COD4 on 360 will>>>>>>COD4 on PS3 Reasons why are so very OBVI

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Ragashahs

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.

you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Ragashahs

Oh yeah i forgot the 360 controller just in general is better. The analog sticks ar far better suited for shooters and are much smoother. Most game sites and mags have voted the 360 contoller better then PS3 and most have said it's the best controller ever made.

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And yet with the PS3 you don't have to pay for the online.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

You mean 10 year olds will be yelling swear words into the Mic.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.OremLK

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

better only community?! There are far too many little kids with mics on xbox live, buddyejstrup

There is a little thing called MUTE you can mute whoever you want.

I played the COD4 beta and it was mostly older gamers it's Hale that see the kiddies more. And Bungie fixed that with button for talk and MUTE feature.

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

Fuzzy_Munch

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Fuzzy_Munch

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.Truth-slayer

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

I did not get any lag at all in COD4 Beta. It really has more to do with your connection spped. And Developer netcode. Either way dedicated server is a nice feature it has a pls to it for choosing your games. So that is cool for PS3. But the whole lag BS i hear from Cows is mostly FALSE. Becuase a good cable connetion and you ar smooth sailing.

[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Ragashahs

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.

Ahh HELLO more chances of this becuase everyone is using mics on Live. Much less chances of this becuase hardley anyones uses mics on PSN. Use LOGIC.

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

Fuzzy_Munch

eh how bout noooo!!!...firstly you cant really be sure their wont be any rumble for the ps3, because dualshock 3 controllers are on the way. so they would put somethin. (cause you wont really know untill somebody proves it!! and im sure its not you cause you got evidence, or atleast not stating it!) In the graphics department, its already been said that the ps3 has better graphics then the 360 version of the game!! and thats more proof then you have to state the opposite!, you cant say that the 360 will have better graphics because it has had it in the past, cause ps3 multiplat games have been better then ther 360 counterparts! And dude the mics, come on...from what ive heard, theirs a whole bunch of idiotic dickheads on XBL that are a bunch of racists. id rather avoid all that. and you never know more people then you think mite use mics for COD4!.

but if you want to go you way fine lets go!...which version of the game is gonna most likely have less lag...sumthin tells me its the ps3. its a no brainer, PS3 VERSION ALL THE.....GIT!!

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"][QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Fuzzy_Munch

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.

Ahh HELLO more chances of this becuase everyone is using mics on Live. Much less chances of this becuase hardley anyones uses mics on PSN. Use LOGIC.

Oh yeah COD4 is the kind of game you deffinatly want to use a mic and coordinate. Especialy when calling in aistrikes. And holding flag points. It's very stratigic if you play with good players or your clan.

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.Truth-slayer

Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that Sony doesn't care enough about gaming to ever bother designing a new controller; the old one works, so why change it? They've always run the Playstation as a mere business.

This complaint of mine goes all the way back to the original Playstation, and it's why I've disliked Sony's consoles since they first started coming out with them. Sony isn't known for any first-party titles; Microsoft has Halo. Nintendo has... too many to mention, beginning with Mario and Zelda. Why is it that after all of this time Sony has never committed itself to any actual games? Why does it merely ride on the successes of its third-party developers?

Why would Sony shove a Blu-ray player into their console, driving its price up at the expense of its adoption by gamers? Is it, perhaps, because the PS3 is part of an overall business strategy, rather than being aimed as an actual system for gamers?

It all comes down to the fact that Sony is completely apathetic towards gaming. Of course they'll never bother designing a new controller, instead sticking with one that to this day is still a tweaked, over-buttoned rip-off of the original SNES controller. It's ugly, it's not particularly ergonomic, and it's confusing and unintuitive for newcomers. But what do they care?

[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"][QUOTE="Ragashahs"][QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Fuzzy_Munch

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.

Ahh HELLO more chances of this becuase everyone is using mics on Live. Much less chances of this becuase hardley anyones uses mics on PSN. Use LOGIC.

Oh yeah COD4 is the kind of game you deffinatly want to use a mic and coordinate. Especialy when calling in aistrikes. And holding flag points. It's very stratigic if you play with good players or your clan.

truthfully, ANY multiplayer team based game really needs communication...

trying to coordinate any team movements w/o a mic is going to fail... and why xbl is so much better than PSN....

XBL lagRagashahs

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Explain to me please how this XBL lag works, mywell informed sir...

Better online community?

XBL= KKK

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

Fuzzy_Munch

Ok...........now why is this important?

[QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.OremLK

Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that Sony doesn't care enough about gaming to ever bother designing a new controller; the old one works, so why change it? They've always run the Playstation as a mere business.

This complaint of mine goes all the way back to the original Playstation, and it's why I've disliked Sony's consoles since they first started coming out with them. Sony isn't known for any first-party titles; Microsoft has Halo. Nintendo has... too many to mention, beginning with Mario and Zelda. Why is it that after all of this time Sony has never committed itself to any actual games? Why does it merely ride on the successes of its third-party developers?

Why would Sony shove a Blu-ray player into their console, driving its price up at the expense of its adoption by gamers? Is it, perhaps, because the PS3 is part of an overall business strategy, rather than being aimed as an actual system for gamers?

It all comes down to the fact that Sony is completely apathetic towards gaming. Of course they'll never bother designing a new controller, instead sticking with one that to this day is still a tweaked, over-buttoned rip-off of the original SNES controller. It's ugly, it's not particularly ergonomic, and it's confusing and unintuitive for newcomers. But what do they care?

He's right, PS3 with the blu-ray has alot more to do with business, and trying to finally win a format war, than actual gaming in any way

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

Fuzzy_Munch

oh brother, just get the game for your system of choice and enjoy it!

20 vs 20ppl on psn and8 vs 8on xbl??? is that true????alberth123123

This would actually be a validpoint... had it only been true.. :)

20 vs 20ppl on psn and8 vs 8on xbl??? is that true????alberth123123

Both will be 16 players.

you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Ragashahs

why?does the game have dedicated servers for the PS3? if it does thats cool, if not then what the hell are you talking about?

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.Truth-slayer

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

WRONG! if its so damn great why did sony try to start this generation with the boomerang controller, of course until people started crying that it was ugly and whatnot, throws your whole hasn't changed in 2 generations excuse out the window. please, give us a break, you guys will defend your systems in such ways that its just annoying!

[QUOTE="ejstrup"]better only community?! There are far too many little kids with mics on xbox live, buddyFuzzy_Munch

There is a little thing called MUTE you can mute whoever you want.

I played the COD4 beta and it was mostly older gamers it's Hale that see the kiddies more. And Bungie fixed that with button for talk and MUTE feature.

Games like Ghost Recon, Rainbows, COD's are usually an older crowd, those are some serious games to play, and usually the younger crowd I play with in these type of games are on point, have a few kids on my friends list who play some damn good tactical games.

the Halo's, unreals, quakes usually have mixed ages in them, and even the older crowd act like complete jerks in these types of games.

anyway, the more Tactical a game is, the older the crowd.

[QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.OremLK

Or maybe it has something to do with the fact that Sony doesn't care enough about gaming to ever bother designing a new controller; the old one works, so why change it? They've always run the Playstation as a mere business.

This complaint of mine goes all the way back to the original Playstation, and it's why I've disliked Sony's consoles since they first started coming out with them. Sony isn't known for any first-party titles; Microsoft has Halo. Nintendo has... too many to mention, beginning with Mario and Zelda. Why is it that after all of this time Sony has never committed itself to any actual games? Why does it merely ride on the successes of its third-party developers?

Why would Sony shove a Blu-ray player into their console, driving its price up at the expense of its adoption by gamers? Is it, perhaps, because the PS3 is part of an overall business strategy, rather than being aimed as an actual system for gamers?

It all comes down to the fact that Sony is completely apathetic towards gaming. Of course they'll never bother designing a new controller, instead sticking with one that to this day is still a tweaked, over-buttoned rip-off of the original SNES controller. It's ugly, it's not particularly ergonomic, and it's confusing and unintuitive for newcomers. But what do they care?

Sony isnt known for any first party titles? Where have you been for the last twelve years? God of war? Gran Turismo? Socom?

Yes i know Sony themselves didnt make all of those games, but then microsoft didnt make halo either.#

As for the controller, i absolutely agree it is unituitive to use... if you're IQ is below 90. In case you didnt notice, it has almost the exact same layout as the 360 controller, aside from left analogue stick, and no, this does not make a world of a difference either.

The ONLY thing better about the 360 controller is the triggers, and while i do love them, i hardly notice while im playing. Case in point, i was playing cod3 on ps2 and rainbow six on 360, and while you're actually playing the game, the lack of tactile feedback/feeling/response from the ps2 controller wasn't even noticed.

EDIT: In response to original poster, cod4 will definitely be superior on the 360 due to the online community (size not quality). Eventhough i can still find games on killzone liberation on psp, a larger community means that a year down the road there will still be a significant amount of players online. Ive no doubt cod4 will do well on ps3 as well, but games like socom will very seriously damage the number of online players, as it was probably the most played online on ps2, and has a very dedicated fanbase.

the only reason 360 will have better version is coz of controller....six axis doesnt even get close to 360's controller

you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Ragashahs

2) The guy that said the PS3 was in 1080p left out the fact that the 360 version does as well, as reported by Kotaku.

(Ok, just found this at Kotaku.com,

"Infinity Ward, the team behind Call of Duty 2, is back in the saddle for the series' fourth installment. The game is cross-platform for the PS3 and the Xbox 360, and both versions will run at 1080p and 60 frames-per-second."

So it's a question of controllers (stick+ rumble prefference), and community (headsets + install base). 360 is the obvious choice from myperspective. Most of my friends are on Live.... so there's that too.

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
donalbane

2) The guy that said the PS3 was in 1080p left out the fact that the 360 version does as well, as reported by Kotaku.

(Ok, just found this at Kotaku.com,

"Infinity Ward, the team behind Call of Duty 2, is back in the saddle for the series' fourth installment. The game is cross-platform for the PS3 and the Xbox 360, and both versions will run at 1080p and 60 frames-per-second."

So it's a question of controllers (stick+ rumble prefference), and community (headsets + install base). 360 is the obvious choice from myperspective. Most of my friends are on Live.... so there's that too.

The 1080p doesn't impress me unless it's native. If COD4 runs at 60fps at native 1080p with those awesome graphics, I'll be amazed.

[QUOTE="donalbane"]

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Mordred19

2) The guy that said the PS3 was in 1080p left out the fact that the 360 version does as well, as reported by Kotaku.

(Ok, just found this at Kotaku.com,

"Infinity Ward, the team behind Call of Duty 2, is back in the saddle for the series' fourth installment. The game is cross-platform for the PS3 and the Xbox 360, and both versions will run at 1080p and 60 frames-per-second."

So it's a question of controllers (stick+ rumble prefference), and community (headsets + install base). 360 is the obvious choice from myperspective. Most of my friends are on Live.... so there's that too.

The 1080p doesn't impress me unless it's native. If COD4 runs at 60fps at native 1080p with those awesome graphics, I'll be amazed.

[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

[QUOTE="ejstrup"]better only community?! There are far too many little kids with mics on xbox live, buddyLEGEND_C4A

There is a little thing called MUTE you can mute whoever you want.

I played the COD4 beta and it was mostly older gamers it's Hale that see the kiddies more. And Bungie fixed that with button for talk and MUTE feature.

Games like Ghost Recon, Rainbows, COD's are usually an older crowd, those are some serious games to play, and usually the younger crowd I play with in these type of games are on point, have a few kids on my friends list who play some damn good tactical games.

the Halo's, unreals, quakes usually have mixed ages in them, and even the older crowd act like complete jerks in these types of games.

anyway, the more Tactical a game is, the older the crowd.

Yes exactly my point. In these kinds of games statigic team play with mics is ESSENTIAL for realtime fun and being good. On PSN you will mostly get people running round like a bunch of fools thinking they are playing QUAKE or UT. Perfect example there was a ton of complaints coming from COWS themselfs with RFOM and this is even not really a tactical game. Wait to the frustration level hits a alltime high on the COD4 PS3 forum about can you guys please get mics. So we can play this game properly.

[QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.LEGEND_C4A

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

WRONG! if its so damn great why did sony try to start this generation with the boomerang controller, of course until people started crying that it was ugly and whatnot, throws your whole hasn't changed in 2 generations excuse out the window. please, give us a break, you guys will defend your systems in such ways that its just annoying!

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.Truth-slayer

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

WRONG! if its so damn great why did sony try to start this generation with the boomerang controller, of course until people started crying that it was ugly and whatnot, throws your whole hasn't changed in 2 generations excuse out the window. please, give us a break, you guys will defend your systems in such ways that its just annoying!

that's not true..

the final xbox and 360 controller was the result of much focus group testing and re-design...

btw; racers are better using the 360 controller... proven...

