Halo Anniversary sub HD confirmed.

I think i'll just stick to the PC version then.

I think i'll just stick to the PC version then.

kraken2109

Comparison(click for 720p):

Very nice remake.

Comparison(click for 720p):

Very nice remake.

gamecubepad

best remake in gaming to date :shock:

Also the only version we have seen is from a much older build, so we aren't even seeing the final graphics.

Also the only version we have seen is from a much older build, so we aren't even seeing the final graphics.

Wasdie

[QUOTE="GreekGameManiac"]

[QUOTE="EliteM0nk3y"]Halo has never run at 60 fps. The only game on a console that has run at 60 fps that I can think of is Call of DutyWasdie

Lol,what?

I've lost count of how many games have run on 60fps :S

Check your sources.

Most of the games that run at 60fps are sports games or racing games with an extremely controled camera. CoD hasn't had a major graphical upgrade in 4 years.

Nothing wrong with 30fps on the consoles. 99% of people can't tell the difference anyways.

what about Ratchet and Clank?

or the upcoming RAGE?

actually, God Of War 3 runs at 45fps most of the time. it barely dips to 30fps.

Still looks great for a ten year old remake.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Also the only version we have seen is from a much older build, so we aren't even seeing the final graphics.

DarkLink77

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Comparison(click for 720p):

Very nice remake.

KarateeeChop

best remake in gaming to date :shock:

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Also the only version we have seen is from a much older build, so we aren't even seeing the final graphics.

Heil68

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Comparison(click for 720p):

Very nice remake.

delta3074

best remake in gaming to date :shock:

Who cares? Alan Wake was "sub HD," and it looked and played great.

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

best remake in gaming to date :shock:

-RocBoys9489-

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="GreekGameManiac"]

Lol,what?

I've lost count of how many games have run on 60fps :S

Check your sources.

rumbalumba

Most of the games that run at 60fps are sports games or racing games with an extremely controled camera. CoD hasn't had a major graphical upgrade in 4 years.

Nothing wrong with 30fps on the consoles. 99% of people can't tell the difference anyways.

what about Ratchet and Clank?

or the upcoming RAGE?

actually, God Of War 3 runs at 45fps most of the time. it barely dips to 30fps.

who cares? Game still looks great...

lets not forget MGS4 is also in sub HD:P

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Also the only version we have seen is from a much older build, so we aren't even seeing the final graphics.

Heil68

who cares? Game still looks great...

lets not forget MGS4 is also in sub HD:P

lawlessx

MGS4 is also a very old 2008 game. Your reaching here, It's 2011 now for a remake it's rather disapointing.

Don't care about fps but 640p? Not buying this for sure.silversix_

What??? Halo Anniversary is not gonna run on 60 FPS??? :(

What??? Halo Anniversary is not gonna run on 60 FPS??? :(

guildclaws

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="GotNugz"]

but crysis 2 pushes the xbox near limits, Halo ann not so much.

i give up, i guess people are satisfied with 640p. let me ask you a question what looks better Halo remake, or Perfect Dark Zero?

is this because they're running 2 games at once? the original graphics mode seemed impractical to me when the game already played identically.

Is it really that big of a deal? It still looks good.

Most games don't eveny run on 60 FPS.

Still looks good despite not being in HD...

[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

who cares? Game still looks great...

lets not forget MGS4 is also in sub HD:P

casharmy

MGS4 is also a very old 2008 game. Your reaching here, It's 2011 now for a remake it's rather disapointing.

is it that surprising? wasnt every single halo game ever made sub-hd

is it that surprising? wasnt every single halo game ever made sub-hd

russiaAK47

Halo Wars was in 720p :P

Halo: Reach was technically in 720p, but it came short on horizontal resolution.

who else can't wait for sum red vs blue videos? should be good

Thought it would be at least 720p at 30fps. They must be trying to push it visually, Better than laggy framerate I guess?nutcrackr

[QUOTE="nutcrackr"]Thought it would be at least 720p at 30fps. They must be trying to push it visually, Better than laggy framerate I guess?Stevo_the_gamer

Bungie does tend to go crazy with their lighting. Apparently, 343 is continuing the trend.DarkLink77

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Bungie does tend to go crazy with their lighting. Apparently, 343 is continuing the trend.Stevo_the_gamer

who else can't wait for sum red vs blue videos? should be good

gamer-adam1

www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-halo-anniversary-demo-analysis

rather dissapointing to be honest for a game that is 10 years old. it should be running at 60fps and native 1080p but instead we get choppy 30 frames and 640p. 343 should be ashamed the game doesn't even look that good, in fact much worse than 360 launch titles and those games ran on only 1 core lol. although real-time engine change is something iv'e never seen before.

GotNugz

You know nothing about hardware do you? There is only so much they can do with a 6 yrd console. And I am sure the game will look on par with the rest. Man this place is so lame now.

Not surprising. Whatever tech it is that they've been using on the Halo series this gen has always seemed poorly optimizedresulting graphically/technically underwhelming visuals.

They are just adding new textures and upping the resolution a bit?

They are just adding new textures and upping the resolution a bit?

tenaka2

343 says the builds they have shown are months old even before E3. Would not surprise me if it's very close to 720p Native when its done.

It's also running TWO Engines at the same time + Halo:CEA looks awesome already. It would not suprise me if it's one of the better looking games this year.

"In introducing the E3 demo, the game's executive producer Dan Ayoub, talks about the code being significantly out of date, with later builds looking much better. We'll be interested to see how much of an improvement we see in the final game, as 343's captures do show some issues."

I wouldn't confirm anything TC until DF has got there hands on the final build of the game.

seems to me that it means nothing considering they've created an up to par engine overlay that can be switched on the fly at any time during the game that wouldn't exactly allow for hd and 60 fps unless they did some major changes to the original game it self it wouldn't be very good to have the overlay and original running at different resolutions and fps.

most of the games that achieve high resolution and fps are either hd remakes or hd releases this is an hd remaster which does not fit into those catagories.

343 says the builds they have shown are months old even before E3. Would not surprise me if it's very close to 720p Native when its done.

It's also running TWO Engines at the same time + Halo:CEA looks awesome already. It would not suprise me if it's one of the better looking games this year.

walkingdream

Maybe on consoles, but definitly is not THAT good looking. I say it's rather lacking in the visual department (even though it was on purpose, reviewers should not let them get away with that.)