As close as you can get considering the hardware imo.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Wasn't this taken from the video? I saw it in another thread.
I'd rather see proper still images than shots taken from footage.
I truly hope this is either fake or a very bad representation of the engine because that looks horrible in my opinion.
Too bad that consolites will compare it to the close corridors, faked lighting and scripted physics of Kz2 and GeoW2 instead of appreciating what Crytek have done :(It's that bad based on the video it was taken from, I think this is a good thing for consolites to get their teeth into. I'd be looking at Crysis low/med at around 720 type graphics... still pretty damn good
lundy86_4
oh but it gets worse.
cobrax75
Cobrax, stop trolling
We all know IGN has horrid video encoding and their videos look 100 times worse than the actual game.
And taking screencaps of said low res, low quality video is hardly representative of the actual appearance of the engine.
Don't give Hermits a bad name. Stop now.
Crysis maxed looks like crap because I just FRAPS'd a video at 640x480 with maximum compression. You can't deny my logic!
Cobrax, stop trollingWell in all fairness, the problem with these screen captures isn't necessarily artifacting (although it is evident) it's mostly that the game (or engine) looks bad. Following Cobrax's source, you'll find this nifty thread over on inCrysis. Further, this poster makes a disheartening point. The difference isn't just that one was direct feed, and the other was a screencap, it's also that CE3 looks much worse.We all know IGN has horrid video encoding and their videos look 100 times worse than the actual game.
And taking screencaps of said low res, low quality video is hardly representative of the actual appearance of the engine.
Don't give Hermits a bad name. Stop now.horrowhip
Yes, but it's still clear enough to see a major lack of detail, particularly in the background (no trees!) and the rock textures (which weren't all that great in Crysis either, but are much worse here).That's a lossy compressed picture of a lossy compressed video. This means nothing.
DeckardLee
The graphics will be better under a complete engine of course, everyone knows this. Even judging off of those videos, however "low quality," it's quite easy to tell that it's not on par or even close to the PC version.
EDIT: Now is this confirmation that Crysis will see a consolized version or was it just for testing purposes?
[QUOTE="DeckardLee"]QFT. Obviously its not gonna look as good as it did on PC. But It'll look better than that picture for sure! So does this mean Crysis is official for consoles? NoThat's a lossy compressed picture of a lossy compressed video. This means nothing.
navstar29
Before any console fanboys come in saying that looks great, it looks like crysis on low with a few settings on medium.
don't worry guys, crysis was never about visuals, its got GREAT core gamesplay mechanics like a super suit :P
Euh :|
I saw the vid this morning and it blew me away.
Downgrade already :oLto_thaG
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]
Euh :|
I saw the vid this morning and it blew me away.
Downgrade already :oMcdonaIdsGuy
Nope,no console game has a chance of competing with Cry engine 3...wow, Killzone and Uncharted look better then that :|
Disturbed123
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment