Guess what, consolites, 90% of US DS Gamers Pirate their games...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#351 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]And why peopel are on you is because this so called credible person and organization have proved nothing yet you won't admit that they need to have proof if they are going to make such far fetched statements. Vandalvideo

Because that isn't my point at all. My point is YOU don't have the credibility to disprove his conjecture with your conjecture. I asked for proof, you gave none, and then proof was provided, and it was over.

No, I have no reason to prove somethign wrong that hasn't even been proved right to begin with LOL Hilarious.

Ok here, I'm in the film industry, I have WAY more credibilty in it then probably anyone here... and I say that 95% of all films are downloaded more than they are paid for legally. Prove me wrong now cause I'm credibile. I won't show you any proof that I'm right except that there are sites that are full badness! Prove me wrong now.

Actually, you made a claim. That claim was, "These statistics are bogus". You have to prove that claim. You were doing the exact same thing you're complaining about. Thats the point. Its hypocritical.

No point from the begining is that it's bogus until proven true. My point and everyone's pretty much is your innocent until PROVEN guilty. Ofcourse, everything is bogus and not true until they are proven to be true.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#352 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]Nope, sorry, we don't have to prove someone wrong who isn't right. Just like those people who claimed college kids were 45% pirating didn't prove jack but people just bought it.Fact is this company is about piracy so they gain if piracy is around. Just like if there were no fat people richard simmons would be in a bad situation. That alone is enough to ask for proof let alone the fact that well... anytime ANYONE says anything they should have to prove it. That's how life is. I guess you prefer it if people with titles don't have to prove anything in life. But that's how corruption grows stronger and undetected when people trust people for their title and dont question. Like how peopel didn't question the government. Vandalvideo
Heres the catch 22, how do we know they're wrong until you prove them wrong?

how do we know they're right until they back yp their claims?
Avatar image for haris12121212
haris12121212

7560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#353 haris12121212
Member since 2004 • 7560 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]Nope, sorry, we don't have to prove someone wrong who isn't right. Just like those people who claimed college kids were 45% pirating didn't prove jack but people just bought it.Fact is this company is about piracy so they gain if piracy is around. Just like if there were no fat people richard simmons would be in a bad situation. That alone is enough to ask for proof let alone the fact that well... anytime ANYONE says anything they should have to prove it. That's how life is. I guess you prefer it if people with titles don't have to prove anything in life. But that's how corruption grows stronger and undetected when people trust people for their title and dont question. Like how peopel didn't question the government. Vandalvideo
Heres the catch 22, how do we know they're wrong until you prove them wrong?

How can we know they are right until they prove it? :? And I don't buy the credibility excuse, it's not because you are some popular thing that you can claim things without proof.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#354 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
No point from the begining is that it's bogus until proven true. My point and everyone's pretty much is your innocent until PROVEN guilty. Ofcourse, everything is bogus and not true until they are proven to be true.kcpp2b
Rhetoric doesn't work on the same principles as a court room. Sorry, but thats not how it works. Otherwise you'd have scientists running around screaming, "Thats not true". We generally require evidence before we shift paradigms.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#355 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]Nope, sorry, we don't have to prove someone wrong who isn't right. Just like those people who claimed college kids were 45% pirating didn't prove jack but people just bought it.Fact is this company is about piracy so they gain if piracy is around. Just like if there were no fat people richard simmons would be in a bad situation. That alone is enough to ask for proof let alone the fact that well... anytime ANYONE says anything they should have to prove it. That's how life is. I guess you prefer it if people with titles don't have to prove anything in life. But that's how corruption grows stronger and undetected when people trust people for their title and dont question. Like how peopel didn't question the government. BuryMe
Heres the catch 22, how do we know they're wrong until you prove them wrong?

how do we know they're right until they back yp their claims?

I never said they were right. In fact, I said they were wrong numerous times. But I never said they were wrong as a fact. Why? I had no evidence.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#356 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
How can we know they are right until they prove it? :? And I don't buy the credibility excuse, it's not because you are some popular thing that you can claim things without proof. haris12121212
I never said they were right. Once again, you can't say "you're wrong" without proof.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#357 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]No point from the begining is that it's bogus until proven true. My point and everyone's pretty much is your innocent until PROVEN guilty. Ofcourse, everything is bogus and not true until they are proven to be true.Vandalvideo
Rhetoric doesn't work on the same principles as a court room. Sorry, but thats not how it works. Otherwise you'd have scientists running around screaming, "Thats not true". We generally require evidence before we shift paradigms.

You put it yourself there. Scientists also don't go screaming "ZOMG THIS IS TURE PLOX" without evidence to back it up. And this article had no evidence besides a guess.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#358 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
[QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"][QUOTE="samusarmada"][QUOTE="Dreams-Visions"]

[QUOTE="samusarmada"]and yet DS software sales consistently do the best out of all the systems. BS i say :|Ballroompirate

there are more DS's on the market than any other system by 2:1 at minimum. Compared to nextGen systems, I think the figure is closer to 4:1 or 5:1.

As in, if they get 30% of the DS market to buy games, it'll be more than any nextGen console's total base.

good point.

90% still way too high though.

I don't see any reason for the ELSPA to lie about it. What would they have to gain from such an indictment, were it untrue? And don't you think Nintendo would have come back strongly against such a claim if it were unfounded?

Again, this isn't some random analyst commenting. This is coming directly from the Entertainment and Leisure Software Publishers Association

http://www.elspa.com/

All they do is fight piracy.

Time for a life lesson 101, ok organizations cost money to run rite? well if a organization that say a organization that trys to prevent crime and there's barely no crime in this such and such place, there would be no reason for that organization to exists see.You can be surprised on what business/organizations would do to keep getting funds/money.

I'm sorry? Life lesson? How old are you? How old do you think I am? You should read up on the ELSPA before commenting on what you think they'd have to gain from such a report.

Are you suggesting there is no piracy in gaming by your weak analogy? "Barely no crime"? :?

Are you suggesting this report will...boost their membership? They're already sizable.

Do you think they function by ad revenue or website traffic? They don't.

Hell, do you even know how they raise money/profit as an organization? :lol:

And are you suggesting they need attention?

They've been around almost 20 years and haven't been accused of fudging numbers for financial gain before. Why do you suppose they start now? Suddenly desperate? No PSP, DS, 360, PS2, Wii, Dreamcast or PS3 piracy going on, right? Surely these R4's aren't popular and sold out everywhere, right? No, of course not. Common sense would tell you that those things are true and this group isn't in the business of fudging numbers. And when clairty is provided, we find that their representative was misquoted. Not that they were trying to get money as you crudely suggested. So stop making it sound like they were.

Was this misquoted estimate high? Clearly. In fact, I acknowledged that no more than 3 or 4 quotes after the post you just quoted. Is the over-arching point that DS piracy is rampant (but we've known that for some time) and is not suddenly lost because of this misquotted and high estimate. Obviously.

Here's a life lesson for you: not everything is done under shady pretenses. And you certainly don't accuse people of fudging numbers for profit without evidence and/or a history of a group doing so. As I said before, they had no reason to lie. And as it turns out they didn't. It was a simple misquote that has been since corrected. And all is well. No harm no foul.

Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#359 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]Nope, sorry, we don't have to prove someone wrong who isn't right. Just like those people who claimed college kids were 45% pirating didn't prove jack but people just bought it.Fact is this company is about piracy so they gain if piracy is around. Just like if there were no fat people richard simmons would be in a bad situation. That alone is enough to ask for proof let alone the fact that well... anytime ANYONE says anything they should have to prove it. That's how life is. I guess you prefer it if people with titles don't have to prove anything in life. But that's how corruption grows stronger and undetected when people trust people for their title and dont question. Like how peopel didn't question the government. Vandalvideo
Heres the catch 22, how do we know they're wrong until you prove them wrong?

My god almightly what is wrong with you dude. How on earth does that makes sense to you? Listen to yourself. Why do I have to prove them wrong. THEY HAVEN'T BEEN PROVED RIGHT. Do you not get that?

If people had to go out and prove wrong everyone who just makes claims on things my god how much time would be waste on such a task.

