Brand new Crysis 3 shots are HOT!

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

Obviously_Right

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

rockydog1111

[QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

rockydog1111

Shame they had the funding to even make it, especially after the bad crysys 2 sales.

[QUOTE="rockydog1111"][QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

tenaka2

Shame they had the funding to even make it, especially after the bad crysys 2 sales.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Wow, you must be blind or really ignorant. Probably both.

Wasdie

Funny. For all of their apparent limitations, Crysis fit onto the current gen consoles. They made some graphical sacrifices, but the levels were just as large, the destruction was still there.

So... if they could do it for Crysis, why couldn't they do it for Crysis 3?

Crysis 2 was made by a different core team than Crysis 1 was. The guys at Crytek Germany were continuing development on the CryEngine 3 while EA forced Crysis 2 to be created by Crytek UK with an unfinished engine.

Console or not, nobody could make a proper sequel to Crysis with an unfinished engine.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Na, you just have low standards or have different tastes. Im looking at more then just the lighting. crysis 3 will be in the same boat as Crysis 2 being held back by console limitations.

rockydog1111

Funny. For all of their apparent limitations, Crysis fit onto the current gen consoles. They made some graphical sacrifices, but the levels were just as large, the destruction was still there.

So... if they could do it for Crysis, why couldn't they do it for Crysis 3?

Crysis 2 was made by a different core team than Crysis 1 was. The guys at Crytek Germany were continuing development on the CryEngine 3 while EA forced Crysis 2 to be created by Crytek UK with an unfinished engine.

Console or not, nobody could make a proper sequel to Crysis with an unfinished engine.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="rockydog1111"] So 9.5, 9.0, and 8.5 are mediocre now? call_of_duty_10

Shame they had the funding to even make it, especially after the bad crysys 2 sales.

I think the kinect game they are making is slipping to next gen consoles also.

They dont look real.I mean,they look more like paintings,and not a game.Highly doubt if C3 will actually look like that.

Nevertheless,it doesn't look good and the gameplay will definitely suck.

call_of_duty_10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2LX8bEmhDc :shock:

[QUOTE="rockydog1111"][QUOTE="Obviously_Right"]

Series needs to die already, it just screams mediocrity.

Jebus213

amen, crysis3 = best looking game reserved for the next 3 years, plus modding potential with the extra package for CE3 with the release of crysis3 will make crysis3 the untouchable graphic god for at least 5 years :cool:

Sorry Beyond: Two Souls PS3 exclusive looks much better

[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]

They dont look real.I mean,they look more like paintings,and not a game.Highly doubt if C3 will actually look like that.

Nevertheless,it doesn't look good and the gameplay will definitely suck.

Peredith

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2LX8bEmhDc :shock:

Yeah it "looks" pretty good but that's about it. The gameplay is far too similar to Crysis 2 for me. no width to it and funnels you into action all the time.I also hate how everything sounds the same too, the suits voice is the same, the enemies voices are the same and the stealth kill animations are the same just faster. While it's not game breaking it just won't feel like a sequel to me but more and extension of Crysis 2 like Warhead was to the original

[QUOTE="rockydog1111"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Funny. For all of their apparent limitations, Crysis fit onto the current gen consoles. They made some graphical sacrifices, but the levels were just as large, the destruction was still there.

So... if they could do it for Crysis, why couldn't they do it for Crysis 3?

Crysis 2 was made by a different core team than Crysis 1 was. The guys at Crytek Germany were continuing development on the CryEngine 3 while EA forced Crysis 2 to be created by Crytek UK with an unfinished engine.

Console or not, nobody could make a proper sequel to Crysis with an unfinished engine.

Jebus213

:P

Looks fantastic.

Wasdie

Do you think you'll have to save the internet and make another settings app for this one?Did you ever hear anything from Crytek about that? I remember that being pretty popular.

[QUOTE="Peredith"]

[QUOTE="call_of_duty_10"]

They dont look real.I mean,they look more like paintings,and not a game.Highly doubt if C3 will actually look like that.

Nevertheless,it doesn't look good and the gameplay will definitely suck.

seanmcloughlin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2LX8bEmhDc :shock:

Yeah it "looks" pretty good but that's about it. The gameplay is far too similar to Crysis 2 for me. no width to it and funnels you into action all the time.I also hate how everything sounds the same too, the suits voice is the same, the enemies voices are the same and the stealth kill animations are the same just faster. While it's not game breaking it just won't feel like a sequel to me but more and extension of Crysis 2 like Warhead was to the original

Pre-Apha, son. The coding "beneath the beauty" isn't done yet (AI, HUD etc.).

looks ALMOST as good as some ps3 exclusives, but not quite there yet..PinnacleGamingP

:lol:

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Looks fantastic.

heretrix

Do you think you'll have to save the internet and make another settings app for this one?Did you ever hear anything from Crytek about that? I remember that being pretty popular.

They implemented a good chunk of those graphics options in to Crysis 2 with further patches.

Considering that their engine is done now and that Crytek Germany is working on the game, they won't be turning to Nvidia to set up some stupid automatic system settings feature. I doubt it will be necessary.

Crysis 2 was rushed with a bad engine and terrible decisions made by people who knew nothing about PC gaming.

Also, the PS3 fanboys in here are blind as bats and they prove it by opening their mouths every single day.

Sad doom4 was announced in like 2007 lol and we havent even see one screenshot yet.

250 people working at idsoftware.

Whats taking so g0ddamn long i told u big teams suck ass.

from 1996-1999

idsoftware with 10 people put out 3 games quake 1/2/3.

WTF

Theres no way a company can stay more organized with 250 developers than 10 developers.

color me unimpressed

There's a lot of disharmony amongst hermits in this thread :P

Those who said C3 looked bad because the'ye blind by their hate of Crytek/C2

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

WarTornRuston

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

WarTornRuston

Casual trash. Next please.

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

[QUOTE="jackfruitchips"][QUOTE="WarTornRuston"]

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

PinnacleGamingP

Fail troll

It looks fantastic. Probably getting the PC version. Hermits rag on Crytek for no reason. They make great games.

[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"][QUOTE="jackfruitchips"] Many hermits hate Crytek because C2 was consolized. I didn't like C2 but C3 looks more pomising. Maybe it won't be as wide open as C1 but it's likely to be more open than C2, better AI. The environment looks more interesting thanks to the vegetation.lostrib

Fail troll

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

who cares crysis 1 was garbage. hermits should play some real shooters, only on the PS3PinnacleGamingP

Fail troll

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Looks fantastic.

heretrix

Do you think you'll have to save the internet and make another settings app for this one?Did you ever hear anything from Crytek about that? I remember that being pretty popular.

Don't think they'd be stupid enough to ignore PC players like that again. They lost a lot of respect and their image from PC gamers after Crysis 2

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Looks fantastic.

seanmcloughlin

Do you think you'll have to save the internet and make another settings app for this one?Did you ever hear anything from Crytek about that? I remember that being pretty popular.

Don't think they'd be stupid enough to ignore PC players like that again. They lost a lot of respect and their image from PC gamers after Crysis 2

DF is so console bias it wasnt even funny, they were comparing Pc version with low and medium settings. 04dcarraher

"Meanwhile, Very High settings are selected across the board in the graphics options menu, with absolutely no mods or custom tweaks in play - to make this a "fair" test, the game must be running in the best case scenario, within all the original parameters laid out by Crytek. If the console versions do indeed look better, this is the standard to beat."

Bu-bu-bu teh console bias.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="heretrix"]Hey Wasdie,

Do you think you'll have to save the internet and make another settings app for this one?Did you ever hear anything from Crytek about that? I remember that being pretty popular.

04dcarraher

Don't think they'd be stupid enough to ignore PC players like that again. They lost a lot of respect and their image from PC gamers after Crysis 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2LX8bEmhDc :shock:

Peredith

Looks as boring as Crysis 2.

Doesn't look like Crysis 1 or Warhead, in which you can stole a jeep, place some C4 in the fender, then run through a KPA camp and cause havok...

Is more like Halo, but without the fun A.I., and enemies are hella harder to see (green filter everywhere + armor mode = I'm blind). But fortunately can't have the worse campaign due that title was won by a landslide by the Battlefield 3 campaign, worst story shooter of the forever.

and are incredibly predictable and bias. Most scores are based off of popularity, advertisement, and what fanboys expect. Remember Jeff Gerstmann...Jebus213

They are usually pretty predictable as any gamer can look at some footage of a game and have a good ballpark esitmate of how good it's going to be.

Bias, based off of popularity and advertisement? Nah. This is just something that PC fanboys have made up as they refuse to believe console games can get good scores. I'm saying that as bluntly as I can because I cannot think of any other reason why the only real group of people that doesn't believe that scores are accurate happens to be the diehard PC gamers who think gaming has turned to crap since 1998.

Reviews are usually pretty unbiased and measure the quality of the game for which people can use so they can spend their money wisely. Or, are you one of those people who thinks you should just buy every game that looks interesting to you because reviews are crap? In that case, you're missing the point. Why does somebody have to risk their money when they could read some reviews on what kind of content is offered in the game, how good the game is put together, and then how much the reviewer liked it.

I guess it's just really easy to ignore all of those things if you believe that only hardcore PC titles deserve good scores.

loos like 360 really brought this game down to wii standardsPinnacleGamingP

Not like the PS3 is any better. The PS3 version of Crysis 2 was the worst of the three. Anyway, graphics look amazing in Crysis 3 and I really enjoyed Crysis 2 so Im looking forward to this one quite a bit.

Looks absolutely stunning, I can't get over those lighting effects! Man, why haven't I bought a PC yet that can play something like that. What's wrong with me? Anyway, it's amazing what devs can do these days... Just imagine what games will look like in 10 years! :shock:

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"] [QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="SNIPER4321"]he is right. there are better looking games out there

Game is heading to mediocre like second one. its primilary build with console in mind.04dcarraher

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.

I think you are extremely biased. Crysis 2, even with the original DX9 rendering, is still one of the best looking games on the PC.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

He is wrong and so are you. Crysis 3 has an astounding level of detail in the levels and the lighting is superb.kalipekona

I think you are extremely biased. Crysis 2, even with the original DX9 rendering, is still one of the best looking games on the PC.

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]DF is so console bias it wasnt even funny, they were comparing Pc version with low and medium settings. Stevo_the_gamer

"Meanwhile, Very High settings are selected across the board in the graphics options menu, with absolutely no mods or custom tweaks in play - to make this a "fair" test, the game must be running in the best case scenario, within all the original parameters laid out by Crytek. If the console versions do indeed look better, this is the standard to beat."

Bu-bu-bu teh console bias.

I must have been thinking about another comparsion, however looking at DF's face off of crysis they carefully picked areas to compare. and didnt want to show the flaws

I must have been thinking about another comparsion, however looking at DF's face off of crysis they carefully picked areas to compare. and didnt want to show the flaws04dcarraher

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]I must have been thinking about another comparsion, however looking at DF's face off of crysis they carefully picked areas to compare. and didnt want to show the flawsStevo_the_gamer

Please..... like your perfect...also my assumption(fact) isnt wrong about Crysis being butchered on consoles. Having shorter draw distances, overall inferior graphics, less foilage, use 2d sprites, having sub 30 fps average , horrid performance when multiple events going on and having to load sections of the a single level in multiple places.

04dcarraher

*you're

And like I said before... Crysis 1 was downgraded to obvious degrees, but for all extents and purposes, it showcased the consoles could hold their own. Digital Foundry even levied a lot of praise for it.

*you're

And like I said before... Crysis 1 was downgraded to obvious degrees, but for all extents and purposes, it showcased the consoles could hold their own. Digital Foundry even levied a lot of praise for it.

Stevo_the_gamer

It's not impressive when they have to cut an entire level out of the game because they couldn't handle it.

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"]I must have been thinking about another comparsion, however looking at DF's face off of crysis they carefully picked areas to compare. and didnt want to show the flaws04dcarraher