Brand new Crysis 3 shots are HOT!

Can't wait to disable those camera affects....Jebus213

But Crytek sacrificed so much gameplay to make those shiny camera effects!

Game still looks like sh!t.

Looks fantastic.

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

Looks fantastic.

Wasdie

Lol Fvck crytek. They refuse to make Timesplitters 4 and the have decided to go F2P after Crysis. They can't even make Crysis 3 decent from the looks of it.

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

Obviously_Right

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Looks fantastic.

04dcarraher

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

Looks pretty similiar to 2 (not saying that's a bad thing).

Impressive, not sure is some are artwork or not.SaltyMeatballs

A lot of it is the lighting. They aren't using as bright and saturated colors as Crysis 2. It's a more realistic rendering.

Rather see actual in game shots. Nice though.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Looks fantastic.

Wasdie

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

he is right. there are better looking games out there

Game is heading to mediocre like second one. its primilary build with console in mind.SNIPER4321

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

ArmA 3 looks impressive, but so did ArmA 2 in all of the promos. You get it running on a machine and you'll notice how terrible the LoD system is (trees poping into detail, grass not rendering properly, terrible lighting).

There is far more detail in those Crysis 3 shots than can be compared with even the best looking games out there right now.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] No they dont, they look awfulSNIPER4321

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

Since when does not being the best equate to being awful?

Oh wait, this is System Wars.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] No they dont, they look awfulSNIPER4321

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] No they dont, they look awful04dcarraher

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

Funny. For all of their apparent limitations, Crysis fit onto the current gen consoles. They made some graphical sacrifices, but the levels were just as large, the destruction was still there.

So... if they could do it for Crysis, why couldn't they do it for Crysis 3?

Crysis 2 was made by a different core team than Crysis 1 was. The guys at Crytek Germany were continuing development on the CryEngine 3 while EA forced Crysis 2 to be created by Crytek UK with an unfinished engine.

Console or not, nobody could make a proper sequel to Crysis with an unfinished engine.

Metro 2033 looks just as good as Crysis 1 and better than 2. so Metro Last light definetely looks better than Crysis 3...SNIPER4321

Metro 2033 has much better details than Crysis 1 but also has much smaller environments. Crysis 2 with the DX11 patch and high texture patch has about the same amount of detail as Metro 2033. Unfortunatly the textures still suffer from some terrible compression. A texture mod fixes that and it is one of the best looking games out there.

Na, you just have low standards or have different tastes.04dcarraher

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]he is right. there are better looking games out there

Game is heading to mediocre like second one. its primilary build with console in mind.

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

ArmA 3 looks impressive, but so did ArmA 2 in all of the promos. You get it running on a machine and you'll notice how terrible the LoD system is (trees poping into detail, grass not rendering properly, terrible lighting).

There is far more detail in those Crysis 3 shots than can be compared with even the best looking games out there right now.

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

ArmA 3 looks impressive, but so did ArmA 2 in all of the promos. You get it running on a machine and you'll notice how terrible the LoD system is (trees poping into detail, grass not rendering properly, terrible lighting).

There is far more detail in those Crysis 3 shots than can be compared with even the best looking games out there right now.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]he is right. there are better looking games out there

Game is heading to mediocre like second one. its primilary build with console in mind.Wasdie

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

Looks great. I really enjoyed Crysis 2. Yeah it was way more linear, but it was still really fun, and I play games for fun, not based on if they're built just for PC or not.

Not impressed really, is this what all the PC hype is about?

Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

04dcarraher

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

Not impressed really, is this what all the PC hype is about?

Davekeeh

[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]

Not impressed really, is this what all the PC hype is about?

PinnacleGamingP

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

Wasdie

Funny. For all of it's limitations, they fit Crysis onto the current gen consoles. They made some graphical sacrifices, but the levels were just as large, the destruction was still there.

So... if they could do it for Crysis, why couldn't they do it for Crysis 3?

Crysis 2 was made by a different core team than Crysis 1 was. The guys at Crytek Germany were continuing development on the CryEngine 3 while EA forced Crysis 2 to be created by Crytek UK with an unfinished engine.

Console or not, nobody could make a proper sequel to Crysis with an unfinished engine.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

Wasdie

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

Wasdie

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

04dcarraher

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

Wasdie

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

I hope you are trolling, its difficult because you are a mod, people are scared to debate you. So many years on and you support a crippled limited sequal that could have been so much more. Shame on you Wasdie, shame on you.

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"] uncharted and GOW says hi.Stevo_the_gamer

I have a feeling this will be a lot more polished than C2. These environments look great for stalking. I'm hoping for more destructibility and more open sandboxes from C3.

Looks really nice, I just hate how over done some of the effects are, you can't even see the sky. I much prefer the more natural look you get from games like ARMA.

Still in the city with jungle added in just to semi impress the old fans, christ sake Crytek.

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]he is right. there are better looking games out there

Game is heading to mediocre like second one. its primilary build with console in mind.Wasdie

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

I have a feeling this will be a lot more polished than C2. These environments look great for stalking. I'm hoping for more destructibility and more open sandboxes from C3.

gamecubepad

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]Please... your caught up the hype and bullshots. Wait until the game actually releases and see all the medicore detail and design flaws from the game. You praised Crysis 2 the same way, and it wasnt that great.

tenaka2

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

I hope you are trolling, its difficult because you are a mod, people are scared to debate you. So many years on and you support a crippled limited sequal that could have been so much more. Shame on you Wasdie, shame on you.

Looks amazing. Crysis is an excellent series :)locopatho

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Crysis 2 was a beautiful game even at launch. Though the levels were hit and miss. Some of the night time levels in time square had the best lighting I've ever seen in a video game.

Crysis 2 had far more detail than Crysis 1 and far better lighting.

Toxic-Seahorse

Crysis 2 vanilla textures were based on console assets which they only have around 256mb Vram to work with.

Need an example eh?

Crysis 2 Pc using vanilla textures

Crysis 2 using imported Grass textures from 1st Crysis.