BF4 PS4 has 64 player battlers...60fps

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

http://blog.us.playstation.com/2013/08/14/battlefield-4-bring-your-ps3-stats-to-ps4/?CMP=US_PS4_Battlefield4_20130814_10806534

 

 

 

also ur stats for ps3 will transfer over to ps4.....

 

 

it only took 8 years for Battle field to get 64 players on consoles

Avatar image for ramonnl
ramonnl

769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 ramonnl
Member since 2010 • 769 Posts

I guess that's why the graphics aren't much better than bf3. but still 64 will be fun!

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
Still not 1080p.
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

I guess that's why the graphics aren't much better than bf3. but still 64 will be fun!

ramonnl
alot better then 24 players thats for sure...
Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

"That way, on October 29th, you can get in the game without any worries that youll have to start ranking up all over again when PS4 launches"

This sounds like PS4 won't be out until November.

Avatar image for Mrmedia01
Mrmedia01

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Mrmedia01
Member since 2007 • 1917 Posts

Still not 1080p. clyde46

 

Who cares. 720P 60fps will be good enough with 64 players for us BIG SCREEN console gamers. Please no PC & console fighting right now lol. Its to early for that crap.

Avatar image for Mrmedia01
Mrmedia01

1917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Mrmedia01
Member since 2007 • 1917 Posts

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

Desmonic

720P scaled

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Seems like my GTX670 FTW should be fine for BF4 then.  I thought I may have to upgrade.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
Still not 1080p. clyde46
Seating distance/screen size requirements make it smarter to focus on framerate, which everyone can take advantage of, over something that you have to sit 7' from a 55" screen to enjoy.
Avatar image for GuNsbl4ziN
GuNsbl4ziN

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 GuNsbl4ziN
Member since 2010 • 285 Posts
Good to see that it's 60 fps.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#12 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

Desmonic

720p on med-high settings.

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
Still not 1080p. clyde46
werent you one of the people saying u will take 720@60fps over 1080@30
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Nice. I'm still really surprised that somehow they can't make it 1080p but I'd take 60fps over that.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Bout time consoles got the ACTUAL BF experience and not half of it

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. lowe0
Seating distance/screen size requirements make it smarter to focus on framerate, which everyone can take advantage of, over something that you have to sit 7' from a 55" screen to enjoy.

Don't care, its 2013, it should be in 1080p.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. stereointegrity
werent you one of the people saying u will take 720@60fps over 1080@30

1080 at 60. Accept nothing else.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. lowe0
Seating distance/screen size requirements make it smarter to focus on framerate, which everyone can take advantage of, over something that you have to sit 7' from a 55" screen to enjoy.

I agree it was the right choice to go for 720p and 60fps but 1080p is still clearer no matter how you try to slice it. 

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#20 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. clyde46
werent you one of the people saying u will take 720@60fps over 1080@30

1080 at 60. Accept nothing else.

Next gen consoles are gonna disappoint then.

Avatar image for GuNsbl4ziN
GuNsbl4ziN

285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 GuNsbl4ziN
Member since 2010 • 285 Posts
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. clyde46
werent you one of the people saying u will take 720@60fps over 1080@30

1080 at 60. Accept nothing else.

In order for it to run at 60 fps at all times, it would be difficult to have 1080p. there would presumably be a lot of frame rate drops and when you cant alter settings it cant happen.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. clyde46
Seating distance/screen size requirements make it smarter to focus on framerate, which everyone can take advantage of, over something that you have to sit 7' from a 55" screen to enjoy.

Don't care, its 2013, it should be in 1080p.

Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"] Seating distance/screen size requirements make it smarter to focus on framerate, which everyone can take advantage of, over something that you have to sit 7' from a 55" screen to enjoy.

Don't care, its 2013, it should be in 1080p.

Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)

I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.
Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Don't care, its 2013, it should be in 1080p.

Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)

I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

most pc's dont even run games at 1080 60fps
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

mitu123

720p on med-high settings.

have they showed console footage yet?

Avatar image for AM-Gamer
AM-Gamer

8116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 AM-Gamer
Member since 2012 • 8116 Posts

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

mitu123

720p on med-high settings.

You just randomply pulled that out of your ass, I have not seen any official specs of BF4 on any next gen console.  If its at at mid-high settings at 720p it will have the pleasure of being the worst next gen title visually on either console.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"] Don't care, its 2013, it should be in 1080p.

Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)

I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

AM-Gamer

720p on med-high settings.

You just randomply pulled that out of your ass, I have not seen any official specs of BF4 on any next gen console.  If its at at mid-high settings at 720p it will have the pleasure of being the worst next gen title visually on either console.

no, that will probably be COD ghosts

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#29 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

lostrib

720p on med-high settings.

have they showed console footage yet?

Nope.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]720p on med-high settings.

mitu123

have they showed console footage yet?

Nope.

interesting.  Hopefully they can get at least medium, because the console versions of BF3 were ass

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"] Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)

I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

And? I'm a paying customer, the product does not fit my needs so I will not be buying it.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#32 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Desmonic"]

60FPS? Nice! Is it 1080p though? Or just 720p up-scaled to 1080p?

AM-Gamer

720p on med-high settings.

