This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]but i dont think that x360 is going to have enough storage space and processing power to match the PC version. PS3 will have enough resources to reach that specific point where it will feel like the godly PC version.
Discuss...
kman3002
link ?
how do you link a thought? he clearly stated he thinks. while he is clearly lacking in technical knowledge, this was a worthless boost of your thread count while adding nothing to the conversation. thanks for nothing
but i dont think that x360 is going to have enough storage space and processing power to match the PC version. PS3 will have enough resources to reach that specific point where it will feel like the godly PC version.
Discuss...
GermanShepard06
for the 500 billianth time NO IT WONT, the ps3 cant even touch my pc with a 5 mile stick, thats rite, im that high above your 'godstation' tsh, i make it look like a caveman
Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.eastside49er
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]but i dont think that x360 is going to have enough storage space and processing power to match the PC version. PS3 will have enough resources to reach that specific point where it will feel like the godly PC version.
Discuss...
shadow_hosi
for the 500 billianth time NO IT WONT, the ps3 cant even touch my pc with a 5 mile stick, thats rite, im that high above your 'godstation' tsh, i make it look like a caveman
I somehow doubt that but all hermits like to justify spending 3x more.
[QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Polaris_choice
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
1: Your whole post=no.
2: Your sig....you havn't seen ANYTHING from killzone 2 but a crummy trailer. We've SEEN COD4. It looks great. Laughing at what the guy said makes no sense.
MADVLAD123
Well put on both points. Crysis will be completely downgraded if it comes out on either platform, like DOOM 3 or Half-Life 2 on Xbox 1. And the downgrade would be equal for both (actually probably more drastic on PS3 if we go by all the evidence so far but I'll ignore that for the sake of the cows' dignity)
[QUOTE="kman3002"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]but i dont think that x360 is going to have enough storage space and processing power to match the PC version. PS3 will have enough resources to reach that specific point where it will feel like the godly PC version.
Discuss...
Gzus666
link ?
how do you link a thought? he clearly stated he thinks. while he is clearly lacking in technical knowledge, this was a worthless boost of your thread count while adding nothing to the conversation. thanks for nothing
This is how you link a thought:
LINK
why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.\
It will be a big game for PC dont get me wrong but for that reason they will port it over to x360 and ps3 to make really good money, i believe that is their plan anyway.
LMAO @ this thread. Crytek AND EA confirmed that Crysis as we know it will never se the light of day on consoles. Sure, a "dumbed down" port is physically possible, but it is NOT going to happen. It is heavily rumored that Crytek themselves are going to develop a seperate game using Cryengine 2 on the PS3. That seems to be a very, very solid possibility.
organic_machine
I love this because what hermits fail to realize if the consoels cant run it well then neitehr can any of yoru pc's you bought a year ago . Also EA never stated it wouldnt come to consoles and to be honest I dont want it coming to consoles. You know why? Because Crytek has never made a console game in there life. Id much rather them test the waters building a game from the ground rather then porting something made for pc's .
Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
im pretty sure MS is feeding them cash because this will be a cash cow for their Vista/DX10 crap. i doubt they give a damn. secondly, everybody and their brother will get this for PC if they can run it, which wont take that much.
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Gzus666
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis level visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into account every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built from the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Vandalvideo
Crysis is going to be a great game but sales r not going to be nowhere near that of Half-Life and HL2.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Vandalvideo
agreed, i have showed crysis to everyone i know, and they all just sit there slack jawed in awe of it. no one says anything bad about what they see for obvious reasons.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
Crysis is going to be a great game but sales r not going to be nowhere near that of Half-Life.
And you have absolutely no evidence to back up that claim. I however, do have evidence that Microsoft has stated the size of the PC gaming userbase. Theres a larger chance that Crysis will be able to sell a whole lot, than not.[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Vandalvideo
Crysis is going to be a great game but sales r not going to be nowhere near that of Half-Life.
And you have absolutely no evidence to back up that claim. I however, do have evidence that Microsoft has stated the size of the PC gaming userbase. Theres a larger change that Crysis will be able to sell a whole lot, than not.but only 000000000.3% are capable to run Crysis in its full glory, soo good luck.
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Vandalvideo
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Polaris_choice
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis levle visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into accoutn every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built fron the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
lol...COD4 doesnt even look close to crysis....and like COD2....will look better on the PC....especially since COD4 is a DX10 game.
1: Your whole post=no.
2: Your sig....you havn't seen ANYTHING from killzone 2 but a crummy trailer. We've SEEN COD4. It looks great. Laughing at what the guy said makes no sense.
MADVLAD123
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Polaris_choice
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
most of that cost is from the engine....which is being licenced to other Devs....oh and BTW....Nvidia, Intel, and MS are all funding Crytek....
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.cobrax25
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis levle visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into accoutn every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built fron the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
lol...COD4 doesnt even look close to crysis....and like COD2....will look better on the PC....especially since COD4 is a DX10 game.
Um yes it does we can do a screenshot comparison if you like. And unlike CO2 which was a pc port COD4 was built as the 360 version being the main SKU . And most pc's wont run it anywhere near as well as the 360 version. All pics you have seen so far are from the 360 version.
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown. Polaris_choiceYou also have to take into account the lower licensing fees and practically no royalties a system like the PC presents. Thats why games are still so cheap.
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
cobrax25
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
most of that cost is from the engine....which is being licenced to other Devs....oh and BTW....Nvidia, Intel, and MS are all funding Crytek....
AMD/ATI is soooo doomed.
but only 000000000.3% are capable to run Crysis in its full glory, soo good luck.GermanShepard06Congratulations on the most obvously fake statistic of all time. Prove it.
[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Polaris_choice
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis level visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into account every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built from the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
agreed about the space. clearly the PS3 has no problems there.COD4 is nowhere close to crysis visually
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/imgs_1.html
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/imgs_1.html
if you cant see a GIGANTIC difference in these games, you shouldnt be speaking about graphics, im being serious here, cause they are on different levels. i can pick the COD4 screens to pieces, even the obvious video pics are somewhat lacking compared to crysis gameplay pics.
just for grins, here is 2 gameplay pics
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/img_3577746.html
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/img_4512056.html
closest pic of gameplay i can find for COD4, similar grassy foliage type pic, crysis clearly destroys this
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown. VandalvideoYou also have to take into account the lower licensing fees and practically no royalties a system like the PC presents. Thats why games are still so cheap.
I know the development cost are cheaper overall there is no doubt of that( hence the reason it gets the most games) but Crytek is not your run of the mill cheap game. Hell the only game I even know annoucned with a budget as large as Crysis is KZ2.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Polaris_choice
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
its obvious now that its coming to x360 and ps3, im sure it wont come out right away, but a year down the road i will be playing Crysis on my Ps3 and my fellow lemms too, but im not so sure for the sheep.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
Crysis is going to be a great game but sales r not going to be nowhere near that of Half-Life.
And you have absolutely no evidence to back up that claim. I however, do have evidence that Microsoft has stated the size of the PC gaming userbase. Theres a larger change that Crysis will be able to sell a whole lot, than not.but only 000000000.3% are capable to run Crysis in its full glory, soo good luck.
So you syaing that 99% of pc gamers are poor, dont have jobs, on welfere ect?
[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Polaris_choice
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis levle visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into accoutn every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built fron the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
lol...COD4 doesnt even look close to crysis....and like COD2....will look better on the PC....especially since COD4 is a DX10 game.
Um yes it does we can do a screenshot comparison if you like. And unlike CO2 which was a pc port COD4 was built as the 360 version being the main SKU . And most pc's wont run it anywhere near as well as the 360 version. All pics you have seen so far are from the 360 version.
yes, go ahead and post comparison screenshots so we can all laugh at you.
COD2 was a PC port? really? thats news to me....
and virtually every console port still ends up looking better on the PC (Oblivion)
You also have to take into account the lower licensing fees and practically no royalties a system like the PC presents. Thats why games are still so cheap.[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown. Polaris_choice
I know the development cost are cheaper overall there is no doubt of that( hence the reason it gets the most games) but Crytek is not your run of the mill cheap game. Hell the only game I even know annoucned with a budget as large as Crysis is KZ2.
Then if its truly taking such an incredibly large ammount of money and they CANT POSSIBLY recoup their earnings.........why on earth is it still a low budget next gen title in compared to consoles? If they truly feared they couldn't pull a profit, they'd obviously highten the price. I think this shows they have a fair ammount of faith in their product.[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Gzus666
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis level visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into account every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built from the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
agreed about the space. clearly the PS3 has no problems there.COD4 is nowhere close to crysis visually
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/imgs_1.html
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/imgs_1.html
if you cant see a GIGANTIC difference in these games, you shouldnt be speaking about graphics, im being serious here, cause they are on different levels. i can pick the COD4 screens to pieces, even the obvious video pics are somewhat lacking compared to crysis gameplay pics.
just for grins, here is 2 gameplay pics
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/img_3577746.html
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/img_4512056.html
closest pic of gameplay i can find for COD4, similar grassy foliage type pic, crysis clearly destroys this
You didnt even link your pics but what you fail to realize is Crysis jungles scenes look far better then the rest of the game. The Char models in COD4 look everybit as good as Crysis. That horrible pic you show of the grass does not do the game justice at all I downloaed the HD trailer on my 360 and it looks far superior. COD4 is one of the most technically impressive games visually out there if you cant admit that then you shouldnt be talking about visuals. And stop acting like Crysis is the average pc game its the exception not the rule. There is no otherpc exclusivegame coming out that even looks close to Crysis
[QUOTE="cobrax25"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
most of that cost is from the engine....which is being licenced to other Devs....oh and BTW....Nvidia, Intel, and MS are all funding Crytek....
AMD/ATI is soooo doomed.
lol...once again you have shown everyone you have no clue what you are talking about....Nvidia's logo is on every other PC games....yet they work fine with ATI cards...
its obvious now that its coming to x360 and ps3, im sure it wont come out right away, but a year down the road i will be playing Crysis on my Ps3 and my fellow lemms too, but im not so sure for the sheep.GermanShepard06Not thats mere conjecture based off the misconception that PC gamers don't have rigs capable of running Crysis, or that are interetested in Crysis.
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
GermanShepard06
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
its obvious now that its coming to x360 and ps3, im sure it wont right away, but a year down the road i will be playing Crysis on my Ps3 and my fellow lemms too, but im not so sure for the sheep.
The aver PC gamer who plays Crysis will have 2Gig ram (-200MB for Windows) + 512MB video Ram, enjoy you stripid down version for consoles farty little 512MB.
[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Crysis is a RAM taxing game which is why I doubt it will ever see the light of day on either console and if it does, they will be dupped down.Polaris_choice
Except consoles use ram much better then any pc. Not to mention they are already coming out with technologies to store high amounts of textures on smaller amounts of Ram( John Carmack is showing it off at this years E3) A high end version of Crysis is completely possible on both consoles.
keep that dream alive. only thing carmack has shown so far is supertextures, which take massive amounts of hard drive space.
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis level visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into account every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built from the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
agreed about the space. clearly the PS3 has no problems there.COD4 is nowhere close to crysis visually
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/imgs_1.html
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/imgs_1.html
if you cant see a GIGANTIC difference in these games, you shouldnt be speaking about graphics, im being serious here, cause they are on different levels. i can pick the COD4 screens to pieces, even the obvious video pics are somewhat lacking compared to crysis gameplay pics.
just for grins, here is 2 gameplay pics
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/img_3577746.html
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/img_4512056.html
closest pic of gameplay i can find for COD4, similar grassy foliage type pic, crysis clearly destroys this
You didnt even link your pics but what you fail to realize is Crysis jungles scenes look far better thent the rest ofthe game. The Char models in COD4 look everybit as good as Crysis. That horrible pic you show of the grass does not do the game justice at all I downloaed the HD trailer on my 360 and it looks far superior. COD4 is amont one of the most technically impressive games visually out there if you cant admit that then you shouldnt be talking about visuals.
