First PS3 screenshot of Crysis 2....I'm not floored, and my jaw is not dropped.

And if it doesn't, are you going to finally admit that the XBOX 360 is not as powerful as the PS3?

Unnatural101

Does GT5 make cows finally admit 360 can run neck-and-neck with the PS3?:lol:

Yes it is,and blur is probably because of very high compression.Game is 720p on consoles...at least everything till now released was.

Bus-A-Bus

I forgot Crytek *edit* isn't using brute-force 3D, so it wouldn't be upscaled. My bad.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Yes.Just like I said its gonna outdo KZ2.

Unnatural101

And if it doesn't, are you going to finally admit that the XBOX 360 is not as powerful as the PS3?

No because both consoles are very close in power,its more up to devs to exploit it.Same was said by cows when KZ2 came and Crysis 2 looks to be surpassed it...

I think it looks great.

FIipMode

No because both consoles are very close in power,its more up to devs to exploit it.Same was said by cows when KZ2 came and Crysis 2 looks to be surpassed it...

Bus-A-Bus

I still don't understand how their "very close in power" when XBOX 360 has been struggling with its SUB HD exclusive issues.

I mean, common sense tells me that the XBOX 360 is nearing its own celing whereas PS3's exclusives keep getting better and better and they are all HD....in fact, putting out a game in SUB HD on the Playstation from Sony's first party studios, you get the impression that it would be unacceptable to Sony and its other developers....SUB HD just isn't happening on the PS3 in 2010, period.

But I suppose I should digress because I don't wanna derail my own topic. lol

I'd say that screen looks like the original Crysis on all medium with only shaders turned to high...at 720p :?

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

No because both consoles are very close in power,its more up to devs to exploit it.Same was said by cows when KZ2 came and Crysis 2 looks to be surpassed it...

Unnatural101

I still don't understand how their "very close in power" when XBOX 360 has been struggling with its SUB HD exclusive issues.

I mean, common sense tells me that the XBOX 360 is nearing its own celing whereas PS3's exclusives keep getting better and better and they are all HD....in fact, putting out a game in SUB HD on the Playstation from Sony's first party studios, you get the impression that it would be unacceptable to Sony and its other developers....SUB HD just isn't happening on the PS3 in 2010, period.

But I suppose I should digress because I don't wanna derail my own topic. lol

KZ3 is proof that PS3 is nearing its celling even when 1st party is dealing with it.Its just appearent that beside better textures and MLAA,KZ3 looks extremely close to KZ2,and UC3 looks very close to UC2.

Anyway,its so clear that 360 and PS3 are so close in power,its even boring to argue about that.

This is how compressed it really is... :roll:

Just look at those little pictures at bottom.They should look waaaaaay sharper if they were downsampled from 720p.Now...that brings in mind that Cryteks custom AA is actually kinda beasty if it features no blur and cleans aliasing that much.

KZ3 is proof that PS3 is nearing its celling even when 1st party is dealing with it.Its just appearent that beside better textures and MLAA,KZ3 looks extremely close to KZ2,and UC3 looks very close to UC2.

Anyway,its so clear that 360 and PS3 are so close in power,its even boring to argue about that.

Bus-A-Bus

Not when Naughty Dog keeps insisting the PS3 has more to give.

Sorry, and no offense, but I'll take Naughty Dog on their word over conjecture.

I mean afterall, if anyone deserves to be listened to and believed its Naughty Dog.

At anyrate, XBOX 360 has proven it doesn't have the power....its proven it over and over and over again.

Nothing more to say, really

When it stops doing Sub HD retail exclusives, it will have proven itself worthy of a discussion of equal power.

*shrug*

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

KZ3 is proof that PS3 is nearing its celling even when 1st party is dealing with it.Its just appearent that beside better textures and MLAA,KZ3 looks extremely close to KZ2,and UC3 looks very close to UC2.

Anyway,its so clear that 360 and PS3 are so close in power,its even boring to argue about that.

Unnatural101

Not when Naughty Dog keeps insisting the PS3 has more to give.

Sorry, and no offense, but I'll take Naughty Dog on their word over conjecture.

I mean afterall, if anyone deserves to be listened to and believed its Naughty Dog.

At anyrate, XBOX 360 has proven it doesn't have the power....its proven it over and over and over again.

Nothing more to say, really

When it stops doing Sub HD retail exclusives, it will have proven itself worthy of a discussion of equal power.

*shrug*

You gonna take a word from developer that last gen said that you cant max system and its all about how to use the best way whats you got.Than fast forward to this gen they say "We use 30% of ps3 power" "Than we use 100% of ps3 power,we maxed it" "Than(even if it looks exactly the same as UC2) they say we have limitless power" :roll: ?

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Yes.Just like I said its gonna outdo KZ2.

Unnatural101

And if it doesn't, are you going to finally admit that the XBOX 360 is not as powerful as the PS3?

Still in the hype train i see! It´s a fact 360 and PS3 have about the same power...

No, they really don't. The fact that 360's graphics queens are never EVER shown in VIDEO compared to PS3s graphics kings is intrinsic proof of the fact.

Still in the hype train i see! It´s a fact 360 and PS3 have about the same power...

PAL360

Sorry.....

Sub HD says otherwise.

Sorry. :(

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Still in the hype train i see! It´s a fact 360 and PS3 have about the same power...

Unnatural101

Sorry.....

Sub HD says otherwise.

Sorry. :(

I have never seen more impressive(techically) game on 360 than RDR and RE5 yet those are 720p...And BTW you ownage is not exactly ownage when its based on such a compressed old shot.Yes...I still expect Crysis 2 to be graphics king on all platforms.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

Still in the hype train i see! It´s a fact 360 and PS3 have about the same power...

Unnatural101

Sorry.....

Sub HD says otherwise.

Sorry. :(

Looks fantastic.

Sorry.....

Sub HD says otherwise.

Sorry. :(

Unnatural101

Like Forza and Gears. Right?

I have never seen more impressive(techically) game on 360 than RDR and RE5 yet those are 720p...And BTW you ownage is not exactly ownage when its based on such a compressed old shot.Yes...I still expect Crysis 2 to be graphics king on all platforms.

Bus-A-Bus

Right...but if I recall,

You said that about Alan Wake...and then for a short time after you said that about Halo Reach....

And we both know how that turned out.

No offense, but your good will in terms of "benefit of the doubt" has now expired.

It's not reasonable for someone to claim it's constantly raining, but when we look out of the window, its a clear sunny sky blue day.

Call me when that Great Pumpkin finally arrives.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]The gun model and the bushes look kind of grimy to me. Bad screen?soulitane

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I have never seen more impressive(techically) game on 360 than RDR and RE5 yet those are 720p...And BTW you ownage is not exactly ownage when its based on such a compressed old shot.Yes...I still expect Crysis 2 to be graphics king on all platforms.

Unnatural101

Right...but if I recall,

You said that about Alan Wake...and then for a short time after you said that about Halo Reach....

And we both know how that turned out.

No offense, but your good will in terms of "benefit of the doubt" has now expired.

It's not reasonable for someone to claim it's constantly raining, but when we look out of the window, its a clear sunny sky blue day.

Call me when that Great Pumpkin finally arrives.

I NEVER said that Reach will be graphics king,NEVER.And i have never said that Alan Wake will be either...AW is great technical accomplishment but falls shorth because of criminal resolution.If it wasnt for that it would be one of the top looking games on consoles,no doubt.

I NEVER said that Reach will be graphics king,NEVER.And i have never said that Alan Wake will be either...AW is great technical accomplishment but falls shorth because of criminal resolution.If it wasnt for that it would be one of the top looking games on consoles,no doubt.

Bus-A-Bus

:lol:

Yes you did.....you most certainly did.

You even made me...er, the other guy feel bad for not giving the allocated 2 or so months of time it was to take Alan Wake to launch. You said something along the lines of "I waited for a couple years for PS3 to prove itself, the least you could do is wait a couple for months for Alan Wake to launch".

Yes....I remember it well.

Halo..I'm not 100% that it was you, but I'm almost sure you said that one too.

But most assuredly, you claimed ALAN WAKE would be a technical marvel.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

I NEVER said that Reach will be graphics king,NEVER.And i have never said that Alan Wake will be either...AW is great technical accomplishment but falls shorth because of criminal resolution.If it wasnt for that it would be one of the top looking games on consoles,no doubt.

Unnatural101

:lol:

Yes you did.....you most certainly did.

You even made me...er, the other guy feel bad for not giving the allocated 2 or so months of time it was to take Alan Wake to launch. You said something along the lines of "I waited for a couple years for PS3 to prove itself, the least you could do is wait a couple for months for Alan Wake to launch".

Yes....I remember it well.

Halo..I'm not 100% that it was you, but I'm almost sure you said that one too.

But most assuredly, you claimed ALAN WAKE would be a technical marvel.

Well than read again what i wrote in the qoute...Yes i did say Alan Wake is technical marvel but not graphics king.At least when developers were claiming it runs at 720p and 4xAA,and about Reach...I never said it,really.Never.I did however say that Crysis 2 will be graphics king and I stay by it.

I'm mostly worried about the framerate.

I'm mostly worried about the framerate.

RawDeal_basic

Don't. Most (all) high fidelity console games strike 20 fps every so often ;)

That pic looks good but it's old, I've seen the beta on 360 and looks better than that.:?

That pic looks good but it's old, I've seen the beta on 360 and looks better than that.:?

mitu123

Yea...and just look at the compression of that shot.Oh my...Aside from bluriness caused by compression,there is some interesting absent of jaggies.

Bus-a-Bus, you bring up some good points. However, image compression that bad can tend to hide jaggies. Jus sayin'

It's using that AA Crytek made from that vid about AA?:o

Yeah it's definitely not a bullshot...you can see the aliasing in a few places if you look closely. It's just so damn blurry and compressed that you can't see most of the aliasing.

That's nice looking. After all the wii graphics I normally play I could definitely live with that.

Bus-a-Bus, you bring up some good points. However, image compression that bad can tend to hide jaggies. Jus sayin'

Shewgenja

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

It's using that AA Crytek made from that vid about AA?:o

mitu123

I think they are...at least they had it in tech papers.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

It's using that AA Crytek made from that vid about AA?:o

Bus-A-Bus

I think they are...at least they had it in tech papers.

looks pretty damn good to me, welllll, welll its the big showwwww

That is what happens when you put a graphically intense game on a piece of hardware with a theoretically powerful CPU and RAM shared betweeen both CPU and GPU. I don't understand how anyone could expect PC-Crysis level graphics from consoles that can barely get games to run at 720p at 30 fps.

That is what happens when you put a graphically intense game on a piece of hardware with a theoretically powerful CPU and RAM shared betweeen both CPU and GPU. I don't understand how anyone could expect PC-Crysis level graphics from consoles that can barely get games to run at 720p at 30 fps.

foxhound_fox

EDIT: and even that is not the final repesentation of the console graphics. :shock:

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

That is what happens when you put a graphically intense game on a piece of hardware with a theoretically powerful CPU and RAM shared betweeen both CPU and GPU. I don't understand how anyone could expect PC-Crysis level graphics from consoles that can barely get games to run at 720p at 30 fps.

theuncharted34

Maybe its even older than 3 monts knowing Crytek :)

And dont forget that its so compressed it makes everyting blurry and trees "sucky" :D

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Bus-a-Bus, you bring up some good points. However, image compression that bad can tend to hide jaggies. Jus sayin'

Bus-A-Bus

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

That is what happens when you put a graphically intense game on a piece of hardware with a theoretically powerful CPU and RAM shared betweeen both CPU and GPU. I don't understand how anyone could expect PC-Crysis level graphics from consoles that can barely get games to run at 720p at 30 fps.

Bus-A-Bus

Maybe its even older than 3 monts knowing Crytek :)

And dont forget that its so compressed it makes everyting blurry and trees "sucky" :D

yep. This game just keeps getting better looking as time goes by :P This game may just beat kz3 after all.. Gonna be close :)

Somebody needs to make a hype thread :D

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Bus-a-Bus, you bring up some good points. However, image compression that bad can tend to hide jaggies. Jus sayin'

Teufelhuhn

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

As i were told its not gonna be exactly that Hybrid AA.

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]

Bus-a-Bus, you bring up some good points. However, image compression that bad can tend to hide jaggies. Jus sayin'

Teufelhuhn

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

Ravensmash

I actually really like the slight blur that MLAA and this Hybrid AA gives games. Certainly MUCH better than Quincux :P

I don't see the problem.It looks really good.

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="Bus-A-Bus"]

Yes you are right,but I do remember Crytek mentioning their own AA implantation...it could have its fingers in also.

Ravensmash

I dont believe you will get blurriness...doubt that Crytek would **** up IQ by doing that.Latest trailer suggest that their AA is doing great job with no blurring.