This topic is locked from further discussion.
:lol: last place is really hurting the lems, another gen coming up, where cows can say 360 is last place the whole time :lol:PinnacleGamingP
It sure hurt the Cows for all those years in last place! :lol: Oh and no matter what you guys believe it is still in last place! :lol:
this gen? PS2 beat the 360 at the start of the gen because ps3 wasnt even out yet, and ps3 beat it at the end of it, which is right now, which is why your so butthurt right now, this second. oh and in the middle of the gen it was a pleasure watching lems scramble and scurry for sales everyday because they knew the PS3 was catching them like Jason with a machete[QUOTE="xhawk27"][QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]:lol: last place is really hurting the lems, another gen coming up, where cows can say 360 is last place the whole time :lol:PinnacleGamingP
It sure hurt the Cows for all those years in last place! :lol: Oh and no matter what you guys believe it is still in last place! :lol:
this gen? PS2 beat the 360 at the start of the gen because ps3 wasnt even out yet, and ps3 beat it at the end of it, which is right now, which is why your so butthurt right now, this second.Cow logic here folks. :|
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]What??? 15 years ago you was the time of the playstation 1, that ALONE sold 130 million (105 million Playstations and another 25 millon PsOnes)>70 million sales = last place.
That alone is larger than gaming was 15 years ago.
Mozelleple112
The Playstation was in last place?
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
It sure hurt the Cows for all those years in last place! :lol: Oh and no matter what you guys believe it is still in last place! :lol:
this gen? PS2 beat the 360 at the start of the gen because ps3 wasnt even out yet, and ps3 beat it at the end of it, which is right now, which is why your so butthurt right now, this second. oh and in the middle of the gen it was a pleasure watching lems scramble and scurry for sales everyday because they knew the PS3 was catching them like Jason with a machetelol, I missed that part of the gen in SW, but I love your analogy.. :lol:God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
Mozelleple112
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
Sony has no need to worry about sales. I mean, look at the performance of the PS2; six years after the introduction of its successor, the machine went on to sell an extra 50 million units worldwide.
I guarantee that demand for the PlayStation 3 will still be strong in five years time, whereas the 360 and Wii would be long forgotten.
Inb4 'Butthurt Cow' replies. :cry:
Not shocking, of course. They;re so committed to it, at least. :lol:God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
Mozelleple112
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
lundy86_4
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
The lemmings? They say it constantly. They even say that it doesn't matter because the system would have sold those units anyways (mass denial there, basically).[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
are you saying, are you saying the are you saying the ps3 would sella zero systems in whole are you saying the ps3 woulda soldet only 2 systems in a whole year. thats you right now.What??? 15 years ago you was the time of the playstation 1, that ALONE sold 130 million (105 million Playstations and another 25 millon PsOnes)[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]
>70 million sales = last place.
That alone is larger than gaming was 15 years ago.
lundy86_4
The Playstation was in last place?
No it was by far in first place, but Wasdie said that "70 million units sold alone was larger than gaming 15 years ago) utterly false. 25 years ago would have been more correct. the PS1 + N64 + Saturn + Sega CD sold about 175 million units combined by the end of their generation (12 years ago) even if we look back 20 years, gaming was still much larger than 70 million as we had the SNES (50 million) and Genesis (40 million) and ataris, 3D0s, Neo geos etc that made up about 100 million units. Actually, scratch that, 25 years ago is still incorrect as the NES sold 60 million units alone, and then you there's the Sega master system, Atari 5400 etc that made up more than 70 million, so in fact, you would have to go back 30 years :lol: ! as the only big console then was the Atari 2600 @ 30 million units sold, the rest of them only made up a few million. Still, it is impressive that the worst selling system (the xbox 360) has outsold any non-playstation platform![QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
are you saying, are you saying the are you saying the ps3 would sella zero systems in whole are you saying the ps3 woulda soldet only 2 systems in a whole year. thats you right now. oh and. are you saying you need it on paper for it to count? the year sale is not on paper so it doesnt count? are you saying the 360 sales not on paper are ok tho is? are you stale?To me, it feels like MS came last. Tied with a year head start and selling arcade and 4 gig 360's for 200< for years while Sony had an albatross start. At least MS stole a ton of market share from Sony.Grawse
Hey a lot of people wanted cheap Blu-Ray players! :lol: Half of PS3's sold in the first two years were mainly used for Blu-ray players I bet! :lol:
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
Except that 70 million 360s SOLD while 70 million Ps3 SHIPPED are very different values. Lets wait for the updated MS numbers first. Actual PS3 units sold may be 68 million or lower while current xbox numbers may be 71 million. Close but no cigar cows.[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"]
God, the lemmings are the biggest hypocrites EVER. Its funny how that extra month matters sooo much now, when the one year head start has been irrelevant to the sales race :lol: Lems get owned by their own logic, daily.
lundy86_4
Hold on. Who said the year head start was irrelevant? It was a distinct advantage that the Wii had no issues overcoming.
The one month advantage does make sense. Especially in a close-tie. However, it doesn't matter, they both tied at the end of the generation.
Microsoft has sold 70 million units in 6 years and 10 months, Sony has sold 70 million units in 6 years, 0 months. the PS3 is in fact.. 10 months ahead of the 360 :cool: :cool: :cool: :cool:Doesn't matter now. I don't care that the WiiU released...PS3/360 and WiiU aren't focused on the same audience.
The lemmings? They say it constantly. They even say that it doesn't matter because the system would have sold those units anyways (mass denial there, basically). lx_theo
All Lemmings say it? I've been here a long time, and to be honest, i've seen very few say it.
are you saying, are you saying the are you saying the ps3 would sella zero systems in whole are you saying the ps3 woulda soldet only 2 systems in a whole year. thats you right now.PinnacleGamingP
I'm saying that your English is f*cking terrible. Take a class.
No it was by far in first place, but Wasdie said that "70 million units sold alone was larger than gaming 15 years ago) utterly false. 25 years ago would have been more correct. the PS1 + N64 + Saturn + Sega CD sold about 175 million units combined by the end of their generation (12 years ago) even if we look back 20 years, gaming was still much larger than 70 million as we had the SNES (50 million) and Genesis (40 million) and ataris, 3D0s, Neo geos etc that made up about 100 million units. Actually, scratch that, 25 years ago is still incorrect as the NES sold 60 million units alone, and then you there's the Sega master system, Atari 5400 etc that made up more than 70 million, so in fact, you would have to go back 30 years :lol: ! as the only big console then was the Atari 2600 @ 30 million units sold, the rest of them only made up a few million. Still, it is impressive that the worst selling system (the xbox 360) has outsold any non-playstation platform!Mozelleple112
Holy sh*t, that's a long answer to my question.
He was talking about the system in last place. In the PS' generation, did the lowest seling system sell close to 70 million? No, they did not. They sold less than half of that.
You misunderstood a quote, that's ok... A big-ass reply was not.
lol cmon guys its common sense, of course it would sell in the month. cmon guys common sense doesnt matter for the year head start tho. from now on, you made a lundy, if you talk like this. :lol:PinnacleGamingP
Seriously, you have terrible English. That post made no sense, nor did the conclusion. What is your IQ? 2?
[QUOTE="lx_theo"]The lemmings? They say it constantly. They even say that it doesn't matter because the system would have sold those units anyways (mass denial there, basically). lundy86_4
All Lemmings say it? I've been here a long time, and to be honest, i've seen very few say it.
They tend to ignore the topic because it doesn't play to their sales game (they also ignore the Wii). But I've never hear them have any other excuse for that when playing the sales game when they are forced to address it.[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]lol cmon guys its common sense, of course it would sell in the month. cmon guys common sense doesnt matter for the year head start tho. from now on, you made a lundy, if you talk like this. :lol:lundy86_4
Seriously, you have terrible English. That post made no sense, nor did the conclusion. What is your IQ? 2?
He was mocking you and proclaimed people talking in such a condescending manner would be called a "Lundy"[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]lol cmon guys its common sense, of course it would sell in the month. cmon guys common sense doesnt matter for the year head start tho. from now on, you made a lundy, if you talk like this. :lol:lundy86_4
Seriously, you have terrible English. That post made no sense, nor did the conclusion. What is your IQ? 2?
cmon guys, we all know it woulda sold systems in the yearrr......oops i mean the month :lol: english is sad that you know it.They tend to ignore the topic because it doesn't play to their sales game (they also ignore the Wii). But I've never hear them have any other excuse for that when playing the sales game when they are forced to address it.lx_theo
When have they ignored the Wii? Did they claim first place?
Do you have evidence for any of your statements?
cmon guys, we all know it woulda sold systems in the yearrr......oops i mean the month :lol: english is sad that you know it.PinnacleGamingP
Your language is f*cking terrible dude.
Who, exactly, has claimed that the year head start does not count?
----
The English language would be sad that I "know" it? Did you just f*ck up every sentence?
[QUOTE="lx_theo"]They tend to ignore the topic because it doesn't play to their sales game (they also ignore the Wii). But I've never hear them have any other excuse for that when playing the sales game when they are forced to address it.
lundy86_4
When have they ignored the Wii? Did they claim first place?
Do you have evidence for any of your statements?
Years here hearing them try those arguments :lol: If you really want me to go track them down each and every time they've actually addressed the topic, then feel free to take the internet less seriously because we both KNOW that's not worth the effort of you saying that its not conclusive evidence enough like you always do when defending them. Sort of ironic when you take into the account that you are anti-evidence in this thread.After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
The gen is over?After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
The_Game21x
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]cmon guys, we all know it woulda sold systems in the yearrr......oops i mean the month :lol: english is sad that you know it.lundy86_4
Your language is f*cking terrible dude.
Who, exactly, has claimed that the year head start does not count?
----
The English language would be sad that I "know" it? Did you just f*ck up every sentence?
:lol: your a joke!!! and so is your brain. enjoy your proficient english skills. while i flow sickness witness dollar bills. last place kills it grumpy when someone doesnt make sense bro, no need to say english, just say lundy. your sh!t is niche. bicheSo butthurt :lol: Hows the Union coming along? :lol:After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
The_Game21x
Years here hearing them try those arguments :lol: If you really want me to go track them down each and every time they've actually addressed the topic, then feel free to take the internet less seriously because we both KNOW that's not worth the effort of you saying that its not conclusive evidence enough like you always do when defending them. Sort of ironic when you take into the account that you are anti-evidence in this thread.lx_theo
Just any time it has been used. At least a few.
---
Where was I "anti-evidence"? Are you serious?
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]The gen is over? No, it ends when the consoles are discontinued. But fanboys try to proclaim whatever they wish for "ownage"After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
White_Dreams
[QUOTE="lx_theo"]Years here hearing them try those arguments :lol: If you really want me to go track them down each and every time they've actually addressed the topic, then feel free to take the internet less seriously because we both KNOW that's not worth the effort of you saying that its not conclusive evidence enough like you always do when defending them. Sort of ironic when you take into the account that you are anti-evidence in this thread.lundy86_4
Just any time it has been used. At least a few.
---
Where was I "anti-evidence"? Are you serious?
And there you go, already upping the amount I'd have to get.[QUOTE="lx_theo"]
All Lemmings say it? I've been here a long time, and to be honest, i've seen very few say it.
[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]are you saying, are you saying the are you saying the ps3 would sella zero systems in whole are you saying the ps3 woulda soldet only 2 systems in a whole year. thats you right now.lundy86_4
I'm saying that your English is f*cking terrible. Take a class.
No it was by far in first place, but Wasdie said that "70 million units sold alone was larger than gaming 15 years ago) utterly false. 25 years ago would have been more correct. the PS1 + N64 + Saturn + Sega CD sold about 175 million units combined by the end of their generation (12 years ago) even if we look back 20 years, gaming was still much larger than 70 million as we had the SNES (50 million) and Genesis (40 million) and ataris, 3D0s, Neo geos etc that made up about 100 million units. Actually, scratch that, 25 years ago is still incorrect as the NES sold 60 million units alone, and then you there's the Sega master system, Atari 5400 etc that made up more than 70 million, so in fact, you would have to go back 30 years :lol: ! as the only big console then was the Atari 2600 @ 30 million units sold, the rest of them only made up a few million. Still, it is impressive that the worst selling system (the xbox 360) has outsold any non-playstation platform!Mozelleple112
Holy sh*t, that's a long answer to my question.
He was talking about the system in last place. In the PS' generation, did the lowest seling system sell close to 70 million? No, they did not. They sold less than half of that.
You misunderstood a quote, that's ok... A big-ass reply was not.
How was that a big ass reply? It probably took you a minute of your time to read it. Its your fault if you felt that it was a waste or not. But I'm afraid that it is indeed you, not I, that have not understood what Wasdie meant, or at least what he POSTED. He said: "That alone is larger than gaming was 15 years ago." Basically, that statement is CLAIMING that the last place console of this generation (70 million units) is larger (larger in terms of sales) ALONE was bigger than ALL OF GAMING COMBINED 15 years. He is indicating that the last place of this gen, was bigger than the FIRST PLACE, SECOND PLACE and the LAST PLACE of the generation 15 years ago. Honestly, read his statement again. Maybe that's not what he meant, but that IS what his statement is inferring.[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]So butthurt :lol: Hows the Union coming along? :lol:After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
Eddie-Vedder
Truth hurts, I know.
They sell ointment for butthurt down at your local pharmacy.
[QUOTE="lx_theo"]Years here hearing them try those arguments :lol: If you really want me to go track them down each and every time they've actually addressed the topic, then feel free to take the internet less seriously because we both KNOW that's not worth the effort of you saying that its not conclusive evidence enough like you always do when defending them. Sort of ironic when you take into the account that you are anti-evidence in this thread.lundy86_4
Just any time it has been used. At least a few.
---
Where was I "anti-evidence"? Are you serious?
Lundy stop being such a biased fanboy, you try way to hard to hide the obvious. It's simply lol worthy how some of the most used lem arguments, constantly repeated all gen long are according to you just a few isolated cases. Just lols.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="xhawk27"]
To be fair though The PS3 had an advantage it's a Movie player! :lol:
xhawk27
Shut up.
It's true. I bet like 25% of sales were from people who wanted to buy a Blu-Ray player.
And people could say the same amount from RRODs for the 360. Its a stupid argument.[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]
[QUOTE="xhawk27"]
To be fair though The PS3 had an advantage it's a Movie player! :lol:
xhawk27
Shut up.
It's true. I bet like 25% of sales were from people who wanted to buy a Blu-Ray player.
I bet you made up that number... Which is more likely to be correct?
[Lundy stop being such a biased fanboy, you try way to hard to hide the obvious. It's simply lol worthy how some of the most used lem arguments, constantly repeated all gen long are according to you just a few isolated cases. Just lols. Eddie-Vedder
If they're repeated, show them. If not, shut up.
[QUOTE="White_Dreams"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]The gen is over? No, it ends when the consoles are discontinued. But fanboys try to proclaim whatever they wish for "ownage"After all the years of Cows proclaiiming the PS3 would surpass the 360 by the end of [INSERT 2006 - 2011 HERE], funny how it never happened. And now the gen is over. :( Oh well.
lx_theo
Oh get out of here. Cows are saying it's over as of the Wii U's release so they can claim a win too.
The next gen has started. The PS3/360/Wii are "last gen" now. Facts are facts.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment