3.0
Link
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
ANOTEHR AAAE JRPG FOR THE PS3 KEEP THEM COMING
Yangire
PS3 JRPG king confirmed!
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
Animal-Mother
You smell:oops:
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
Luxen90
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: Animal-Mother
Does anyone here even know what a flop is supposed to be, anymore?
I knew this and knew this game would be bad because of this just at looking at the cover.
The Good: Building combos can be rewarding The Bad:Characters are disturbingly sexualized caricatures of young girls , Visuals are choppy and poorly animated , Music is so repetitive that it verges on painful ,Story does little to build on promising premise , Random healing system is irritating and poorly executed.johny300
How is that bad?
Ya know, you can hope for the best in a JRPG and at least hope HOPE it'll be good. But this gen JRPGs have consistently been beaten down with a baseball bat. but then again they haven't changed much at all.
Animal-Mother
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: nervmeister
Does anyone here even know what a flop is supposed to be, anymore?
Dude, common. Its the SW game. It's fun. And a 3.0 doesn't really bode well.[QUOTE="johny300"]The Good: Building combos can be rewarding The Bad:Characters are disturbingly sexualized caricatures of young girls , Visuals are choppy and poorly animated , Music is so repetitive that it verges on painful ,Story does little to build on promising premise , Random healing system is irritating and poorly executed.BPoole96
How is that bad?
Ask the reviewer lol?[QUOTE="nervmeister"]
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: Animal-Mother
Does anyone here even know what a flop is supposed to be, anymore?
Dude, common. Its the SW game. It's fun. And a 3.0 doesn't really bode well. Still, what was the hype?[QUOTE="BPoole96"][QUOTE="johny300"]The Good: Building combos can be rewarding The Bad:Characters are disturbingly sexualized caricatures of young girls , Visuals are choppy and poorly animated , Music is so repetitive that it verges on painful ,Story does little to build on promising premise , Random healing system is irritating and poorly executed.johny300
How is that bad?
Ask the reviewer lol?Shouldn't have to ask a reviewer to know why that's bad. >_>
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
Animal-Mother
do you even know what a flop means and how a game flops? seriously lmao it didnt even get a hype thread to begin with so not a flop ;), and the only person that kept posting about this game was me lol.. anyways was expecting a 6 from GS but oh well GS never changes in terms or reviewing JRPGs, have the game and love it! check my unbxing if anyone curious :D Link 8)
[QUOTE="Luxen90"]
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]
Another flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
Animal-Mother
Maybe on consoles.
Radiant Historia just launched for the DS and was called creative and refreshing by gamespot :) DS and PSP are doing fantastic in the jrpg department!
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Dude, common. Its the SW game. It's fun. And a 3.0 doesn't really bode well. Still, what was the hype?[QUOTE="nervmeister"]
Does anyone here even know what a flop is supposed to be, anymore?
nervmeister
Be sammy fun police not no fun police
Who the heck is Kat Bailey? It's obvious that who ever that person is they didn't play very far into the game. The criticisms about the battle system are somewhat legit, but everything else is way off. It's pretty clear that this Kat person isn't a hardcore RPG gamer. Giving a good game like HN a 3.0 is ridiculous. I actually beat the game (didn't do all the extra stuff) and it is a good game with rewards if you play it long enough.
Bunk review is bunk. Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community. I rated it a 7.5.
Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community.
Bigboi500
I have a feeling gamespot couldn't care less about being taken seriously by the JRPG community.
Who the heck is Kat Bailey? It's obvious that who ever that person is they didn't play very far into the game. The criticisms about the battle system are somewhat legit, but everything else is way off. It's pretty clear that this Kat person isn't a hardcore RPG gamer. Giving a good game like HN a 3.0 is ridiculous. I actually beat the game (didn't do all the extra stuff) and it is a good game with rewards if you play it long enough.
Bunk review is bunk. Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community. I rated it a 7.5.
Bigboi500
6 to 7 is the right score for this game agreed. been getting a few requests from people to make a review and post it so going to do so very soon
Me too I was actually going to buy it this morning but I did not have the money on me. Dodged a bullet there! :PAnother flipty flopper for the PS3 :lol: and to think I was actually thinking about buying this. Someone make fun of me NOW.
Animal-Mother
Who the heck is Kat Bailey? It's obvious that who ever that person is they didn't play very far into the game. The criticisms about the battle system are somewhat legit, but everything else is way off. It's pretty clear that this Kat person isn't a hardcore RPG gamer. Giving a good game like HN a 3.0 is ridiculous. I actually beat the game (didn't do all the extra stuff) and it is a good game with rewards if you play it long enough.
Bunk review is bunk. Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community. I rated it a 7.5.
Bigboi500
I recognize that name. She's the host of Active Time Babble podcast on 1up. She's pretty hardcore if you ask me. You should listen to her podcast and get schooled. ;)
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community.
Yangire
I have a feeling gamespot couldn't care less about being taken seriously by the JRPG community.
You're right. It has become very obvious.Why is AR Tonelico3 is rated M ?johny300
Read the ESRB rating you'll probably know why, i did not read it to avoide spoilers :D
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community.
Yangire
I have a feeling gamespot couldn't care less about being taken seriously by the JRPG community.
I go to RPGFan, RPGamer and Gamecritics for JRPG reviews. GS has been a hit and miss for me in terms of JRPG reviews. They gave Nier a 5, but I loved that game. If it weren't for those three sites I mentioned, I would have never played Nier.
[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]
Who the heck is Kat Bailey? It's obvious that who ever that person is they didn't play very far into the game. The criticisms about the battle system are somewhat legit, but everything else is way off. It's pretty clear that this Kat person isn't a hardcore RPG gamer. Giving a good game like HN a 3.0 is ridiculous. I actually beat the game (didn't do all the extra stuff) and it is a good game with rewards if you play it long enough.
Bunk review is bunk. Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community. I rated it a 7.5.
majadamus
I recognize that name. She's the host of Active Time Babble podcast on 1up. She's pretty hardcore if you ask me. You should listen to her podcast and get schooled. ;)
It's pretty obvious that she must be a casual mainstream gamer who only played the game for a few hours at best and made some premature judgements.Still, what was the hype?[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] Dude, common. Its the SW game. It's fun. And a 3.0 doesn't really bode well.
Animal-Mother
Be sammy fun police not no fun police
The JRPG community, (Well the hardcore ones) are some of the most biased people in the world.Who the heck is Kat Bailey? It's obvious that who ever that person is they didn't play very far into the game. The criticisms about the battle system are somewhat legit, but everything else is way off. It's pretty clear that this Kat person isn't a hardcore RPG gamer. Giving a good game like HN a 3.0 is ridiculous. I actually beat the game (didn't do all the extra stuff) and it is a good game with rewards if you play it long enough.
Bunk review is bunk. Gamespot should take the time to hire some better free-lance reviewers who actually know what the heck they're talking about if they want to be taken seriously from the JRPG community. I rated it a 7.5.
Bigboi500
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment