[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] I haven't created a double standard quite yet. I don't feel the need to comment, because I've made my stance abudantly clear. Heavily derivative means that it was derived from numerous science fiction IPs, which it has. The fact that Halo was heavily influenced by numerous science fiction IPs makes it heavily derivative. Thats what we call a tautology Einstein, a self-substantiating statement. Its a fact. Ringworld is a prime example that they borrow from the IPs they are heavily influenced by.Ninja-Vox
"
Of course, these things influence us. After all, we're nerds. The specific accusation that we swiped the idea of a ring-shaped planet wholesale is not accurate. The idea of a Ringworld, first posited in sci-fi by Larry Niven in his brilliant novel of the same name, is actually a variation of a Dyson Sphere, a fantastically impossible object described by the 20 th century physicist, Freeman Dyson. You can read about that here: Dyson Spheres!
Ring-shaped artificial worlds have also been used by Iain M. Banks and others because they are cool. And that's why we used one. Because it's cool and therefore the type of thing a Forerunner civilization would build."
:roll:
Did you even read the article you're basing your arguement off? Dont you think your whole arguementis annihilated by the fact that half of the influences they list were created AFTER Halo was released?
Reread those exerts four times. Its clear that they borrowed the idea of a Ringworld full stock and barrel. They can talk about Dyson Spheres all they want, but a Ringworld is unique in conception. they borrowed that idea fll stock and barrel. Halo is heavily derivative. Yaaaay tautologies.
Log in to comment