This topic is locked from further discussion.
Hmmmmm. I've seen video's and screens that look far better than this. I'd side with the PC guy here; it's not that impressive judging my those screenshots :Soddballrulez
That's because they're not bullshots I guess.
I think it looks great but low res (obviously).
Looks exactly the same as Killzone 2. Don't get me wrong, Killzone 2 looks very good for a console game but this doesn't really look like much of an improvement.
Not great, but they seem like some random shots. For publicity developers choose the best looking ones (or even bullshots). The game cannot look much better than KZ2, because it's running on the same hardware. But the people who complain that they are brown have to realize that this is the art style of KZ. I personally thought KZ2 looked impressive, and I have also played the hermit holy games Crysis and Metro :)
KiZZo1
Devs allways find better ways to use the same old hardware. Just look at Gears3 compared to Gears1 and 2, Reach compared to Halo3 or Uncharted2 compared to the first one.
Funny how mostly PC gamers call it "meh"... Its like they cannot appreciate a 5 year old systems graphics even now which is definitely a good looking game.. Elitism FTL.JohnF111
Those pics look horrible though, even for a 5 year old piece of hardware.
It'll look better in motion, no doubt, and every game has its locations were it looks bad.
Either way, i don't really care that much, i don't buy games to look at them.
Razor sharp textures? Those shots look like Fallout 3 on the PC at medium settings... not so awesome.
Funny how mostly PC gamers call it "meh"... Its like they cannot appreciate a 5 year old systems graphics even now which is definitely a good looking game.. Elitism FTL.JohnF111
I've played unenhanced console ports before, those screens just aren't appealing to me. Just because I don't like those; doesn't mean I don't like all console level games.
Since people are so negative towards those images, I'll just commend TC for not using bullshots.
Even though that makes console games look dastardly we can at least see why proper 1920*1080 is better than 720p we get on consoles unlike all the usual promo bullshot (omg pun) we get *cough* Gears 3 *cough*.
Funny how mostly PC gamers call it "meh"... Its like they cannot appreciate a 5 year old systems graphics even now which is definitely a good looking game.. Elitism FTL.JohnF111
DOOM 3 (PC version) is from 2004 and looks alot better then Killzone 3 so no those kz3 screens are not impressive
As a mainly PC gamer I'm gonna give one big meh.GeneralShowzer
Likewise, it doesn't look any better than MW2 and that was hardly the best looking game.
snip
Totalgym9000
Chill, no need for that sort of talk.
There are PS3/KZ fans in this thread saying they aren't very good shots.
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
Not great, but they seem like some random shots. For publicity developers choose the best looking ones (or even bullshots). The game cannot look much better than KZ2, because it's running on the same hardware. But the people who complain that they are brown have to realize that this is the art style of KZ. I personally thought KZ2 looked impressive, and I have also played the hermit holy games Crysis and Metro :)
PAL360
Devs allways find better ways to use the same old hardware. Just look at Gears3 compared to Gears1 and 2, Reach compared to Halo3 or Uncharted2 compared to the first one.
OT Have we actually seen GeoW3's visuals yet? Someone please give me a link, didn't know that I were behind. :([QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
Not great, but they seem like some random shots. For publicity developers choose the best looking ones (or even bullshots). The game cannot look much better than KZ2, because it's running on the same hardware. But the people who complain that they are brown have to realize that this is the art style of KZ. I personally thought KZ2 looked impressive, and I have also played the hermit holy games Crysis and Metro :)
OctaBech
Devs allways find better ways to use the same old hardware. Just look at Gears3 compared to Gears1 and 2, Reach compared to Halo3 or Uncharted2 compared to the first one.
OT Have we actually seen GeoW3's visuals yet? Someone please give me a link, didn't know that I were behind. :(Some grainy gifs i found.
Well I'm a PC gamer so I'm judging the visuals by that standard. If you guys want an impartial opinion, from what I've seen so far Killzone 3 looks much better than Gears of War 3.
Funny how mostly PC gamers call it "meh"... Its like they cannot appreciate a 5 year old systems graphics even now which is definitely a good looking game.. Elitism FTL.JohnF111Right... Which is why I praise Uncharted 2 graphics to the heavens.... But honestly Killzone never looked good to me. It's like the art style highlights the technical shortcomings.
OT Have we actually seen GeoW3's visuals yet? Someone please give me a link, didn't know that I were behind. :([QUOTE="OctaBech"][QUOTE="PAL360"]
Devs allways find better ways to use the same old hardware. Just look at Gears3 compared to Gears1 and 2, Reach compared to Halo3 or Uncharted2 compared to the first one.
MFDOOM1983
Some grainy gifs i found.
Thanks :D Seems like it's time for me to do some googling.[QUOTE="KillerJuan77"]and the excessive use of motion bluris still there.FIipModeNot in the actual game it isn't.
After seeing this: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-killzone-3-tech-analysis
You are right, but it's still pretty blurry, see Batman: Arkham Asylum, Assassin's Creed 2, Metroid Prime 3: Corruption and Uncharted 2 for great graphics on consoles that don't overuse anything to look great.
Not insecure sorry...It's just meh.[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="OctaBech"] Funny how insecure PC gamers are.Ikuto_Tsukiyomi
Agreed.
I think the game is inaccurately portrayed in these pics, but I do agree that PC FPS's (and any other genre) look quite a bit better, but what are you going to do :P. Man I want to play some Crysis or Half Life right now for some reason lol.
Not in the actual game it isn't.[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="KillerJuan77"]and the excessive use of motion bluris still there.KillerJuan77
After seeing this: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-killzone-3-tech-analysis
You are right, but it's still pretty blurry, see Batman: Arkham Asylum, Assassin's Creed 2, Metroid Prime 3: Corruption and Uncharted 2 for great graphics on consoles that don't overuse anything to look great.
I'm not getting this excessive use your talking about, but anyway I guess it's different strokes, because for one i'm fine with a little motion blur like what KZ3 and Reach uses, and 2 these games look great even when motion blur isn't in effect a.k.a when not moving.this, infact it looks disgusting even compared to some console games imo[QUOTE="Silenthps"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]As a mainly PC gamer I'm gonna give one big meh.waltefmoney
Come on now. That's too much.
I can't blame him. He's probably used to 4096x2048p 32X SSAA screenshots of console games, how can this 720p KZ3 shots compare :roll: ?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment