DICE: Console gamers have no idea How pc is capable of

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hashim19
Hashim19

1324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Hashim19
Member since 2007 • 1324 Posts

Some 'Console gamers have really no idea' on what a modern PC is capable of according to DICE

Whole story with comparsion of Pc Vs Ps3 battlefield 3 onhttp://goo.gl/xJbeA


Same goes with many pc games which looks far better on Pc than any console versions

So some of the ps3 gamers dont like the fact that battlefield3 looks better on pc and making some points on twitter to johan.

I think Johan makes a pretty valid point. I think console gamers need to realize that the PS3 is almost 5 years old and the 360 will be completing its sixth year soon. But then too, the game is looking pretty damn awesome on the PlayStation 3.


Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

They're right. My friends are all console only gamers and constantly trash on PC whenever I mention it. There's only like one or two that realize and admit that PC games look better than console games(yes, I know I hang out with idiots) People who haven't played on a modern PC don't have any indication of what a PC can do.

Avatar image for Super__FLY
Super__FLY

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Super__FLY
Member since 2011 • 118 Posts
PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
typing crysis in youtube would easily teach these people
Avatar image for NoodleFighter
NoodleFighter

11897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NoodleFighter
Member since 2011 • 11897 Posts

Hehe I guess PS3 gamers thought that "The Cell" instantly makes their outdated system a super computer.

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
typing crysis in youtube would easily teach these peoplecampzor
Looking at the average Youtube comment might reduce your faith.
Avatar image for Hashim19
Hashim19

1324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 Hashim19
Member since 2007 • 1324 Posts
PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.Super__FLY
Its not like you have to upgrade pc every year .. even 3 years old card can do alot better :)
Avatar image for NiteLights
NiteLights

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 NiteLights
Member since 2010 • 1181 Posts

Well, they are right. Not hating on consoles, but it's just a fact.

Avatar image for Super__FLY
Super__FLY

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Super__FLY
Member since 2011 • 118 Posts
[QUOTE="Super__FLY"]PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.Hashim19
Its not like you have to upgrade pc every year .. even 3 years old card can do alot better :)

I dont care for graphics so why do I need a gaming PC? thats all PC gaming is good for Graphics...Well thats the ONLY thing hermits talk about...OMG look at Crysis on max settings...BF3 PC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BF3 PS3 graphics lol uMAD? :roll:
Avatar image for Hashim19
Hashim19

1324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Hashim19
Member since 2007 • 1324 Posts

Well, they are right. Not hating on consoles, but it's just a fact.

NiteLights
Console gamers have to face the fact and also they should be happy beacuase Battlfield 3 looks amazing on Ps3
Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts
Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard.
Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

All of my firneds know the PC is better.... either they dont care for it, or cant afford it.

Avatar image for Hashim19
Hashim19

1324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Hashim19
Member since 2007 • 1324 Posts
Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. xhawk27
what ? 140 dollars mid range video card is more expense than console ?
Avatar image for NiteLights
NiteLights

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 NiteLights
Member since 2010 • 1181 Posts

[QUOTE="NiteLights"]

Well, they are right. Not hating on consoles, but it's just a fact.

Hashim19

Console gamers have to face the fact and also they should be happy beacuase Battlfield 3 looks amazing on Ps3

Does look pretty good, but it does look better on PC. It's just something consoles can't win, because they can't update they're hardware every once in a while, like PC's can. Not hating at all btw.

Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

I would play the PC version for the improved (and higher) framerate. Nicer graphics is just a bonus. Starting point would not be how great I can make it look, but how great I can make it play. Then adjust the graphic settings from then on while trying to maintain the same perceivable performance. Yes, PCs aren't just toys, so they should be able to handle games well beyond what we've up to this point.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. xhawk27

What? And what?

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#17 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
typing crysis in youtube would easily teach these peoplecampzor
Crysis can't be conveyed in sub-60 fps videos with poor encoding.
Avatar image for Afrikanxl
Afrikanxl

1112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Afrikanxl
Member since 2006 • 1112 Posts

who are the "some gamers" who complained about the PS3 version to the DICE dev?

from the article linked, it seems like some other fanboy was complaining about "PS3 owners *complaining* about the footage".

I don't think many were disappointed, especially after watching the HD footage of the stage demo.

I think some random fanboy was stealth trolling with that tweet, and it worked.

"dont u love how PS3 fluffers dont really understand game design?I love their comments on the ps3 footage thinking it can be = pc"

I mean "PS3 fluffers"? Don't know why the DICE dev responed to that tweet.

