Haha a cheap mans God of War :roll: :lol:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I love how people sit here and attack GS's reviewers... as though they know what they are talking about.
The GoW comparisons in the GS review are minimal.[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Nice. Mention it once, then.
The entire review had me thinking I clicked on a GoW review, then I saw the score and noticed this is indeed DI.
Review the damn game in front of you. I don't want to hear about this or that. Let's bring up Doom every single time we review a modern day FPS, too. Heck, let's bring it up ten times in a single video review.
God, I felt like pulling my eardrums out down through my backside. This is amongst the worst review I've watched.
Yes, it's a clone. Yes, it's not on GoW's level. Yes, it's not as good as it should have been. But geez louise, cool it and review this game for what it is. Don't repeat the same **** over and over again.
No disrespect to the reviewer, as I usually tend to like his reviews, but this isn't the top notch material I'm used to from you.
IronBass
they really were.
although things do tend to get blown out of porportion when you are upset about a game flopping.
Just finished reading and watching the video review. I don't think the God of War mentions went overboard. I think the reviewer judged the game on itself fair enough but it's hard not to make the comparison to God of War when it borrows so heavily from it. Not in a flattering way it seems. I don't know, I didn't have fun with the demo and probably won't pick Dante's Inferno up for awhile or at all.
What does this mean for God of War, when a game that plays almost exactly like it gets such a score. themyth01You realize that DI may have not had better production values then GOW? Do you think that the mention of the last third of the game being a bit of a chore a problem? Do you think a copy paste job could be better than the original?
What does this mean for God of War, when a game that plays almost exactly like it gets such a score. themyth01It means that Dante's Inferno isn't what it could have been. According to the review, it showed promise early on, but dissolved into a chain of derivative and uninspired designs.
Tom McShea is on a flopping spree! Keep him away from GOW3 Kevin!Episode_Eve
I've incurred quite the wrath this week, eh? What can I say, White Knight and Dante's both had serious issues. I had fun with both games, but they aren't ultimately "good" games and could not recommend them to the majority of players. I'm crossing my fingers for something better next week!
Sweet! Velvet Assassin smoked Dante's Inferno!BioShockOwnz
I may be the biggest fan of Velvet Assassin in the world, and I'm darn proud of that!
I wonder if they will say negative things about God of War 3 if it doesn't do anything different from the previous two games. I still think they will give GoW3 a 9.5. I wanted an alternative for GoW but I guess DI isn't going to cut it.gago-gago
God of War III will be held to the same standard. God of War II is one of the finest games I have ever played, but it's a three-year-old PS2 game. If GoWIII doesn't make a sizable leap, you can be sure our review will point that out.
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]I beat you, more than 10k post and back from the dead :OAnimal-Mother
I beat you both and I've only been here for about a year and a half. 8)
Have you come back from the dead? No. I am immortal.What does this mean for God of War, when a game that plays almost exactly like it gets such a score. themyth01It means the developers of Dante's Inferno could copy paste the look, and the combat, but couldn't copy the superb skill with which Santa Monica actually executes it all.
[QUOTE="Kevin-V"][QUOTE="Panosola"]A game that shamelessly copies another invites itself to be compared. Our job is to put a game in context, and making comparisons to the game Dante's Inferno essentially copies is a perfectly valid action. But the comparisons to GoW aren't nearly as plentiful as you would have us think ;). I notice, however, that you didn't link to, say, 1UP's review, or IGN's. Is that because they don't support your claim, while the Digital Chumps review does? I can pick a non-GameSpot review and make it support my opinion too! I agree.....but even and IGN have gave 7,5.I don't say that it is a perfect game or better than God of War games but a 6,5 it is not a fair score...i mean there is a lot worst games out and DI it is worth at least a 7~8 score.....and because it just copy copy from God of War that it is not mean that it is not a good game.You don't seem to understand. It's a God of War clone that misses a lot of the things that make God of War so damn good. P.S. Where in the hell is BioShockOwnz!? I want him to see this and burn for ever saying this would be the better game! :PI don't think it is a fair review for DI.You don't review a game comparing another game.........god of War this...god of War that and that.The game is good and it is worth 8~8,5.DI have get 8.8 from Digital Chumps......i have see many gameplay videos for this game and i don't think 6,5 it is a fair score for DI.
http://www.digitalchumps.com/game-reviews/34-360/4503-dantes-inferno.html
Panosola
[QUOTE="Panosola"][QUOTE="Kevin-V"] A game that shamelessly copies another invites itself to be compared. Our job is to put a game in context, and making comparisons to the game Dante's Inferno essentially copies is a perfectly valid action. But the comparisons to GoW aren't nearly as plentiful as you would have us think ;). I notice, however, that you didn't link to, say, 1UP's review, or IGN's. Is that because they don't support your claim, while the Digital Chumps review does? I can pick a non-GameSpot review and make it support my opinion too!NAPK1NSI agree.....but even and IGN have gave 7,5.I don't say that it is a perfect game or better than God of War games but a 6,5 it is not a fair score...i mean there is a lot worst games out and DI it is worth at least a 7~8 score.....and because it just copy copy from God of War that it is not mean that it is not a good game.You don't seem to understand. It's a God of War clone that misses a lot of the things that make God of War so damn good. P.S. Where in the hell is BioShockOwnz!? I want him to see this and burn for ever saying this would be the better game! :P Honestly first demons souls now this LMAO i think its pretty evident that if you blatantly copy a game you will lose lots of points for innovation.. Of course the lems will love it but what do you gain from that.
I knew this game was gonnoa blow, the demo was horrible and a rip off of GOW and wasnt even that good of a rip off at that.
I wasnt fond of the graphics either,, Ill just stick to bayonetta and GOW for my two action games.,
It's a 95% rip off of GoW, and it screws up a classic piece of literature. 6.5 sounds about right.Parasomniachaha great post.
The GoW comparisons in the GS review are minimal.yea, there wasnt alot of gow refrences:| ... and he did review the game for what it is bioshock.. he reviewed it as not a good game worth the money... so much for a gow killer huh?[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Nice. Mention it once, then.
The entire review had me thinking I clicked on a GoW review, then I saw the score and noticed this is indeed DI.
Review the damn game in front of you. I don't want to hear about this or that. Let's bring up Doom every single time we review a modern day FPS, too. Heck, let's bring it up ten times in a single video review.
God, I felt like pulling my eardrums out down through my backside. This is amongst the worst review I've watched.
Yes, it's a clone. Yes, it's not on GoW's level. Yes, it's not as good as it should have been. But geez louise, cool it and review this game for what it is. Don't repeat the same **** over and over again.
No disrespect to the reviewer, as I usually tend to like his reviews, but this isn't the top notch material I'm used to from you.
IronBass
Personally I would give this game a 7.0 from the gameplay I saw on the demo, but then I would dock it 0.5 for being a shameless GoW rip-off that doesn't even rip it off correctly, so the score is about right :PMaybe here the game have score 6,5 but the game have get many good reviews on metacritic.I don't think a 6,5 it is a fair score for this game.....there is a lot worst games out.DI at least worth a 7,5~8.
Panosola
I like how people were like 'omg this game looks SO AWESOME' before and now they're like 'haha omg told u so lololol'.
:|
system wars...sigh.
Games have to bring their A game in 2010. The standards are high.there is something seriously wrong with 2010 ............ i expected 7 or 7.5 ............... flop after a flop, may be i need to have a break from the forum.
2mrw
Also I love how they take off points from DI for "repetitive combat" even though its basically the same as God of War's. Juggernaut140Now I havent played the full DI game, but im assuming the bad guys all die by being hit the same way? Maybe there isn't any need to experiment with different combos and the same cookie-cutter combo can serve you the whole way through. That's what I'm assuming the "repetitive combat" con is from.
Yeah they're not too far off. Been playing it for some time now and it is underwhelming. The movepool is limited to only a few attacks (well the beginning anyway), enemies are recycled too much, boss fights are really mediocre, not much replay value and it from what I've heard it's short. Really short.
And believe it or not, they actually advertised the future DLC in the game. Like it's even in the main menu. It just shows how lazy and greedy EA is starting to become.
GOW3 killer? Absolutely not.
I was hyped for this until I played the demo and then I was hoping the demo was just unfinished and unpolished. I guess the game is just not that good. I'll still pick it up when it's 20$.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment