If GT5 scores less than 9.5 on GS, will SW consider it a failure?

  • 187 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
Yea, there would be ownage here for a few weeks probably with lems playing up scores, playing down sales while cows do the exact opposite
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#52 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

i guess. although imo, since forza 3 raised the standards, if GT5 gets a 9.0 it should be equal to forza 3's 9.5Silenthps

Only if the reviewer says they are equal. Although that logic is pretty silly to begin with. If we are comparing scores in the first place, unequal scores are unequal games.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

So then we are in agreement that Gamespot will likely have to changer the maximum score to 20, and give GT5 a 32?

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
Pretty much.
Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts
I'm sure cowspot will score it above a 9.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#56 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Yea, there would be ownage here for a few weeks probably with lems playing up scores, playing down sales while cows do the exact opposite93soccer
This is exactly what will happen.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#57 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]i guess. although imo, since forza 3 raised the standards, if GT5 gets a 9.0 it should be equal to forza 3's 9.5foxhound_fox


Only if the reviewer says they are equal. Although that logic is pretty silly to begin with. If we are comparing scores in the first place, unequal scores are unequal games.

yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

Avatar image for tonitorsi
tonitorsi

8692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#58 tonitorsi
Member since 2006 • 8692 Posts

Wouldn't stop it from outselling anyliving 360 game :P

And that alone, will be ownage...for an entire generation.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]i guess. although imo, since forza 3 raised the standards, if GT5 gets a 9.0 it should be equal to forza 3's 9.5Silenthps


Only if the reviewer says they are equal. Although that logic is pretty silly to begin with. If we are comparing scores in the first place, unequal scores are unequal games.

yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

Standards don't change that much in a year, especially in the racing genre. Gears scoring less was more to do with it releasing on the PC than anything.

Avatar image for mo0ksi
mo0ksi

12337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#60 mo0ksi
Member since 2007 • 12337 Posts
Even thought it'll be great regardless, anything less than 9.5 would be a flop in this case. 9.5 would have some mildness to it, 9 would be explosive, and 8.5 would be insane.
Avatar image for KarateeeChop
KarateeeChop

4666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 KarateeeChop
Member since 2010 • 4666 Posts

Wouldn't stop it from outselling anyliving 360 game :P

And that alone, will be ownage...for an entire generation.

tonitorsi

so now sales matters?

Avatar image for fifamessi
fifamessi

825

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 fifamessi
Member since 2009 • 825 Posts
9 would be good enough.. but knowing some members here ofcourse 9 is a horrible game lol. But i have to say im expecting 9.5
Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#63 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
Flops aren't by exact score. A game hyped AAA scoring 9 isn't a flop necessarily. But sure, people my call it a failure for not outscoring Forza 3.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts
Playing by the rules, it wouldn't be a flop because its hyped AAA (provided it gets 9.0 obviously) but people will then have "proof" if you want to call it that, that Forza 3 is better than GT5.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51616 Posts

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Chutebox
Perfect Dark Zero is relieved to hear that.
Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

yep. and the same can happen to Halo Reach.

Avatar image for ferrarimanf355
ferrarimanf355

1884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 ferrarimanf355
Member since 2005 • 1884 Posts

Anything less than a 10 is a failure, methinks.

You guys can quote me on this, put in your sigs, anything. Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit will outscore GT5. Not because it's more realistic, but because it's more FUN. Take it to the bank.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Anjunaddict

Perfect Dark Zero is relieved to hear that.

oh snap:P

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#70 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Anjunaddict
Perfect Dark Zero is relieved to hear that.

And Assassin's Creed
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

Yes it will fail below 9.5 in system wars.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Standards increase over time, if anything GT5 has a lot of proving to do against the amazing FORZA 3, and previous Gran Turismo games to the Gamespot staff. If the game gets AAA, then it's truly earned it, if it gets lower than AAA, then GT5 failed to meet Hype. That's the rules TC, and you know it.

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Chutebox

That's how I feel, this whole cutting into an AAA score by halves (.5's), is damage control if you ask me, as it shows a worry that a game may score AAA, but bashing still is needed to be done by certain folks.

I saw a banned user, I believe his name was BSO try to make only PS3 AAA games flop if they didn't get that .5 half.

Sure, there have been some great AAA games that got AA at GS, and even some A games that got AAA at GS, but as far as the GS spreadsheet they still count, and are used in arguments to this day.

I don't see a GIANT SW thread about Halo : Reach or ZELDA having to score a 9.5 or 10, or it's a failure (especially considering Halo ODST got 9.0)...and there is a reason why. It wouldn't make sense, if that thread existed, I would post the same thing I'm posting now.