Avatar image for Hashim19
Hashim19

1324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 Hashim19
Member since 2007 • 1324 Posts

who are the "some gamers" who complained about the PS3 version to the DICE dev?

from the article linked, it seems like some other fanboy was complaining about "PS3 owners *complaining* about the footage".

I don't think many were disappointed, especially after watching the HD footage of the stage demo.

I think some random fanboy was stealth trolling with that tweet, and it worked.

"dont u love how PS3 fluffers dont really understand game design?I love their comments on the ps3 footage thinking it can be = pc"

I mean "PS3 fluffers"? Don't know why the DICE dev responed to that tweet.

Afrikanxl
May be dice dev is excited lawl
Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

While I was snuggled up in bed the other morning playing Persona 3, controller underneath the blanket so my fingers didn't freeze (it's winter here), I experienced one of the many perks of console gaming. There are more important things to my gaming experience than pretty colours & flashes.

So, sorry PC, no DICE (;)). I guess I'm just an 'idiot console peasant'.

Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#21 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
Well, good for you Dice. Too bad graphics isn't everything, huh? I'd rather play an out dated looking game like Deadly Premonition with great characters and personality, than another generic military shooter.
Avatar image for PcGamingRig
PcGamingRig

7386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 PcGamingRig
Member since 2009 • 7386 Posts

Well, good for you Dice. Too bad graphics isn't everything, huh? I'd rather play an out dated looking game like Deadly Premonition with great characters and personality, than another generic military shooter.001011000101101
it's not just graphics though... gameplay can be way more advanced on pc too.

Avatar image for TehFuneral
TehFuneral

8237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 TehFuneral
Member since 2007 • 8237 Posts

Console gamers do realize that PC graphics are way better, but theycomfort themselves by stating the fact that they don't have to spend much money on upgrading every now and then.

It a win-win situation.

Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#24 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts

How so? Because of the mouse and keyboard controls, or because of the extra processing power? I'm not being a smartass, I'm actually curious.

edit: it was a reply to PcGamingRig's post.

Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts

While I was snuggled up in bed the other morning playing Persona 3, controller underneath the blanket so my fingers didn't freeze (it's winter here), I experienced one of the many perks of console gaming. There are more important things to my gaming experience than pretty colours & flashes.

So, sorry PC, no DICE (;)). I guess I'm just an 'idiot console peasant'.

Twin-Blade
You can play games on PC with a controllers too.And you also get more choice.You can use any controller you want.
Avatar image for call_of_duty_10
call_of_duty_10

4954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 call_of_duty_10
Member since 2009 • 4954 Posts
Well, good for you Dice. Too bad graphics isn't everything, huh? I'd rather play an out dated looking game like Deadly Premonition with great characters and personality, than another generic military shooter.001011000101101
Yep,graphics aren't everything. That's why BF3 on PC is even better than console versions.64 players with bigger maps=more fun.
Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

If you need more proof just go read comments on a BF3 PS3 gameplay YouTube video.

Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="Hashim19"][QUOTE="Super__FLY"]PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.Super__FLY
Its not like you have to upgrade pc every year .. even 3 years old card can do alot better :)

I dont care for graphics so why do I need a gaming PC? thats all PC gaming is good for Graphics...Well thats the ONLY thing hermits talk about...OMG look at Crysis on max settings...BF3 PC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BF3 PS3 graphics lol uMAD? :roll:

You know nothing about PC gaming. You prove the point of the article.

Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

Console gamers do realize that PC graphics are way better, but theycomfort themselves by stating the fact that they don't have to spend much money on upgrading every now and then.

It a win-win situation.

TehFuneral

I have a gaming rig, but I only ever use it for MMOs, which I don't play anymore due to time constraints, and RTS, which I don't play much anymore either. I haven't bought Witcher 2 because I'm waiting for the 360 release. I'll be buying Skyrim on the 360 & haven't even considered buying it for my PC (I played modded Morrowind back in the day, so I know the possibilities). I probably won't even be buying BF3, but if I do it will be on the 360 also. I just find it a lot more simple, comfortable & easier to manage.

I also have a bunch of friends to play/speak with on XBL. Also, Demon's Souls, Red Dead Redemption, Gears of War 3, Halo Reach, Uncharted, Last Guardian, Team ICO Collection.. I just don't get why PC gamers talk as if playing on a console instead of a PC is insane..

Avatar image for x-2tha-z
x-2tha-z

8994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#30 x-2tha-z
Member since 2003 • 8994 Posts
PC games look better than console games, but in most cases the difference isn't very big. If you look at how much more powerful new PC hardware is to consoles that are now almost five and six years old, PC games really should look a lot better. Is the slight graphical improvement worth all the money it costs for a powerful gaming PC? I'd say no, it isn't. If I could go back to June 2009 and stop myself from spending all that money on a gaming PC, I would. I bought a PC because I was always hearing how much better everything was on PC. It's better, but the difference isn't big enough. I think most PC gamers exaggerate how good these games look on PC. The difference between console and PC, this late into the console generation, should be as big as the difference between PS2 and PS3, but sadly, it isn't.
Avatar image for deactivated-635525971e920
deactivated-635525971e920

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-635525971e920
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts

Console gamers do realize that PC graphics are way better, but theycomfort themselves by stating the fact that they don't have to spend much money on upgrading every now and then.

It a win-win situation.

TehFuneral

With more and more games going multiplat these days, system requirements are relatively low. Games are made with the lowest common denominator in mind, usually the PS3/360 (in some cases even the Wii), making the PC versions less taxing on the hardware, assuming the port is somewhat decent.

That's why there are three year old cards that still have little to no problems running today's games at high settings at 1920x1080.

PC gaming won't leave you stone-broke if you're only after a visual experience superior to that of consoles.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. Phoenix534

What? And what?

A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card. I meant to say High - mid not mid - high.
Avatar image for LazyMushroom
LazyMushroom

914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LazyMushroom
Member since 2011 • 914 Posts

This is probably right. If you think about it, the vast majority of console gamers are so called 'casual' gamers and therefore will not know much about PC gaming and it's potential.

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts
[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. xhawk27

What? And what?

A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card.

Well, if you go by release date then those cards are low end. Either way, for $100 you will be playing games at higher than console settings and FPS.
Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts
[QUOTE="x-2tha-z"]PC games look better than console games, but in most cases the difference isn't very big. If you look at how much more powerful new PC hardware is to consoles that are now almost five and six years old, PC games really should look a lot better. Is the slight graphical improvement worth all the money it costs for a powerful gaming PC? I'd say no, it isn't. If I could go back to June 2009 and stop myself from spending all that money on a gaming PC, I would. I bought a PC because I was always hearing how much better everything was on PC. It's better, but the difference isn't big enough. I think most PC games exaggerate how good these games look on PC. The difference between console and PC this late into the console generation should be as big as the difference between PS2 and PS3, but sadly, it isn't.

Crysis, Metro and The Witcher 2 are both a gen ahead and the difference that 1080p+, AA and x16 Aniso makes even to crappy ports still makes current consoles look primitive. Personally I would have not purchased any consoles this gen if I had to choose, I've had fun with them but wasted a lot of money on bloated game prices and add ons.
Avatar image for 001011000101101
001011000101101

4395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 337

User Lists: 0

#36 001011000101101
Member since 2008 • 4395 Posts
I just like the idea of buying a game and then go home and play it. I used to be a PC gamer, but I got fed up with all the errors, drivers, hardware problems etc. I play videogames to relax and and have fun after a long day at work. I don't want to fiddle around with all these unnecessary things, just to be able to play my games. Sorry, but it sucks.
Avatar image for deactivated-635525971e920
deactivated-635525971e920

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 deactivated-635525971e920
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts

A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card. xhawk27

And it's also alot more powerful than the 360/PS3, even combined. You get what you pay for.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. xhawk27

What? And what?

A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card. I meant to say High - mid not mid - high.

The 570 is a top of the line card. It can easily max out every game out there and then some. And you don't need a 570 GTX or an HD 6970 to get the most out of PCs. Those are great cards and work well, but a GTX 260 or 5830 can still handle new releases very well well.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card. the_delta

And it's also alot more powerful than the 360/PS3, even combined. You get what you pay for.

I don't know the 360/PS3 combined could make a really great looking game. :D Yeah but it's not only the videocard you need a high power CPU, lots of Ram, etc. I have a 260GTX and I know I am not going to be able to run BF3 at 1080p @ 60 fps.
Avatar image for GlobalLaming
GlobalLaming

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 GlobalLaming
Member since 2011 • 63 Posts

More and more DICE are sounding like the Elitist PC gamers that you'd find in this thread. All systems are good people.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

More and more DICE are sounding like the Elitist PC gamers that you'd find in this thread. All systems are good people.

GlobalLaming

With that attitude how do they expect to beat cod which gets most sales on consoles? ha

Avatar image for aGOODdude
aGOODdude

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 aGOODdude
Member since 2010 • 444 Posts

I think he is wrong. Most console gamers do realize that a high end PC is a semi generation ahead in technology...

Unfortunately for him, I don't think he has any idea how much console gamers don't care aboutthe PC...

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts

How so? Because of the mouse and keyboard controls, or because of the extra processing power? I'm not being a smartass, I'm actually curious.

edit: it was a reply to PcGamingRig's post.

001011000101101
Both really. Although It comes down to the developers in the end, it is the same way a 360 offers more possibilities than a SNES. While the gap isn't that big of course, in a game like Arma 2 it allows massive battles, that just couldn't be done on consoles. More advanced hardware is always a good thing, just because it allow more possibilities, but of course no amount of power can save a crappy dev or game. The PC has by far the widest range of control options not just mouse and keyboard but a wide range of controllers, racing wheels, flight stick, fighter stick, motion controls like the wiimote etc. All these are either supported nativity or can be supported via a patch or program made by the community. So PC offers more possibilities other than graphics but it comes down to what the devs manage to come up with.
Avatar image for deactivated-635525971e920
deactivated-635525971e920

429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-635525971e920
Member since 2009 • 429 Posts

I have a 260GTX and I know I am not going to be able to run BF3 at 1080p @ 60 fps. xhawk27

Probably not, but that isn't really saying much in this context, considering consoles will not even run it at half that. At the very least, you'll get a better experience than you would on consoles.

The consoles will struggle to maintain 30 frames per second at 720p in this game and many others. Your GTX 260 should, and probably will easily top that.

Avatar image for APiranhaAteMyVa
APiranhaAteMyVa

4160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 APiranhaAteMyVa
Member since 2011 • 4160 Posts

More and more DICE are sounding like the Elitist PC gamers that you'd find in this thread. All systems are good people.

GlobalLaming
They aren't being elitist just addressing unrealistic expectations. It is undeniable that a current PC is more powerful than a console, so anyone expecting the PS3 or 360 to look the same is delusional. I don't think they are saying any system is bad, otherwise they wouldn't be making a game on the 360 or PS3.
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

I think he is wrong. Most console gamers do realize that a high end PC is a semi generation ahead in technology...

Unfortunately for him, I don't think he has any idea how much console gamers don't care aboutthe PC...

aGOODdude

Radeon HD 2900 and Geforce 8800 GT is already generation ahead of console GPUs.

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

I think he is wrong. Most console gamers do realize that a high end PC is a semi generation ahead in technology...

Unfortunately for him, I don't think he has any idea how much console gamers don't care aboutthe PC...

aGOODdude
Semi-generation? Sir... no. It's next gen in terms of technology, we just don't get games yet to squeeze out the capability of the tech.
Avatar image for edinsftw
edinsftw

4243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 edinsftw
Member since 2009 • 4243 Posts

The best part about the pc version...no blood screen effects...i hate those so much.

Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="the_delta"]

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]A 570GTX isn't top of the line but it's more than $300. It's a high -mid range card. xhawk27

And it's also alot more powerful than the 360/PS3, even combined. You get what you pay for.

I don't know the 360/PS3 combined could make a really great looking game. :D Yeah but it's not only the videocard you need a high power CPU, lots of Ram, etc. I have a 260GTX and I know I am not going to be able to run BF3 at 1080p @ 60 fps.

Not at max no. But at medium-high(probably closer to medium) you could. BF3 is going to be pretty well optimized. And you don't need to spend a lot more money on a CPU or RAM either. You can get a could 4GB for less than $50 and an AMD Phenom II X4 for around $110.

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"][QUOTE="the_delta"]

And it's also alot more powerful than the 360/PS3, even combined. You get what you pay for.

Phoenix534

I don't know the 360/PS3 combined could make a really great looking game. :D Yeah but it's not only the videocard you need a high power CPU, lots of Ram, etc. I have a 260GTX and I know I am not going to be able to run BF3 at 1080p @ 60 fps.

Not at max no. But at medium-high(probably closer to medium) you could. BF3 is going to be pretty well optimized. And you don't need to spend a lot more money on a CPU or RAM either. You can get a could 4GB for less than $50 and an AMD Phenom II X4 for around $110.

I hope to get a 460 this fall to play BF3. I have an older Intel Quad 9550 and 4 gigs so I hope that can run it on high at 1080x1050.