Halo Reach vs KZ2 comparison

Halo games are never made for the graphics, the game will still look better than Killzone 2 Visually even if the graphics arn't as good.

Plus anyone saying Reach looks like 3 obvisously dont know what there talking about.

In the latest VidOc of reach the bungie team state that they have TRIPLE the amoun of polygons to play with and TRIPLE the amount of AI that can be placed on screen at the same time.

MobilechicaneX

I dobut from based on what I have seen it will look better then Killzone 2.. But that should be irrelevent.. Halo has never been the standard for graphics on any of its iterations.. Halo 3 is more popular then KZ2 for other obvious reasons.

I just want everyone to know that a 1 1/2 year old game just destroyed Reach, the 360's great hope. I thought Reach was supposed to have ground breaking visuals? It looks just like the other halo 3. Can we put it to rest that the 360 is maxed out. It's just sad that the PS3's 3rd best looking game beats a new game that was supposed to be the one great 360 hope to show the 360 had the power to compete with the PS3. http://gamingbolt.com/2010/02/14/halo-reach-versus-killzone-2-hd-screenshot-comparison/

gamewhat

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Killzone 2 scored the same as an "expansion".

It didn't score as high as Halo 3.

And like Halo 3, Reach will once again gain 9.5 status.

But hey, if a lesser product is what you're about, then go right ahead.

Killzone 2 is good, but still a lesser and less desirable product.

II_Seraphim_II

No offense, but you should probably read a little more. I said Killzone 2 is good, so I obviously didn't mean that it was a bad score, but a 9.0 is lesser than a 9.5, no?

Or are we living in the twilight zone here? Yeah, that's probably the case. Damn reality gettin' up in our ****!

Halo games are never made for the graphics, the game will still look better than Killzone 2 Visually even if the graphics arn't as good.

Plus anyone saying Reach looks like 3 obvisously dont know what there talking about.

In the latest VidOc of reach the bungie team state that they have TRIPLE the amoun of polygons to play with and TRIPLE the amount of AI that can be placed on screen at the same time.

MobilechicaneX

quadruple and double.

Based on those comparisons KZ2 looks has better graphics, but i think HR looks better because of the colors.

Halo isn't about graphics, it never has been, its about gameplay. The tech behind Halo 3 in the vein of AI quality and the amount on screen or in a battle at once is far more impressive than that of Killzone 2's. Halo: Reach looks to further push the envelope. As much as it may sound as though I'm trying to bag on Killzone 2, I'm not. I don't even own a 360, I'm simply tired of people getting their knickers in a twist over games that are better in different ways and in different areas. Visually, Killzone 2 kicks Halo's ass no doubt, but tech-wise Halo has much more going on. Its just as simple as that.

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Killzone 2 scored the same as an "expansion".

It didn't score as high as Halo 3.

And like Halo 3, Reach will once again gain 9.5 status.

But hey, if a lesser product is what you're about, then go right ahead.

Killzone 2 is good, but still a lesser and less desirable product.

BioShockOwnz

No offense, but you should probably read a little more. I said Killzone 2 is good, so I obviously didn't mean that it was a bad score, but a 9.0 is lesser than a 9.5, no?

Or are we living in the twilight zone here? Yeah, that's probably the case. Damn reality gettin' up in our ****!

/crysis

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] I love how here on GS people act like 9.0 is a bad score :lol:II_Seraphim_II

No offense, but you should probably read a little more. I said Killzone 2 is good, so I obviously didn't mean that it was a bad score, but a 9.0 is lesser than a 9.5, no?

Or are we living in the twilight zone here? Yeah, that's probably the case. Damn reality gettin' up in our ****!

Ah, how I love System Wars :)

People, I know this is System Wars, but comparing a game that won't come out until late 2010 with a game that came out in February of 2009?.. gee, I wonder which one of those 2 will look better../sarcasm

I'm pretty confident..no, I'm absolutely sure that Bungie being the skilled development studio that they are, won't disappoint their fans and the rest of the gaming world be it with the graphics, gameplay or depth of the game.

Either way, I'm enjoying quite a lot this little "graphic war" :P

Desmonic