When I see threads like this I promise myself I will not comment because its such a waste of time, but here I am again...
The TC has created an interesting PC, I myself would not install some of the listed componants in my home computer, but again I would imagine the point of the thread was to address the cost issue rather then the quality componant issue.
As a gamer who enjoys games on any platform be it PC or Console, I find that this is a very interesting "attack" on the PC is expensive debate, and looks to prove a point and is successful...assuming that the person reading knows nothing about PC's.
The TC is correct, or at least seems to be correct the $500PC built from February 2008 pricing does in fact look to be quite the beast when compared to 360 which launched in 2005 and PS3 which launced in 2006.
And based on the spec's I would imagine it would run Crysis.
However, what about in February 2009? Will I still be able to run whatever the latest and greatest titles are? With the listed PC I would highly doubt it. This is a PC built for right now, not for a year from now.
When Crysis hit the market, I was stoked and my PC that I had built not more then 18 months or so prior now required a new video card to take full advantage of Crysis, and rather then shopping for the bare minimum I opt for a PNY GeForce 8800 GTX which will assure I don't need to get a new video card in another 18 months (I hope) at a cost of roughly 500 bucks CDN.
So basically over two years of owning my new PC, I have absorbed:
1200 bucks for the first build (900 if we back out the monitor)
That was my tower, HDD, Ram, Processor, OS, Keyboard, Mouse, Wireless, Sound Card, Cooling etc (the basics)
Then 89.99 in june of last year for Ram
Then my new Video Card PNY GeForce 8800 GTX (January 2008) 500.00CDN or so (There was a mail in rebate so after taxes and the rebate it came out to roughly 500 or so)
Lets assume that I am now set till January-April 2009 without having to buy anything new for the tower itself
I have still spent more over the course of three years on PC gaming then I have spent on every console I have bought this generation, and within a year or so I will need to turn over the box to examine the system requirements if I want to take full advantage of the game to assure that I meet the optimal requirements.
This is something that I don't have to do with console games,
No one in the right mind should be buying a PC that is barely able to play the highest end games of today (IE Crysis) because what happen when the next high end title comes out? Well you join me in line at Tiger Direct getting a new video card, or ram, or whatever.
PC gaming is a high upkeep cost, high reward way of gaming.
Console gaming is as plug and play as it comes,
Each has its perks, as well as its cons.
cosmostein77
First off other than the HDD all those are top notch brands for PC. Secondly..... you upgraded not because your PC was obsolete but because you wanted to play crysis at max?... Crysis is the only game that required that yet you say PC gaming has upkeep cost when coming to high end titles... tell me how many high end titles do you know of other than crysis. Then tell me if shelling out 500 canadian for an upgraded you probably didn't need is practical?
Log in to comment