You just randomply pulled that out of your ass, I have not seen any official specs of BF4 on any next gen console.  If its at at mid-high settings at 720p it will have the pleasure of being the worst next gen title visually on either console.

I go by experience, and no way the console versions will be at Ultra, that would require 4xMSAA which is gpu intensive and Ultra on Shadows which is cpu intensive. Med-high makes the most sense with 64 players and 60FPS.

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15879 Posts

Best part about this is it means the maps will actually be designed around 64 players. No more half-assed maps that have to work for 24 and 64 people.

Avatar image for Douevenlift_bro
Douevenlift_bro

6804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Douevenlift_bro
Member since 2013 • 6804 Posts

Still not 1080p. clyde46
who gives a shit

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#35 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

have they showed console footage yet?

lostrib

Nope.

interesting.  Hopefully they can get at least medium, because the console versions of BF3 were ass

Medium is guaranteed with quite a bit of high in areas. If the consoles had better cpu and gpu they could easily do 1080p on Ultra at 60 FPS with 64 players but that doesn't appear to be the case.

And BF3 on consoles was lower than lowest setting on PC, lol.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"] I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

And? I'm a paying customer, the product does not fit my needs so I will not be buying it.

$60 lost. Not exactly worth changing their plans over.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"] Okay, let's hear your pitch. Explain the value proposition - why should people give up features attainable at the current resolution to gain extra resolution that they can't actually see? (And before you say "move your couch", remember that you still have to spend a non-trivial amount of your non-gaming time in this space as well.)

I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

Are you seriously defending 720p in 2013?
Avatar image for Kaz_Son
Kaz_Son

1389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Kaz_Son
Member since 2013 • 1389 Posts
:cool: Not bad. :P Any news on the XBone version?
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Best part about this is it means the maps will actually be designed around 64 players. No more half-assed maps that have to work for 24 and 64 people.

Vaasman

Good point, hadn't thought about that actually. 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]Still not 1080p. Douevenlift_bro

who gives a shit

the asshats who thought it would be 1080p 60fps on PS4

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]Nope.mitu123

interesting.  Hopefully they can get at least medium, because the console versions of BF3 were ass

Medium is guaranteed with quite a bit of high in areas. If the consoles had better cpu and gpu they could easily do 1080p on Ultra at 60 FPS with 64 players but that doesn't appear to be the case.

And BF3 on consoles was lower than lowest setting on PC, lol.

and lower than 720p if i remember correctly

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"] I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough. kraken2109
And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

Are you seriously defending 720p in 2013?

Of course he is. He defends anything that goes against what Hermit say because to him Hermits think they're smarter than Console players so he gets elated when he can debunk hermit arguments or try prove them wrong and fight the good fight.

He never cares about either side he just likes to try make people look hypocritical or wrong. he just loves debating

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"] I don't care about you or your value proposition. If the game is not in 1080p and running at 60FPS then its not good enough.

And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

Are you seriously defending 720p in 2013?

Yes. Before replying, please do me a favor: grab a measuring tape and find the distance from your screen to your eye position when seated in front of your TV, then look up that distance and your screen size on a screen size vs. seating distance chart (easily available from Google Images).
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#44 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

interesting.  Hopefully they can get at least medium, because the console versions of BF3 were ass

lostrib

Medium is guaranteed with quite a bit of high in areas. If the consoles had better cpu and gpu they could easily do 1080p on Ultra at 60 FPS with 64 players but that doesn't appear to be the case.

And BF3 on consoles was lower than lowest setting on PC, lol.

and lower than 720p if i remember correctly

1280x704 to be exact, which is why it had black bars on top and bottom of the screen.
Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

I remember the days when consoles were actually better than high-end PCs at launch.

The Xbox 360 will be remembered as the high-end console 390316326.gif

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lowe0"] And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.

And? I'm a paying customer, the product does not fit my needs so I will not be buying it.

$60 lost. Not exactly worth changing their plans over.

And? Why are you accepting 720p in 2013? How long have you had a 1080p HDTV? Isn't it about time games took advantage of that?
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="lowe0"] And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.seanmcloughlin

Are you seriously defending 720p in 2013?

Of course he is. He defends anything that goes against what Hermit say because to him Hermits think they're smarter than Console players so he gets elated when he can debunk hermit arguments or try prove them wrong and fight the good fight.

He never cares about either side he just likes to try make people look hypocritical or wrong. he just loves debating

he just enjoys fishing for an argument. what an ass

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="lowe0"] And when you're the one paying to develop the game, you may certainly take that attitude. EA, however, has to run things just a teensy bit more business-like.lowe0
Are you seriously defending 720p in 2013?

Yes. Before replying, please do me a favor: grab a measuring tape and find the distance from your screen to your eye position when seated in front of your TV, then look up that distance and your screen size on a screen size vs. seating distance chart (easily available from Google Images).

2

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Let's all take a moment to really talk about Lowe0. This is the guy saying 720p and 60fps is fine when he said before he returned his copy of Dishonored on PC because it didn't support 3 monitors properly. Then went and bought the 360 to play instead of the PC one cos it was apparently 3 monitors or bust for him. 

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#50 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

Look forward to playing it on my PC at 2560x1440 at 100+ FPS with everything maxed out and KB/M.