I said he was bogus until proven true and WOW I was right.... so maybe you should go along with that common sense way of thinking... as it has proven valid in this situation alone that their credibility meant nothing and they were still wrong. I'm sure I can find a million more giant examples of people considered credible that were insanely wrong let alone just wrong.

There's not catch, you can keep telling yourself there is whatevr floats your boat. But in real life I don't have to prove anything about something that isn't true. Like I said I'm credible in the film industry and I say it's dying and will die tommorow... now prove me wrong.

See how dumb that is? Why do you have to me wrong? I have shown nothing that proves me to be right even though movie piracy is rising and I am a film insider and producer it means nothing. I have no proof....

Hell didn't the Epic dev say PC gaming is hurt by huge amounts of piracy. I guess PC gaming is dying then and we should get serious about it now no? Cause he's more credible than anyone here saying things are fine

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#360 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]No point from the begining is that it's bogus until proven true. My point and everyone's pretty much is your innocent until PROVEN guilty. Ofcourse, everything is bogus and not true until they are proven to be true.Grodus5
Rhetoric doesn't work on the same principles as a court room. Sorry, but thats not how it works. Otherwise you'd have scientists running around screaming, "Thats not true". We generally require evidence before we shift paradigms.

You put it yourself there. Scientists also don't go screaming "ZOMG THIS IS TURE PLOX" without evidence to back it up. And this article had no evidence besides a guess.

Actually, thats how scholastic dogma worked and is working to this day. Thats why we have paradigms. Like I gave the example of Wegener earlier. Despite him having extremely strong and compelling evidence that there was continental drift, it wasn't accepted by the community. SOrry, but this isn't some utopian society where ideas are just automatically granted. We have systems for a reason.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#362 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
My god almightly what is wrong with you dude. How on earth does that makes sense to you? Listen to yourself. Why do I have to prove them wrong. THEY HAVEN'T BEEN PROVED RIGHT. Do you not get that? If people had to go out and prove wrong everyone who just makes claims on things my god how much time would be waste on such a task.I said he was bogus until proven true and WOW I was right.... so maybe you should go along with that common sense way of thinking... as it has proven valid in this situation alone that their credibility meant nothing and they were still wrong. I'm sure I can find a million more giant examples of people considered credible that were insanely wrong let alone just wrong. There's not catch, you can keep telling yourself there is whatevr floats your boat. But in real life I don't have to prove anything about something that isn't true. Like I said I'm credible in the film industry and I say it's dying and will die tommorow... now prove me wrongSee how dumb that is? Why do you have to me wrong? I have shown nothing that proves me to be right even though movie piracy is rising and I am a film insider and producer it means nothing. I have no proof....Hell didn't the Epic dev say PC gaming is hurt by huge amounts of piracy. I guess PC gaming is dying then and we should get serious about it now no? Cause he's more credible than anyone here saying things are finekcpp2b
Think back for a second. You made the claim, "These statistics are wrong". You had to prove that claim, I asked you to prove that claim, you FAILED to prove that claim. You were making the same kind of empty statements they were making. Thats what this thread was about, your failure to prove them wrong.
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#363 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts
In the end, I'd love to see how many R4's and similar devices have been sold. They can't make those things fast enough.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#364 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

I'm sorry? Life lesson? How old are you? How old do you think I am? You should read up on the ELSPA before commenting on what you think they'd have to gain from such a report.

Are you suggesting there is no piracy in gaming by your weak analogy? "Barely no crime"? :?

Are you suggesting this report will...boost their membership? They're already sizable.

Do you think they function by ad revenue or website traffic? They don't.

Hell, do you even know how they raise money/profit as an organization? :lol:

And are you suggesting they need attention?

They've been around almost 20 years and haven't been accused of fudging numbers for financial gain before. Why do you suppose they start now? Suddenly desperate? No PSP, DS, 360, PS2, Wii, Dreamcast or PS3 piracy going on, right? Surely these R4's aren't popular and sold out everywhere, right? No, of course not. Life would tell you that would not be the case. And when clairty is provided, we find that their representative was misquoted. Not that they were trying to get money as you crudely suggested. So stop making it sound like they were.

Was this misquoted estimate high? Clearly. In fact, I acknowledged that no more than 3 or 4 quotes after the post you just quoted. Is the over-arching point that DS piracy is rampant (but we've known that for some time) and is not suddenly lost because of this misquotted and high estimate. Obviously.

Here's a life lesson for you: not everything is done under shady pretenses. And you certainly don't accuse people of fudging numbers for profit without evidence and/or a history of a group doing so. As I said before, they had no reason to lie. And as it turns out they didn't. It was a simple misquote that has been since corrected. And all is well. No harm no foul.

Dreams-Visions

No way is Piracy not a big problem for all systems no.

BUt truth be told these guys do stand to benefit from saying there are huge numbers of pirating going on. Just like film and music does when they bump up numbers in reports. Or people fighting obesity does.... everyone does it cause it helps their cause. This is just how it is done man. They bump up numbers and push little lies because it DOES benefit them.

Like I was saying before... with richard simmons and not fat people LOL Or like McAfee and no viruses as much they are fighting it, it is their bread and butter and if it was wiped from existence they wouldn't excess so you cant blindly think they are pure and wouldn't do such things as so many companies and organizations do even if with good will.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#365 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]My god almightly what is wrong with you dude. How on earth does that makes sense to you? Listen to yourself. Why do I have to prove them wrong. THEY HAVEN'T BEEN PROVED RIGHT. Do you not get that? If people had to go out and prove wrong everyone who just makes claims on things my god how much time would be waste on such a task.I said he was bogus until proven true and WOW I was right.... so maybe you should go along with that common sense way of thinking... as it has proven valid in this situation alone that their credibility meant nothing and they were still wrong. I'm sure I can find a million more giant examples of people considered credible that were insanely wrong let alone just wrong. There's not catch, you can keep telling yourself there is whatevr floats your boat. But in real life I don't have to prove anything about something that isn't true. Like I said I'm credible in the film industry and I say it's dying and will die tommorow... now prove me wrongSee how dumb that is? Why do you have to me wrong? I have shown nothing that proves me to be right even though movie piracy is rising and I am a film insider and producer it means nothing. I have no proof....Hell didn't the Epic dev say PC gaming is hurt by huge amounts of piracy. I guess PC gaming is dying then and we should get serious about it now no? Cause he's more credible than anyone here saying things are fineVandalvideo
Think back for a second. You made the claim, "These statistics are wrong". You had to prove that claim, I asked you to prove that claim, you FAILED to prove that claim. You were making the same kind of empty statements they were making. Thats what this thread was about, your failure to prove them wrong.

And these people failed to prove their claim. They just said hey, 90 percent of DS gamers pirate. lol wut. Yeah. In order to make a claim, you need evidence. If they had evidence, then we wouldn't have to get evidence to disprove them. Ok. Got it? I don't think so.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#366 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
In the end, I'd love to see how many R4's and similar devices have been sold. They can't make those things fast enough. Dreams-Visions
Thats what we need in this debate. With out that number, I think a mod could officially CLOSE this thread.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#367 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
And these people failed to prove their claim. They just said hey, 90 percent of DS gamers pirate. lol wut. Yeah. In order to make a claim, you need evidence. If they had evidence, then we wouldn't have to get evidence to disprove them. Ok. Got it? I don't think so.Grodus5
And for the millionth time, that doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. They are a credible organization that made conjectures. You are a layman that made conjectures. Who should I believe? The more credible person. Ceteris paribus, all things considered equal, you choose the more trustworthy source. The fact of the matter is you were making empty claims that you FAILED to prove.
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#368 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts

[QUOTE="BreakingPoint8"]So that's like 18 million DS owners who supposedly pirate games? Sounds like BS to me.Grodus5
I bet 90 percent of DS users don't even know how to pirate games. I know I don't. Its more like 90 percent of PSP gamers. That would be more accurate, but it would still be over streaching the truth.

If you factor in the fact if someone wants to buy one they also have to go out of their way. They don't sell them at EB or any other main stream place.

Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#370 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]My god almightly what is wrong with you dude. How on earth does that makes sense to you? Listen to yourself. Why do I have to prove them wrong. THEY HAVEN'T BEEN PROVED RIGHT. Do you not get that? If people had to go out and prove wrong everyone who just makes claims on things my god how much time would be waste on such a task.I said he was bogus until proven true and WOW I was right.... so maybe you should go along with that common sense way of thinking... as it has proven valid in this situation alone that their credibility meant nothing and they were still wrong. I'm sure I can find a million more giant examples of people considered credible that were insanely wrong let alone just wrong. There's not catch, you can keep telling yourself there is whatevr floats your boat. But in real life I don't have to prove anything about something that isn't true. Like I said I'm credible in the film industry and I say it's dying and will die tommorow... now prove me wrongSee how dumb that is? Why do you have to me wrong? I have shown nothing that proves me to be right even though movie piracy is rising and I am a film insider and producer it means nothing. I have no proof....Hell didn't the Epic dev say PC gaming is hurt by huge amounts of piracy. I guess PC gaming is dying then and we should get serious about it now no? Cause he's more credible than anyone here saying things are fineVandalvideo
Think back for a second. You made the claim, "These statistics are wrong". You had to prove that claim, I asked you to prove that claim, you FAILED to prove that claim. You were making the same kind of empty statements they were making. Thats what this thread was about, your failure to prove them wrong.

AGAIN

Think yourself. They were wrong. Anything not proven true is false. you're saying someone can be guilty and then has to be proved innocent. I guess you like that way of thinking but yeah... they have to prove their claims to be right first... cause a claim isn't any kind of fact or truth.

It ain't true until you can prove it, until then it's all claims and words, those aren't facts. Let alone the fact that common sense even tells you he's wrong before they even can try and prove it.

Anyway I find it funny they are supposed to be amazing credible when they allow themselves to release info that they don't know is correct or not. That alone is disgusting thing to do for anyone who is ethical and credible.

I don't go around saying SW is full of 90% crazy fanboys, trust me because I go there and know this, now bye.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#372 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

[QUOTE="Grodus5"][QUOTE="BreakingPoint8"]So that's like 18 million DS owners who supposedly pirate games? Sounds like BS to me.HarlockJC

I bet 90 percent of DS users don't even know how to pirate games. I know I don't. Its more like 90 percent of PSP gamers. That would be more accurate, but it would still be over streaching the truth.

If you factor in the fact if someone wants to buy one they also have to go out of their way. They don't sell them at EB or any other main stream place.

Yeah, are these things we are talking about the multimedia cards they sell for the DS?
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#373 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Think yourself. They were wrong. Anything not proven true is false. you're saying someone can be guilty and then has to be proved innocent. I guess you like that way of thinking but yeah... they have to prove their claims to be right first... cause a claim isn't any kind of fact or truth.It ain't true until you can prove it, until then it's all claims and words, those aren't facts. Let alone the fact that common sense even tells you he's wrong before they even can try and prove it.Anyway I find it funny they are supposed to be amazing credible when they allow themselves to release info that they don't know is correct or not. That alone is disgusting thing to do for anyone who is ethical and credible.I don't go around saying SW is full of 90% crazy fanboys, trust me because I go there and know this, now byekcpp2b
They don't have to prove something right before it can, "Be proven wrong". Thats a redundancy in logic. If you make a claim, you have to back it up. thats the point. Even if they were making surreptitous claims, you were making the same kind of claims. You were no better than them. I asked you to provide evidence to back up your claims, and you didn't. Whether or not they were wrong is inconsequential, because you didn't prove your statements.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#374 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"] And these people failed to prove their claim. They just said hey, 90 percent of DS gamers pirate. lol wut. Yeah. In order to make a claim, you need evidence. If they had evidence, then we wouldn't have to get evidence to disprove them. Ok. Got it? I don't think so.Grodus5
And for the millionth time, that doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. They are a credible organization that made conjectures. You are a layman that made conjectures. Who should I believe? The more credible person. Ceteris paribus, all things considered equal, you choose the more trustworthy source. The fact of the matter is you were making empty claims that you FAILED to prove.

You always here the words trust your instinct. So, Bush said that GLobal Warming isn't real. Is he right? Maybe. Maybe not. But by your logic, he is right. 100 percent. Because by YOUR logic, you don't need facts, just a big rep and a big head.

Exactly... the side of science has more than proved that it's real. Yet the so called credible people are not even looking into it properly. That's the point... when you talk about big companies or any organizations... the possiblity of corruption and people having agenda's always exist. Which is why you don't go by names and titles... because even the more amazing man on earth can be the most evil... hell you think the devil would come in on a dirty horse half naked?

No he comes in on a wicked car with a suit, perfect hair and all with a nice smile. And credentials lol Proof is the only way to fight such things... to let the proof decide. lets facts be the judge. Because by your thinking those people who killed women by throwing them off ledges to see if they were witches and flew off was a good thing. While we're saying they should have proof before they throw people off ledges lol

Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#376 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]Think yourself. They were wrong. Anything not proven true is false. you're saying someone can be guilty and then has to be proved innocent. I guess you like that way of thinking but yeah... they have to prove their claims to be right first... cause a claim isn't any kind of fact or truth.It ain't true until you can prove it, until then it's all claims and words, those aren't facts. Let alone the fact that common sense even tells you he's wrong before they even can try and prove it.Anyway I find it funny they are supposed to be amazing credible when they allow themselves to release info that they don't know is correct or not. That alone is disgusting thing to do for anyone who is ethical and credible.I don't go around saying SW is full of 90% crazy fanboys, trust me because I go there and know this, now byeVandalvideo
They don't have to prove something right before it can, "Be proven wrong". Thats a redundancy in logic. If you make a claim, you have to back it up. thats the point. Even if they were making surreptitous claims, you were making the same kind of claims. You were no better than them. I asked you to provide evidence to back up your claims, and you didn't. Whether or not they were wrong is inconsequential, because you didn't prove your statements.

I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS.

Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#377 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.kcpp2b
Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#378 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"] And these people failed to prove their claim. They just said hey, 90 percent of DS gamers pirate. lol wut. Yeah. In order to make a claim, you need evidence. If they had evidence, then we wouldn't have to get evidence to disprove them. Ok. Got it? I don't think so.Vandalvideo
And for the millionth time, that doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. They are a credible organization that made conjectures. You are a layman that made conjectures. Who should I believe? The more credible person. Ceteris paribus, all things considered equal, you choose the more trustworthy source. The fact of the matter is you were making empty claims that you FAILED to prove.

You always here the words trust your instinct. So, Bush said that GLobal Warming isn't real. Is he right? Maybe. Maybe not. But by your logic, he is right. 100 percent. Because by YOUR logic, you don't need facts, just a big rep and a big head.

Actually, no, because Bush is not a geologist or a scientist.

Ok, lets move on to a different example. The Greeks were highly respected people. Very smart. Very advanced. Good sciencetists. However, they thought that seasons were caused by Demeter weeping over her daughter's "leave" in the underworld. They were smart. They were experts. They had a good rep. Were they right? NO!
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#379 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Actually, no, because Bush is not a geologist or a scientist. Grodus5
Ok, lets move on to a different example. The Greeks were highly respected people. Very smart. Very advanced. Good sciencetists. However, they thought that seasons were caused by Demeter weeping over her daughter's "leave" in the underworld. They were smart. They were experts. They had a good rep. Were they right? NO! Wana know why? THey had no evidence.

But can a random guy without evidence say they are wrong? NO! He needs proof. Otherwise hes no better.
Avatar image for kcpp2b
kcpp2b

12498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#380 kcpp2b
Member since 2006 • 12498 Posts

[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.Vandalvideo
Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.

I don't have the claim. I said there always was piracy... I don't claim to know any specific number. THEY DID... so they have to prove how. I claimed they are BS cause they have no proof. And wow what a shock I'm right. If they had proof they would have shown it WITH the statement. Common sense FTW

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#381 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.kcpp2b

Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.

I don't have the claim. I said there always was piracy... I don't claim to know any specific number. THEY DID... so they have to prove how. I claimed they are BS cause they have no proof. And wow what a shock I'm right. If they had proof they would have shown it WITH the statement. Common sense FTW

Oh yes, "These statistics are bull" is not a claim. Totally not a claim.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#382 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="kcpp2b"]I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.Vandalvideo
Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.

Unfortunatly... the thing we need to prove them wrong are those numbers, and without them... we can't nor can they, make claims.
Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#383 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts
I wanted to stop at "it's believed", but I kept going until i saw "it's thought". It's a damn shame that faith isn't very factual. :|
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#384 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.Grodus5
Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.

Unfortunatly... the thing we need to prove them wrong are those numbers, and without them... we can't nor can they, make claims.

How can you state those numbers are wrong without contradictory numbers? Otherwise you're making empty claims as well.
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#385 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Yeah someone posted this the other day, but it is not even close to accurate. Most people that own a DS in the US never pirated any game or modded a system in there life. I could see 90% in a 3rd world country but not in the US. Also the article is just advertising for the new M3 and R4 cards that allow modding if they cared they would not give brand names.
Avatar image for haris12121212
haris12121212

7560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#386 haris12121212
Member since 2004 • 7560 Posts
I wanted to stop at "it's believed", but I kept going until i saw "it's thought". It's a damn shame that faith isn't very factual. :|-RPGamer-
Yeah they posted the article claiming 90% without any proof, all you can read is thought and believe, Very disapointing for an article.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#387 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"] Actually, no, because Bush is not a geologist or a scientist. Vandalvideo
Ok, lets move on to a different example. The Greeks were highly respected people. Very smart. Very advanced. Good sciencetists. However, they thought that seasons were caused by Demeter weeping over her daughter's "leave" in the underworld. They were smart. They were experts. They had a good rep. Were they right? NO! Wana know why? THey had no evidence.

But can a random guy without evidence say they are wrong? NO! He needs proof. Otherwise hes no better.

Hey, did you just circumnavigate my entire post? Whats there to prove wrong if its rotten from the core? Its like trying to save an apple with a worm in it. Also, yes, a random person could come and "prove" them wrong. If I were in that time perios, I could've said "Hey, the season's are caused by *insert something here*" and if they beilived me, in some people's eyes, I have proven the myth wrong.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#388 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="kcpp2b"]I will gladly have to prove them wrong, right after they first prove what they say to be right. I don't have to do jack until they first prove how they are correct with proof. Until they show proof for such a insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we here about games are all BS until it is proven true, regardless on who is saying it.Vandalvideo
Until you show proof for such an insane claim, all it is, is BS. Like all the rumours we hear about games are all BS until proven true, regardless on who is saying it..........................even you.

Unfortunatly... the thing we need to prove them wrong are those numbers, and without them... we can't nor can they, make claims.

How can you state those numbers are wrong without contradictory numbers? Otherwise you're making empty claims as well.

Did I ever say the numbers were wrong? They just plain out aren't there.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#389 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
Whats there to prove wrong if its rotten from the core? Its like trying to save an apple with a worm in it. Also, yes, a random person could come and "prove" them wrong. If I were in that time perios, I could've said "Hey, the season's are caused by *insert something here*" and if they beilived me, in some people's eyes, I have proven the myth wrong.Grodus5
How do you know its rotten to the core if you can't prove its rotten to the core?
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#390 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"]Whats there to prove wrong if its rotten from the core? Its like trying to save an apple with a worm in it. Also, yes, a random person could come and "prove" them wrong. If I were in that time perios, I could've said "Hey, the season's are caused by *insert something here*" and if they beilived me, in some people's eyes, I have proven the myth wrong.Vandalvideo
How do you know its rotten to the core if you can't prove its rotten to the core?

Selective reading ftw... Funny how you ignore the enitre rest of my post. Anyhow. Back in those times I wouldn't of known. But if I could come up with a better theory, then I could "Disprove" my compeition.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#391 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"]Whats there to prove wrong if its rotten from the core? Its like trying to save an apple with a worm in it. Also, yes, a random person could come and "prove" them wrong. If I were in that time perios, I could've said "Hey, the season's are caused by *insert something here*" and if they beilived me, in some people's eyes, I have proven the myth wrong.Grodus5
How do you know its rotten to the core if you can't prove its rotten to the core?

Selective reading ftw... Funny how you ignore the enitre rest of my post. Anyhow. Back in those times I wouldn't of known. But if I could come up with a better theory, then I could "Disprove" my compeition.

It is funny you use the word "disprove". Whats the root word there? Prove...proof..evidence plzkthnx.
Avatar image for grapefruit21
grapefruit21

3537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#392 grapefruit21
Member since 2007 • 3537 Posts
My guess is that include action replay because that number seems absurd.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#393 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

[QUOTE="Grodus5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"]Whats there to prove wrong if its rotten from the core? Its like trying to save an apple with a worm in it. Also, yes, a random person could come and "prove" them wrong. If I were in that time perios, I could've said "Hey, the season's are caused by *insert something here*" and if they beilived me, in some people's eyes, I have proven the myth wrong.Vandalvideo
How do you know its rotten to the core if you can't prove its rotten to the core?

Selective reading ftw... Funny how you ignore the enitre rest of my post. Anyhow. Back in those times I wouldn't of known. But if I could come up with a better theory, then I could "Disprove" my compeition.

It is funny you use the word "disprove". Whats the root word there? Prove...proof..evidence plzkthnx.

Lol, you asked for this. Defination from http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/disprove

dis·prove /dɪsˈpruv/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[dis-proov] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation -verb (used with object), -proved, -prov·ing. to prove (an assertion, claim, etc.) to be false or wrong; refute; invalidate: I disproved his claim.

I'll let you figure out the meaning.

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#394 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
I'll let you figure out the meaning.Grodus5
It means to PROVE something wrong. You PROVE something wrong with PROOF. Evidence.
Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#395 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts
[QUOTE="Grodus5"]I'll let you figure out the meaning.Vandalvideo
It means to PROVE something wrong. You PROVE something wrong with PROOF. Evidence.

Yeah. It also says that proof can be a claim. I disprove that claim? They made a claim, and I can disprove it with there own evidence: or lack of it therefore.
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#396 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"]I'll let you figure out the meaning.Grodus5
It means to PROVE something wrong. You PROVE something wrong with PROOF. Evidence.

Yeah. It also says that proof can be a claim. I disprove that claim? They made a claim, and I can disprove it with there own evidence: or lack of it therefore.

Actually it says to prove an assertion or claim wrong. It doesn't you can use a claim to prove something wrong. re read it.
Avatar image for -RPGamer-
-RPGamer-

34283

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

#397 -RPGamer-
Member since 2002 • 34283 Posts

"I think that 90% of DS gamers pirate."

"Yeah? Well I think only 5% of DS gamers pirate games."

Neither is proving anything. They don't support anything being suggested. People can think all they want, but thoughts alone don't make a statistic valid, let alone worth arguing over. It's laughable that any defense is being given to first claim, considering it's not viable data.

Avatar image for Grodus5
Grodus5

7934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#399 Grodus5
Member since 2006 • 7934 Posts

[QUOTE="Grodus5"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Grodus5"]I'll let you figure out the meaning.Vandalvideo
It means to PROVE something wrong. You PROVE something wrong with PROOF. Evidence.

Yeah. It also says that proof can be a claim. I disprove that claim? They made a claim, and I can disprove it with there own evidence: or lack of it therefore.

Actually it says to prove an assertion or claim wrong. It doesn't you can use a claim to prove something wrong. re read it.

K, I misread it, I admit my mistake. Sorry. I just did what all GOOD debaters do. Aknowledged when my oponent outsmarted me. Very good. However, since your mind is set, and we are not arguing on a team (for winning or loseing) I declare myself out of the debate. I will say this, open up your mind. Nothing can be accomplished with a corridor mind. Thats it, I've had enough. Good debate though. Very good. I'll see you around.

P.S. It might be a good idea for you to take a break too. We got really close to a flame war there.

Avatar image for saywat11
saywat11

596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#400 saywat11
Member since 2007 • 596 Posts
I know a dude with one actually :P