.2 with no single player.
Times are changing for the worse.
Wasdie
Eh, don't be so dramatic. Different times mean diffferent standards, and if a developer wants to include a SP campaign they better be graded for it.
I just hope GS and other sites finally have the balls to call out COD's campaigns.
If COD got a 8.5 here because of the single player you people would be praising the review
but since its oh so sacred battlefield that FLOPPED its a terrible review and the end of the world
I cannot comprehend how A BAD SINGLE PLAYER AND COOP GAME DESERVES A 9!!!
I lost ALOT of respect for some people
This may sound dumb or silly, but I truly believe it would of been better if they only did MP just like BF2 and focus on that. I mean, I just don't think I've ever heard anyone say any of the Battlefield campaigns are good. I know if they just worked MP and polished it, I'd certainly be more willing to get it assuming it'd come with more MP content in exchange.BF2 = 9.2 with no single player.
Times are changing for the worse.
Wasdie
[QUOTE="lawlessx"][QUOTE="commonfate"]It got an 8.5 for it's single player...the other half of the game that BF vents didn't want and never really cared for. Did anyone expect anything out of the single player though? :P Seems like the MP is good which is what everyone will spend 99% of the time doing anyways. But it's still a flop. Best flop of the year confirmed :wink: This thread is depressing..im going back inJust another typical military shooter. All those annoying BF fanboys praising the game like it's the second coming of the Christ... what a flop.
And already killed the hype thread eh?
It seems that Adobe is not the only mod using his power for his own agenda.
commonfate
Woooooooooow!:lol: It got the same score as Resistance 3 by the same reviewer!:lol:
sanim02
At least he's consistent. R3 has an awesome campaign with an abysmal multiplayer. BF3 has awesome multiplayer with an abysmal campaign.
Seriously, I'm on the second level of BF3's campaign and I'm already sick of it.
[QUOTE="fueled-system"]
IT GOT A 8.5 IT IS NOT A BAD SCORE
This is the prime example of why gamers today are being spoiled.
Last I checked a 8.5 a 7.5 a 7 were GOOD SCORESWasdie
Apparently it's still a worse game than BC2 by the scores.
It's hard to even comprehend that.
did the guy who reviewed bc2 review this?[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
BF2 = 9.2 with no single player.
Times are changing for the worse.
Upparoom
Eh, don't be so dramatic. Different times mean diffferent standards, and if a developer wants to include a SP campaign they better be graded for it.
True that.[QUOTE="sanim02"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]
That is absolute ****, especially when it had a mediocre SP just like Battlefield and a piss-poor CoD clone MP.
AmayaPapaya
:lol:
To be honest, I thought R3 had a pretty good SP.:P
Yea R3 has a great campaign :?
In fact, IMO, it's better than 99% of shooters that come out now-a-days. The only two games that are probably better than it are BioShock and Deus Ex.
Resistance 3 shall not be slept on! The SP is dope. They take what you're doing 90% of the time, which is shooting, and make it fun and strategic with the unique weapons, the weapon wheel, and no regenerating health. Its probably the best single player for a shooter that I've played since Bioshock.[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]
Yep, just another military shooter. It was well designed I'm sure, but that can only get you so far.
Wasdie
CoD MW3 is guarenteed AAA here and it's a military shooter.
EH, I don't think so. It will get 8.0 or 8.5
If it does get AAA though...then just one epic face palm for GS. I mean really?
[QUOTE="Luxen90"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]Maybe that's because CoD comes with a full package(Great SP, Great MP, and Great Co-op). been playing near the same MP for years now...wonder why reviewers seem to ignore that. But it has 30 different modes though!!!!! lolCoD MW3 is guarenteed AAA here and it's a military shooter.
lawlessx
If COD got a 8.5 here because of the single player you people would be praising the review
but since its oh so sacred battlefield that FLOPPED its a terrible review and the end of the world
I cannot comprehend how A BAD SINGLE PLAYER AND COOP GAME DESERVES A 9!!!
I lost ALOT of respect for some people
fueled-system
You're apparently new to System Wars.
This is what happens during a massive flop.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment