i look at that character and it does nothing for me, i think it looks a little stupid but it doesnt affect me on any emotional level.
why is it that the people making the reviews bad because of it cant ignore it like me and just enjoy the game?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i look at that character and it does nothing for me, i think it looks a little stupid but it doesnt affect me on any emotional level.
why is it that the people making the reviews bad because of it cant ignore it like me and just enjoy the game?
That sig is gold! :lol:Anybody else notice that the only two negative reviews listed on metacritic are both written by females? Hmmmm....
Master_ShakeXXX
[QUOTE="Master_ShakeXXX"]That sig is gold! :lol:Anybody else notice that the only two negative reviews listed on metacritic are both written by females? Hmmmm....
Xaero_Gravity
I've taken a fancy to it myself. Think I will hold onto this one for a while.
Out of curiosity, can anybody that says that the Dragon's Crown female characters are offensive; can they articulate where that actually makes sense. Because even on an intellectual level one can't really make the claim that the developers depiction of gender roles diminishes the female gender role of one of submission to patriarchal propriety. Can they articulate that the depiction of women reinforces female patriarchal propriety? After all when people throw around "objectification" that's really what "objectification" really is. If they're just going to critic the utilization of sex appeal then "exploitation" is the more proper critical terminology, and as far as "exploitation" criticism goes that criticism really only stands if the piece is void of any artistic merit. And it would be even more absurd on its face to claim that a fantasy title reinforces "unrealistic expectations". I get the feeling people say they're offended by this because they think society expects of them, not because some part of them is genuinely offended.lamprey263
Just boils down to the last remnants of western religious ethics. Sexuality is still too scary for some, even when it's fake and victimless.
It's like some people want to bring back the Index Librorum Prohibitorum or something.
was there even a hype thread for the game?[QUOTE="Some-Mist"][QUOTE="loosingENDS"]
It flopped, but i am still buying it
loosingENDS
That is the problem with gaming, really good games dont get attention
it's more of an issue with mainstream gaming boards. GAF has had many threads on it and of course an |OT| as per the norm. the gameplay has been grabbing a lot of people's attention on neo-geo too.Isn't it only a few characters? If so, don't play as them. Â Although I agree the designs are quite ridiculous, getting so ass mad about it does nothing.
But I fail to see why they should be designed that way in the first place. I don;t know about anyone else, but I don't find animated characters sexually arousing, so I don't see the point.
I have no problem if the reviewer feels like its a worse game to him personally but he needs to understand that not everyone will be phased by it and it shouldn't be listed as lowering the quality of the game. That would be like me doing a professional review of Bioshock Infinite and grading it lower because I was offended by the religious themes present in it. I can certainly mention that it put me off in the review but in no way would it make sense to deduct points from it.
I don't mind the exaggerated characatures of women and men in the game, but I am kind of irked by the weird touching sequences that I saw in this japanese trailer. They just seem so out of place and not really vital to the gameplay. I don't have much context on them, but it just gives me a really sketchy vibe. Overall though the the game looks great and it's not like Vanillaware hasn't made exaggerated character models before. People in this field just seem to latch on to keywords, phrases, and ideas and run with it, even if they're not entirely right.
I mean everyone mentions the Sorceress and Amazon because of their bust sizes, but those are powerful women who can handle their own. Sure they might have unrealistic proportions, but I wouldn't say they are degrading women. On the same note, journalists might have an argument if they picked the half-naked spirit who is chained up and is being 'poked' by the player to the as she lets out a moan; something that doesn't really seem to fit. Of course, the barbarian can also be touched and the goblin chef, both of whom I find equally uneasy about.
:shock: Nice video, I liked touching the half naked girl part. :( I did find the part they were touching the Barbarian to be creepy as hell though, I hope I can skip that part.I don't mind the exaggerated characatures of women and men in the game, but I am kind of irked by the weird touching sequences that I saw in this japanese trailer. They just seem so out of place and not really vital to the gameplay. I don't have much context on them, but it just gives me a really sketchy vibe. Overall though the the game looks great and it's not like Vanillaware hasn't made exaggerated character models before. People in this field just seem to latch on to keywords, phrases, and ideas and run with it, even if they're not entirely right.
Minishdriveby
I mean everyone mentions the Sorceress and Amazon because of their bust sizes, but those are powerful women who can handle their own. Sure they might have unrealistic proportions, but I wouldn't say they are degrading women. On the same note, journalists might have an argument if they picked the half-naked spirit who is chained up and is being 'poked' by the player to the as she lets out a moan; something that doesn't really seem to fit. Of course, the barbarian can also be touched and the goblin chef, both of whom I find equally uneasy about.
:cool: Same here. I actually wanna play as the boobalicious Sorceress first but I hear she's for advanced players so I'll start with the Amazon thunder thighs first and go from there.I'm buying this shit day 1. Dat Amazon is freakin crazy. Defo gonna be playing as her first.
Master_ShakeXXX
Gamespot clearly doew not know their target audience that well. 90% of the forum sigs have boobs in them.
Â
Seriously though, I am tired of this politically correct garbage. If a game is "offensive", then to some people that is a good thing. Does Gamespot want to be Christwire?Â
[QUOTE="Minishdriveby"]:shock: Nice video, I liked touching the half naked girl part. :( I did find the part they were touching the Barbarian to be creepy as hell though, I hope I can skip that part. they're just easter eggs. might as well be offended by the first person camera in MGS3 and how it always focuses on eva's boobs.I don't mind the exaggerated characatures of women and men in the game, but I am kind of irked by the weird touching sequences that I saw in this japanese trailer. They just seem so out of place and not really vital to the gameplay. I don't have much context on them, but it just gives me a really sketchy vibe. Overall though the the game looks great and it's not like Vanillaware hasn't made exaggerated character models before. People in this field just seem to latch on to keywords, phrases, and ideas and run with it, even if they're not entirely right.
Kaz_Son
I mean everyone mentions the Sorceress and Amazon because of their bust sizes, but those are powerful women who can handle their own. Sure they might have unrealistic proportions, but I wouldn't say they are degrading women. On the same note, journalists might have an argument if they picked the half-naked spirit who is chained up and is being 'poked' by the player to the as she lets out a moan; something that doesn't really seem to fit. Of course, the barbarian can also be touched and the goblin chef, both of whom I find equally uneasy about.
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]
Looks like i'll be getting the game this cmoing Tuesday afterall.. Futureshop having a deal where get the vita version for free after trading in 1 game so i'll trade 1 game and get this baby on Vita for free :D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D
mojito1988
Sir I am sorry but you fail to understand. These boobies/behinds need to be on the big screen! Ps3 all the way!
On the plus side he gets to see them on the go.You should look at my sig more. It might help you do it rite.So far I've been neither offended nor aroused... I think I'm doing it wrong.
syztem
This seems to be the Flavour of the Month for video game "journalists" to get upset about these days (the whole being-offended-by-depictions-of-females-in-games thing). Ten years ago, they were up in arms whenever an RPG featured random encounters, and a few years ago, they just couldn't stand it if games weren't "open-world" like GTA. That being said, the art-style's a bit too over the top for me (literally and figuratively ;)). Still didn't stop me from buying it today; this game's gonna take up some time for me!
You know what's sad is GS gave CoD MW2 a 9.0, which if any one doesn't remember has a scene where you massacre a bunch of civilians in a Airport, but hey bouncing breasts seems to be more inappropriate than killing civilians....
Oh gaming journalism have you fallen.
But secks is bad mmmkay.You know what's sad is GS gave CoD MW2 a 9.0, which if any one doesn't remember has a scene where you massacre a bunch of civilians in a Airport, but hey bouncing breasts seems to be more inappropriate than killing civilians....
Oh gaming journalism have you fallen.
Ballroompirate
That would imply that it ever rose anywhere above rock bottom.You know what's sad is GS gave CoD MW2 a 9.0, which if any one doesn't remember has a scene where you massacre a bunch of civilians in a Airport, but hey bouncing breasts seems to be more inappropriate than killing civilians....
Oh gaming journalism have you fallen.
Ballroompirate
[QUOTE="Ballroompirate"]But secks is bad mmmkay.You know what's sad is GS gave CoD MW2 a 9.0, which if any one doesn't remember has a scene where you massacre a bunch of civilians in a Airport, but hey bouncing breasts seems to be more inappropriate than killing civilians....
Oh gaming journalism have you fallen.
foxhound_fox
It's best when it's a surprise.
Trust me
Gaming journalism has always been in the shitter, it never left. They follow whatever is trendy to get hits, nowadays feminism and whiteknighting is the is the new trend. Rehashed garbage FPSs like MW2 and BLOP 2 can get 9/10s while artistic masterpieces like Dragon's Crown get bashed for having some boobs just so that feminazis can be pleased. Apparently killing random civilians in games like MW2 and GTA is A-okay but boobs are the work of the devil.You know what's sad is GS gave CoD MW2 a 9.0, which if any one doesn't remember has a scene where you massacre a bunch of civilians in a Airport, but hey bouncing breasts seems to be more inappropriate than killing civilians....
Oh gaming journalism have you fallen.
Ballroompirate
In all honesty, I think posts like your are sort of missing the point. There's a whole history of fantasy/pulp/comic book art that is designed to be arousing to 15 year old nerds who have no chance of ever actually touching a boob. Just as there's a whole category of romance dramas that are essentially softcore porn for lonely old women, a lot of this fantasy stuff really HAS historically been for 15 year old nerds to get off on it. Having said that, I just started playing the game. And while I have only barely started it (less than an hour in), so far that doesn't seem to be the case with this game. It seems like what they're doing isn't so much exaggerating the characters in order to make them appealing to the players. What they seem to be doing is exaggerating the exaggerations that already are heavily established within these kinds of games/books/etc. I'm not sure yet if it's homage or parody (probably a little bit of both, I suspect). But the INTENT of these exaggerated character proportions seems to be not to arouse the player, but to draw attention to the game's influences. This game seems to be heavily reliant on lots of different nerd pop culture influences, and it does so without an ounce of shame. It's heavily derivative, and it almost seems to deliberately draw attention to where its influences are coming from. The giant boobs and asses and ridiculously muscled men seem to be just another example of that. Having said that, I find it hard to fault people for thinking that the game is sexist. Like I said before, there's a whole history of artists who have previously peddled the exact same thing with a straight face, because it really WAS just masturbation material for teenaged nerds who can't get a girl. Artists who did it with a straight face and expected their audience to take it seriously. The difference here? I get the strong impression that the artists on Dragon's Crown are winking at us. We're not supposed to see the sorceress and want to beat off. We're supposed to see the sorceress and say, "ha ha, yeah, that's true!" But it's hard to fault people for seeing this as offensive. It's the difference between being genuine and being sarcastic. Sometimes it's not so obvious. Having said that...maybe I'm completely f***ing wrong. I also said that I'm only about an hour into the game, so maybe my impressions will change A LOT once I've played it longer. But those are my impressions right now. In any case, the game really is a lot of f***ing fun. I need to get the hell off these forums and go back to playing the game.There's a comment about the female characters having big boobs, but not one about the dwarf who is just a humungous, bulging mass of muscles, and the fighter who has an enormous upper body.
Ly_the_Fairy
That's the thing: when I first heard about this game and saw the art, I assumed that's what they were doing. After playing the game a little bit, my opinions started to change. Now I don't even think that "sex appeal" is even (primarily) what they're going for. I think they tried to exaggerate it so much that it's just stupid, as a wink and a nod to the audience. It's the difference between saying a stupid comment and being serious about it, and saying an even more stupid comment just in order to poke fun at how absurd such comments tend to be. But again...maybe I'm completely wrong on that. I can't say for sure having played the game for only an hour. But that's the impression that I'm getting.While I'm not offended by the art-styl personally, and don't necessarily mind some sex appeal in my entertainment media, I do find it stupid when devs go overboard and make the sex appeal so blatantly obvious like Dragon's Crown did, as if they were trying as hard as possible to make the game as sexual as possible to try and increase sales from young teenagers going through puberty.
Maybe some critics are going overboard in their criticism, and I don't think such art-styles should be censored, but TBH, I do see how some people might not exactly be able to appreciate something like Dragon Crown's art.
DJ-Lafleur
there's no problem with disliking the art style. you have a crap taste, but that's you :P the problem is the whole misplaced white knighting that journalists are going on and on around this game, calling it pornographic and stuff. hell, the gamespot review says the females "feel like a betrayal and leave a stain on an otherwise great art style". that's not having an opinion, that's being stupid.This seems to be the Flavour of the Month for video game "journalists" to get upset about these days (the whole being-offended-by-depictions-of-females-in-games thing). Ten years ago, they were up in arms whenever an RPG featured random encounters, and a few years ago, they just couldn't stand it if games weren't "open-world" like GTA. That being said, the art-style's a bit too over the top for me (literally and figuratively ;)). Still didn't stop me from buying it today; this game's gonna take up some time for me!
svetzenlether
[QUOTE="svetzenlether"]there's no problem with disliking the art style. you have a crap taste, but that's you :P the problem is the whole misplaced white knighting that journalists are going on and on around this game, calling it pornographic and stuff. hell, the gamespot review says the females "feel like a betrayal and leave a stain on an otherwise great art style". that's not having an opinion, that's being stupid. 1) Personally, I don't think that the character designs are intended to be sexy. I think that they're a wink and a nod to the influences that played into the game. You could almost say that the designs in this game are sarcasm or parody. However, that doesn't really work unless there is a genuine and non-ironic parallel. That's how it works. You might get into a political discussion and then sarcastically say an exaggerated version of what the opposing party says. But your sarcastic remark fails to have any meaning if the opposition doesn't indeed make some kind of real world parallel. If there's no real world parallel then you aren't even making a point, you're just saying stupid $hit that EVERYONE thinks is moronic. The point, this kind of tongue-in-cheek reference only works when people see that you are deliberately referencing something. If they fail to see that, it just looks offensive. Which is understandable, considering that the entire reason you made the point in the first place is because there IS a real world, genuine, non-ironic parallel. It's just sometimes hard to tell whether people are being genuine or sarcastic. 2) If this is meant to be serious, rather than a deliberate nod to the sources which inspired it, then I would probably have a problem with that. If this was actually intended to be sexually appealing to the gamers who bought it, then that makes assumptions about the audience that many audience members WOULD have a problem with. The people making magazines that show hardcore man-on-man sex tend to work under the assumption that their audience is one who gets turned on by seeing hardcore man-on-man sex. Buy extension, it's hard for someone to buy that magazine without also carrying the label of someone who gets turned on by seeing hardcore man-on-man sex. Similarly...if a game or a comic book or a novel is non-ironically designed to be wank material for nerdy 14 year old boys (which isn't exactly unprecedented), then you can understand why someone who buys it for the story rather than the T&A would get a little offended. That makes assumptions about the buyer, which he implicitly finds offensive because they don't apply to him. It's like when you play a game or see a movie that has a potentially interesting concept, but instead ruins it by constantly holding your hand and walking you through it. What do people say? They say, "give me a little credit, I'm not so stupid that I can't understand a little bit of subtle symbolism." The assumption being made is that the audience is f***ing stupid. And YES, audiences who are not stupid tend to be a little bit offended when that assumption is made. Same thing with Dragon's Crown. If the huge T&A is designed to be sexually appealing, if the huge overmuscled men are designed to be power fantasies for weak-ass nerds (and again, there's a precedent for this kind of stuff in fantasy fiction), then it sort of IS offensive and insulting.This seems to be the Flavour of the Month for video game "journalists" to get upset about these days (the whole being-offended-by-depictions-of-females-in-games thing). Ten years ago, they were up in arms whenever an RPG featured random encounters, and a few years ago, they just couldn't stand it if games weren't "open-world" like GTA. That being said, the art-style's a bit too over the top for me (literally and figuratively ;)). Still didn't stop me from buying it today; this game's gonna take up some time for me!
BrunoBRS
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="svetzenlether"]there's no problem with disliking the art style. you have a crap taste, but that's you :P the problem is the whole misplaced white knighting that journalists are going on and on around this game, calling it pornographic and stuff. hell, the gamespot review says the females "feel like a betrayal and leave a stain on an otherwise great art style". that's not having an opinion, that's being stupid. 1) Personally, I don't think that the character designs are intended to be sexy. I think that they're a wink and a nod to the influences that played into the game. You could almost say that the designs in this game are sarcasm or parody. However, that doesn't really work unless there is a genuine and non-ironic parallel. That's how it works. You might get into a political discussion and then sarcastically say an exaggerated version of what the opposing party says. But your sarcastic remark fails to have any meaning if the opposition doesn't indeed make some kind of real world parallel. If there's no real world parallel then you aren't even making a point, you're just saying stupid $hit that EVERYONE thinks is moronic. The point, this kind of tongue-in-cheek reference only works when people see that you are deliberately referencing something. If they fail to see that, it just looks offensive. Which is understandable, considering that the entire reason you made the point in the first place is because there IS a real world, genuine, non-ironic parallel. It's just sometimes hard to tell whether people are being genuine or sarcastic. 2) If this is meant to be serious, rather than a deliberate nod to the sources which inspired it, then I would probably have a problem with that. If this was actually intended to be sexually appealing to the gamers who bought it, then that makes assumptions about the audience that many audience members WOULD have a problem with. The people making magazines that show hardcore man-on-man sex tend to work under the assumption that their audience is one who gets turned on by seeing hardcore man-on-man sex. Buy extension, it's hard for someone to buy that magazine without also carrying the label of someone who gets turned on by seeing hardcore man-on-man sex. Similarly...if a game or a comic book or a novel is non-ironically designed to be wank material for nerdy 14 year old boys (which isn't exactly unprecedented), then you can understand why someone who buys it for the story rather than the T&A would get a little offended. That makes assumptions about the buyer, which he implicitly finds offensive because they don't apply to him. It's like when you play a game or see a movie that has a potentially interesting concept, but instead ruins it by constantly holding your hand and walking you through it. What do people say? They say, "give me a little credit, I'm not so stupid that I can't understand a little bit of subtle symbolism." The assumption being made is that the audience is f***ing stupid. And YES, audiences who are not stupid tend to be a little bit offended when that assumption is made. Same thing with Dragon's Crown. If the huge T&A is designed to be sexually appealing, if the huge overmuscled men are designed to be power fantasies for weak-ass nerds (and again, there's a precedent for this kind of stuff in fantasy fiction), then it sort of IS offensive and insulting. i'm not reading this until i see some proper paragraphing.This seems to be the Flavour of the Month for video game "journalists" to get upset about these days (the whole being-offended-by-depictions-of-females-in-games thing). Ten years ago, they were up in arms whenever an RPG featured random encounters, and a few years ago, they just couldn't stand it if games weren't "open-world" like GTA. That being said, the art-style's a bit too over the top for me (literally and figuratively ;)). Still didn't stop me from buying it today; this game's gonna take up some time for me!
MrGeezer
I don't think I've ever met a girl who is actually "offended" by this kind of thing. Anyway - since when did offending people become such a crime?PernicioEnigma
From the Responses I have seen it is usually White Males telling women what they can or can not be offended by, or uneducated tumbler feminists.
If only the developers had the foresight to dress the female characters in this game with full-body hijabs. Then it would surely get a 10/10 here. princeofshapeirThis.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment