I will care when it actually becomes a true issue.
All this "is becoming an issue"-chat is totally irrelevant as we continue seeing huge and quality open world games that fit on a single DVD.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I will care when it actually becomes a true issue.
All this "is becoming an issue"-chat is totally irrelevant as we continue seeing huge and quality open world games that fit on a single DVD.
It will always be irrelevant then. Devs could be making great games on Snes cartridges right now. The potential that comes with new formats is wasted though, that's the issue.I will care when it actually becomes a true issue.
All this "is becoming an issue"-chat is totally irrelevant as we continue seeing huge and quality open world games that fit on a single DVD.
IronBass
I will care when it actually becomes a true issue.
All this "is becoming an issue"-chat is totally irrelevant as we continue seeing huge and quality open world games that fit on a single DVD.
IronBass
the problem is that you get a castrated game if a dev sees that he can't fit the whole data into a dvd.. so you get the sad sad dlc's.
edit: you get them also on the ps3 anyway, but what Rockstar says makes sense imo. dvd9 + 360 without HDD = fail.
It will always be irrelevant then. Devs could be making great games on Snes cartridges right now. The potential that comes with new formats is wasted though, that's the issue.kuraimenThere's a point when every format is maxed out. It's evident the time of DVD has not come yet.
the problem is that you get a castrated game if a dev sees that he can't fit the whole data into a dvd.. so you get the sad sad dlc's.pitty8982I have not seen a single case of DLC that exists because of the format limitation. It always seems to be the case of the dev's greed.
[QUOTE="shadow8585"]Multiple disks? Problem solvedoajlu
yeah Multiple disc...
i am sure 99.5% of 360 users dont mihd changing disc while they play games.
and cost on disc and case material = make it $5 more expensive than regular games.
I am sure 360 gamers dont mindpaying $5 for better quality.
Depends. In a game like FFXIII / ME2, changing discs is a non issue. If RDR would have needed disc swapping, depending on which area you were in. . . that'd be a BIG issue. The 360 is 5 years old, and I think I can count the amount of multi disc games on 2 hands. Sure in some cases, DVD9 has it's draw backs, but looking back I think it was a VERY smart move for MSFT to go with DVD9 and not Blu-Ray this gen. I do agree with R* however that MSFT should have made HDD mandatory. However, I honestly think this will be a nonissue next gen.yet they cant even get their PS3 versions of their games to run in HD. So really, theyre rather incompetant to begin with.
This. Of course Blu-Ray or a standard HDD offers advantages - but I've yet to really see any 'issues' yet.yet they cant even get their PS3 versions of their games to run in HD. So really, theyre rather incompetant to begin with.
XboximusPrime
[QUOTE="oajlu"][QUOTE="shadow8585"]Multiple disks? Problem solvedmythrol
yeah Multiple disc...
i am sure 99.5% of 360 users dont mihd changing disc while they play games.
and cost on disc and case material = make it $5 more expensive than regular games.
I am sure 360 gamers dont mindpaying $5 for better quality.
Depends. In a game like FFXIII / ME2, changing discs is a non issue. If RDR would have needed disc swapping, depending on which area you were in. . . that'd be a BIG issue. The 360 is 5 years old, and I think I can count the amount of multi disc games on 2 hands. Sure in some cases, DVD9 has it's draw backs, but looking back I think it was a VERY smart move for MSFT to go with DVD9 and not Blu-Ray this gen. I do agree with R* however that MSFT should have made HDD mandatory. However, I honestly think this will be a nonissue next gen.Then why not just split by the story (which BTW tends to be pretty linear even in an open-world game) instead of by the map? Doesn't ME2 use this kind of technique?[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]PS3 doesn't require mandatory install. Haven't you played GOW3 or Uncharted2? Its a developer choice that they use HD install to minimize the load time of optimal drives.foxhound_fox
Again , PS3 didn't mandate the Install, Developer did. Why? probably because PS3 has HD on all models 360 doesn't. Installs helps loading faster. Ever wonder why nearly all PC games requires HD installs?
Multiple disks,problem solved.Arach666Unless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game).
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]PS3 doesn't require mandatory install. Haven't you played GOW3 or Uncharted2? Its a developer choice that they use HD install to minimize the load time of optimal drives.fun-da-mental
Again , PS3 didn't mandate the Install, Developer did. Why? probably because PS3 has HD on all models 360 doesn't. Installs helps loading faster. Ever wonder why nearly all PC games requires HD installs?
But why mandate it instead of just making it an option?a console - in 2010 - without HDD is like a pizza without anything on it. aia89Oh yeah. Unless it has an extremely solid library.
[QUOTE="Arach666"]Multiple disks,problem solved.HuusAskingUnless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game). I guess...then maybe they should install the game on the hard disk.
[QUOTE="Arach666"]Multiple disks,problem solved.HuusAskingUnless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game). yes, how the hell would they split the discs of a open world game like GTA?
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Arach666"]Multiple disks,problem solved.Arach666Unless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game). I guess...then maybe they should install the game on the hard disk.And if you don't have a hard drive...and the a sizable chunk (if not the majority) of the consoles in homes are HDD-less? Bullet meet foot, anyone?
[QUOTE="aia89"] a console - in 2010 - without HDD is like a pizza without anything on it. IronBassOh yeah. Unless it has an extremely solid library. I don't get why you people are so against progress. I don't think bluray is sooo necessary, but in some cases, it really helps.
yes, how the hell would they split the discs of a open world game like GTA? aia89Easy. Put the world in the two discs and divide the specific history parts. Despite being open world games, GTA games are relatively linear games.
[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="Arach666"]Multiple disks,problem solved.aia89Unless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game). yes, how the hell would they split the discs of a open world game like GTA? The main storyline of GTA games are actually pretty linear. Even the main quest progression of Fallout 3's pretty linear. It's not like the side jobs alter the course of the main quest. That's when you really get into trouble.
[QUOTE="aia89"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]PCs have standard hard drives (because they're required to install the OS). Installs are also usually required (a no-no for a console with potentially no hard drive).HuusAskinga console - in 2010 - without HDD is like a pizza without anything on it. What? You've never had a focaccia before? Focaccia is bread,and it´s many times topped with stuff like onions,meat,cheese,etc... :P
I don't get why you people are so against progress. I don't think bluray is sooo necessary, but in some cases, it really helps. aia89It's has nothing to do with progress, but you implied that the most important part of a console is the HDD. I just proved the contrary.
Seriously, Rockstar just needs to man up on their Multiplatform development. They keep complaining about 360s DVD 9 and no HDDs, yet they keep optimizing and making the 360 version of their last two games run better on 360. So really, I dont see why their complaining if their not doing anythinga bout it.
[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]Unless the storyline is less-than-linear. Then you can't predict where the story goes, making it impossible to intelligently split the discs by storyline (which is really the only intelligent way to split a sandbox game).HuusAskingI guess...then maybe they should install the game on the hard disk.And if you don't have a hard drive...and the a sizable chunk (if not the majority) of the consoles in homes are HDD-less? Bullet meet foot, anyone? That´s MS´s fault for selling consoles without the hard drive. That thing should be mandatory imo.
What? You've never had a focaccia before? Focaccia is bread,and it´s many times topped with stuff like onions,meat,cheese,etc... :PIt's still essentially a pizza without any of the usual pizza accouterments on it. And it is eaten (I actually do eat plain focaccia--straight up). The bread came first (Greek pita), then the pie (Italian pizza). IOW, bad analogy. Better to day a PC without a hard drive of some sort is like a car with nothing in the interior but bare metal.[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="aia89"] a console - in 2010 - without HDD is like a pizza without anything on it. Arach666
[QUOTE="fun-da-mental"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
And those two games being entirely irrelevant to the discussion in this thread. The PS3 version of RDR requires an install. My point has always been, DVD9 drive >>> Blu-ray drive when read speed comes into play... no matter how much greater storage it offers.HuusAsking
Again , PS3 didn't mandate the Install, Developer did. Why? probably because PS3 has HD on all models 360 doesn't. Installs helps loading faster. Ever wonder why nearly all PC games requires HD installs?
But why mandate it instead of just making it an option?I don't know, ask Rockstar. May be because they are too are lazy/incompetent to write code that buffers data instead of Install? Games like Uncharted, GOW3 runs fine without install, even Ninja Gaiden Sigma has optional install.
[QUOTE="aia89"][QUOTE="HuusAsking"]PCs have standard hard drives (because they're required to install the OS). Installs are also usually required (a no-no for a console with potentially no hard drive).HuusAskinga console - in 2010 - without HDD is like a pizza without anything on it. What? You've never had a focaccia before?
I happen to be italian, so yeah I had lots of focacce and pizze and I can tell you that they're not the same thing at all.
Rockstar knew the DVD9 was a problem from the beginning of GTA4 development, but the biggest fault of the X360 is'nt the DVD9 alone, but it's not having a HDD in all X360's.
Games from the start of this generation has been pushing the 6.7GB on the X360 to it's limits, but if we look at the last generation, the games varied from 500MB in the start of the generation, to 5GB in the end. And it all could be done on one disc. Disc swapping should have ended last generation in my opinion.
Why not just save developers and yourself all the trouble, yes multi discs is not much of a problem but there are certain things that makes it a problem and why not just adapt to Blu Ray?
Why would you bother with multi discs when you can just adapt blu ray and eliminate disc swapping?
Why would you bother with multi discs when you can just adapt blu ray and eliminate disc swapping?def_mode
For a couple of reasons.
Costs being the first one. I don't think we need to start talking about how much the high price has hurted Sony this gen.
The second one being the little relevance of the "issue". The number of games that need more than one disc is practically non-existant.
what about all the xbox 360 owners then? will they receive a new shiny 360 equipped with bluray for free, then? they CAN'T adapt to bluray this gen, it'd be a suicidal strategy if they were to do it now. HDD installation is the answerWhy not just save developers and yourself all the trouble, yes multi discs is not much of a problem but there are certain things that makes it a problem and why not just adapt to Blu Ray?
Why would you bother with multi discs when you can just adapt blu ray and eliminate disc swapping?
def_mode
[QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]
I never saw dvd9's to be a problem, until I read this article
I agree 100% with the rockstar guy when he "complains" about the xbox 360 arcades which are not equipped with a HDD. It's stupid imo, they should only sell 360's with a harddisk, but I think it's too late, since they should have done it already at the beginning of this gen. there are many people who only own an arcade and of course you can't force them to buy a hdd to play a certain game.
I don't think bluray is essential, but I think sony exclusives took advantage of it thanks to the much higher storage than a dvd9.
This sentence is the key imo "If we're filling up the disc right now, where are we going? It's not like our games are going to get any smaller. I think that issue's on the table with a bunch of games right now. I'm sure they'll come through with an intelligent solution."
What kind of "intelligent solution" do you think Microsoft you come through with? Flash drives??
Multiple discs?
Yeah, I agree with that. I have no issue with the multiple discs situation. It may not be as comfortable as having it on one Blu ray, but I'd rather be switching discs then get a watered down version. I think by the time that this really becomes a nuisance, will be about the time the next Xbox is here. Also Mass Effect 2 was one of the best looking games that I've seen on my 360 in a while.[QUOTE="def_mode"]what about all the xbox 360 owners then? will they receive a new shiny 360 equipped with bluray for free, then? they CAN'T adapt to bluray this gen, it'd be a suicidal strategy if they were to do it now. HDD installation is the answer I know, I blame MS for this, if they had been thinking of the future, developers wouldnt suffer as much and who knows...we might not see as much DLC/rip offs as we do now.Why not just save developers and yourself all the trouble, yes multi discs is not much of a problem but there are certain things that makes it a problem and why not just adapt to Blu Ray?
Why would you bother with multi discs when you can just adapt blu ray and eliminate disc swapping?
pitty8982
that OR, they forced DVD9 so that dlc will be a must and make more profits.
I know, I blame MS for this, if they had been thinking of the future, developers wouldnt suffer as much and who knows...we might not see as much DLC/rip offs as we do now.def_modeHow many pieces of DLC exist because of DVD limitations, and not because of the dev's greed? Honest question, please, list them.
[QUOTE="def_mode"] I know, I blame MS for this, if they had been thinking of the future, developers wouldnt suffer as much and who knows...we might not see as much DLC/rip offs as we do now.IronBassHow many pieces of DLC exist because of DVD limitations, and not because of the dev's greed? Honest question, please, list them. Well MS has opened the world of greed, I wouldn't be surprised because MS is greedy themselves too. They are the main reason why we are getting charged off map packs and some updates. They are also the reason why we are getting charged off themes and avatars. This is not rocket science, if companies saw possibilities, they will do it. MS opened that window for them by charging for dlc, Gears of War for an example, devs wants to give it away but MS wanted to make profit out of it, now everyone jumped on the greed train.
Well MS has opened the world of greed, I wouldn't be surprised because MS is greedy themselves too. They are the main reason why we are getting charged off map packs and some updates. They are also the reason why we are getting charged off themes and avatars. This is not rocket science, if companies so possibilities, they will do it. MS opened that window for them by charging for dlc, Gears of War for an example, devs wants to give it away but MS wanted to make profit out of it, now everyone jumped on the greed train. def_mode
I don't want to sound rude, but you didn't answer my question, so I'll ask again:
How many pieces of DLC exist because of DVD limitations?
[QUOTE="def_mode"] Well MS has opened the world of greed, I wouldn't be surprised because MS is greedy themselves too. They are the main reason why we are getting charged off map packs and some updates. They are also the reason why we are getting charged off themes and avatars. This is not rocket science, if companies so possibilities, they will do it. MS opened that window for them by charging for dlc, Gears of War for an example, devs wants to give it away but MS wanted to make profit out of it, now everyone jumped on the greed train. IronBassYou didn't answer my question, so I'll ask again: How many pieces of DLC exist because of DVD limitations? Of course I have no idea, but there's no way you could know this either right? If it wasnt for the space limitations the possibilities of dlc wont be as big as it is now. I'm basically saying space limitations caused dlc and dlc's caused greed. Its a trend you know, now $15 will be the new regular price of their map packs. (Call of Duty)
rockstar or any dev working with 360 should understand that well they dont have to include arcade owners into their thinking if they dont want to.xbox360isgr8teasier said than done. so many people have the arcade model. you're like telling them to ignore all those people who are all potential buyers.
Sounds like the issue is 360 games arn't allowed to have mandatory installs. Forza 3 comes close, but it' still playable without the second disk. Probably afraid someone will sue someone. Also, pen drives? Er that's not really a viable option for many reasons, including cost. If pen drives were cost effective why bother installing a disk drive which makes the console about 1/5 bigger? Using it as a hard drive might be possible if MS allow it, but even then it's still not provided with the console. This isn't an issue yet, but it does seem to be the case that MS made a mistake with the Arcade model. Still MS don't have a crystal ball (As far as I'm aware, otherwise they wouldn't have to steal other peoples technology, ha!) so you can't really blame them for providing the option. If things change MS might finally have to reduce the cost of their hard drives. Not a bad thing.
I'm basically saying space limitations caused dlcdef_modeConsidering that some of the so called "DLC" is actually content that is already on the disc, I strongly doubt that.
[QUOTE="Metroid_Other_M"]
I never saw dvd9's to be a problem, until I read this article
I agree 100% with the rockstar guy when he "complains" about the xbox 360 arcades which are not equipped with a HDD. It's stupid imo, they should only sell 360's with a harddisk, but I think it's too late, since they should have done it already at the beginning of this gen. there are many people who only own an arcade and of course you can't force them to buy a hdd to play a certain game.
I don't think bluray is essential, but I think sony exclusives took advantage of it thanks to the much higher storage than a dvd9.
This sentence is the key imo "If we're filling up the disc right now, where are we going? It's not like our games are going to get any smaller. I think that issue's on the table with a bunch of games right now. I'm sure they'll come through with an intelligent solution."
What kind of "intelligent solution" do you think Microsoft you come through with? Flash drives??
ArcticWolf77
Multiple discs?
That does not solve the problem, only create a new one.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment