Blizzard is now selling mounts from their online store...

  • 198 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

http://us.blizzard.com/store/browse.xml?f=c:5,c:33

The supreme milking has begun....

The original (it's a reskinned model being sold for 25$)

Kotaku article about this.

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
Ummmm, no it started before that. Remember how they said they will never do PVE > PVP server transfers? Remember when you could not transfer high level characters to a new server until 6 months later? Or how about taking items that could be made or found in game for fun and instead selling them as bonuses for buying their card battle game? OR maybe with recruit a friend making players coming into the game new and alone without people to group with? (not to mention they still didn't take away the group XP penalty.) Or how about this; allowing people to multibox? And this is a good one; instead of merging low populated servers and to avoid any bad news possible they just made it super hard to have an actual server community by allowing cross server grouping!
Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]Ummmm, no it started before that. Remember how they said they will never do PVE > PVP server transfers? Remember when you could not transfer high level characters to a new server until 6 months later? Or how about taking items that could be made or found in game for fun as bonuses for buying their card battle game? OR maybe with recruit a free making players coming into the game new and alone without people to group with? Or how about this; allowing people to multibox? And this is a good one; instead of merging low populated servers to avoid any bad news possible they they made it super hard to have an actual server community by allowing cross server grouping!

Right, but this is pretty much the ultimatum. Selling an epic flying mount on a blizzard store for 25$ (that has the same model as the Arthas mount drop). It's just stooping to a whole new level. I wasn't even sure if it was possible to stoop this low after all that.
Avatar image for Vinegar_Strokes
Vinegar_Strokes

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Vinegar_Strokes
Member since 2010 • 3401 Posts

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Avatar image for Lethalhazard
Lethalhazard

5451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Lethalhazard
Member since 2009 • 5451 Posts

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Vinegar_Strokes
It's on the same level as the 15$ DLC that Modern Warfare 2 presented. Sure, it's optionable -- it's still milking. Even though, that at least provided content whereas this 25$ mount provides a reskinned mount that's already in the game available only to hardcore raiders. Not that I play WoW, it's just annoying to see Blizzard do this. I guess they're all for the money now.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
If it continues it will get much worst; they could start selling tier sets and the ability to play as non-playable races or race/class combination.
Avatar image for deactivated-598fc45371265
deactivated-598fc45371265

13247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 deactivated-598fc45371265
Member since 2008 • 13247 Posts

At least it's a ridiculously awesome mount. I've seen people in Dalaran with them....ah....

I admit I'm tempted....

Avatar image for Snagal123
Snagal123

3524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Snagal123
Member since 2006 • 3524 Posts

If WoW addicts are willing to pay, and they are, can you really blame them?

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Vinegar_Strokes
We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.
Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

Its not bad to WoW players. When they started paying 15 dollars a month, well thats when they became susceptible to such things as this. Its pocket digging at its finest. Blizzard are so rich they can afford their own conventions.

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts

[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Nerkcon

We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.

I Pretty much agree with this. Its the truth.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

lol @ people buying these things, especially the celestial steed.

They must feel so ashamed when someone asks them where did they get that.

I don't usually agree with anti-Blizzard movements as they have extremely lame points one hundred percent of the time, but this is ridiculous.

I'd also like to see the sales figures for them.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

$25 dollars to switch servers is pretty insane. Warhammer does it for free, they just have a set limit on how many times you can move.

Avatar image for MJPK
MJPK

3360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 MJPK
Member since 2006 • 3360 Posts

Can't blame blizzard tbh, People will buy it so why not do it?

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Nerkcon
We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.

Monthly fees are how a company pays for the servers. This has always been true. Purchase of the game pays for development costs, monthly fees pay for server costs. Allowing somebody to shell out $25 for their flying mount is no different than the redemption codes they have for in-game items in their packs of trading cards and crap like that. They're not getting anything in game that you can't get yourself... they're just getting it without work. You can be indignant all you want, but there have always (yes, ALWAYS) been items only a few were able/willing to get their hands on, because it cost them real money to do so. (If I remember correctly, people who paid extra for a special edition of the game a while back got a code for a special in-game pet) This is not new, so get over it. That all being said... Activision. That is all.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

$25 dollars to switch servers is pretty insane. Warhammer does it for free, they just have a set limit on how many times you can move.

UnknownSniper65
I used to think they're a good idea but after reading a long, intense debate several years ago; I don't think server transfers should exist. Servers are like foreign countries to each other; the community in each server forms their own mini culture, rules, stories and legends. Server transfers are like letting foreign coming to your country without using/respecting your rules and such. In a game with super fast leveling like in WoW starting over shouldn't even be that hard.
Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts

Their in league with Activision, it's to be expected.

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Greyfeld
We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.

Monthly fees are how a company pays for the servers. This has always been true. Purchase of the game pays for development costs, monthly fees pay for server costs. Allowing somebody to shell out $25 for their flying mount is no different than the redemption codes they have for in-game items in their packs of trading cards and crap like that. They're not getting anything in game that you can't get yourself... they're just getting it without work. You can be indignant all you want, but there have always (yes, ALWAYS) been items only a few were able/willing to get their hands on, because it cost them real money to do so. (If I remember correctly, people who paid extra for a special edition of the game a while back got a code for a special in-game pet) This is not new, so get over it. That all being said... Activision. That is all.

1. They are making tons of monthly from their monthly fee alone, or else it wouldn't had taken four years for the first expansion to come out. 2. They are not giving them items you can get yourself in game, the card game items and the store items can only be brought and not earn in the game.
Avatar image for dkrustyklown
dkrustyklown

2387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 dkrustyklown
Member since 2009 • 2387 Posts

I think that Blizzard took a look at the revenue that Turbine is pulling from its in-game shop and decided that it wanted a piece of the microtransaction action. I don't blame them. Even though DDO is a small MMO, Turbine has seen a marked increase in revenue ever since they went free to play with a microtransaction shop.

I don't mind it at all, since it creates a new way for developers to profit from MMO's and variety is a good thing.

I've never played WoW, though, so I can't relate to any game specific issues with their shop.

Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts
How is this milking? It doesn't affect other players at all, if you care this much about how other people's fun... you really should stop playing
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
How is this milking? It doesn't affect other players at all, if you care this much about how other people's fun... you really should stop playingsalxis
It does affect our fun, if they weren't selling it at a store it would likely had been a raid drop or a PVP award. Selling items for extra in a game you pay a monthly fee for is not fun.
Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#22 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts

[QUOTE="Greyfeld"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.Nerkcon
Monthly fees are how a company pays for the servers. This has always been true. Purchase of the game pays for development costs, monthly fees pay for server costs. Allowing somebody to shell out $25 for their flying mount is no different than the redemption codes they have for in-game items in their packs of trading cards and crap like that. They're not getting anything in game that you can't get yourself... they're just getting it without work. You can be indignant all you want, but there have always (yes, ALWAYS) been items only a few were able/willing to get their hands on, because it cost them real money to do so. (If I remember correctly, people who paid extra for a special edition of the game a while back got a code for a special in-game pet) This is not new, so get over it. That all being said... Activision. That is all.

1. They are making tons of monthly from their monthly fee alone, or else it wouldn't had taken four years for the first expansion to come out. 2. They are not giving them items you can get yourself in game, the card game items and the store items can only be brought and not earn in the game.

1. This link alone should completely blow away any debate you have about how much money blizzard is making on monthly fees.

2. You can get flying mounts in game. Just because it's skinned differently doesn't mean anything. You want to be able to get your hands on it without having to shell out the cash, and that's your problem. This doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with Blizzard, it just means you don't think it's worth your money to buy the mount yourself.

Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"]How is this milking? It doesn't affect other players at all, if you care this much about how other people's fun... you really should stop playingNerkcon
It does affect our fun, if they weren't selling it at a store it would likely had been a raid drop or a PVP award. Selling items for extra in a game you pay a monthly fee for is not fun.

And if they never made the mount at all, you wouldn't be getting it anyway. So ultimately, you're crying because somebody else is getting something you're not.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#24 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
Most MMO's survive on this kind of micro-transactions.
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts

[QUOTE="salxis"]How is this milking? It doesn't affect other players at all, if you care this much about how other people's fun... you really should stop playingNerkcon
It does affect our fun, if they weren't selling it at a store it would likely had been a raid drop or a PVP award. Selling items for extra in a game you pay a monthly fee for is not fun.

It's a skin, that's really all I want to say, other than Epeen happiness, there's really no differences (minus the 30% speed) between each epic flying mount.

Since this skin is unique, we could assume that if it's implemented into the game, it would be

1: Meta achievement

2: Hardmode boss kill

3: Gladiator PVP reward.

If you could've gotten these, you already got a 310% mount, so how does a skin affect your enjoyment of the game?

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="Greyfeld"] Monthly fees are how a company pays for the servers. This has always been true. Purchase of the game pays for development costs, monthly fees pay for server costs. Allowing somebody to shell out $25 for their flying mount is no different than the redemption codes they have for in-game items in their packs of trading cards and crap like that. They're not getting anything in game that you can't get yourself... they're just getting it without work. You can be indignant all you want, but there have always (yes, ALWAYS) been items only a few were able/willing to get their hands on, because it cost them real money to do so. (If I remember correctly, people who paid extra for a special edition of the game a while back got a code for a special in-game pet) This is not new, so get over it. That all being said... Activision. That is all.Greyfeld

1. They are making tons of monthly from their monthly fee alone, or else it wouldn't had taken four years for the first expansion to come out. 2. They are not giving them items you can get yourself in game, the card game items and the store items can only be brought and not earn in the game.

1. This link alone should completely blow away any debate you have about how much money blizzard is making on monthly fees.

2. You can get flying mounts in game. Just because it's skinned differently doesn't mean anything. You want to be able to get your hands on it without having to shell out the cash, and that's your problem. This doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with Blizzard, it just means you don't think it's worth your money to buy the mount yourself.

1. The answer was true, but they're still making money. After all, they avoid merging low populated servers just to avoid bad news. The monthly fee pays all the servers, employees, and development all by itself. Selling extras is just to give them more pocket change. 2. Most of the content in the the game, including dungeons are bosses, are just reskins. But they're still content. And it is predicted the speed is going to be 370%, %10 faster than any other flying mount in the game.
Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts
If I still played WoW I admit I would be pretty tempted to do it.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts

I've been playing MMO's for a long time but I've always avoided WoW. I can tell you from experience that Blizzard need to be very careful, it's one long slippery slope from here....

Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="salxis"]How is this milking? It doesn't affect other players at all, if you care this much about how other people's fun... you really should stop playingsalxis

It does affect our fun, if they weren't selling it at a store it would likely had been a raid drop or a PVP award. Selling items for extra in a game you pay a monthly fee for is not fun.

It's a skin, that's really all I want to say, other than Epeen happiness, there's really no differences (minus the 30% speed) between each epic flying mount.

Since this skin is unique, we could assume that if it's implemented into the game, it would be

1: Meta achievement

2: Hardmode boss kill

3: Gladiator PVP reward.

If you could've gotten these, you already got a 310% mount, so how does a skin affect your enjoyment of the game?

For one thing I"m not even playing the game. It's not the price or the existence but the principle; if this sells like hotcakes they will continue to do more of this stuff and it'll get worst, to the point they will sell many important items via the store. And then other companies will follower suit, and then every MMO will be a monthly fee + a cash shop.
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts

I've been playing MMO's for a long time but I've always avoided WoW. I can tell you from experience that Blizzard need to be very careful, it's one long slippery slope from here....

Kan0nF0dder
It won't be a slippery slope until they start selling exp scrolls/items that are better than in-game ones :P
Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="Greyfeld"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] 1. They are making tons of monthly from their monthly fee alone, or else it wouldn't had taken four years for the first expansion to come out. 2. They are not giving them items you can get yourself in game, the card game items and the store items can only be brought and not earn in the game.Nerkcon

1. This link alone should completely blow away any debate you have about how much money blizzard is making on monthly fees.

2. You can get flying mounts in game. Just because it's skinned differently doesn't mean anything. You want to be able to get your hands on it without having to shell out the cash, and that's your problem. This doesn't mean that there's anything wrong with Blizzard, it just means you don't think it's worth your money to buy the mount yourself.

1. The answer was true, but they're still making money. After all, they avoid merging low populated servers just to avoid bad news. The monthly fee pays all the servers, employees, and development all by itself. Selling extras is just to give them more pocket change. 2. Most of the content in the the game, including dungeons are bosses, are just reskins. But they're still content. And it is predicted the speed is going to be 370%, %10 faster than any other flying mount in the game.

*Gasp* oh no, not a whole 10% faster! How will you ever keep up when you fly from the flight path to the dungeon entrance?? Jeez, I bet they get there a whole 8 seconds ahead of you. This is unacceptable. Boycott Blizzard!!!
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

I've been playing MMO's for a long time but I've always avoided WoW. I can tell you from experience that Blizzard need to be very careful, it's one long slippery slope from here....

salxis
It won't be a slippery slope until they start selling exp scrolls/items that are better than in-game ones :P

In a way they do; people make new accounts and RAF themselves which is most likely why they support multiboxing.
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"]

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] It does affect our fun, if they weren't selling it at a store it would likely had been a raid drop or a PVP award. Selling items for extra in a game you pay a monthly fee for is not fun.Nerkcon

It's a skin, that's really all I want to say, other than Epeen happiness, there's really no differences (minus the 30% speed) between each epic flying mount.

Since this skin is unique, we could assume that if it's implemented into the game, it would be

1: Meta achievement

2: Hardmode boss kill

3: Gladiator PVP reward.

If you could've gotten these, you already got a 310% mount, so how does a skin affect your enjoyment of the game?

For one thing I"m not even playing the game. It's not the price or the existence but the principle; if this sells like hotcakes they will continue to do more of this stuff and it'll get worst, to the point they will sell many important items via the store. And then other companies will follower suit, and then every MMO will be a monthly fee + a cash shop.

If Blizzard wants to ruin their reputation by doing micro transactions that actually affects the game balance (i.e. selling items that are better than what you can get in-game), then yeah, it would be terrible, western audiences will never accept it, and at the end we still can't do anything about it :P
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Greyfeld"] *Gasp* oh no, not a whole 10% faster! How will you ever keep up when you fly from the flight path to the dungeon entrance?? Jeez, I bet they get there a whole 8 seconds ahead of you. This is unacceptable. Boycott Blizzard!!!

No it's not, I find it perfectly acceptable that the most profitable pay to play MMO of all time is trying to milk itself more by trying to make money the way free MMOs make money while still keeping the monthly fee. You must have limited money or something. :lol:
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"][QUOTE="Kan0nF0dder"]

I've been playing MMO's for a long time but I've always avoided WoW. I can tell you from experience that Blizzard need to be very careful, it's one long slippery slope from here....

Nerkcon
It won't be a slippery slope until they start selling exp scrolls/items that are better than in-game ones :P

In a way they do; people make new accounts and RAF themselves which is most likely why they support multiboxing.

I would just call those "creative" (albeit money wasting and totally silly) way of abusing the existing system :P. I am sure noone would've thought RAF would degrade into a super easy exp system
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"] If Blizzard wants to ruin their reputation by doing micro transactions that actually affects the game balance (i.e. selling items that are better than what you can get in-game), then yeah, it would be terrible, western audiences will never accept it, and at the end we still can't do anything about it :P

Yeah we can, we can complain! IT doesn't get anything done but it makes me feel better! :D... :( I'm pissed because I know everyone is going to follow suit. Traditional MMORPGs are dead. Casual instant gratification MMORPGs that milk you for all you got are the future.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="salxis"] It won't be a slippery slope until they start selling exp scrolls/items that are better than in-game ones :P

In a way they do; people make new accounts and RAF themselves which is most likely why they support multiboxing.

I would just call those "creative" (albeit money wasting and totally silly) way of abusing the existing system :P. I am sure noone would've thought RAF would degrade into a super easy exp system

They could had at the least removed the normal low level XP penalty so people without RAF would actually, you know, play together?
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"][QUOTE="salxis"] If Blizzard wants to ruin their reputation by doing micro transactions that actually affects the game balance (i.e. selling items that are better than what you can get in-game), then yeah, it would be terrible, western audiences will never accept it, and at the end we still can't do anything about it :P

Yeah we can, we can complain! IT doesn't get anything done but it makes me feel better! :D... :( I'm pissed because I know everyone is going to follow suit. Traditional MMORPGs are dead. Casual instant gratification MMORPGs that milk you for all you got are the future.

Pretty much, if the biggest MMO's gonna do that, everyone would follow, I simply hope Blizzard care about their reputation, if they are gonna whore it out... well... thanks god I don't play it anymore
Avatar image for SilentlyMad
SilentlyMad

2093

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 SilentlyMad
Member since 2009 • 2093 Posts

None of this stuff is bad because all the pets and this mount do not effect gameplay. It is just fun stuff that does not make a character any better. It will not be bad till they start selling high tier weapons and armor. The mount is no faster then the persons other mounts. A player has to already have a 310% flight speed to get that with the new mount.

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Nerkcon
We are paying a MONTHLY FEE for WoW, the monthly fee is suppose to cover all the content in the game. Expansions shouldn't even exist (they did because bandwidth used to be so expensive the monthly fee was just to break even and the expansions made the money). Everything they're selling for extra could and should had been items we can attain in game. Selling extras for real money is how FREE MMORPGs make money.

I agree with what you're saying about having paid downloadable items online like mounts etc. But expansions have ALWAYS been part of mmorpg's, and are well worth their $40 price-tag.
Avatar image for salxis
salxis

4280

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 salxis
Member since 2009 • 4280 Posts
[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] They could had at the least removed the normal low level XP penalty so people without RAF would actually, you know, play together?

Yeah, new players are pretty much screwed in WoW these day, sooo much to learn, so little people to group with and so little people to teach them, sure it's still easy as hell to level, but... they are gonna get shout at a lot for their first level 80 instance
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] They could had at the least removed the normal low level XP penalty so people without RAF would actually, you know, play together?

Yeah, new players are pretty much screwed in WoW these day, sooo much to learn, so little people to group with and so little people to teach them, sure it's still easy as hell to level, but... they are gonna get shout at a lot for their first level 80 instance

It is actually hard to level as a spell caster; you run out of mana all the time and you die very quickly. I level the game at level 27 because the low level areas were so empty and dull I wasn't willing to torture myself just to get to the level where the game magically gets better.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#43 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
[QUOTE="salxis"][QUOTE="Nerkcon"] They could had at the least removed the normal low level XP penalty so people without RAF would actually, you know, play together?

Yeah, new players are pretty much screwed in WoW these day, sooo much to learn, so little people to group with and so little people to teach them, sure it's still easy as hell to level, but... they are gonna get shout at a lot for their first level 80 instance

Yeah, I remember that when I hit 70 my first time and in those times RAF didn't exist. WoW is getting each time more and more casual. I'm glad that I left that game. Anyways TC, I think Blizzard started with the milking with the 3 Starcraft 2.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
I have not been a main target in a forum argument in just along time, wow. :P I'm going drop it right now. But!; when they start selling gear sets that are 'just reskins of the latest tier with slightly better stats' remember me! :evil:
Avatar image for Vinegar_Strokes
Vinegar_Strokes

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Vinegar_Strokes
Member since 2010 • 3401 Posts
[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Lethalhazard
It's on the same level as the 15$ DLC that Modern Warfare 2 presented. Sure, it's optionable -- it's still milking. Even though, that at least provided content whereas this 25$ mount provides a reskinned mount that's already in the game available only to hardcore raiders. Not that I play WoW, it's just annoying to see Blizzard do this. I guess they're all for the money now.

as opposed to being in it for what?
Avatar image for Greyfeld
Greyfeld

3007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 Greyfeld
Member since 2008 • 3007 Posts
[QUOTE="Lethalhazard"][QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"]

how is that milking? if people want to buy mounts then blizzard would be MORONS not to sell them. by the way this does not mean you now have to buy you mount in the game. that would be milking.

Vinegar_Strokes
It's on the same level as the 15$ DLC that Modern Warfare 2 presented. Sure, it's optionable -- it's still milking. Even though, that at least provided content whereas this 25$ mount provides a reskinned mount that's already in the game available only to hardcore raiders. Not that I play WoW, it's just annoying to see Blizzard do this. I guess they're all for the money now.

as opposed to being in it for what?

lol i guess they're supposed to be in it for the smiles and rainbows.
Avatar image for gameboy343
gameboy343

1024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 gameboy343
Member since 2005 • 1024 Posts

i totallly called it. and everyone i knew was like "nah you're wrong" and they laughed! look who is laughing now!
also i totally want that mount QQ

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#48 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Oh Blizzard, what's happened to you. I knew that merger with Activision was going to be trouble....
Avatar image for Mythomniac
Mythomniac

1695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Mythomniac
Member since 2009 • 1695 Posts
This is not milking at all, completely optional. I support Blizzard and everything they do, it's just business, if you were in their situation, you would probably do the exact same thing.
Avatar image for Nerkcon
Nerkcon

4707

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Nerkcon
Member since 2006 • 4707 Posts
[QUOTE="Mythomniac"]This is not milking at all, completely optional. I support Blizzard and everything they do, it's just business, if you were in their situation, you would probably do the exact same thing.

And when they kidnap your girl friend and start to torture her, unless you give your secret blue prints for your MMO so you can't become a threat, they'll torture her more, you would support them? After all, it's just business. You would do the exact same. EDIT: For those of you who can't tell; yes, I'm J/King. :P