Does Forza 4 produce the most realistic car photos in a game? [not for 56k]

@kuraimen, your latest set of shots are much better than campzors attempt though, they are now comparable thats for sure.sts106mat

And more

i might get a few forza photo's up i had a couple races on it after seeing this topic, but im too busy watchin the telly and hoping to get a laugh if sky news play i so ronrey again like they did whne i got up xD.

Those new GT5 screens posted above look amazing. Cmon Lems, post more Forza 4 screensPeredith

heres one of mine

sts106mat

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

AMD Phenom II 1055T is from 2008 and it sucks

Intel's 2.8gz quadcore from early 2007 stomps on it

5870 is from 2008 aswell and it was always med-end, maybe even low end

12gb of ram... lol how useless

HaloinventedFPS

lol. wow I didn't think there ever could be someone who knew so little about computers! :P

ah my bad Phenom dual cores came out in 08, got confused and the X6 came out early 2010, either way, intel 2 quad still beats it, AMD suck now for CPU's, everyone knows that, they have since 2006

the 5870 was 2009, again my bad, but it was never high end, it was med end, but the 5970, now that was high end, it could run Crysis in 1080p with 4xaa at 60fps, god damn beast

This processor is now slouch, especially with it being overclocked to 3.8GHz. Also the 5870 was high end, it used to be AMD's single GPU flagship card, and that can play Crysis 1080p 4xaa 60fps too....

Ironbash

[QUOTE="Ironbash"]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7167/6480065431_8e68c98bdf_z.jpgkweeni

[QUOTE="Ironbash"]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7167/6480065431_8e68c98bdf_z.jpgkweeni

Looks like an RUF RT112.

[QUOTE="kweeni"][QUOTE="Ironbash"]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7167/6480065431_8e68c98bdf_z.jpgIronbash

Porn is not allowed on GS.

Forza 4:

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="kweeni"]Wait I thought Forza was no longer allowed to have Porsche? Or is that a Ruf?sts106mat

Looks like an RUF RT112.

I let him in, sorry. :P

Lol at consolite bullshots!

I've seen the game running and it's nothign liek that! Where are the jaggies?

Why are most of the pics so low res?

Of course they look good, you're effectively supersampling.

Why are most of the pics so low res?

Of course they look good, you're effectively supersampling.

kraken2109

Are you kidding me?

The characteristics of the material and how it interacts with light are too much like plastic. Car paint simply does not shine and reflect at every viewing angle. It also looks like Turn 10 got lazy and just used the same material on every single car in the game. There should be angles where you can see the base coat more than the clear coat and vice versa. Turn 10 has it all wrong. This is how it's done:

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

no, modded GTA4 does in realtime, in an open world game... lol consoles

HaloinventedFPS

lol PC that costs an arm and a leg to run a single modification.

who cares its still in engine rendering and it looks purdy.

its not in game at all, and a $600 PC could run modded GTA4 in 1080p with no probs, with ease over 40fps at all times

@ Rikusaki - real world photo, lots of shiny.

sts106mat

They both look incredible in my opinion. :)

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

lol. wow I didn't think there ever could be someone who knew so little about computers! :P

_Matt_

ah my bad Phenom dual cores came out in 08, got confused and the X6 came out early 2010, either way, intel 2 quad still beats it, AMD suck now for CPU's, everyone knows that, they have since 2006

the 5870 was 2009, again my bad, but it was never high end, it was med end, but the 5970, now that was high end, it could run Crysis in 1080p with 4xaa at 60fps, god damn beast

This processor is now slouch, especially with it being overclocked to 3.8GHz. Also the 5870 was high end, it used to be AMD's single GPU flagship card, and that can play Crysis 1080p 4xaa 60fps too....

5870 runs Crysis in 1080p with 4xaa at like 25fps

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

lol PC that costs an arm and a leg to run a single modification.

who cares its still in engine rendering and it looks purdy.

Supabul

its not in game at all, and a $600 PC could run modded GTA4 in 1080p with no probs, with ease over 40fps at all times

i think they do, ive gotten alot of replies

[QUOTE="Supabul"][QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

its not in game at all, and a $600 PC could run modded GTA4 in 1080p with no probs, with ease over 40fps at all times

HaloinventedFPS

i think they do, ive gotten alot of replies

Go away, nobody likes you

[QUOTE="_Matt_"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

ah my bad Phenom dual cores came out in 08, got confused and the X6 came out early 2010, either way, intel 2 quad still beats it, AMD suck now for CPU's, everyone knows that, they have since 2006

the 5870 was 2009, again my bad, but it was never high end, it was med end, but the 5970, now that was high end, it could run Crysis in 1080p with 4xaa at 60fps, god damn beast

HaloinventedFPS

This processor is now slouch, especially with it being overclocked to 3.8GHz. Also the 5870 was high end, it used to be AMD's single GPU flagship card, and that can play Crysis 1080p 4xaa 60fps too....

5870 runs Crysis in 1080p with 4xaa at like 25fps

maybe in DX10. however in DX9 mode I get 60fps ;) . And no one cares about DX10, it was a performance hog with very little improvement

Forza Photomode looks fantastic but I think GT 5 spanks it. Polyphony's lighting is superior.

This is why Forza 4 is going to take the best Technical Graphic's Award from GS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfV3MeMZyoY

Its a thing of beauty

I am really starting to think people have never played Forza 4 and GT5 both. Anyone who thinks GT5 looks remotely as good is just being ridiculous or they are as stupid as this Hermit trying ti intercept the thread.

Forza Photomode looks fantastic but I think GT 5 spanks it. Polyphony's lighting is superior.

heretrix

I am really starting to think people have never played Forza 4 and GT5 both. Anyone who thinks GT5 looks remotely as good is just being ridiculous or they are as stupid as this Hermit trying ti intercept the thread.

WarTornRuston

The game is different however, where I would give the nod to Forza simply for it's consistency.

BUT-

GT 5's premium car models are astounding and they blow awayForza 4's car models.

Here are some more great shots taken from the guys over at GTPlanet.

For anyone who loves cars surely will say that both F4 & GT5 are amazing racing games and can produce some gorgeous looking pics...

Definately look forward on how these 2 x series will evolve on next-gen consoles :)

Why are the pics so tiny?

Even modded oblivion looks like crysis in screengrabs of that size.

For anyone who loves cars surely will say that both F4 & GT5 are amazing racing games and can produce some gorgeous looking pics...

Definately look forward on how these 2 x series will evolve on next-gen consoles :)

Malta_1980

How could you forget GT5?

:o

On a serious note, im sure it is. It was nominated for the best technical graphics for a reason!

[QUOTE="Supabul"][QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

its not in game at all, and a $600 PC could run modded GTA4 in 1080p with no probs, with ease over 40fps at all times

HaloinventedFPS

i think they do, ive gotten alot of replies

As a PC gamer, I want to urge you people to ignore this guy. He does not represent the average PC gamer.

How could you forget GT5?

:o

On a serious note, im sure it is. It was nominated for the best technical graphics for a reason!

PAL360

LOL i forgot about the standard cars. Seriously though i think both forza and GT models are very close to the point that unless you were really up close and looking for faults you wouldnt really tell any difference between them.

It's widely regarded GT5 has the better looking photo mode. Why is this even a thread or a debate? Is Ironbash upset from getting run out of the GT5 sales thread?

First here are some shots taken by me during replay of an actual race. Not that autovista thing that only a handfull of cars can be have pictures taken of them.

By the way these are Standard Cars that obviously belong on PS2 :rolleyes:

A Premium Golf Mk V Taken during Race Replay.

It's widely regarded GT5 has the better looking photo mode. Why is this even a thread or a debate? Is Ironbash upset from getting run out of the GT5 sales thread?

First here are some shots taken by me during replay of an actual race. Not that autovista thing that only a handfull of cars can be have pictures taken of them.

By the way these are Standard Cars that obviously belong on PS2 :rolleyes:

Nuck81

I got some more:

I think we have a winner here.

And just to nail the coffin in this thread here are some photo's taken by the folks at GT Planet. These pics aren't mine, but still from GT5.