God of War 3 -- How did this game get a 9.0?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#2 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts

The ending.

Avatar image for thetruespin
thetruespin

3256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 thetruespin
Member since 2008 • 3256 Posts
no multiplayaaaaaaaaaa
Avatar image for KevinButlerVP
KevinButlerVP

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 KevinButlerVP
Member since 2010 • 2378 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

GOW3 is epic, probably GOTY contendewr
Avatar image for BURSTIIIFIRE
BURSTIIIFIRE

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 BURSTIIIFIRE
Member since 2007 • 2025 Posts

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

II_Seraphim_II

my bad...misread you topic

Avatar image for deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
Member since 2004 • 530 Posts
Because beat em ups are never going to get more than 9. Games need more depth to score higher.
Avatar image for TaigaTiger
TaigaTiger

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 TaigaTiger
Member since 2009 • 660 Posts

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

BURSTIIIFIRE

You just lost all credibilty in this topic by saying that.

if you read the last bit you would know he was just kidding about that statement
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

Honstly it deserves an 8.5 imo. I played GoW2 and then GoW3 back to back and I didn't see anything in the game that made it AAA caliber so long after GoW2 achieved that score. It's a great game and I enjoyed it but it's not much different from GoW2 overall.

Avatar image for ___gamemaster__
___gamemaster__

3425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ___gamemaster__  Online
Member since 2009 • 3425 Posts

ME2 and GOW3 both deserve 9.5 IMO.

Avatar image for KevinButlerVP
KevinButlerVP

2378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KevinButlerVP
Member since 2010 • 2378 Posts
[QUOTE="TaigaTiger"][QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

You just lost all credibilty in this topic by saying that.

if you read the last bit you would know he was just kidding about that statement

u just lost all credibility by not reading the last sentence
Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts

Games need more depth to score higher.RABicle

No they don't. In fact, games in general don't need a huge amount of depth in order to be good.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#12 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Yeah, thats the way i feel about Mass Effect 2!

Avatar image for deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
Member since 2004 • 530 Posts

[QUOTE="RABicle"]Games need more depth to score higher.Shad0ki11

No they don't. In fact, games in general don't need a huge amount of depth in order to be good.

I never said anything about games needing depth to be good. What I'm saying is that the sort of games that get scores above 9 tend be huge expansive games. God of War is fundamentally a beat em up, a fun one too, but since all you ever really do is run along killing everything that appears it wont score higher on any critical scale. Similarly Donkey Kong Jungle Beat is possibly the most fun game I've ever played, but its so simple it only uses 2 buttons and a sound detector and therefore doesn't score above an 8 anywhere except my heart.
Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

II_Seraphim_II I don't care about the other games, but you watch your heathen tongue when you speak about Bayonetta or that oven cooked PS3 of yours will explode DAMN YOU

Anyway personally? combats still not as good as some of the other games in the genre, it plays it a bit safe to the formula, the scorpion sucks monkey ass, flying segments were corny, first half of the story isn't very strong, and 2 of the alternate weapons while "good" are too similar to the blades of exile. Are they massive complaints? no clearly it's mostly some nitpicking with some solid flaws, that have a remedy to them(for instance an ending i enjoyed makes up for the overall weak plot, and the game being so polished, well paced, well designed made the action thrilling).

It's a great game, but for my own tastes it's not a 9.5. I also don't think it's insulting Bayonetta scored the same. Bayonetta is a great game and deserved to be looked as an equal in quality. Both have a different playsty-le to them. But hey I'll let everyone else argue it out.

Avatar image for _Tobli_
_Tobli_

5733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 _Tobli_
Member since 2007 • 5733 Posts

I think GOW played it a bit too safe with the combat mechanics, and puzzle stuff. I have lost count of people who have said that they feel that it is too similar to the previous iterations.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#16 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
Because beat em ups are never going to get more than 9. Games need more depth to score higher.RABicle
That's a fun theory, yet when it comes to a gameplay standpoint. Few games have the gameplay depth of a Ninja Gaiden, Devil May Cry 3, Bayonetta and yet clearly there are far more "shallow" games in the gameplay department that score higher. No one element dictates the quality of a game. You can be an exceptional game without much gameplay depth. Core gameplay wise Mario Galaxy is not deep, and many can argue it isn't challenging. Yet it more than makes a strong case for it's high review scares. It's so well designed overall. It's fun. Also if it's a story thing when you meant depth. First and foremost eww videogame stories? and two Mario doesn't have much of a story and that still debunks the "depth" theory.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

II_Seraphim_II I don't care about the other games, but you watch your heathen tongue when you speak about Bayonetta or that oven cooked PS3 of yours will explode DAMN YOU

Anyway personally? combats still not as good as some of the other games in the genre, it plays it a bit safe to the formula, the scorpion sucks monkey ass, flying segments were corny, first half of the story isn't very strong, and 2 of the alternate weapons while "good" are too similar to the blades of exile. Are they massive complaints? no clearly it's mostly some nitpicking with some solid flaws, that have a remedy to them(for instance an ending i enjoyed makes up for the overall weak plot, and the game being so polished, well paced, well designed made the action thrilling).

It's a great game, but for my own tastes it's not a 9.5. I also don't think it's insulting Bayonetta scored the same. Bayonetta is a great game and deserved to be looked as an equal in quality. Both have a different playsty-le to them. But hey I'll let everyone else argue it out.

jg4xchamp

Psht...Bayonetta? That game is for noobs! Real men play GoW3 :D

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#18 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

II_Seraphim_II I don't care about the other games, but you watch your heathen tongue when you speak about Bayonetta or that oven cooked PS3 of yours will explode DAMN YOU

Anyway personally? combats still not as good as some of the other games in the genre, it plays it a bit safe to the formula, the scorpion sucks monkey ass, flying segments were corny, first half of the story isn't very strong, and 2 of the alternate weapons while "good" are too similar to the blades of exile. Are they massive complaints? no clearly it's mostly some nitpicking with some solid flaws, that have a remedy to them(for instance an ending i enjoyed makes up for the overall weak plot, and the game being so polished, well paced, well designed made the action thrilling).

It's a great game, but for my own tastes it's not a 9.5. I also don't think it's insulting Bayonetta scored the same. Bayonetta is a great game and deserved to be looked as an equal in quality. Both have a different playsty-le to them. But hey I'll let everyone else argue it out.

II_Seraphim_II

Psht...Bayonetta? That game is for noobs! Real men play GoW3 :D

Yo you hatin son.

Avatar image for tmaclabi
tmaclabi

17109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 tmaclabi
Member since 2006 • 17109 Posts
GOW3. Yeah, it deserves a rating higher than 9.0 and i do think it is a sequel that is excellent almost in everything. It actually depends on the reviewers of the game but for me, this game deserves a higher rating too ;)
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

Yo you hatin son.

jg4xchamp

lol. I wish GoW3 had gotten a higher rating, that way there would be no debate about which game is better. You probably paid of GS reviewers to knock down GoW3's score :x :P

Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#21 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
Eh...I'm not gonna argue about a .5 difference. A 9.0 is just that, excellent....which is what this game is.
Avatar image for soapandbubbles
soapandbubbles

3412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 soapandbubbles
Member since 2010 • 3412 Posts
WTH are you talking about? GOW3 was dissapointing...nothing but a tech demo for pretty graphics, both STORY and gameplay are pathetic, especially gameplay, they didn't even bother to improve animations, but recycle them from the past games. Some levels nearly bored me to tears and just done with little effort. While a few boss battles were awesome, the game IMO was indeed rushed and needed another year in dev. 8.5 is what it should have got.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
WTH are you talking about? GOW3 was dissapointing...nothing but a tech demo for pretty graphics, both STORY and gameplay are pathetic, especially gameplay, they didn't even bother to improve animations, but recycle them from the past games. Some levels nearly bored me to tears and just done with little effort. While a few boss battles were awesome, the game IMO was indeed rushed and needed another year in dev. 8.5 is what it should have got. soapandbubbles
:o.....:o.....:o Blasphemy!!!!
Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

I'd agree with everything except the voice acting. I found it almost cringe worthy to be honest. There's no denying the amount of polish GOW3 has, which is to be expected after playing GOW1 and 2, but I personally think they played it safe. In my opinion it plays identical to it's predecessors, which isn't always a bad thing. And it seems they overloaded it with gore just for the sake of it. It's a pretty mindless game, but what saves it is it's stunning set peices. Not my personal game of the year, but a pretty awesome game none the less.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#25 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

Yo you hatin son.

II_Seraphim_II

lol. I wish GoW3 had gotten a higher rating, that way there would be no debate about which game is better. You probably paid of GS reviewers to knock down GoW3's score :x :P

I did. I clearly paid tom mcshea to underscore God of War 3 by a whole point. It's true. I SHALL NOT LIE NO LONGER!

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#26 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

not a huge difference for me personally in 9 or 9.5/10.

GOW3 is a great game and AAA material, nothing more nothing less.

9/10 is a perfect score that I agree with.

Avatar image for Tekkenloving
Tekkenloving

1546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Tekkenloving
Member since 2008 • 1546 Posts
meh this thread is disappointing joke post aftr joke post bring some real argument to the table like "bayonetta as nothing to offer but it's combat system" and " gow is a button mashing fest"oh and "crysis looks like carp with out mods ":)
Avatar image for icygangsta
icygangsta

2897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 icygangsta
Member since 2006 • 2897 Posts

[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]

Yo you hatin son.

II_Seraphim_II

lol. I wish GoW3 had gotten a higher rating, that way there would be no debate about which game is better. You probably paid of GS reviewers to knock down GoW3's score :x :P

I've got to agree with you Seraphim. Even though the story definetely isn't as compelling as the first; its as if the developers literally took everything that made GoW1 & 2 amazing; and absolutely solidified and perfected it to the most pristine level known to man. Absolutely jaw dropping. A visceral beauty is God of war; and the premiere hack n slash game deserves more than a 9.0. In my opinion ofcourse.

Avatar image for JonSnow777
JonSnow777

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 JonSnow777
Member since 2009 • 787 Posts

It should have gotten an 8. Short, linear game that brings nothing new to the table except for upgraded graphics that come, once again, at the expense of expansive, interactive environments.

Avatar image for icygangsta
icygangsta

2897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 icygangsta
Member since 2006 • 2897 Posts

It should have gotten an 8. Short, linear game that brings nothing new to the table except for upgraded graphics that come, once again, at the expense of expansive, interactive environments.

JonSnow777

The fact that the battle system is the best in the genre; aswell as the production value and 'upgraded graphics' which are some of the best this generation alone destroy your statement.

Linear game? What did you expect, open world GoW? Please.

Avatar image for CR00K
CR00K

2657

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 CR00K
Member since 2006 • 2657 Posts
[QUOTE="BURSTIIIFIRE"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

Seriously, after playing this game, it deserves atleast a 9.5. This game was utter and complete perfection. Everything about this game was high caliber. The graphics, the presentation, the voice acting, the sound, the story...this game was just top notch. I just finished beating the game and I'm still foaming at the mouth from the sheer awesomeness I just experienced. And it's borderline insulting to give this game the same score as Bayonetta! (Awaits Bayonetta lovers :P )

Seriously though, this game is definitely my top runner for GOTY 2010. had it come out last year, I would vote for this game 100x over Uncharted 2 and Demon's Souls for GOTY. What were your thoughts about the game?

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta, Ninja Gaiden 2, Dante's Inferno, DMC4, and Halo 3! And it has better graphics than Crysis! You know I had to add in Halo 3 and Crysis or this wouldn't be a proper SW topic :P

You just lost all credibilty in this topic by saying that.

You just lost all credibility in this topic by not reading the last sentence.
Avatar image for JonSnow777
JonSnow777

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 JonSnow777
Member since 2009 • 787 Posts

[QUOTE="JonSnow777"]

It should have gotten an 8. Short, linear game that brings nothing new to the table except for upgraded graphics that come, once again, at the expense of expansive, interactive environments.

icygangsta

The fact that the battle system is the best in the genre; aswell as the production value and 'upgraded graphics' which are some of the best this generation alone destroy your statement.

Linear game? What did you expect, open world GoW? Please.

Ninja Gaiden and Bayonetta have better combat.

Avatar image for RadecSupreme
RadecSupreme

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#33 RadecSupreme
Member since 2009 • 4824 Posts
Agreed completely. Quite an epic game that should have gotten higher score but the score is good nevertheless.
Avatar image for GabeNewellsPie
GabeNewellsPie

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 GabeNewellsPie
Member since 2008 • 1147 Posts

It should have gotten an 8. Short, linear game that brings nothing new to the table except for upgraded graphics that come, once again, at the expense of expansive, interactive environments.

JonSnow777

Yeah I was really hoping a first part sony developer would be able to unleash some of teh PS3's untaaped power and give us destructible and interactive environments that you could use against your enemies.

The game would then have actually been epic.As it is its a solid a fun hack 'n slash.Nothing more.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
I see what you did there Seraphim :D
Avatar image for thrillh0
thrillh0

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 thrillh0
Member since 2008 • 335 Posts

How did this game get a 9.0?

II_Seraphim_II

Easy peasy - Sony's GS ad campaign check cleared. There's your answer.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Nah, felt like a 9.0 to me.
Avatar image for h575309
h575309

8551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 h575309
Member since 2005 • 8551 Posts

It had a bunch of glitches in my experience, and the last boss was meh, so it gets an 8.5 in my book.

Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts

[spoiler] Because Pandora was such a silly plot device. [/spoiler] .

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
GOW in HD.
Avatar image for lloveLamp
lloveLamp

2891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 lloveLamp
Member since 2009 • 2891 Posts
hold on. Ninja Gaiden 2 is better IMO.
Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#42 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

Honstly it deserves an 8.5 imo. I played GoW2 and then GoW3 back to back and I didn't see anything in the game that made it AAA caliber so long after GoW2 achieved that score. It's a great game and I enjoyed it but it's not much different from GoW2 overall.

Bigboi500
It was a lot different. You same people spewing this didn't complain when halo3 played the same way as halo2, or halo1, or when insert first person shooter here played the same way as it's sequel. there were plenty of new ideas in gow3.. first person death play, on the fly weapon switching, tons of new weapons and spells, vertical flight, wings for gliding, giant titans to traversal, excellently designed boss battles, and all the graphic animation, texture improovments from the last. I really belive people like this guy didn't play the game if they make staments like this. Lets make the next Call of duty a different genre or it won't be worthy of a high score mentality lol
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
hold on. Ninja Gaiden 2 is better IMO. lloveLamp
You really think so? I find the overall presentation to be better in GOW. Combat is better in NG no doubt, but GOW shines in pretty much every other area.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
I would prefer Bayonetta's combat over God of War's. Me personally God of War gets an 8.5, not a 9.5 :P
Avatar image for tbone802
tbone802

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 tbone802
Member since 2006 • 1195 Posts
I think a 9 is a fair score for this game. The first few hours really suck you in but to me the game really tails off in the later hours (contrary to what the review says). It's worth a playthrough for the boss fights though especially Hades and Hercules.
Avatar image for Ninja-Bear
Ninja-Bear

1028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 Ninja-Bear
Member since 2010 • 1028 Posts

And it has better graphics than Crysis!

II_Seraphim_II
Man, why'd you have to go there? :?
Avatar image for killerfist
killerfist

20155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#47 killerfist
Member since 2005 • 20155 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

And it has better graphics than Crysis!

Ninja-Bear
Man, why'd you have to go there? :?

Well, if he didn't add that in...people would have said that it would belong on the PS3 board.:P
Avatar image for Some-Mist
Some-Mist

5631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#48 Some-Mist
Member since 2009 • 5631 Posts

P.S. GoW3 is better than Bayonetta

II_Seraphim_II

:roll:

can't tell if you're serious or not

[QUOTE="JonSnow777"]

It should have gotten an 8. Short, linear game that brings nothing new to the table except for upgraded graphics that come, once again, at the expense of expansive, interactive environments.

icygangsta

The fact that the battle system is the best in the genre; aswell as the production value and 'upgraded graphics' which are some of the best this generation alone destroy your statement.

Linear game? What did you expect, open world GoW? Please.

it actually has a very limited and casualized battle system. Especially in comparison to games like DMC, NG, and Bayonetta.

however, it is one of the first titles in the genre that doesn't have a ridiculously steep learning curve in order to appeal to a wider audience, so that could be seen as a plus by many casuals who are otherwise turned off by technicality.

Avatar image for IppoTenma
IppoTenma

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 IppoTenma
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts
It proably would have gotten an 8.9 or something like Zelda TP for being the too similar to the older games if the old rating system was still in, lol.
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#50 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"]

And it has better graphics than Crysis!

Ninja-Bear
Man, why'd you have to go there? :?

Read the whole post.