Not even the best COD4 picture looks comparible to Crysis....
[QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Gzus666"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="eastside49er"]Polaris_choice
I dont need to keep the dream alive. COD4 is already on Crysis level visuals and every video shown so far is from the 360 version. Now take into account every dev under the sun says if programed for correctly the PS3 is more capable then the 360 . To say that if a game built from the ground up couldnt run on a console is absolutely ridiculous. As for the hardrive space the PS3 has plenty that too.
agreed about the space. clearly the PS3 has no problems there.COD4 is nowhere close to crysis visually
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/imgs_1.html
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/imgs_1.html
if you cant see a GIGANTIC difference in these games, you shouldnt be speaking about graphics, im being serious here, cause they are on different levels. i can pick the COD4 screens to pieces, even the obvious video pics are somewhat lacking compared to crysis gameplay pics.
just for grins, here is 2 gameplay pics
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/img_3577746.html
http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/902/902590/img_4512056.html
closest pic of gameplay i can find for COD4, similar grassy foliage type pic, crysis clearly destroys this
You didnt even link your pics but what you fail to realize is Crysis jungles scenes look far better thent the rest ofthe game. The Char models in COD4 look everybit as good as Crysis. That horrible pic you show of the grass does not do the game justice at all I downloaed the HD trailer on my 360 and it looks far superior. COD4 is amont one of the most technically impressive games visually out there if you cant admit that then you shouldnt be talking about visuals.
far superior to the small little box video on gametrailers, at what, 680 or so pixels. wow, i wonder why the native 720 or 1080 image is so much better. crysis is regarded as a technical marvel, COD4 is a fart in the wind, and no one cares
oh, and are you seriously too lazy to copy and paste a link? it takes 2 seconds. some people blow my mind
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Marka1700
Crysis is going to be a great game but sales r not going to be nowhere near that of Half-Life.
And you have absolutely no evidence to back up that claim. I however, do have evidence that Microsoft has stated the size of the PC gaming userbase. Theres a larger change that Crysis will be able to sell a whole lot, than not.but only 000000000.3% are capable to run Crysis in its full glory, soo good luck.
So you syaing that 99% of pc gamers are poor, dont have jobs, on welfere ect?
99% of pc gamers own8800gtx sli, 4gigs, dual/quad cores?
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]Except that development costs are relatively low on PCs, and that Crysis has been optimized to play on as many PCs as humanly possible. As Microsoft stated, "There are over 200 million PC gaming customers out there". We have by far the largest userbase. Some games like Half-Life one sold incredibly well, and are one of the bset selling games of all time. Its a matter of attaining widespread word of mouth. I think its almost achieved that.why r hermits acting like Crysis is going to sell like crazy? it wont, they are going to have to put this game on ps3 and x360 to get their money back and make profit.
Marka1700
Um not on Crysis its development cost alone cost 25million dollars making it among the most expensive games of all time.( Yes those visuals come at a cost) thats not even counting marketing. And 200 million users? Um id hate to tell you but not even 10 million will be able to run Crysis at settings that look anything remotely close to the videos that have been shown.
its obvious now that its coming to x360 and ps3, im sure it wont right away, but a year down the road i will be playing Crysis on my Ps3 and my fellow lemms too, but im not so sure for the sheep.
The aver PC gamer who plays Crysis will have 2Gig ram (-200MB for Windows) + 512MB video Ram, enjoy you stripid down version for consoles farty little 512MB.
Then that wont even make up for 1% of the pc community . lmao and I dont want Crysis on my console ill just get it on my pc as I play certain games on my consoel that will never come to pc( thats why I own it not for pc ports) however for argumetn sakes to say no console can handle it is ridiculous.
99% of pc gamers own8800gtx sli, 4gigs, dual/quad cores? GermanShepard06Way to completely overstate the system requirements? Its been stated that one 8800, 2 gigs of ram, and a e6600 will be enough to run it in ultra fidelity.
hey people, look lets not go that far and say that Crysis is going to look as good as the godly pc with 8800gtx sli but it can still look great on x360 and ps3.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment