Crysis will be on PS3 and Xbox360.

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

GermanShepard06

I'd like you to prove that, especially since my x1600 can run BF2.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="hamumu"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.GermanShepard06

Lair on ps3 is a good sign that ps3 has the resources and tools to make 512mb of ramlook like 2gigs on a PC.

Ram is hardly what good graphics result from. (Unless you are talking about video ram)

First off, it will never reach PC Crysis level graphics. It's impossible unless you use very long, and very time consuming (ie, it wouldn't have a playable fps rate) alternate.

Second, ram is mainly used to store data. Level data, AI memory, variables etc. Without a large amount of ram, the huge islands wouldn't work without reducing size (Whether it's textures, number of enemies, creating less areas to explore).

So don't count on either console running Crysis like you would on a PC.

well, i never said it will look just like the pc version that has aintel quad core and 8800gtx's in SLI. What i was saying was that it will hit that mark where its going to feel like Crysis. PS3 has that potential to reach that goal so does x360 but not as good, x360's cpu and dvd storage is going to cripple pretty much everything.

some quality ram

as for the gpu :lol:

those 75$ are faster and more space then any console and the gpu is more powerfull.

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

LOL, you really have no clue do you?

the x1950pro can run bf2 at higher resolution then your console.

And the 8800gts 320mb at 300$ runs over any console.

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="hamumu"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]GermanShepard06

some quality ram

as for the gpu :lol:

those 75$ are faster and more space then any console and the gpu is more powerfull.

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

the X1950pro is a pile of crap, an 8800GTS will out perform it hands down, and is about $260-280. you really dont know jack about hardware it seems. you dont need that much to run crysis, it isnt that expensive, please stop making threads, they just keep getting worse. i love my PS3, but i dont have delusions about what it can do. you live in a fantasy land it seems.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="hamumu"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Bebi_vegeta

Lair on ps3 is a good sign that ps3 has the resources and tools to make 512mb of ramlook like 2gigs on a PC.

Ram is hardly what good graphics result from. (Unless you are talking about video ram)

First off, it will never reach PC Crysis level graphics. It's impossible unless you use very long, and very time consuming (ie, it wouldn't have a playable fps rate) alternate.

Second, ram is mainly used to store data. Level data, AI memory, variables etc. Without a large amount of ram, the huge islands wouldn't work without reducing size (Whether it's textures, number of enemies, creating less areas to explore).

So don't count on either console running Crysis like you would on a PC.

well, i never said it will look just like the pc version that has aintel quad core and 8800gtx's in SLI. What i was saying was that it will hit that mark where its going to feel like Crysis. PS3 has that potential to reach that goal so does x360 but not as good, x360's cpu and dvd storage is going to cripple pretty much everything.

some quality ram

as for the gpu :lol:

those 75$ are faster and more space then any console and the gpu is more powerfull.

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

LOL, you really have no clue do you?

the x1950pro can run bf2 at higher resolution then your console.

And the 8800gts 320mb at 300$ runs over any console.

actually the 8800GTS is $250 now with the rebate.

You people are trying to get suspended? Whats with the giant quote pyramids?Bansheesdie

Here comes the party pooper...

mastershake575

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

sorry but i dont play my pc games at 640 x 480 res.

and btw have fun trying to run Crysis in dx10 mode with ur video card

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]

GermanShepard06

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

sorry but i dont play my pc games at 640 x 480 res.

and btw have fun trying to run Crysis in dx10 mode with ur video card

Crytek said that, that card would run the game on ultra high settings.....

and clearly they know more about PC hardware then you...(which isnt to hard)

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]

1: Your whole post=no.

2: Your sig....you havn't seen ANYTHING from killzone 2 but a crummy trailer. We've SEEN COD4. It looks great. Laughing at what the guy said makes no sense.

GermanShepard06

KZ2 is going to shock everyone and everything at E3, even the babes on the floor during E3 are going to be shocked.

shocked by how much it will be downgraded from the CGI trailer they showed u last year :lol: and u probably fell for that too

Here comes the party pooper...

Bebi_vegeta

Its your ass not mine, you do what you will.

[QUOTE="mastershake575"]

GermanShepard06

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

sorry but i dont play my pc games at 640 x 480 res.

and btw have fun trying to run Crysis in dx10 mode with ur video card

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"] Here comes the party pooper...

Bansheesdie

Its your ass not mine, you do what you will.

Why are you so uptight?

sorry but i dont play my pc games at 640 x 480 res.

and btw have fun trying to run Crysis in dx10 mode with ur video card

GermanShepard06

Why don't you just admit it already, you know nothing about pc.

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.GermanShepard06

Lair on ps3 is a good sign that ps3 has the resources and tools to make 512mb of ramlook like 2gigs on a PC.

Doesnt the PS3 have 256 mb of RAM?

[QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]You people are trying to get suspended? Whats with the giant quote pyramids?Bebi_vegeta

Here comes the party pooper...

would you rather get suspended?

Why are you so uptight?Bebi_vegeta

I didn't mean to come off like that. I thought you came to me with an "I don't care about being suspended" attitude.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="mastershake575"]

mastershake575

only the $400 dollar x1950pro is a better gpu, the model you listed cant even run BF2.

sorry but i dont play my pc games at 640 x 480 res.

and btw have fun trying to run Crysis in dx10 mode with ur video card

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

GermanShepard06

provide benchmarks, then.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Riki101

Lair on ps3 is a good sign that ps3 has the resources and tools to make 512mb of ramlook like 2gigs on a PC.

lair is a good sign of a flop

At least it will look great while flopping, please check this link to a preview and some new LAIR screenshots

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=166825

I'll buy crysis, 256MB XDR Main RAM @3.2GHz and 256MB GDDR3 VRAM @700MHz might help ps3 version look good

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Bansheesdie"]You people are trying to get suspended? Whats with the giant quote pyramids?-Sora

Here comes the party pooper...

would you rather get suspended?

Jesus why don't you send me to prison...

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]Why are you so uptight?Bansheesdie

I didn't mean to come off like that. I thought you came to me with an "I don't care about being suspended" attitude.

LOL, no... just this whole quoting system is messed up, and gamespot should be blamed for it.... not the users using the site that is faulthy....

in fact, I will provide benchmarks.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

Hewkii

provide benchmarks, then.

the $117 dollar 1950 gpu is the one with only 12pixel pipelines.

in fact, I will provide benchmarks.

Hewkii

thats not the 1950 vide card he was talking about, they come in many different models, the one he mentioned is the cheap one with only 12pixel pipelines.

HERE:

the cheap one that someone here mentioned is better than xenos and rsx: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102061

the expensive one and with good power: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814102096

[QUOTE="MGS9150"][QUOTE="albi321"]

[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]Ram issues make this improbable, but possible.GermanShepard06

/thread

exactly what I was going to say, this game requires 2 gigs of ram to play.

PC ram is different from console RAM, pcs have to run a s*** load of stuff in the background. And PS3 has uber uber fast VRAM 3.2GHz RAM. Also streaming textures and compression could make it possible with the 512mbs of RAM on current gen consoles.

only ps3 can stream textures and ps3 doesnt need to compress anything, it has enough space.

360 can do it, I mean gears of war did it but the disk fills up pretty quickly. Not to mention direct x is known for being horribly unefficient at managing RAM. PS3s blu ray disk and the fact that it uses Open GL will become great assets in the future.

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

GermanShepard06

provide benchmarks, then.

the $117 dollar 1950 gpu is the one with only 12pixel pipelines.

oh and also that card you listed is a dual x1950pro all the benchmarks that say x1950pro mean the same exact one im talking no dual ONEmastershake575

look at that pink-ish line near the top.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

mastershake575

provide benchmarks, then.

the $117 dollar 1950 gpu is the one with only 12pixel pipelines.

it will run crysis on max? man, now ur talking bs, it doesnt even support pixel shader 4 or dx10.

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]

1: Your whole post=no.

2: Your sig....you havn't seen ANYTHING from killzone 2 but a crummy trailer. We've SEEN COD4. It looks great. Laughing at what the guy said makes no sense.

GermanShepard06

KZ2 is going to shock everyone and everything at E3, even the babes on the floor during E3 are going to be shocked.

Can I please have your time machine?

[QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

GermanShepard06

provide benchmarks, then.

the $117 dollar 1950 gpu is the one with only 12pixel pipelines.

it will run crysis on max? man, now ur talking bs, it doesnt even support pixel shader 4 or dx10.

you can also play on dx9 mode.

