This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="GlobalLaming"]They aren't being elitist just addressing unrealistic expectations. It is undeniable that a current PC is more powerful than a console, so anyone expecting the PS3 or 360 to look the same is delusional. I don't think they are saying any system is bad, otherwise they wouldn't be making a game on the 360 or PS3.More and more DICE are sounding like the Elitist PC gamers that you'd find in this thread. All systems are good people.
APiranhaAteMyVa
Their making ignorant assumptions about people who play on other systems, thats fanboyism. DICE should leave it to the rambling forums to argue PC superiority and actually awnser questions relating to their games.
[QUOTE="Phoenix534"][QUOTE="xhawk27"] I don't know the 360/PS3 combined could make a really great looking game. :D Yeah but it's not only the videocard you need a high power CPU, lots of Ram, etc. I have a 260GTX and I know I am not going to be able to run BF3 at 1080p @ 60 fps. xhawk27
Not at max no. But at medium-high(probably closer to medium) you could. BF3 is going to be pretty well optimized. And you don't need to spend a lot more money on a CPU or RAM either. You can get a could 4GB for less than $50 and an AMD Phenom II X4 for around $110.
I hope to get a 460 this fall to play BF3. I have an older Intel Quad 9550 and 4 gigs so I hope that can run it on high at 1080x1050.I have a 460 and I can tell you it's great. But, by the time fall gets here we'll be seeing some of the next series cards coming out. You'd probably be better off with a 560ti. It'll probably be at 460 price by then. As for processor, it may not be the newest but it'll do you good for a while. The 9550 is a very, very solid chip.
[QUOTE="aGOODdude"]
I think he is wrong. Most console gamers do realize that a high end PC is a semi generation ahead in technology...
Unfortunately for him, I don't think he has any idea how much console gamers don't care aboutthe PC...
ronvalencia
Radeon HD 2900 and Geforce 8800 GT is already generation ahead of console GPUs.
It ain't about the hardware it's about the produce, good sir. What've you got? AA, 60 FPS, 1080p? That is impressive but hardly a entire generation ahead... I do think the PC is a generation in front on paper, but what has the PC done that truly validates its superiority?
They aren't being elitist just addressing unrealistic expectations. It is undeniable that a current PC is more powerful than a console, so anyone expecting the PS3 or 360 to look the same is delusional. I don't think they are saying any system is bad, otherwise they wouldn't be making a game on the 360 or PS3.[QUOTE="APiranhaAteMyVa"][QUOTE="GlobalLaming"]
More and more DICE are sounding like the Elitist PC gamers that you'd find in this thread. All systems are good people.
GlobalLaming
Their making ignorant assumptions about people who play on other systems, thats fanboyism. DICE should leave it to the rambling forums to argue PC superiority and actually awnser questions relating to their games.
The title of the thread is wrong they actually said: "dont u love how PS3 fluffers dont really understand game design?I love their comments on the ps3 footage thinking it can be = pc" (random individual)
To which Johan replied: "yeah some console gamers have really no idea what they are playing on or what a modern PC is capable of"
I think the some part is very important. There are some console gamers who had unrealistic expectations, there were a couple of threads here with people saying that they was disappointed it didn't look like the PC version.
Also the PS3 version looks amazing, people need to check out the HD footage comparing it to the PC, looks really great. I think DICE will do a top job all around, so everyone wins.
[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]
[QUOTE="aGOODdude"]
I think he is wrong. Most console gamers do realize that a high end PC is a semi generation ahead in technology...
Unfortunately for him, I don't think he has any idea how much console gamers don't care aboutthe PC...
aGOODdude
Radeon HD 2900 and Geforce 8800 GT is already generation ahead of console GPUs.
It ain't about the hardware it's about the produce, good sir. What've you got? AA, 60 FPS, 1080p? That is impressive but hardly a entire generation ahead... I do think the PC is a generation in front on paper, but what has the PC done that truly validates its superiority?
So because no games make use of the technology, that means the technology isn't a generation ahead? That makes complete sense. No arguing that at all.Consoles cost less than a mid-high range videocard. xhawk27
a glorified webcam or harddrive for the 360 costs as much as a mid-high range gfx card.
[QUOTE="GlobalLaming"]
[QUOTE="APiranhaAteMyVa"] They aren't being elitist just addressing unrealistic expectations. It is undeniable that a current PC is more powerful than a console, so anyone expecting the PS3 or 360 to look the same is delusional. I don't think they are saying any system is bad, otherwise they wouldn't be making a game on the 360 or PS3.APiranhaAteMyVa
Their making ignorant assumptions about people who play on other systems, thats fanboyism. DICE should leave it to the rambling forums to argue PC superiority and actually awnser questions relating to their games.
Thanks for telling me about the "some" part, point taken. Although they still remind me of PC Elitists though, because of their previous comments.
The title of the thread is wrong they actually said: "dont u love how PS3 fluffers dont really understand game design?I love their comments on the ps3 footage thinking it can be = pc" (random individual)
To which Johan replied: "yeah some console gamers have really no idea what they are playing on or what a modern PC is capable of"
I think the some part is very important. There are some console gamers who had unrealistic expectations, there were a couple of threads here with people saying that they was disappointed it didn't look like the PC version.
Also the PS3 version looks amazing, people need to check out the HD footage comparing it to the PC, looks really great. I think DICE will do a top job all around, so everyone wins.
[QUOTE="APiranhaAteMyVa"]
[QUOTE="GlobalLaming"]
Their making ignorant assumptions about people who play on other systems, thats fanboyism. DICE should leave it to the rambling forums to argue PC superiority and actually awnser questions relating to their games.
GlobalLaming
The title of the thread is wrong they actually said: "dont u love how PS3 fluffers dont really understand game design?I love their comments on the ps3 footage thinking it can be = pc" (random individual)
To which Johan replied: "yeah some console gamers have really no idea what they are playing on or what a modern PC is capable of"
I think the some part is very important. There are some console gamers who had unrealistic expectations, there were a couple of threads here with people saying that they was disappointed it didn't look like the PC version.
Also the PS3 version looks amazing, people need to check out the HD footage comparing it to the PC, looks really great. I think DICE will do a top job all around, so everyone wins.
Thanks for telling me about the "some" part, point taken. Although they still remind me of PC Elitists though, because of their previous comments.
most console gamers have no idea about hardware, thats fine, but it does annoy me seeing all the comments about "oh if Dice worked on the PS3 version more it would look better than the PC version" "the power of the cell" 360 is holding BF3 back on PS3" etc etc
current PC's are 10x more powerful than consoles, John Carmack confirmed it, there is no debate to be had, if you want to debate it, make an engine better than john carmack, im waiting PS3 fans
Console cant compete with pc ever they console gamer also know thismost console gamers have no idea about hardware, thats fine, but it does annoy me seeing all the comments about "oh if Dice worked on the PS3 version more it would look better than the PC version" "the power of the cell" 360 is holding BF3 back on PS3" etc etc
current PC's are 10x more powerful than consoles, John Carmack confirmed it, there is no debate to be had, if you want to debate it, make an engine better than john carmack, im waiting PS3 fans
HaloinventedFPS
[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]Console cant compete with pc ever they console gamer also know thismost console gamers have no idea about hardware, thats fine, but it does annoy me seeing all the comments about "oh if Dice worked on the PS3 version more it would look better than the PC version" "the power of the cell" 360 is holding BF3 back on PS3" etc etc
current PC's are 10x more powerful than consoles, John Carmack confirmed it, there is no debate to be had, if you want to debate it, make an engine better than john carmack, im waiting PS3 fans
Hashim19
um no they dont, most console gamers have no clue about hardware
Console cant compete with pc ever they console gamer also know this[QUOTE="Hashim19"][QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]
most console gamers have no idea about hardware, thats fine, but it does annoy me seeing all the comments about "oh if Dice worked on the PS3 version more it would look better than the PC version" "the power of the cell" 360 is holding BF3 back on PS3" etc etc
current PC's are 10x more powerful than consoles, John Carmack confirmed it, there is no debate to be had, if you want to debate it, make an engine better than john carmack, im waiting PS3 fans
HaloinventedFPS
um no they dont, most console gamers have no clue about hardware
May be but only if they are casual kinect fanboy :pPC is more capable? Well if you have the slightest knowledge of hardware, you'd know that. I play consoles because I prefer the simplicity and the exclusives imo are better than anything on PC.racing1750This isn't relative to the point, but nice deflecting you did there.
[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"][QUOTE="Hashim19"] Console cant compete with pc ever they console gamer also know thisHashim19
um no they dont, most console gamers have no clue about hardware
May be but only if they are casual kinect fanboy :pIt's quite common for console oriented gamers to believe what the package tells them.
It's a common belief that console games are rendered at 1920*1080 for example, it does say 1080p on the back of the box afterall....
[QUOTE="racing1750"]PC is more capable? Well if you have the slightest knowledge of hardware, you'd know that. I play consoles because I prefer the simplicity and the exclusives imo are better than anything on PC.Mystic-GThis isn't relative to the point, but nice deflecting you did there. Maybe not, but there ya go, take it or leave it.
Even though what he said is probably true, does DICE not realize that console gamers are hearing these quotes too? As an isolated quote this isn't too bad, but it fits into a larger context of quotes from the BF3 developers in which they make it clear the PC version is their main focus. With that attitude, there is no way in hell they will even come close to competing with MW3. I mean, I'll still probably buy BF3 for the PC, but I would consider myself primarily a console gamer, and I'm really getting sick of these quotes.DarthBilfWhta's magical about IBM VMX kitbash ISA (SPUs)?
Even though what he said is probably true, does DICE not realize that console gamers are hearing these quotes too? As an isolated quote this isn't too bad, but it fits into a larger context of quotes from the BF3 developers in which they make it clear the PC version is their main focus. With that attitude, there is no way in hell they will even come close to competing with MW3. I mean, I'll still probably buy BF3 for the PC, but I would consider myself primarily a console gamer, and I'm really getting sick of these quotes.DarthBilfGreat! Now you know how PC gamers feel when we get great PC games getting a console focus (Crysis 2).
[QUOTE="Hashim19"][QUOTE="Super__FLY"]PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.Super__FLYIts not like you have to upgrade pc every year .. even 3 years old card can do alot better :) I dont care for graphics so why do I need a gaming PC? thats all PC gaming is good for Graphics...Well thats the ONLY thing hermits talk about...OMG look at Crysis on max settings...BF3 PC>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>BF3 PS3 graphics lol uMAD? :roll: Most of our most popular games are not even up to console graphics king standard... WoW, LoL , HoN, Starcraft II .... and many more.
Lots of butt hurt damage control here, I see console gamers don't care about graphics yet on this very board I see PS3 and 360 owners at each other throats over blades of grass... make your minds up guys :roll:.
PC gaming is that good...And I dont care too much about graphics so I'll stick to console gaming thaanks.Super__FLY
I dont care for graphics so why do I need a gaming PC? Super__FLY
First off you dont NEED video games. Secondly I prefer the superior perforamnce rather then the superior graphics.
I tried explaining to one guy that the HD Twins were pretty much maxed out. He was like 'nah the PS3 isn't it's got the CELL blah blah' I explained to him that both HD Twins were bottlenecked by the RAM but it didn't sink in.Hehe I guess PS3 gamers thought that "The Cell" instantly makes their outdated system a super computer.
NoodleFighter
Console cant compete with pc ever they console gamer also know this[QUOTE="Hashim19"][QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]
most console gamers have no idea about hardware, thats fine, but it does annoy me seeing all the comments about "oh if Dice worked on the PS3 version more it would look better than the PC version" "the power of the cell" 360 is holding BF3 back on PS3" etc etc
current PC's are 10x more powerful than consoles, John Carmack confirmed it, there is no debate to be had, if you want to debate it, make an engine better than john carmack, im waiting PS3 fans
HaloinventedFPS
um no they dont, most console gamers have no clue about hardware
Do "most" PC gamers have extensive hardware knowledge? Keep in mind that, ever since the often-quoted pie chart came out, PC gamers are now claiming FarmVille players as their own.Given how much Crysis(Oblivion, Doom 3, HL2, Quake 3, HL, Quake II) has been spammed all over the web, I'd think console gamers are more than informed of what PCs are capable of.
I don't understand why people have to waste their precious breath bragging about PC supperiority.... current hardware vs. 6 year old hardware is hardly a fair fight.
Even though what he said is probably true, does DICE not realize that console gamers are hearing these quotes too? As an isolated quote this isn't too bad, but it fits into a larger context of quotes from the BF3 developers in which they make it clear the PC version is their main focus. With that attitude, there is no way in hell they will even come close to competing with MW3. I mean, I'll still probably buy BF3 for the PC, but I would consider myself primarily a console gamer, and I'm really getting sick of these quotes.DarthBilfYeah, and Bobby Kotick has certainly never said anything to dissuade people from buying COD. At the end of the day, almost nobody will ever hear the quotes, COD will sell like crazy on the consoles, and the PC version of Battlefield 3 will make DICE a ton of money. You have to realize that the goal is to maximize profit, not outsell COD. Why wouldn't DICE promote the superior (and most profitable) version of their game?
Given how much Crysis(Oblivion, Doom 3, HL2, Quake 3, HL, Quake II) has been spammed all over the web, I'd think console gamers are more than informed of what PCs are capable of.
gamecubepad
You'd think so but that's not the case.
[QUOTE="DarthBilf"]Even though what he said is probably true, does DICE not realize that console gamers are hearing these quotes too? As an isolated quote this isn't too bad, but it fits into a larger context of quotes from the BF3 developers in which they make it clear the PC version is their main focus. With that attitude, there is no way in hell they will even come close to competing with MW3. I mean, I'll still probably buy BF3 for the PC, but I would consider myself primarily a console gamer, and I'm really getting sick of these quotes.PurpleMan5000Yeah, and Bobby Kotick has certainly never said anything to dissuade people from buying COD. At the end of the day, almost nobody will ever hear the quotes, COD will sell like crazy on the consoles, and the PC version of Battlefield 3 will make DICE a ton of money. You have to realize that the goal is to maximize profit, not outsell COD. Why wouldn't DICE promote the superior (and most profitable) version of their game? They want to go against COD. They have talked about it numerous times.
[QUOTE="PurpleMan5000"][QUOTE="DarthBilf"]Even though what he said is probably true, does DICE not realize that console gamers are hearing these quotes too? As an isolated quote this isn't too bad, but it fits into a larger context of quotes from the BF3 developers in which they make it clear the PC version is their main focus. With that attitude, there is no way in hell they will even come close to competing with MW3. I mean, I'll still probably buy BF3 for the PC, but I would consider myself primarily a console gamer, and I'm really getting sick of these quotes.gaming25Yeah, and Bobby Kotick has certainly never said anything to dissuade people from buying COD. At the end of the day, almost nobody will ever hear the quotes, COD will sell like crazy on the consoles, and the PC version of Battlefield 3 will make DICE a ton of money. You have to realize that the goal is to maximize profit, not outsell COD. Why wouldn't DICE promote the superior (and most profitable) version of their game? They want to go against COD. They have talked about it numerous times. Not alot of console or PC gamers outside of these nerdtastic forums will read these quotes :P
[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]
Given how much Crysis(Oblivion, Doom 3, HL2, Quake 3, HL, Quake II) has been spammed all over the web, I'd think console gamers are more than informed of what PCs are capable of.
Filthybastrd
You'd think so but that's not the case.
Perhaps we're talking about console-only kiddies?
You'd think most reasonable folks understand that a cutting-edge PC that has 2011 tech and cost anywhere from 3-10 times the amount of a console would outperform $300 2005 tech.
Did somebody important say the PS3 version is better than the PC version, or something?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment