If 3DS goes up to $399, Would you buy it?

  • 155 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#101 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
No way, it's a handheld. I would never buy a handheld that's more expensive than consoles.
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#102 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
hahahahaha... No. Never ever in my life I would buy a portable console at that price.
Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#103 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

No, I don't want to own a system that's going to fail.

Avatar image for abuabed
abuabed

6606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#104 abuabed
Member since 2005 • 6606 Posts
Nope, maximum I'd pay is $200.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#105 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
I probably wouldn't buy it for any price as it is now. Maybe a Jackson.
Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts
I wouldn't buy an handheld for that price. And I think some of you are being rather hopeful for a sub-$200 price. I think it was Kotaku that asked Reggie about how much of a jump this is and whether Nintendo was going to continue a policy of making profit on every unit sold. He indicated that they would continue to make a profit on every unit sold and that it was "significantly" more expensive to produce. If the DSi retails for $169, I really doubt $30 or less is his definition of "significant". I'd say more realistically, we're looking at $230-250.
Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#107 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

Hell no. I got my Iphone at a great student deal, 50$ a month and the phone costed me 30$ here in Canada, why the HELL would I buy a handheld at 400$? I waited for as long as I could for the PS3's price to drop and no way in hell would I pay for a gaming system for more than what I paid for my PS3.-_-

However, Nintendo would NEVER do that. They would rather wait until costs are down and release it at 199.99. Max 249.99 but that's a wee bit of a strech.

Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

No. The handheld looks very good, but not worth what a 360 or PS3 are. I would pay $200 max at most for it.

Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#109 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts

Good Lord no. I felt bad buying my PS3 for 300 and its a console.

Ragnarok1051
you must be poor :P
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#110 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

Of course not.

Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#111 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

Good Lord no. I felt bad buying my PS3 for 300 and its a console.

hd5870corei7

you must be poor :P

It's not a matter of being poor or not, it's about being intelligent with your money. Wasting 400$ for a handheld when it's price would go down eventually as well as it's games price is just stupid imo.

This also goes to the PS3 owners who bought their consoles at 500$ for the 20G. I have a friend and I really feel sorry for him since he has no wifi while I have an extra 100G HDD + wifi and almost half the price. I just find it sad but if you don't regret it, by all means ignore my post.

Avatar image for Cruse34
Cruse34

4468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#112 Cruse34
Member since 2009 • 4468 Posts

Nintendo would never do that, but if they did I would still buy it

Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts
I'm buying at least two to sell the other on ebay lol.
Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Nintendo is not stupid they are not gonna charge more for a handheld then the wii...:P

anyway nope

Avatar image for kweeni
kweeni

11413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#115 kweeni
Member since 2007 • 11413 Posts
No I would rather but a new tv for my room instead.
Avatar image for Buckledant
Buckledant

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 Buckledant
Member since 2010 • 157 Posts
[QUOTE="LongZhiZi"]I wouldn't buy an handheld for that price. And I think some of you are being rather hopeful for a sub-$200 price. I think it was Kotaku that asked Reggie about how much of a jump this is and whether Nintendo was going to continue a policy of making profit on every unit sold. He indicated that they would continue to make a profit on every unit sold and that it was "significantly" more expensive to produce. If the DSi retails for $169, I really doubt $30 or less is his definition of "significant". I'd say more realistically, we're looking at $230-250.

Yes, Reggie said that it would cost more to produce it. Now considering Nintendo was selling the DS for profit over 4 years ago at 130 dollars, It wouldn't surprise me at all if a DS costs around 60-80 dollars to make. so even if a 3DS costs between two or three times as much to make they could still sell it for 199 and make a profit.
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

I would never pay that much for a handheld.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
[QUOTE="OwnallConsoles"]

Yes I would.

If you see how much cell phones like The Iphone and Droid X goes for then this is a bargin.

i wouldn't, but i highly doubt that would happen. not bashing sony (well, maybe a little), but i think the companies have learned to not launch something with too high of a price point. and honestly, cell phones are often snatched up with a rebate.
Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#119 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts

$400 is roughly about £260 and no i wouldnt pay that but would gladly pay £200.

Avatar image for hd5870corei7
hd5870corei7

1612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#120 hd5870corei7
Member since 2010 • 1612 Posts
@sanim02 If you buy a PS3 for a meer $300 which is around half of my monthly food bill or less and then you feel bad because you "spent so much money on a console" then imo you are poor :S sorry but under no circumstance is $300 for a blu-ray player, built in wifi, cell engine, great software and a huge library of games ready for you --- a bad purchase.
Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#121 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

I wonder why people keep pointing out that it's a handheld. Yeah, it's handheld, but it's also a console. The differentiation is handheld console and home console, not console and handheld.

That being said, being inferior technologically speaking doesn't say anything about the quality of the system. I still personally think that the DS is the best console this gen.

calvinsora

Because, like you said, inferior tech. I could never bring myself to pay more than 50 bucks for a handheld.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#122 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Maybe not I would have trouble spending more then $250 for a Console so I doubt I would spend more for a Handheld.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
$399.99 for a handheld? What the buck?!
Avatar image for HaLoMaStErJT
HaLoMaStErJT

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 HaLoMaStErJT
Member since 2008 • 1380 Posts

no way I would much rahter buy a few games for my ps3 and psp instead.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#125 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

I wonder why people keep pointing out that it's a handheld. Yeah, it's handheld, but it's also a console. The differentiation is handheld console and home console, not console and handheld.

That being said, being inferior technologically speaking doesn't say anything about the quality of the system. I still personally think that the DS is the best console this gen.

Pug-Nasty

Because, like you said, inferior tech. I could never bring myself to pay more than 50 bucks for a handheld.

Inferior tech doesn't mean inferior gaming system. I pay for systems to play great games, I'd pay more for a DS than a PS3, for example, because I think the former has a better game library.

I presume you've never bought a handheld before? Not many that sell for 50 bucks.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1

2436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 deactivated-5b2b34c3a42a1
Member since 2009 • 2436 Posts

Yes I would.

If you see how much cell phones like The Iphone and Droid X goes for then this is a bargin.

OwnallConsoles

But those are phones. You can phone people with them and text...

But no I wouldn't pay $400 for a handheld. I'd rather buy like 6-8 games for my 360 than spend that much on a 3DS. I plan to buy it when its a cheaper, like $250 or so.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#127 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
no console should ever cost more then 299
Avatar image for sergemyster8
sergemyster8

1749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 sergemyster8
Member since 2006 • 1749 Posts

$200 is the perfect price. It better be that.

Avatar image for deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e

6013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#129 deactivated-61cf0c4baf12e
Member since 2006 • 6013 Posts

I think 250 is is way too expensive for a portable gaming system.

200 should be it's price.

Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
Even tho the 3DS wont be that much,I wouldnt buy it
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#131 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
I would never spend that much money on a handheld. If the price is above 250, Nintendo lost a sale.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="hd5870corei7"]@sanim02 If you buy a PS3 for a meer $300 which is around half of my monthly food bill or less and then you feel bad because you "spent so much money on a console" then imo you are poor :S sorry but under no circumstance is $300 for a blu-ray player, built in wifi, cell engine, great software and a huge library of games ready for you --- a bad purchase.

I'm in college so $300 is a little much to be spending on a console. I just had to go without dinner for a few weeks. :P
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#133 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts

Yes. The games speak for themselves. (Although I doubt Nintendo would do such a thing)

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#134 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

I wonder why people keep pointing out that it's a handheld. Yeah, it's handheld, but it's also a console. The differentiation is handheld console and home console, not console and handheld.

That being said, being inferior technologically speaking doesn't say anything about the quality of the system. I still personally think that the DS is the best console this gen.

calvinsora

Because, like you said, inferior tech. I could never bring myself to pay more than 50 bucks for a handheld.

Inferior tech doesn't mean inferior gaming system. I pay for systems to play great games, I'd pay more for a DS than a PS3, for example, because I think the former has a better game library.

I presume you've never bought a handheld before? Not many that sell for 50 bucks.

No, it doesn't mean inferior gaming, but it does mean, wait for it, inferior tech. Which is, usually, cheaper tech. Cheaper parts means it costs less to produce, which should translate to cheaper sales price. Anything outside standard mark up is just price gouging.

No, I've never bought a handheld. I had an original gameboy and there's a gameboy advance floating around here somewhere. The only game I've cared to play on either is Tetris.

Avatar image for kontejner44
kontejner44

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 kontejner44
Member since 2006 • 2025 Posts

Definitely, that high price means that Nintendo is going to double the wow factor, count me in!!

Avatar image for svaubel
svaubel

4571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 133

User Lists: 0

#136 svaubel
Member since 2005 • 4571 Posts

Heck no!

199$ is the absolute max I would pay for a portable.

399$ for a console.

Avatar image for calvinsora
calvinsora

7076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#137 calvinsora
Member since 2009 • 7076 Posts

[QUOTE="calvinsora"]

[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]

Because, like you said, inferior tech. I could never bring myself to pay more than 50 bucks for a handheld.

Pug-Nasty

Inferior tech doesn't mean inferior gaming system. I pay for systems to play great games, I'd pay more for a DS than a PS3, for example, because I think the former has a better game library.

I presume you've never bought a handheld before? Not many that sell for 50 bucks.

No, it doesn't mean inferior gaming, but it does mean, wait for it, inferior tech. Which is, usually, cheaper tech. Cheaper parts means it costs less to produce, which should translate to cheaper sales price. Anything outside standard mark up is just price gouging.

No, I've never bought a handheld. I had an original gameboy and there's a gameboy advance floating around here somewhere. The only game I've cared to play on either is Tetris.

Ah, I see your point. ;)

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts
no console should ever cost more then 299surrealnumber5
here, here. i really do believe that is the magic price point.
Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts

No, I don't want to own a system that's going to fail.

Cherokee_Jack
wait, what?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]no console should ever cost more then 299clone01
here, here. i really do believe that is the magic price point.

i like it lower but that is my max
Avatar image for bytgames
bytgames

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 bytgames
Member since 2008 • 1030 Posts

With the line up it has...Sure wouldHarlockJC

you would pay 400 dollars to play previous gen games...like OOT and MGS3? those are the best 2 games announced for it.

Avatar image for OwnallConsoles
OwnallConsoles

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 OwnallConsoles
Member since 2010 • 404 Posts

Nintendo has rumored that the 3DS "be online all the time." Hinting at their own 3G network or something. If may be a phone too.

Avatar image for EvanTheGamer
EvanTheGamer

1550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 EvanTheGamer
Member since 2009 • 1550 Posts

Only non-gamers would pass up this deal.

Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

No, I don't want to own a system that's going to fail.

Rahnyc4
wait, what?

at $400 there is NO WAY it can succeed. If it won't succeed then it won't get enough games. If there aren't any games then the system is not worth $400. There, your mind is officially blown.
Avatar image for Gamingcucumber
Gamingcucumber

5612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#145 Gamingcucumber
Member since 2004 • 5612 Posts
Nope, though I won't be picking up a 3DS until the "upgrade" comes out, and let's be honest. We all know they will release a improved version of the 3DS withing 2 years.
Avatar image for Jelley0
Jelley0

1867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Jelley0
Member since 2009 • 1867 Posts

150$ - I have to have it right now!

200$ - I'll buy it

250-280$ - I'll consider buying it

Anything above that much I won't be getting it.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#147 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts
$399 ??? hell no
Avatar image for edwise18
edwise18

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 edwise18
Member since 2008 • 1533 Posts

Yes I would.

If you see how much cell phones like The Iphone and Droid X goes for then this is a bargin.

OwnallConsoles

Yeah, but the Iphone and the droid, do a lot more than the 3ds can.

Avatar image for mayforcebeyou
mayforcebeyou

2703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 mayforcebeyou
Member since 2007 • 2703 Posts
Not for when it releases. I would only buy it after the price would decrease in the 100-200 range.
Avatar image for JustusCF
JustusCF

1050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 JustusCF
Member since 2009 • 1050 Posts

not paying more than $200