The SW rules are about Hype and Flop based on initial Hype. GT5's hype is AAA, so if it fails to meet AAA, it's a flop, if it meets AAA then it isn't a flop.


Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

tbh i couldnt cae cause i will be too busy playing it.Where as 13 y/o lemmings and cows who aint played the game will be trying to claim some form of superiority.

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
It has to score a 10. It's hyped to be better than Forza 3, and getting the same score isn't "better". Which is basically setting yourself up for failure, but not my problem.
Avatar image for jman1553
jman1553

1332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 jman1553
Member since 2009 • 1332 Posts

Since the release of GT4 there's been two Forza's released on the XBOX 360, both of which scored considerabley well. Forza 3 really set the bar for racing simulators and with the production GT5 been so long and hyped if it scores anything less than 9.5 (Which Forza 3 scored) do you see SW exploding and calling it a failure?

Zune_HD

If there is a different reviewer than the one who reviewed Forza 3, then if it was still 9.0, I wouldn't call it inferior. Why? Because we're talking about two different people, with two different opinions.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Hmm.... it should go without saying no AAA game is ever going to be a flop.

Avatar image for PiGsCaNFIy
PiGsCaNFIy

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 PiGsCaNFIy
Member since 2010 • 92 Posts

I thought official hype was AAA and whether it meets the hype was the thing to determine flops and failures.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#78 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

Silenthps


Actually, that had more to do with it being on PC than coming out later. Look at the difference between the two versions of Halo 2, the PC version scored low 7, but was still called the definitive version. You need to text of the review to make any hedge-way, but when just comparing scores, and not to the PC, if they are unequal, then the games are unequal.

Avatar image for Scythes777
Scythes777

2796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Scythes777
Member since 2006 • 2796 Posts

Anything less than a 10 and I would consider it a flop. I know its going to be a great game regardless.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

Anything less than a 10 and I would consider it a flop. I know its going to be a great game regardless.

Scythes777

Same thing for Zelda and Halo Reach then, right?

:P

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Chutebox  Online
Member since 2007 • 51616 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

I gotta make this clear, no AAA game will ever, ever be a failure.

Ever.

Anjunaddict
Perfect Dark Zero is relieved to hear that.

Ha, happened sooner than I thought!
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#82 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Well even if it scores 1.0 the developers have [supposedly] made up the development costs so whatever happens after the release is only more income.... I am sure it will score 9.0 but this game is hyped and the critics are just dying to get their sarcastic surgeon hands onto it to tear it open and find something wrong with it. Their only hope is that it has too much gameplay and not enough storyline behind it, look at NFS: Shift they said "Career mode is very bare-bones" and that is GT5's biggest issue as far as i'm aware....
Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#83 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts
Honestly, I think the 9.5 for F3 was too high. I don't play online, but all the offline features weren't exceptional. I want to choose the time of day and weather conditions. This is what made GT4 better IMO.
Avatar image for JAS1024
JAS1024

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 JAS1024
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Isn't the hype AAA? A 9 would be a good score but lemmings would definitely use it as ownage. I can already see the comments now.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

foxhound_fox


Actually, that had more to do with it being on PC than coming out later. Look at the difference between the two versions of Halo 2, the PC version scored low 7, but was still called the definitive version. You need to text of the review to make any hedge-way, but when just comparing scores, and not to the PC, if they are unequal, then the games are unequal.

First, I agree that the text of the review is the ultimate decider. But are you seriously saying that if Forza 3 was released again, a year later after Forza 3 and was sold and had no improvements on it what-so-ever, and was sold at full price, that it would still score a 9.5? One of the reasons standards change over time is price. If GT5 were to score a 9.5 a year after F3, that would mean that a $60 GT5 would be an equal value to a $30 Forza 3, which would mean the game itself is of higher quality. For a 9.0 $60 GT5 to score .5 less than a $30 Forza 3, the games themselves would be about equal in quality. Also halo2 is a completely different scenario since the game was released 3 years later and its an FPS, the 3PS market on PC isn't that great so the PC standards excuse doesn't really apply that much. The reason the PC version of Gears was called the best version was that it had more content, otherwise it would have been lower thanks to being released a year later.

Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

I genuinely don't think it will score more than 9.2 here - GS will whine on about how it feels "incomplete" because there are only 200 premium cars, and the other 800 just feel "unfinished". That's my bet anyway.

Avatar image for ChaltierX
ChaltierX

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 ChaltierX
Member since 2009 • 1128 Posts

It doesn't really matter to me since (IMO) it'll be better than Forza.

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#88 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

foxhound_fox


Actually, that had more to do with it being on PC than coming out later. Look at the difference between the two versions of Halo 2, the PC version scored low 7, but was still called the definitive version. You need to text of the review to make any hedge-way, but when just comparing scores, and not to the PC, if they are unequal, then the games are unequal.

Oblivion scored less on the PS3 than the 360 version, but the PS3 version was considerably better with performance and graphics. The main difference is that the PS3 version came out later.

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts

Any game that scores 9.0 isn't a failure :).

Avatar image for GnR-SLaSh
GnR-SLaSh

3021

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 GnR-SLaSh
Member since 2006 • 3021 Posts

Any game that scores 9.0 isn't a failure :).

lbjkurono23
Amen.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]yeah but standards are raised as time progresses. look at Gears 360 > PC. The PC version was superior to the 360 in everyway and got .6 less because it came out a year later. zelda spirit tracks got an 8.5 despite being superior in everyway to zelda phantom hourglass which got a 9.

zero_snake99


Actually, that had more to do with it being on PC than coming out later. Look at the difference between the two versions of Halo 2, the PC version scored low 7, but was still called the definitive version. You need to text of the review to make any hedge-way, but when just comparing scores, and not to the PC, if they are unequal, then the games are unequal.

Oblivion scored less on the PS3 than the 360 version, but the PS3 version was considerably better with performance and graphics. The main difference is that the PS3 version came out later.

It was the same game, but a year late. That would be the main reason it scored less, not that standards had increased. (the 360 version was patched later to match the PS3 version) plus the 360 version has access to a lot of DLC the PS3 version doesn't. Anyway thats besides the point, comparing Oblivion to a year late port of oblivion isn't the same as comparing Forza 3 to a year later GT5.

Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

I genuinely don't think it will score more than 9.2 here - GS will whine on about how it feels "incomplete" because there are only 200 premium cars, and the other 800 just feel "unfinished". That's my bet anyway.

GnR-SLaSh
Well if you have a mass of crap with some gold sticking out of it, its still a mass of crap, so it wouldn't exactly be whining. You'd just have a bigger mass of crap and more gold.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
If it scores less than 9.5(very unlikely) this board will be in anarchy.
Avatar image for Rikusaki
Rikusaki

16641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#94 Rikusaki
Member since 2006 • 16641 Posts
[QUOTE="lbjkurono23"]

Any game that scores 9.0 isn't a failure :).

GnR-SLaSh
Amen.

Agreed.
Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#95 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts
given the hype and how long the game has been in development for I'd say yes although the real fun would be if it didn't get the AAA score and it only got an 8.5 :D.
Avatar image for YankeesNYC4life
YankeesNYC4life

235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 YankeesNYC4life
Member since 2010 • 235 Posts

not really, GT5 will sell 5-10 million copies, forza isnt even that popular. and whyis GS the "ultimate' review center? its still one person's opinion.

Avatar image for zero_snake99
zero_snake99

3478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 zero_snake99
Member since 2004 • 3478 Posts

[QUOTE="zero_snake99"]

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
Actually, that had more to do with it being on PC than coming out later. Look at the difference between the two versions of Halo 2, the PC version scored low 7, but was still called the definitive version. You need to text of the review to make any hedge-way, but when just comparing scores, and not to the PC, if they are unequal, then the games are unequal.

Anjunaddict

Oblivion scored less on the PS3 than the 360 version, but the PS3 version was considerably better with performance and graphics. The main difference is that the PS3 version came out later.

It was the same game, but a year late. That would be the main reason it scored less, not that standards had increased. (the 360 version was patched later to match the PS3 version) plus the 360 version has access to a lot of DLC the PS3 version doesn't. Anyway thats besides the point, comparing Oblivion to a year late port of oblivion isn't the same as comparing Forza 3 to a year later GT5.

PS3 oblivion had completely new textures over the 360. The 360 version never got that. Yes, it got an update (patch 1.2) which improved the LOD and some performance things, but the PS3 version had not only better lighting but redone textures. Regardless, it still scored less. Which contradicts the "same game, same score" comment made above.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Any game that scores 9.0 isn't a failure :).

lbjkurono23

It will be failure in the sense that it failed to outscore Forza 3 which is the point everyone here is making.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

not really, GT5 will sell 5-10 million copies, forza isnt even that popular.

YankeesNYC4life

So every FPS other than Halo and Call of Duty are failures?

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

Lems would have a field day with it, scoring less than 9.5 is not failure I can't say that, I'd be crazy if I said that it's not even a failure in the Forza VS GT sense, it'd only mean that Forza >>>>>>>>>>>GT series.