[QUOTE="Truth-slayer"][QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.tango90101

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

WRONG! if its so damn great why did sony try to start this generation with the boomerang controller, of course until people started crying that it was ugly and whatnot, throws your whole hasn't changed in 2 generations excuse out the window. please, give us a break, you guys will defend your systems in such ways that its just annoying!

that's not true..

the final xbox and 360 controller was the result of much focus group testing and re-design...

btw; racers are better using the 360 controller... proven...

there was an article in NextGen and OXM that stated how they came up with the final design.... there were literally dozens of mockups that didn't make it....

"The Duke" was a very comfortable controller... just too big for the whiny kids....

But you need to play for XBL and those f*cking kids screaming all the time, I hate it when I play Gears. And sometimes it lags, but almost never... After all it will be the same. The controls aren't beter for XBOX360, the controller just lies better in your hand. So you could say the controller is better, not the controls itself.bluearmykid

You are WAY WRONG. the analog sticks on the 360 controller ar WAY smoother then PS3. you can aim and shoot way more precise with the 360 analogs. And the triggers on the 360 controller>>>PS3 controller. Hmm and well yes the 360 controller has a very smooth controlled rumble. Lets just hope the new rumble on PS3 will be as smooth and as controlled as the 360's is.

[QUOTE="Fuzzy_Munch"]

It's just that simple. 360 will have a much better online community as they always do with multiplat games.

And just about everyone will be uning mics and coordinating. Whereas PS3I guarantee there will be far less mics being used.

Hmm yeah this is a game that just says HEY canI have some RUMBLE please for my gun recoil and airstrike explosions and such.

Who knowsI believe both will look about the same. I think the 360 may have a slightly better AA for smoother graphics. But this is not that big of a deal. But the 2 othersI mentioned, Is and if you have a 360 AND A ps3 it'sA no brainer 360 VERSION ALL THE WAY.

mgs_freak91

eh how bout noooo!!!...firstly you cant really be sure their wont be any rumble for the ps3, because dualshock 3 controllers are on the way. so they would put somethin. (cause you wont really know untill somebody proves it!! and im sure its not you cause you got evidence, or atleast not stating it!) In the graphics department, its already been said that the ps3 has better graphics then the 360 version of the game!! and thats more proof then you have to state the opposite!, you cant say that the 360 will have better graphics because it has had it in the past, cause ps3 multiplat games have been better then ther 360 counterparts! And dude the mics, come on...from what ive heard, theirs a whole bunch of idiotic dickheads on XBL that are a bunch of racists. id rather avoid all that. and you never know more people then you think mite use mics for COD4!.

but if you want to go you way fine lets go!...which version of the game is gonna most likely have less lag...sumthin tells me its the ps3. its a no brainer, PS3 VERSION ALL THE.....GIT!!

[QUOTE="LEGEND_C4A"][QUOTE="Truth-slayer"]

[QUOTE="OremLK"]Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.Truth-slayer

THe PS3 will have dedicated servers so very little lag and less annoying 14 year olds using their mics. The PS3 wins.

WRONG! if its so damn great why did sony try to start this generation with the boomerang controller, of course until people started crying that it was ugly and whatnot, throws your whole hasn't changed in 2 generations excuse out the window. please, give us a break, you guys will defend your systems in such ways that its just annoying!

regardless if it was as great as some people say, they were going to change it. so the fact that they went back to it because people complained, you can't use the "its the best ever thats why its been around for 2 generations" excuse. I'm not saying the controller sucks, i'm just saying that excuse is not a good one.

Well, the 360 controller pretty much guarantees that any multiplatform will have better controls than its counterpart on the PS3.OremLK

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"]you better hope it also does't include that XBL lag that comes with nearly every game. and i thinks some guy already said PS3 version will look better.
Fuzzy_Munch

I'm sorry but i do not have any clue what lag you speak of and for that matter the rest of the cows who claim this. I have a good cable connection and i run smooth as butter always. And most of us on live do also. You must have that cheesy 768 grade dsl.

Anyway. Only times you get lag on live is if the game has bad netcode and thats just the developers fault. Live runs very smooth with a good cable connection. You speak on not truth and myths my good buddy.