Good-Bye Nintendo

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MagnuzGuerra
MagnuzGuerra

1037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#751 MagnuzGuerra
Member since 2004 • 1037 Posts

[QUOTE="MagnuzGuerra"]Because, above all things, gamers, causals and non-gamers play games just to have some fun. And that doesn't hunt anyone.Jandurin

That's not true.

I've heard someone say that games stopped being just about fun awhile ago. I was shocked.

Yeah, I know, I heard that too. I just ignored it.
Avatar image for dirty_diaz
dirty_diaz

1193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#752 dirty_diaz
Member since 2005 • 1193 Posts

[QUOTE="MagnuzGuerra"]Because, above all things, gamers, causals and non-gamers play games just to have some fun. And that doesn't hunt anyone.Jandurin

That's not true.

I've heard someone say that games stopped being just about fun awhile ago. I was shocked.

Omg, are you serious? :O

what idiot said that?

Avatar image for DSgamer64
DSgamer64

4449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#753 DSgamer64
Member since 2007 • 4449 Posts
[QUOTE="zaney"]

Sony has easily made the biggest impact on gaming of recent. They show that through their sales the last decade. Just because Nintendo has done well in sales the last several months doesn't make them the authority on gaming when they were owned the last 10 years by sony. If it wasn't for sony we would be playing crappy 70 and 80dollar games on Nintendo systems. That is what they charged when N64 launched, it didn't fly because sony was selling them for 50. If it wasn't for Sony taking over their gamers Nintendo wouldn't be going the casual route. They are going that way because they can't compete with MS and Sony right now. You call what Nintendo is doing innovation. I call it running away.

TheDuffman26

Wow I couldn't have said it any better myself. I agree 100% nice post.

It's just too bad that without Nintendo, gamers would be stuck using the old D-pad for controls and rumble would be non existant in games as well. The Wiimote is the next step in gaming controls, its so sad though that cows and lemmings are going to be stuck using an inferior control scheme since they could not even begin to comprehend the technology in the Wiimote.

Avatar image for Areola54
Areola54

1827

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#754 Areola54
Member since 2006 • 1827 Posts

well they will suffer in the end when these non gamers don't buy any games. with Wii's install base, it's barely selling any more games than PS3. Non gamers don't buy games like us.

MS is selling like 3 - 4 games for console and making money off of that. 3rd party is not going to stick around wii when it's not selling any games.

Avatar image for Zaeryn
Zaeryn

9070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#755 Zaeryn
Member since 2005 • 9070 Posts
Nintendo held my childhood days in gaming, the Nintendo 64 to be exact. For 3 or 4 years that system was my life. But after I was done with the N64, the Gamecube couldn't hold my interest much. It had a few games, but it was wearing off. Now with the Wii I just laugh. I don't care about Nintendo anymore. They don't care about old fans, they don't care that they're ruining gaming, they just want to promote "exercise" and the actual normal games on the Wii, are horrible. I don't care about that system. Compare it to the PS3, Xbox 360, or PC, and the Wii looks like trash. I don't care about them, they lost a fan a long time ago.
Avatar image for ElToRo_14
ElToRo_14

1408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#756 ElToRo_14
Member since 2005 • 1408 Posts
tag
Avatar image for BeauRoger
BeauRoger

1671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#757 BeauRoger
Member since 2003 • 1671 Posts
i suggest all of you go read krudus thread "hello - and welcome nintendo" which is a retributal to this non-sense thread. should knock some sense into all of you.
Avatar image for Jester712
Jester712

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#758 Jester712
Member since 2006 • 38 Posts

Well, Nintendo is now appealing towards the Casuals,but it hasn't forgotten it's hardcore gamers. They're making all these games like Wii Fit to appeal to people that think that they'd never play a video game. That's where the majority of their sales come from, those "casuals". They're plan worked. Then theres the Hardcore gamers. Twilight Princess made you think in the dungeons for the first time, don't even lie to me and say that they were so easy for you that you just breezed right through them. Super Paper mario may be easy, but it still continues the PM series, and thats fine, because none of those games were very hard. What about fans of Mario Party and Warioware? Nintendo sastisfied thosee players early. We still have Metroid 3 coming out, and that should also satisfy the hardcore players, because it does seem challenging. BRAWL and Galaxy will get more hardcore players interested.

Nintendo is doing fine right now.

BTW If you're going to actually stop supporting nintendo and stop buying their products, the least you should do is take down the Legend of Zelda ORacle of Seasons theme.

Avatar image for chutup
chutup

7656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#759 chutup
Member since 2005 • 7656 Posts
I admit that Nintendo's conference was poor but as someone else said, they may have been aiming it at the mainstream media. I know somewhere they promised to pull out more stuff later in E3 or maybe later in the year. They could be just lying and playing for time, but I don't think it's like Nintendo to do something like that. I am confident that Nintendo will have some more information on 'core' games fairly soon.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#760 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="TheDuffman26"][QUOTE="zaney"]

Sony has easily made the biggest impact on gaming of recent. They show that through their sales the last decade. Just because Nintendo has done well in sales the last several months doesn't make them the authority on gaming when they were owned the last 10 years by sony. If it wasn't for sony we would be playing crappy 70 and 80dollar games on Nintendo systems. That is what they charged when N64 launched, it didn't fly because sony was selling them for 50. If it wasn't for Sony taking over their gamers Nintendo wouldn't be going the casual route. They are going that way because they can't compete with MS and Sony right now. You call what Nintendo is doing innovation. I call it running away.

DSgamer64

Wow I couldn't have said it any better myself. I agree 100% nice post.

It's just too bad that without Nintendo, gamers would be stuck using the old D-pad for controls and rumble would be non existant in games as well. The Wiimote is the next step in gaming controls, its so sad though that cows and lemmings are going to be stuck using an inferior control scheme since they could not even begin to comprehend the technology in the Wiimote.



What are you talking about? Nintendo is the only company that gets to decide what innovations will occur in control? That's an absolutely ridiculous statement. Nintendo didn't invent motion controls, they were brought by third parties to the NES, and have existed in various forms for years, especially in arcade games.

And, in fact, Sony brought dual-joystick control into the mainstream for home consoles, which has become the de facto standard for console gaming (even the VC controller uses it - and it will be used in Brawl and Fire Emblem) and for PC USB controllers. Oh, and Sony didn't invent dual-joystick control either. No one company decides the controller innovations.

It's extremely narrow-minded to think there's only one "right" or "innovative" way to control a game. I don't like it when PC gamers say "console FPS titles suck because there's no KB&M" so don't turn around and say "oh, all games that aren't using motion controls suck". Let me further add that while some games benefit from motion controls, not all do. A racing sim isn't better because you turn the Wiimote like a wheel - the best controls come from footpedal and wheel add-ons built specifically for those type of games. An arcade title like Geometry Wars plays best with a pair of arcade-****joysticks.

Different games - different controls. All kinds of companies introduced innovations into controls and displays - I suggest you look up the Vectrex if you want see something really amazing from the early 80s, it's just that many of these ventures are not remembered by gamers nowadays, many of whom were born after they were already pulled from the market.
Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#761 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
Nintendo held my childhood days in gaming, the Nintendo 64 to be exact. For 3 or 4 years that system was my life. But after I was done with the N64, the Gamecube couldn't hold my interest much. It had a few games, but it was wearing off. Now with the Wii I just laugh. I don't care about Nintendo anymore. They don't care about old fans, they don't care that they're ruining gaming, they just want to promote "exercise" and the actual normal games on the Wii, are horrible. I don't care about that system. Compare it to the PS3, Xbox 360, or PC, and the Wii looks like trash. I don't care about them, they lost a fan a long time ago.Zaeryn


I have tried not to make this a "let's compare the Wii to everything else" thread - I think everyone here knows what else is on the market, but the big issue is for those of us who want a Nintendo platform to have a core library. There are a lot of people who enjoy Nintendo franchises, but to get the one or two games that you see that look interesting on the Wii, you have to invest in the platform. There is a problem that occurs there, when the platform is not focused on the core gamer, and that is we do not get a lot of choice in core games - there are three coming this year, and perhaps a handful next year.

By comparisson to competition that does focus on the core gamer, and whose third parties focus on the traditional core / casual gamer, you simply don't get the sheer volume of core titles. It's clear where they're going with this, and it's absolutely frustrating.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#762 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Well Nintendo fans are already used to only a small handful of games. Owning the Wii should be just like home for them.

With the big three coming out this year their won't be much left for the next 2-3 years the Wii remains technologically relevant.

They keep bringing up mario and metroid like those are new games to be excited about. I see those games and can barely muster an ounce of interest. No More Heroes gets more of a raised eyebrow out of me. Mention that game instead.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#763 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Well Nintendo fans are already used to only a small handful of games. Owning the Wii should be just like home for them.Bread_or_Decide
You know... you can own a Wii without being a "Sheep".
Avatar image for Mu5uk0
Mu5uk0

19144

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#764 Mu5uk0
Member since 2005 • 19144 Posts

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Well Nintendo fans are already used to only a small handful of games. Owning the Wii should be just like home for them.Jandurin
You know... you can own a Wii without being a "Sheep".

... he never called anyone a sheep.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#765 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Well Nintendo fans are already used to only a small handful of games. Owning the Wii should be just like home for them.Mu5uk0

You know... you can own a Wii without being a "Sheep".

... he never called anyone a sheep.

And yet, he said Nintendo "fans" are used to only having a handful of games. Implying that they noticed such a thing because they didn't own other systems.

Secondly, the Wii can be owned by non-Nintendo only fans.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#766 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Well Nintendo fans are already used to only a small handful of games. Owning the Wii should be just like home for them.

With the big three coming out this year their won't be much left for the next 2-3 years the Wii remains technologically relevant.

They keep bringing up mario and metroid like those are new games to be excited about. I see those games and can barely muster an ounce of interest. No More Heroes gets more of a raised eyebrow out of me. Mention that game instead.

Bread_or_Decide


I think many people miss that the focus on non-gamers goes beyond a reduction of focus on c lassic franchises, it also extends into what new franchises they will create. Wii Fitness comes at an opportunity cost. Even if it only took a few months to create, instead of a year or two like a "core" title, it was still time from Miyamoto's life that was put towards a title that does not appeal to core gamers.

The Nintendo "our online is there" and "games are for everyone" attitude has been seen for the past two years, the press conference was the culmination of it, and as we've seen it's something that has become their company vision. I don't know many Nintendo fans who would be upset if the Wii had the kind of core releases coming that we saw as the standard for the NES / SNES days. There was real innovation occuring in core titles, and for all the Wii "innovation" that was supposed to occur, it hasn't been happening with new IPs aimed explicitly at core gamers.
Avatar image for Riviera_Phantom
Riviera_Phantom

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#767 Riviera_Phantom
Member since 2006 • 3658 Posts

Nintendo held my childhood days in gaming, the Nintendo 64 to be exact. For 3 or 4 years that system was my life. But after I was done with the N64, the Gamecube couldn't hold my interest much. It had a few games, but it was wearing off. Now with the Wii I just laugh. I don't care about Nintendo anymore. They don't care about old fans, they don't care that they're ruining gaming, they just want to promote "exercise" and the actual normal games on the Wii, are horrible. I don't care about that system. Compare it to the PS3, Xbox 360, or PC, and the Wii looks like trash. I don't care about them, they lost a fan a long time ago.Zaeryn

Wow thats' very similar to me. N64 is one of my favourite consoles ever and ever since the GC i became less and less interested in Nintendo, maybe because they lost rare during that gen i don't know, but now i completely agree with you. But deep down i still have pasion for some of their 1st party games like Brawl and Metroid. I'm going to buy those.

Avatar image for TNT_Slug
TNT_Slug

1735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#768 TNT_Slug
Member since 2007 • 1735 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaeryn"]Nintendo held my childhood days in gaming, the Nintendo 64 to be exact. For 3 or 4 years that system was my life. But after I was done with the N64, the Gamecube couldn't hold my interest much. It had a few games, but it was wearing off. Now with the Wii I just laugh. I don't care about Nintendo anymore. They don't care about old fans, they don't care that they're ruining gaming, they just want to promote "exercise" and the actual normal games on the Wii, are horrible. I don't care about that system. Compare it to the PS3, Xbox 360, or PC, and the Wii looks like trash. I don't care about them, they lost a fan a long time ago.Riviera_Phantom

Wow thats' very similar to me. N64 is one of my favourite consoles ever and ever since the GC i became less and less interested in Nintendo, maybe because they lost rare during that gen i don't know, but now i completely agree with you. But deep down i still have pasion for some of their 1st party games like Brawl and Metroid. I'm going to buy those.

Wow. :? Who are you and where did you hide Riviera_Phantom's corpse.

Listening to you say you have passion for anything Nintendo... Let's just say it's odd.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#769 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

Listening to you say you have passion for anything Nintendo... Let's just say it's odd.TNT_Slug
Riviera defends Brawl as much as anyone. Moreso, perhaps.

Avatar image for bad82man82
bad82man82

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#770 bad82man82
Member since 2006 • 1059 Posts

I didn't see any of the pages because I read two minutes ago and god bless posters, your post is long and they reply with longer posts, so Im not reading any of the posts.

I agree 100%, and I walked out of Nintendo from 64, in a matter of fact my brother bought it not me, it has great games back then but not great like the NES and SuperNES, so don't worry, most of the buyers of Wii are non-gamers, and even non-gamers do like the Wii, a lot of them prefer PS3 and Im talking about my family members because they worship the benefits of sharing pics, watching movies,online services and seeing somethings looks so real, in another meaning, they have brains and love technology.

Avatar image for Rudy25
Rudy25

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#771 Rudy25
Member since 2003 • 2001 Posts

Subrosian. You make way too much sense for this thread..I doubt the kids in this place actually had the joy of playing old school Nintendo. It was greatness in its day.

Avatar image for bloodychimp
bloodychimp

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#772 bloodychimp
Member since 2006 • 933 Posts
I totally agree. I'm a long time Nintendo die-hard. I'm buying a 360 when I get back to town Saturday, and I will buy a Wii in hopes that it turns out like the DS, but I dont think thats going to happen. I think my faith really died when they molested DK in a series of aweful bongo games.
Avatar image for furtherfan
furtherfan

3699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#773 furtherfan
Member since 2007 • 3699 Posts

Subrosian. You make way too much sense for this thread..I doubt the kids in this place actually had the joy of playing old school Nintendo. It was greatness in its day.

Rudy25

just look at the mario Galxay video's. still fun imo.

Avatar image for Rudy25
Rudy25

2001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#774 Rudy25
Member since 2003 • 2001 Posts
fanboys miss out

furtherfan

Yeah you guys sure do

Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#775 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts

You know, I used to laugh whenever someone on here would say something like "Nintendo should go third party!" but at this point, I kinda wish they had. I'm not ready to give up on the Wii just yet, but so far I have to say; I'm very dissapointed right now.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#776 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

Subrosian. You make way too much sense for this thread..I doubt the kids in this place actually had the joy of playing old school Nintendo. It was greatness in its day.

Rudy25


Yeah, but it's hard to go back and show people that. You can't show people Super Mario World, Super Metroid, or Chrono Trigger now and have it make the kind of impact it did back in the day. You can't just say "look at the SNES library" unless they were around in that era and understand what a revolution it was when some of those games came out. It's almost like Goldeneye / Perfect Dark ... a lot of people have nostalgia for these games, but you really can't go back and play Goldeneye now and see the impact, because by modern standards it's awful.


You know, I used to laugh whenever someone on here would say something like "Nintendo should go third party!" but at this point, I kinda wish they had. I'm not ready to give up on the Wii just yet, but so far I have to say; I'm very dissapointed right now.

TyrantDragon55


In a lot of ways, it would be nice if they did, but for a number of financial reasons I don't see that happening. I also don't see that as a solution to their focus on non-gamers with the Wii.
Avatar image for samusarmada
samusarmada

5816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#777 samusarmada
Member since 2005 • 5816 Posts

did you expect this large a response subrosion?

seriously, i stopped following after about 20 pages. But how much response did you think you would rerally get.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#778 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts

did you expect this large a response subrosion?

seriously, i stopped following after about 20 pages. But how much response did you think you would rerally get.

samusarmada


Yes. I've sensed a growing unrest with Nintendo fans, it has been coming from the fans themselves, the Wii boards, people I've talked to, et cetera. There's a lot of confusion from longtime fans. I think a great deal of it comes from this divide - we were promised innovation, but, for the most part, we've gotten the same c lassic series with Wiimote controls added. It's more of "controls are innovation" rather than following the model of evolving a series or genre over time.

And on top of that, we've got the continued focus on non-gamers over the core - when they see the new IPs coming from Nintendo, a lot of people are simply pissed, where are there exciting new games? Where is the innovation for the core gamer with the Wiimote - where is something beyond Metroid Prime (with wiimote controls) for them?

-
-
It goes beyond that, there's the little hardware issues, the game droughts (for core titles), the lack of core third party support - I think for many longtime Nintendo fans it doesn't feel much different from the GCN, and that's frustrating
-
-
But, to answer your question, I anticipated a large response, but definately not as large as it has been. If I had done this eight months ago, you would have seen a lot more fanboy response, y'know the usual Wii-bashing, and I tried very hard to stay away from hardware discussion to prevent that (and because that's not what this is about). I don't want to say I'm glad at the downfall of Nintendo, because I'm not, but I'm glad to see people sharing their personal stories, because it's a lot more meaningful for the gaming community to be united as individuals, rather than "user43894 bashing the Wii".

I am surprised at how many longtime supporters of Nintendo are willing to admit they're tired of what's going on though, I think that's a hard break to make, and for many it has taken two generations of dissapointments (GCN and Wii) to get to this point. I see the backlash growing, I don't know if they'll ever be an outcry, so much as longtime gamers fading from Nintendo's flock. It's concerning, I hope that people don't leave gaming over it, because while it may be years (or never) before Nintendo realizes the support they've lost, it's about the games more than the companies, characters, or franchises.

Kind of like when we lost Sonic, it just hurts to have to see characters / franchises we grew up with become the face of something that doesn't live up to the expectations we have for them.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#779 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts

did you expect this large a response subrosion?

seriously, i stopped following after about 20 pages. But how much response did you think you would rerally get.

samusarmada

Enough for the Nintendo fanboy meter to hit red and make a retaliatory topic :wink:

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#780 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Rudy25"]

Subrosian. You make way too much sense for this thread..I doubt the kids in this place actually had the joy of playing old school Nintendo. It was greatness in its day.

subrosian


Yeah, but it's hard to go back and show people that. You can't show people Super Mario World, Super Metroid, or Chrono Trigger now and have it make the kind of impact it did back in the day. You can't just say "look at the SNES library" unless they were around in that era and understand what a revolution it was when some of those games came out. It's almost like Goldeneye / Perfect Dark ... a lot of people have nostalgia for these games, but you really can't go back and play Goldeneye now and see the impact, because by modern standards it's awful.


You know, I used to laugh whenever someone on here would say something like "Nintendo should go third party!" but at this point, I kinda wish they had. I'm not ready to give up on the Wii just yet, but so far I have to say; I'm very dissapointed right now.

TyrantDragon55



In a lot of ways, it would be nice if they did, but for a number of financial reasons I don't see that happening. I also don't see that as a solution to their focus on non-gamers with the Wii.

Super Mario World was overrated.

Mario has been going downhill since SMB3. Super Metroid though, that's a game everyone should play.

And my favorite newest IP from Nintendo is definitely Smash Brothers. One of my favorite series ever.

Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#781 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts

My thread was erilly silent for how long it's been on the front page... So I'll post it in a slightly more populare topic.

Facts:

-As much as nintendo talks about making games simpler, they have never dumbed an old series down of it's gameplay. If you have a way to say simplify an rpg's interface to be easier to go through, that's considered simplifying... common misconseption on systemwars is that means "They dumbed the game down for non gamers so us hardcores have to suffer!"

-As many "non gamer games" as there are, they take a few months at most to make and are side projects at best:
[5:27] Here's an obvious question after the announcement of Wii Fit: Has the success of the Touch Generations games made Miyamoto less interested in developing traditional or hardcore-5tylegames like Mario Galaxy?

[5:28] "You certainly don't have to worry about that." He's having a lot of fun working on both Galaxy and Wii Fit, and he thinks it's perfectly acceptable to have simpler games that can be completed in a few months while also working on more ambitious projects that take years to complete.
If you could spend such a short amount of time to massivly increase your audience, what downfalls are there to doing so?

-Games of depth on wii are still coming. BWii and Super smash are 2 of the most obvious ones. They didn't just disapear off the face of the earth because nintendo felt the floorspace at E3 would be a good time to show off wii fit.

-Online plans are still in works, and the 1 good game that shows it off, mario strikers, has online well exicuted minus communication.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#782 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="samusarmada"]

did you expect this large a response subrosion?

seriously, i stopped following after about 20 pages. But how much response did you think you would rerally get.

tomarlyn

Enough for the Nintendo fanboy meter to hit red and make a retaliatory topic :wink:



They made a retaliatory topic? "Dear Nintendo, here is Subrosian's head on a stake. He used his right to free speech to express a concern over the direction you have chosen to go in... we choked him to death with a Wiimote. Please don't delay Metroid Prime, thanks. P.S. Shiggy rules!"

In all seriousness, I'd be curious to see it.
Avatar image for tomarlyn
tomarlyn

20148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#783 tomarlyn
Member since 2005 • 20148 Posts
[QUOTE="tomarlyn"][QUOTE="samusarmada"]

did you expect this large a response subrosion?

seriously, i stopped following after about 20 pages. But how much response did you think you would rerally get.

subrosian

Enough for the Nintendo fanboy meter to hit red and make a retaliatory topic :wink:



They made a retaliatory topic? "Dear Nintendo, here is Subrosian's head on a stake. He used his right to free speech to express a concern over the direction you have chosen to go in... we choked him to death with a Wiimote. Please don't delay Metroid Prime, thanks. P.S. Shiggy rules!"

In all seriousness, I'd be curious to see it.

:lol:

The Wii Fit board could make a seriously deadly bludgeon.

Avatar image for NorthlandMan
NorthlandMan

2302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#784 NorthlandMan
Member since 2007 • 2302 Posts

On further thought i would say this

Nintendo are not hurting game.

With the DS they gave us the best handheld ever made,. It is beloved by gamers, casuals and non-gamers alike and it truly deserves all the succcess it can get. Online is fairly well implemented in alot of the newer games, and while the interface may suck it is not much worse than the PSP's and the selection of games destroy those on the PSP.

The Wii is a very poor console for gamers. But the irrelevance of it to ourselves does not mean that it's success is any less deserved. They do tend to exploit hardcore Nintendo fans, but i think that those fans invite expoitation so it's not really a big deal.

I am not done with Nintendo, because like I said the DS is still the best hahdheld ever made. But the Wii has become largely irrelevant to me. I may get one in 5 years time to play the Nintendo games i missed out on, which regardless of Casualisation are always known for quality. But I recognise the superiority of the PS3/360 for gamers more clearly now and the PS3 will be my main console.



They made a retaliatory topic? "Dear Nintendo, here is Subrosian's head on a stake. He used his right to free speech to express a concern over the direction you have chosen to go in... we choked him to death with a Wiimote. Please don't delay Metroid Prime, thanks. P.S. Shiggy rules!"

In all seriousness, I'd be curious to see it.
subrosian

:lol: but seriously dude. You've hit a nerve here and the topic has some excellent points that have hit home with a lot of gamers, especially those that grew up with Nintendo. Kudos

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#785 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts
I have been gaming for roughly 23 of my 27 years. Personally I have always loved the Japanese quirky games that i have imported over the years. And that is what the wii is all about. sure i own a highend pc, 360 and ps3 for more graphical intense games but that does not mean i can not enjoy the fun games the ds and wii offer. Plus I am hyped about mario galaxy and metriod prime 3 just as much as i am mass effect and killzone two. Why should you discount casual gaming? It is a ton of fun when my mother, girlfriend or friends come over and have a blast gaming with me. Something i could never share with them till the ds and wii were released.
Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#786 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts
Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...
Avatar image for NorthlandMan
NorthlandMan

2302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#787 NorthlandMan
Member since 2007 • 2302 Posts

Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...kittykatz5k

Dude i don't thinkt that anyone can argue the stregth of the Wii's lineup this year, but that is largely due to Nintendo's first party lineup and the remnants of Gamecube Development.

This year you have mario Galaxy, Prime 3, SSBB, BWii, Fire Emblem, SPM

Next year you have a dumbed down Mario Kart with the same graphics as the GC game and Wii fit. The Wii simply isn't in the same league as the 360/PS3 if you are looking at it from a gamers viewpoint. Anyone who says otherwise is simply deluding themselves. This is coming from someone who recognises the Wii's success and thinks i's well deserved.

I have no doubt that Nintendo will occasionally pump out a first/second party game on the Wii that looks good. but these titles will be few and far between and all you'll have in the meantime is minigames and non games.

As for online, the Wii online is archaic. This is not so much a problem on the DS given its lack of competition and superior games lineup but it kills the Wii

Avatar image for karmageddon2k4
karmageddon2k4

919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#788 karmageddon2k4
Member since 2004 • 919 Posts

I somewhat agree. I don't have a problem with their games that address the other market demographics but i am saddened that nintendo has basically become a first party only system. The NES and SNES were basically what the ps2 and 360 are. Lots of games and good 3rd party stuff. Now they basically have almost no 3rd party that appeals to the older generation. Don't get me wrong i still love zelda and all those great first parties but by the end of the Wii's life cycle i don't see me buying a ton of games for the system. I have 6 games on the Wii compared to 44 for the 360. Even last gen i only ended up getting about 15 game cube games compared to mid 30s on the ps2 and xbox.

I love the new controller and i have played games that show that it has great potential but i still don't see the 3rd parties jumping on board like they used to. I hope to be proven wrong before the end of the wii's life cycle but so far i don't have confidence it will happen.

Avatar image for TSCombo
TSCombo

2957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#789 TSCombo
Member since 2006 • 2957 Posts

[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...NorthlandMan

Dude i don't thinkt that anyone can argue the stregth of the Wii's lineup this year, but that is largely due to Nintendo's first party lineup and the remnants of Gamecube Development.

This year you have mario Galaxy, Prime 3, SSBB, BWii, Fire Emblem, SPM

Next year you have a dumbed down Mario Kart with the same graphics as the GC game and Wii fit. The Wii simply isn't in the same league as the 360/PS3 if you are looking at it from a gamers viewpoint. Anyone who says otherwise is simply deluding themselves. This is coming from someone who recognises the Wii's success and thinks i's well deserved.

I have no doubt that Nintendo will occasionally pump out a first/second party game on the Wii that looks good. but these titles will be few and far between and all you'll have in the meantime is minigames and non games.

As for online, the Wii online is archaic. This is not so much a problem on the DS given its lack of competition and superior games lineup but it kills the Wii

Nice post but what is a gamer's viewpoint? Are we talking about graphix again?
Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#790 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts

Next year you have a dumbed down Mario Kart NorthlandMan

It's become blatently obvious you have ignored my post...

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#791 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45558 Posts

Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...kittykatz5k
For some odd reason, you're post reminds me of that old saying " the kettle calling the pot black " !

Might you have been mistaken ?

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#792 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...SecretPolice

For some odd reason, you're post reminds me of that old saying " the kettle calling the pot black " !

Might you have been mistaken ?

Wait, was that an instance of the pot calling the kettle black?

Or is your post an instance of a raven calling a crow black? :lol:

Avatar image for NorthlandMan
NorthlandMan

2302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#793 NorthlandMan
Member since 2007 • 2302 Posts

It's become blatently obvious you have ignored my post...

kittykatz5k

I wasn't referring to the increased emphasis on inclusivity. I was talking about the game mechanics being dumbed down from Mario Kart DD. The barely adequate visuals and pimping of a ubisoft style plastic fisher price wheel didn't exactly inspire confidence either.

and the rest of my post was spot on. stop trying to divert attention from the topic at hand

Nice post but what is a gamer's viewpoint? Are we talking about graphix again?TSCombo

Not necessarily. I'm talking about people who want to see great franchises they know and love as well as exciting new IP's that look to offer immersive, original and downright fun experiences. I'm talking about people who want to see a good mix of quality first party titles as well as a broad range of third party efforts.

The DS is a good example. Yoshis Island 2 and contra 4 are new spins on existing franchise but fairly traditional. Advance Wars, Canvas curse are platform specific first party titles that are perfect for the machine. Hotel Dusk and Ninja Gaiden are great examples of first/third party titles that use the functionality well. ASH and Sonic RPGS are exciting new IPs from some of the best devs in the industry. Dragon Quest 9 and NSMB DS are HUGE, more traditional games given a showing on the platform..

So basically a diverse range of titles focused on GAMES in the traditional sense

Avatar image for 01SniperWolf
01SniperWolf

33

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#794 01SniperWolf
Member since 2007 • 33 Posts

Nintendo are still making the games they've always made, they're not abandoning their core audience.

Mario in a bee suit... GOTY.

Avatar image for shadowcat2576
shadowcat2576

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#795 shadowcat2576
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts

I never have and never will understand this "core", "hardcore", "casual" thing. For 20+ years I've been content buying games that I felt I would enjoy. Some I was right about, some I was wrong. I bought Nintendogs, Sims, GTA:VC, and RE and didn't enjoy them. It doesn't make Nintendogs or Sims any lrss games because I din't like them, or me any less of a gamer because I didn't like RE and GTA.

Nintendo said they were releasing 100 Wii games for the rest of the year. My very short must have list of games I know that I want is over 10 (SMG, SMBB,Lego SW: Complete, TR: Anniversary, Dewey, Boogie, RE:UC, SM:Strikers, SC:Legends, Zack & Wiki) That's 10% of the games releasing this year. Over 50 of the games I've probably never heard of so the % could be much higher. Personally that sounds like a high percentage of a library for one person to own, maybe it isn't but I know I've never bought so many games for a system so quickly so this is one "core gamer" that Nintendo has not forgotten.

I keep being reminded that I probably have a good 15 years on most of the poster on SW. For some reason the younger gaming generation has warped what a "videogame" is. There are good games and bad games, long games and short, epic and pick up and play, but they are all games. They will entertain or they won't based on your tastes and the performance of the game. If you don't think you'll like a game, don't buy it, someone else may really like it.

Avatar image for subrosian
subrosian

14232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#796 subrosian
Member since 2005 • 14232 Posts
[QUOTE="NorthlandMan"]

Next year you have a dumbed down Mario Kart kittykatz5k

It's become blatently obvious you have ignored my post...



It's impossible for Miyamoto to devote 100% of his time to every game he creates, the more he's working on, the less of himself he puts into each title.

In this case we have Galaxy, an evolution of Mario 64 (casual title) and Wii Fitness (a non-gamer title). What does that mean? What's he not creating?

If Nintendo had said, "we need a title for a core gamer, we don't care if non-gamers will be interested" what else could he have created? What new character from his mind didn't come out because of Wii Fitness? There is *always* an opportunity cost from going in one direction over another.

There are still going to be a few core titles here and there, I'm concerned about the overall focus, because as a platform, the Wii is not getting many core titles, and it's frankly frustrating. There aren't many games with the depth of Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, or Half-Life 2, if any, on the system.

Nintendo has no unified standard online service, it needs to be there, and it is not. There is no equivelant to Battlenet, LIVE, PSN, et cetera on the system. Voice chat at the least, along with leaderboards, ranking, clan support, messaging as a standard service, and Nintendo has shown no intention of creating one. This is not acceptable.

-
-
And no offense, but the arrogance of feeling your post really justified a response - there are a lot of great posts here I haven't gotten to respond to, and I'm sorry, but I don't have infinite time. As I've said - again and again - no one post can tell hundreds of gamers to stop feeling the way they feel. If you disagree, that's your right, but this is the general feeling that many gamers have about the direction Nintendo is going in, and it's something that we'll see continue to grow over the coming months.
-
And yes, you cannot make a Mario Kart where an unskilled player can beat a skilled player without dumbing down the game.
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#797 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45558 Posts
[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"]Well this ain't too polite, don't rekon I could at least get a reply to my post up there, a reason why it's suddenly being avoided by every fanboy on this forum...Jandurin

For some odd reason, you're post reminds me of that old saying " the kettle calling the pot black " !

Might you have been mistaken ?

Wait, was that an instance of the pot calling the kettle black?

Or is your post an instance of a raven calling a crow black? :lol:

As usual, my words fly above you're head - but keep trying to be the funnyboy, it only has me and many others here at my place laughing at you. ;)

Just might be time for you to try substantive conversation - you think?

Nah - dont do it - you are always good for a laugh at !

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#798 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
[QUOTE="kittykatz5k"][QUOTE="NorthlandMan"]

Next year you have a dumbed down Mario Kart subrosian

It's become blatently obvious you have ignored my post...



It's impossible for Miyamoto to devote 100% of his time to every game he creates, the more he's working on, the less of himself he puts into each title.

In this case we have Galaxy, an evolution of Mario 64 (casual title) and Wii Fitness (a non-gamer title). What does that mean? What's he not creating?

If Nintendo had said, "we need a title for a core gamer, we don't care if non-gamers will be interested" what else could he have created? What new character from his mind didn't come out because of Wii Fitness? There is *always* an opportunity cost from going in one direction over another.

There are still going to be a few core titles here and there, I'm concerned about the overall focus, because as a platform, the Wii is not getting many core titles, and it's frankly frustrating. There aren't many games with the depth of Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, or Half-Life 2, if any, on the system.

Nintendo has no unified standard online service, it needs to be there, and it is not. There is no equivelant to Battlenet, LIVE, PSN, et cetera on the system. Voice chat at the least, along with leaderboards, ranking, clan support, messaging as a standard service, and Nintendo has shown no intention of creating one. This is not acceptable.

-
-
And no offense, but the arrogance of feeling your post really justified a response - there are a lot of great posts here I haven't gotten to respond to, and I'm sorry, but I don't have infinite time. As I've said - again and again - no one post can tell hundreds of gamers to stop feeling the way they feel. If you disagree, that's your right, but this is the general feeling that many gamers have about the direction Nintendo is going in, and it's something that we'll see continue to grow over the coming months.
-
And yes, you cannot make a Mario Kart where an unskilled player can beat a skilled player without dumbing down the game.

your original post is arrogant, self-important, and overly-melodramatic. if he had the courtesy to reply to it you should extend him the same courtesy without feeling the need to rub it in.

Avatar image for TSCombo
TSCombo

2957

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#800 TSCombo
Member since 2006 • 2957 Posts

[QUOTE="TSCombo"] Nice post but what is a gamer's viewpoint? Are we talking about graphix again?NorthlandMan

Not necessarily. I'm talking about people who want to see great franchises they know and love as well as exciting new IP's that look to offer immersive, original and downright fun experiences. I'm talking about people who want to see a good mix of quality first party titles as well as a broad range of third party efforts.

The DS is a good example. Yoshis Island 2 and contra 4 are new spins on existing franchise but fairly traditional. Advance Wars, Canvas curse are platform specific first party titles that are perfect for the machine. Hotel Dusk and Ninja Gaiden are great examples of first/third party titles that use the functionality well. ASH and Sonic RPGS are exciting new IPs from some of the best devs in the industry. Dragon Quest 9 and NSMB DS are HUGE, more traditional games given a showing on the platform..

So basically a diverse range of titles focused on GAMES in the traditional sense

I know what u are saying but a lot of what the DS did the Wii is on pace to do. The 1st party titles that Nintendo always delivers on are being supplied and the 3rd party devs are getting in gear with their original and spin-off titles. The major difference is the "traditional" interface which for some gamers has gotten a little repeative, even for some hardcore. Mostgamers are used to a title change, graphix upgrades, online, etc. The wii is offering a different control scheme, new audience, original gameplay elements, online, etc.