Black Ops plays @ 1,024 x 600 on consoles compared to 2560x1600 on PC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Jermone123
Jermone123

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Jermone123
Member since 2006 • 803 Posts

Consoles = 1,024 x 600

PC = 2560x1600 on my monitor

Ouch....

GTX 580 can play Black Ops @ 1280x1024 with an average of 236 FPS. What fps would consoles get at the resolution? Not even 30?? :o

I think it might be time for an update for the consoles. No?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#2 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50182 Posts
PC has the powa. We've known this for quite some time now. :)
Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#3 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

i thought we all new the PC version would be better technically?

Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
but if someone has a 1024x600 monitor than i guess they're equal.
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Call of Duty has always been a good deal better on PC. Glad some are finally noticing this. :P

Avatar image for Jermone123
Jermone123

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Jermone123
Member since 2006 • 803 Posts

i thought we all new the PC version would be better technically?

AmayaPapaya

Yea, but I did not realize that consoles were THAT behind. I mean damn dude that is bad. That is complete ownage. I am sorry. Its just the truth

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#7 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

i thought we all new the PC version would be better technically?

Jermone123

Yea, but I did not realize that consoles were THAT behind. I mean damn dude that is bad. That is complete ownage. I am sorry. Its just the truth

I don't think so. Consoles have always been like this compared to PC.

Avatar image for Lto_thaG
Lto_thaG

22611

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Lto_thaG
Member since 2006 • 22611 Posts

Yay for pointing out the obvious.

Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts

[QUOTE="AmayaPapaya"]

i thought we all new the PC version would be better technically?

Jermone123

Yea, but I did not realize that consoles were THAT behind. I mean damn dude that is bad. That is complete ownage. I am sorry. Its just the truth

your shocked that 7-8 year old graphics hardware is being outperformed by a 2010 GPU?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#10 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

It started as a PC franchise and to me these games were always meant for PC.

Avatar image for Jermone123
Jermone123

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Jermone123
Member since 2006 • 803 Posts

I just must be ignorant. I thought xbox360 and PS3 played their games at 1080 or atleast 720. They are like the wii. They are not even HD. I play my games at 2560x1600. HD was like year 2000 lol. Its 2010 people...

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#12 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

I just must be ignorant. I thought xbox360 and PS3 played their games at 1080 or atleast 720. They are like the wii. They are not even HD. I play my games at 2560x1600. HD was like year 2000 lol. Its 2010 people...

Jermone123
A lot of games do 720p, a very few do 1080p. I have a list.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

I think i be more worried if it didnt ran that good on the PC.... its not like COD is know for its amazing graphics.

Avatar image for OmegaPillow
OmegaPillow

1055

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 OmegaPillow
Member since 2010 • 1055 Posts

So..?

Avatar image for SakusEnvoy
SakusEnvoy

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 SakusEnvoy
Member since 2009 • 4764 Posts

While most PC gamers play at resolutions higher than 1024x600, something like 2560x1600 is definitely in the extreme minority. Consoles are designed to be mainstream, they don't have to be technically cutting edge. That's what gaming PCs are for.

Avatar image for yellosnolvr
yellosnolvr

19302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#16 yellosnolvr
Member since 2005 • 19302 Posts

It started as a PC franchise and to me these games were always meant for PC.

mitu123
they WERE a pc franchise until this generation came out. now they just have horrible ports to the pc.
Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

So..?

OmegaPillow

Pointless thread.

Avatar image for Jermone123
Jermone123

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Jermone123
Member since 2006 • 803 Posts

Its not a pointless thread. I think it points out the huge gap between the PC and consoles that is getting ridiculous. Next generation consoles are not going to be out for years yet, which is going to widen the gap even further. To be quite honest I am getting sick and tired of consoles dragging down the games I play on my PC. How bout you keep your exclusives and we will keep ours mmmk thanks.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#19 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

It started as a PC franchise and to me these games were always meant for PC.

yellosnolvr

they WERE a pc franchise until this generation came out. now they just have horrible ports to the pc.

COD4 wasn't that bad.:P

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="yellosnolvr"][QUOTE="mitu123"]

It started as a PC franchise and to me these games were always meant for PC.

mitu123

they WERE a pc franchise until this generation came out. now they just have horrible ports to the pc.

COD4 wasn't that bad.:P

COD4 is way better on the PC than it is on the consoles.... plus the mods are great as well.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#21 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="yellosnolvr"] they WERE a pc franchise until this generation came out. now they just have horrible ports to the pc.GTSaiyanjin2

COD4 wasn't that bad.:P

COD4 is way better on the PC than it is on the consoles.... plus the mods are great as well.

That's the only version I had and agree too. Certain mods allowed bots!=p
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

Yay resolution, Easily the best way to make a game awesome...some how a higher resolution changes things...

Avatar image for rpgs_shall_rule
rpgs_shall_rule

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 rpgs_shall_rule
Member since 2006 • 1943 Posts
You have a 30" monitor?!? And yes, higher resolution does make it better.
Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

Consoles = 1,024 x 600

PC = 2560x1600 on my monitor

Ouch....

GTX 580 can play Black Ops @ 1280x1024 with an average of 236 FPS. What fps would consoles get at the resolution? Not even 30?? :o

I think it might be time for an update for the consoles. No?

Jermone123

Now I dislike Call of Duty something fierce, but pompous PC fanboys are the worst of the worst. I personally have an Xclio Windtunnel as my case...so I can naturally fit a LOT more hardware into it. If my PC were the size of my 360S (!) there is no way it would be getting the same kind of output. FYI the 360S is about 12-13in tall and about 1-2in thick at its skinniest point. My PC also doesn't have 5 year old tech inside of it...except for maybe the motherboard.

As for resolution everyone is different, my Asus monitor only goes up to 1920x1080

Avatar image for redneckdouglas
redneckdouglas

2977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 redneckdouglas
Member since 2005 • 2977 Posts

[QUOTE="Jermone123"]

Consoles = 1,024 x 600

PC = 2560x1600 on my monitor

Ouch....

GTX 580 can play Black Ops @ 1280x1024 with an average of 236 FPS. What fps would consoles get at the resolution? Not even 30?? :o

I think it might be time for an update for the consoles. No?

R3FURBISHED

Now I dislike Call of Duty something fierce, but pompous PC fanboys are the worst of the worst. I personally have an Xclio Windtunnel as my case...so I can naturally fit a LOT more hardware into it. If my PC were the size of my 360S (!) there is no way it would be getting the same kind of output. FYI the 360S is about 12-13in tall and about 1-2in thick at its skinniest point. My PC also doesn't have 5 year old tech inside of it...except for maybe the motherboard.

Hmm, no. There are machines called ITX PC or SFF which is able to fit in the most extreme hardwares.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts

Yay resolution, Easily the best way to make a game awesome...some how a higher resolution changes things...

WilliamRLBaker
Resolution actually changes a lot. It's enough to make or break some games graphically.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#27 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

Its not a pointless thread. I think it points out the huge gap between the PC and consoles that is getting ridiculous. Next generation consoles are not going to be out for years yet, which is going to widen the gap even further. To be quite honest I am getting sick and tired of consoles dragging down the games I play on my PC. How bout you keep your exclusives and we will keep ours mmmk thanks.

Jermone123

Since the performance gap is so wide, then why isn't Gamespot reviewing PC versions of games? They are focused on consoles too much imo. Bioshock 2 and Gothic 4 still don't have a PC review.:?

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

Its not a pointless thread. I think it points out the huge gap between the PC and consoles that is getting ridiculous. Next generation consoles are not going to be out for years yet, which is going to widen the gap even further. To be quite honest I am getting sick and tired of consoles dragging down the games I play on my PC. How bout you keep your exclusives and we will keep ours mmmk thanks.

Jermone123

OR how about taking off your "PCgoggles" and just play the darn games? Just a thought...You do know that there is very little difference in PC and CONSOLE games right? I have never in my life heard so much complaining over some flippin resolution in my life..Please just stop and go play your TRUE HD graphics and enjoy..

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Yay resolution, Easily the best way to make a game awesome...some how a higher resolution changes things...

KHAndAnime

Resolution actually changes a lot. It's enough to make or break some games graphically.

Yeah, just look at Infamous. The Resolution and lack of AA make the game look atrocious. Not too mention the horrible Pop in. If the game were on PC, it would actually look pretty good.

Demon's Souls too actually. It doesn't have much pop in, but the lack of AA and the low res make it look like garbage when it would look great otherwise.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

[QUOTE="Jermone123"]

Its not a pointless thread. I think it points out the huge gap between the PC and consoles that is getting ridiculous. Next generation consoles are not going to be out for years yet, which is going to widen the gap even further. To be quite honest I am getting sick and tired of consoles dragging down the games I play on my PC. How bout you keep your exclusives and we will keep ours mmmk thanks.

topsemag55

Since the performance gap is so wide, then why isn't Gamespot reviewing PC versions of games? They are focused on consoles too much imo. Bioshock 2 and Gothic 4 still don't have a PC review.:?

That's because consoles are mainstream. Appeal to a wider audience.
Avatar image for Assassin_87
Assassin_87

2349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#31 Assassin_87
Member since 2004 • 2349 Posts

The hardware inside current generation consoles is way behind what computers are reaching right now. That's undeniable. However, some people just prefer the console experience (cheap, simple in many ways, and fairly hassle free with limited customization and great optimization), or would rather not deal with the sometimes-complex process of putting together and maintaining their own stable and reliable gaming rig. And pre-built rigs? Not even going to go into that.

Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#32 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

probably, but playing online games (especially fps) is very bad on pc.Online FPS isabout community, pc fps has no good community so all they can talk is hardware.

On console, the only differences are monitor and internet connection, everything else is same among all console gamers.

On PC, everyone gets different hardare and accessories. Someone might have super fast pc with gaming mouse, that basically gives them a big advantage on other players. Therefore, PC's online FPS is not as fair as console, not even mentioning pc gamers tend to cheat more. btw mod kills balance and orignal ideal, once someone plays it with mod, then the game is pretty much doomed, like cheat code on single players.

As the result, on youtube, those prestige COD gamers usually play on console, not pc. PC youtube video are usually bunch of mod or hack footage.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

probably, but playing online games (especially fps) is very bad on pc.Online FPS isabout community, pc fps has no good community so all they can talk is hardware.

On console, the only differences are monitor and internet connection, everything else is same among all console gamers.

On PC, everyone gets different hardare and accessories. Someone might have super fast pc with gaming mouse, that basically gives them a big advantage on other players. Therefore, PC's online FPS is not as fair as console, not even mentioning pc gamers tend to cheat more. btw mod kills balance and orignal ideal, once someone plays it with mod, then the game is pretty much doomed, like cheat code on single players.

As the result, on youtube, those prestige COD gamers usually play on console, not pc. PC youtube video are usually bunch of mod or hack footage.

oajlu
It's interesting, but almost nothing in this post is true.
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
but if someone has a 1024x600 monitor than i guess they're equal.Zero5000X
Awesome way to put it, but we all know most hermits have a superiority complex.
Avatar image for Jermone123
Jermone123

803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Jermone123
Member since 2006 • 803 Posts

The hardware inside current generation consoles is way behind what computers are reaching right now. That's undeniable. However, some people just prefer the console experience (cheap, simple in many ways, and fairly hassle free with limited customization and great optimization), or would rather not deal with the sometimes-complex process of putting together and maintaining their own stable and reliable gaming rig. And pre-built rigs? Not even going to go into that.

Assassin_87

I get what your saying, but building and maintaining my gaming rig is part of the hobby and what makes PC gaming so much fun :D

Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

games dont need graphics to be good

Avatar image for rpgs_shall_rule
rpgs_shall_rule

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 rpgs_shall_rule
Member since 2006 • 1943 Posts

games dont need graphics to be good

EdenProxy

Been playing MUDs lately? Besides, we all know the only thing FPSs have going for them are graphics :P

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
It's even lower resolution on the PS3, but yea PC is better.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#39 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

pc fps has no good community

oajlu

Neither do consoles...

Or I wouldn't complain.:P

Avatar image for Kleeyook
Kleeyook

5213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 1

#40 Kleeyook
Member since 2008 • 5213 Posts
It's even lower resolution on the PS3, but yea PC is better. themyth01
Yeah, PS3 version got 544p and X360 version got 608p. Sometimes PS3 version drops frame rate to 20 fps too. Bad job handle by Trechyard. But what I'm more pissed is how bad MW2 on PC version is. IW technically kill the game. And thus people have to buy it on console. PC version is just too annoying to use. My friends always got some **** message insult them as pirates or cheaters while he's buying the genuine copy. It's THAT bad. :(
Avatar image for Yrkoon99
Yrkoon99

494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Yrkoon99
Member since 2007 • 494 Posts

aww i thought my 1920x1200 was high res :(

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

probably, but playing online games (especially fps) is very bad on pc.Online FPS isabout community, pc fps has no good community so all they can talk is hardware.

On console, the only differences are monitor and internet connection, everything else is same among all console gamers.

On PC, everyone gets different hardare and accessories. Someone might have super fast pc with gaming mouse, that basically gives them a big advantage on other players. Therefore, PC's online FPS is not as fair as console, not even mentioning pc gamers tend to cheat more. btw mod kills balance and orignal ideal, once someone plays it with mod, then the game is pretty much doomed, like cheat code on single players.

As the result, on youtube, those prestige COD gamers usually play on console, not pc. PC youtube video are usually bunch of mod or hack footage.

oajlu
lmao i was like lmao
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

Yay resolution, Easily the best way to make a game awesome...some how a higher resolution changes things...

KHAndAnime
Resolution actually changes a lot. It's enough to make or break some games graphically.

:roll: not really Resolution is just a change and infact causes your system to work harder it changes much of a nothing if a game needs resolution to look good it doesn't look good to begin with.
Avatar image for Sandvichman
Sandvichman

4006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Sandvichman
Member since 2010 • 4006 Posts

Awesome, now i can play with my buddy here zombies on the pc, oh wait, no split screen, no deal. You can have all the fancy resolutions you want for the pc, but cod without splitscreen is mediocre.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts
You're comparing 2005 hardware to 2010 hardware?
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts
[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]

[QUOTE="Jermone123"]

Consoles = 1,024 x 600

PC = 2560x1600 on my monitor

Ouch....

GTX 580 can play Black Ops @ 1280x1024 with an average of 236 FPS. What fps would consoles get at the resolution? Not even 30?? :o

I think it might be time for an update for the consoles. No?

Now I dislike Call of Duty something fierce, but pompous PC fanboys are the worst of the worst. I personally have an Xclio Windtunnel as my case...so I can naturally fit a LOT more hardware into it. If my PC were the size of my 360S (!) there is no way it would be getting the same kind of output. FYI the 360S is about 12-13in tall and about 1-2in thick at its skinniest point. My PC also doesn't have 5 year old tech inside of it...except for maybe the motherboard.

As for resolution everyone is different, my Asus monitor only goes up to 1920x1080

How about a laptop fitted with AMD Radeon HD 5870M or NV Geforce GTX460M?
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#47 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
To TC, zomg no wai. Though unpatched runs awful on my 2xgtx460 sli + q6700, never tried playing post patch as I have no interest in anything Treyarch makes. MW2 ran flawless.
Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

probably, but playing online games (especially fps) is very bad on pc.Online FPS isabout community, pc fps has no good community so all they can talk is hardware.

On console, the only differences are monitor and internet connection, everything else is same among all console gamers.

On PC, everyone gets different hardare and accessories. Someone might have super fast pc with gaming mouse, that basically gives them a big advantage on other players. Therefore, PC's online FPS is not as fair as console, not even mentioning pc gamers tend to cheat more. btw mod kills balance and orignal ideal, once someone plays it with mod, then the game is pretty much doomed, like cheat code on single players.

As the result, on youtube, those prestige COD gamers usually play on console, not pc. PC youtube video are usually bunch of mod or hack footage.

oajlu

Showing that you have never played a PC game online.
Here is my clan website. There are many more around the world just like it.

I have a PC that plays MW2 at like 90+ FPS IIRC. My mouse and keyboard combined cost about $10. I still win the majority of my matches.

You havent played many mods have you?

Avatar image for supdotcom
supdotcom

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 supdotcom
Member since 2010 • 1121 Posts

probably, but playing online games (especially fps) is very bad on pc.Online FPS isabout community, pc fps has no good community so all they can talk is hardware.

On console, the only differences are monitor and internet connection, everything else is same among all console gamers.

On PC, everyone gets different hardare and accessories. Someone might have super fast pc with gaming mouse, that basically gives them a big advantage on other players. Therefore, PC's online FPS is not as fair as console, not even mentioning pc gamers tend to cheat more. btw mod kills balance and orignal ideal, once someone plays it with mod, then the game is pretty much doomed, like cheat code on single players.

As the result, on youtube, those prestige COD gamers usually play on console, not pc. PC youtube video are usually bunch of mod or hack footage.

oajlu



Have you actually played on the pc, you know, like for real. I could say the same for consoles, the tv screen size can grant one advantages over one with a smaller tv. lawyered.

and to tc, you just noticed now that pc was superior to 5 year old hardware? although I do say, what they can get out of that hardware is pretty impressive.

Avatar image for amaneuvering
amaneuvering

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 amaneuvering
Member since 2009 • 4815 Posts

Consoles = 1,024 x 600

PC = 2560x1600 on my monitor

Ouch....

GTX 580 can play Black Ops @ 1280x1024 with an average of 236 FPS. What fps would consoles get at the resolution? Not even 30?? :o

I think it might be time for an update for the consoles. No?

Jermone123
Do you realize how few people actually give a crap about going up to that resolution. I have no problem with 720p to be honest and I have no problem with SDTV resolution for that matter. I was watching a film on my SDTV last night and it looked perfectly good to me. Some idi...people just get stuck on numbers without ever thinking about anything beyond the actual number itself it seems.