[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]Ram issues make this improbable, but possible.albi321

/thread

exactly what I was going to say, this game requires 2 gigs of ram to play.

I agree with the fact that the game would have to be toned down a bit to play on consoles, the fact that it requires 2 gigs of ram on computer doesn'ttranslate toconsoles. Computers use up alot more ram than consoles due to operating systems and backround apps.

[QUOTE="albi321"]

[QUOTE="osirisomeomi"]Ram issues make this improbable, but possible.FonkeyMunky7

/thread

exactly what I was going to say, this game requires 2 gigs of ram to play.

I agree with the fact that the game would have to be toned down a bit to play on consoles, the fact that it requires 2 gigs of ram on computer doesn'ttranslate toconsoles. Computers use up alot more ram than consoles due to operating systems and backround apps.

Bf2 takes about 600-800mb of ram... now imagine crysis.

[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Danm_999"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

Danm_999

I read somewhere that with the PS3's RAM (I hate being so vague on a source), it can has general memory that can help support other tasks, but then it has specialized memory which cannot. Is that not less efficient than more RAM which can perform any task?

not sure i understand what you are saying here. i think you were trying to say that 512 of general purpose ram is somehow better. if that were the case, gaming PC's would be dominated by unified memory,and built in everything. meanwhile that is not the case. as you can guess video ram and system ram are different. they function differently.

there is no real purpose of being able to shuffle ram around when unified, cause it will serve no real purpose. you cant reduce system ram too low, nor can you reduce video ram too low cause both are needed. it becomes a fight of what needs ram. normally it cant even be changed on the fly, and has to be changed through bios on PC's, not sure on the 360, but chances are its the same way since it shares so much with normal PC structure.

unified ram is always done for cheapness, not for performance. i doubt either one in this case really affords much of a performance gain, but unified ram does not give any sort of edge, and from experience in it, its quite the opposite.

LMAO @ this thread. Crytek AND EA confirmed that Crysis as we know it will never se the light of day on consoles. Sure, a "dumbed down" port is physically possible, but it is NOT going to happen. It is heavily rumored that Crytek themselves are going to develop a seperate game using Cryengine 2 on the PS3. That seems to be a very, very solid possibility.

[QUOTE="mastershake575"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

you must be waiting 3 seconds for every other frame with those setting then. There is no way can make bf2 playable with that video card at 1600x1200, 4xaa, 16xaf and all setting set at High.

GermanShepard06

provide benchmarks, then.

the $117 dollar 1950 gpu is the one with only 12pixel pipelines.

it will run crysis on max? man, now ur talking bs, it doesnt even support pixel shader 4 or dx10.

Stop hype Crysis because Killzone will make it to be a shame.

[QUOTE="hamumu"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.GermanShepard06

Lair on ps3 is a good sign that ps3 has the resources and tools to make 512mb of ramlook like 2gigs on a PC.

Ram is hardly what good graphics result from. (Unless you are talking about video ram)

First off, it will never reach PC Crysis level graphics. It's impossible unless you use very long, and very time consuming (ie, it wouldn't have a playable fps rate) alternate.

Second, ram is mainly used to store data. Level data, AI memory, variables etc. Without a large amount of ram, the huge islands wouldn't work without reducing size (Whether it's textures, number of enemies, creating less areas to explore).

So don't count on either console running Crysis like you would on a PC.

well, i never said it will look just like the pc version that has aintel quad core and 8800gtx's in SLI. What i was saying was that it will hit that mark where its going to feel like Crysis. PS3 has that potential to reach that goal so does x360 but not as good, x360's cpu and dvd storage is going to cripple pretty much everything.

Stop hype Crysis because Killzone will make it to be a shame.

Macolele

You should go to school before playing games young cow.

[QUOTE="MADVLAD123"]

1: Your whole post=no.

2: Your sig....you havn't seen ANYTHING from killzone 2 but a crummy trailer. We've SEEN COD4. It looks great. Laughing at what the guy said makes no sense.

GermanShepard06

KZ2 is going to shock everyone and everything at E3, even the babes on the floor during E3 are going to be shocked.

self owned urself again. its been confirmed that no more booth babes :(

Pss...good luck playing crysis with the PS3 controller.turgore

ummm..where have you been living for the last couple months..did you not hear about the splitfish controller for ps3? sheesh...