If it wasnt for XBL, PSN would never be as it is now

  • 156 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

Alot of people have been saying how PSN is better because it's free and such, fairenough. Do those people even know where PSN got all their features from? Thats right, XBL. XBL was invented much more before PSN was made. PSN took many things like trophies, in game XMB support, in game messaging, voice chat, join session in progress, recent players all from XBL. People have been saying how XBL is same as PSN, but do people know 70% of the features in PSN are plainly ripped-off from XBL? If one of the two services were to add something different and innovative, it will be xbox live. Also if XBL didnt exist, I wonder where PSN would of ripped their ideas from? People need to realise that XBL is far original, and that PSN is company that clones features from XBL. This is plain fact. Sorry cows but true.

Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#2 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts

But what makes it worse is that we have to pay for the "original features". So..... yeah. Not that great.

Avatar image for Bazooka_4ME
Bazooka_4ME

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Bazooka_4ME
Member since 2008 • 2540 Posts
And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts

But what makes it worse is that we have to pay for the "original features". So..... yeah. Not that great.

Thuganomic05
Dont you love paying for XBL? As again, if the two company were to invent a new feature, it definitely be XBL.
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#5 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts
[QUOTE="shahilsyed"][QUOTE="Thuganomic05"]

But what makes it worse is that we have to pay for the "original features". So..... yeah. Not that great.

Dont you love paying for XBL? As again, if the two company were to invent a new feature, it definitely be XBL.

Not really. I'd rather have that money to buy something else. But that's how it goes I suppose.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts
I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts
I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?ultraking
Me ;)
Avatar image for ActionRemix
ActionRemix

5640

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 ActionRemix
Member since 2011 • 5640 Posts

Here's hoping online on next gen consoles stay free.

Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?ultraking
Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#10 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?Ly_the_Fairy

Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

But not on consoles.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?Ly_the_Fairy

Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

true that, but you do have to admit.. when people are playing the same game for free online on ps3 , somethings wrong
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#12 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?Thuganomic05

Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

But not on consoles.

Phantasy Star disagrees.
Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?ultraking

is that really a joke? if PSN wouldn't be what it is today with out XBL, than how is MS taking online gaming in the wrong direction?. cause you have to pay?

GIVE ME A BREAK, PC gaming wouldn't even be where its at today if gamers weren't given it money. PC gaming is supported by the community, same goes for XBL,

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Bazooka_4ME
This. If you're going to play the innovation to innovation game then Xbox isn't going to be the brand that wins. However like all things it's the PC who wins in the end.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?gamer-adam1

is that really a joke? if PSN wouldn't be what it is today with out XBL, than how is MS taking online gaming in the wrong direction?. cause you have to pay?

GIVE ME A BREAK, PC gaming wouldn't even be where its at today if gamers weren't given it money. PC gaming is supported by the community, same goes for XBL,

nothing you said made sense
Avatar image for shahilsyed
shahilsyed

654

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 shahilsyed
Member since 2010 • 654 Posts
[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?

I love it though, :)
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#18 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts

[QUOTE="Thuganomic05"][QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

vashkey

But not on consoles.

Phantasy Star disagrees.

That's not fair - I have no idea what a "Phantasy Star" is...

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

Alot of people have been saying how PSN is better because it's free and such, fairenough. Do those people even know where PSN got all their features from? Thats right, XBL. XBL was invented much more before PSN was made. PSN took many things like trophies, in game XMB support, in game messaging, voice chat, join session in progress, recent players all from XBL. People have been saying how XBL is same as PSN, but do people know 70% of the features in PSN are plainly ripped-off from XBL? If one of the two services were to add something different and innovative, it will be xbox live. Also if XBL didnt exist, I wonder where PSN would of ripped their ideas from? People need to realise that XBL is far original, and that PSN is company that clones features from XBL. This is plain fact. Sorry cows but true.

shahilsyed
The PS2 had online play with voice chat before xbox live was even launch for the xbox so no. Trophies is not tied to PSN,and achievements are not part of xbox live,you don't need xbox live to win achievements on games that is part of the OS,the PS2 online also allowed you to join games in progress that i remember. That is like saying if it wasn't for the PS there would be no xbox. Considering that no other controller on the market was 8 buttons for gameplay and 2 analogues and rumble build in before the DS,i say MS copy the DS,HDD,DVD drive,Kinect.?
Avatar image for StrongDeadlift
StrongDeadlift

6073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 StrongDeadlift
Member since 2010 • 6073 Posts

Anyone who says "PSN is better" is delusional, a diehard PS3 fanboy, or has simply never used a 360 (or Xbox Live) for an extended period of time. (IE. Owning a 360, not going over to your friends house and using it)

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
Yeah it could probably be better. We could be having PSN+ deals for free before MS made charging for online services popular.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

Anyone who says "PSN is better" is delusional, a diehard PS3 fanboy, or has simply never used a 360 (or Xbox Live) for an extended period of time. (IE. Owning a 360, not going over to your friends house and using it)

StrongDeadlift
I own a 360 and i pay for xbox live,stopped doing and i am glad i only pay for 3 months,is basically the same,i did not use party chat,and yes games are hurt by it,mainly because people are talking with other people out side the game your playing,is a team work killer party chat,there was another dude here who also owned a 360 who agree with my point,based on gameplay on Halo Reach,most of the game i play people were silent way to silent,1 or 2 talking and for my surprise most of the silent games i loss them,and games where people tented to talk with team mates i won. While Halo Reach was a clean games for the most parts,games like Gears and COD were not,and yes like i say integration did not solve the problems those games have,because those problems are game based,the problems COD had were not present on Halo Reach which was basically clean for me,but COD was broken,laggy,had dropped games,pauses for host migration,and cheaters,so integration doesn't count where it should making your experience on the gameplay better. I don't care for integration i care for online play,pure fun online play,integration serves me for nothing on games that are broken. Any one who actually claim that live is million of times better than PSN,is just under the Placebo effect of believing that just because you are paying for something it most be better than anything else.
Avatar image for BloodyFalcon007
BloodyFalcon007

514

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 BloodyFalcon007
Member since 2006 • 514 Posts

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

Anyone who says "PSN is better" is delusional, a diehard PS3 fanboy, or has simply never used a 360 (or Xbox Live) for an extended period of time. (IE. Owning a 360, not going over to your friends house and using it)

tormentos

I own a 360 and i pay for xbox live,stopped doing and i am glad i only pay for 3 months,is basically the same,i did not use party chat,and yes games are hurt by it,mainly because people are talking with other people out side the game your playing,is a team work killer party chat,there was another dude here who also owned a 360 who agree with my point,based on gameplay on Halo Reach,most of the game i play people were silent way to silent,1 or 2 talking and for my surprise most of the silent games i loss them,and games where people tented to talk with team mates i won. While Halo Reach was a clean games for the most parts,games like Gears and COD were not,and yes like i say integration did not solve the problems those games have,because those problems are game based,the problems COD had were not present on Halo Reach which was basically clean for me,but COD was broken,laggy,had dropped games,pauses for host migration,and cheaters,so integration doesn't count where it should making your experience on the gameplay better. I don't care for integration i care for online play,pure fun online play,integration serves me for nothing on games that are broken. Any one who actually claim that live is million of times better than PSN,is just under the Placebo effect of believing that just because you are paying for something it most be better than anything else.

If it's better then it's better. Deal with it.

Avatar image for o0HAPPY0o
o0HAPPY0o

815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 o0HAPPY0o
Member since 2007 • 815 Posts

[QUOTE="shahilsyed"]

Alot of people have been saying how PSN is better because it's free and such, fairenough. Do those people even know where PSN got all their features from? Thats right, XBL. XBL was invented much more before PSN was made. PSN took many things like trophies, in game XMB support, in game messaging, voice chat, join session in progress, recent players all from XBL. People have been saying how XBL is same as PSN, but do people know 70% of the features in PSN are plainly ripped-off from XBL? If one of the two services were to add something different and innovative, it will be xbox live. Also if XBL didnt exist, I wonder where PSN would of ripped their ideas from? People need to realise that XBL is far original, and that PSN is company that clones features from XBL. This is plain fact. Sorry cows but true.

tormentos

The PS2 had online play with voice chat before xbox live was even launch for the xbox so no. Trophies is not tied to PSN,and achievements are not part of xbox live,you don't need xbox live to win achievements on games that is part of the OS,the PS2 online also allowed you to join games in progress that i remember. That is like saying if it wasn't for the PS there would be no xbox. Considering that no other controller on the market was 8 buttons for gameplay and 2 analogues and rumble build in before the DS,i say MS copy the DS,HDD,DVD drive,Kinect.?

Any PS2 mult-player features at that time were developer implemented. Fact is, Sony hasn't done much of anything really innovative in the console gaming space this gen or last for that matter, it's been all MS imo.

Avatar image for POPEYE1716
POPEYE1716

4749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 POPEYE1716
Member since 2003 • 4749 Posts
[QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Ace6301
This. If you're going to play the innovation to innovation game then Xbox isn't going to be the brand that wins. However like all things it's the PC who wins in the end.

So true
Avatar image for senses_fail_06
senses_fail_06

7033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 senses_fail_06
Member since 2006 • 7033 Posts
My $60 > MS' Originality.
Avatar image for MushroomWig
MushroomWig

11625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MushroomWig
Member since 2009 • 11625 Posts

Here's hoping online on next gen consoles stay free.

ActionRemix
Same here, I don't mind extra subscriptions like PlayStation Plus but I don't want to pay just to play online.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Bazooka_4ME
The first video game console came out in 1972. So that doesn't even make sense.
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#30 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts

My question is - who brought the payments up? As if it's been such a problem since the launch?

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

My question is - who brought the payments up? As if it's been such a problem since the launch?

Thuganomic05
Can you rephrase that so it makes sense.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#32 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="Thuganomic05"]

My question is - who brought the payments up? As if it's been such a problem since the launch?

KC_Hokie
Can you rephrase that so it makes sense.

I think it's like "People who wanted it paid for it. People who didn't want it didn't pay for it. So where is the problem?" But I am excited to find out whether I'm right.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#33 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?gamer-adam1

is that really a joke? if PSN wouldn't be what it is today with out XBL, than how is MS taking online gaming in the wrong direction?. cause you have to pay?

GIVE ME A BREAK, PC gaming wouldn't even be where its at today if gamers weren't given it money. PC gaming is supported by the community, same goes for XBL,

True it just costs ten times more. He has good reason to dislike that direction.
Avatar image for mems_1224
mems_1224

56919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 mems_1224
Member since 2004 • 56919 Posts
[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"]

[QUOTE="ultraking"]I'm just glad that ms is taking online gaming in the right direction Who doesn't love paying to play online?Thuganomic05

Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

But not on consoles.

yea and before xbl online on consoles sucked
Avatar image for Thuganomic05
Thuganomic05

3456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#35 Thuganomic05
Member since 2004 • 3456 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Thuganomic05"]

My question is - who brought the payments up? As if it's been such a problem since the launch?

Can you rephrase that so it makes sense.

Lol - no problem. I read it just now and thought... wtf. "My question is - why are we talking about the XBL payments? It's been around since the beginning of this console generation - why is it still being discussed/argued?"
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts
PSN being like XBL is not a good thing imo. The "social experience" is overrated. I really don't care to hear other people's stupid voices while I play games. Nor do I care for achievements or trophies, more often than not they are a nuisance.
Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts
The "major issue" with XBL being a pay system is that it drives a wedge between single-player and multiplayer that don't exist. ie if you pay a yearly fee to play online, then you will want to do it alot to get your money's worth. It alters the way people play, and the way games are developed to have a more multiplayer focus. People like me who play SP %95 of the time, and only once in a while login to frag it up, are penalized because we have to pay for something we use only rarely. I think XBL influences game development to the detriment of the single-player experience. I kind of admire Nintendo for sticking to their guns and offering a very rudimentary online experience. They focus on the core experience : Games, the controller, the player, the person sitting in front of the device playing. MS is like "oh online online play online be social blah blah" Quite frankly online sucks, the people online suck, the games online suck, and every time I hear someone praise Gears for online I want to vomit, because I played it online and it was garbage. I respect Sony more because the 5-10 days out of the year that I want to play online, the servers are there, they are fast and dedicated, and I have a good experience. And the rest of the time I can ignore the "social" part of console ownership and just focus on enjoying story-driven gaming. XBL quite frankly sucks in my opinion.
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#38 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

True, but both are great and have flaws.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#39 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

I'm sure competition helps each company grow or be more productive, trying to have the best product, or service out there. Look at how Madden is just updating each installment little by little, mainly just updated rosters, and tweaking the game engine a bit. NFL2K's competition had Madden on the ropes, and if it was still around I guarantee you would see a much better Madden game currently.

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#40 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

[QUOTE="Thuganomic05"][QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] Paying to play games online existed before MS introduced XBL.

mems_1224

But not on consoles.

yea and before xbl online on consoles sucked

That may be debatable, but I think a lot more gamers got introduced to online play with the original Xbox. I know I didn't game online with my Dreamcast, but I hear it was pretty popular, nor did I game online on my PS2. I did play it online once or twice, but not nearly as much as I did on xbox live, and the Xbox.

Avatar image for jtm33
jtm33

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 jtm33
Member since 2007 • 236 Posts
I think XBL influences game development to the detriment of the single-player experience.ZombieKiller7
You bring up an excellent point in my opinion. The fact that Xbox Live costs money demands people that pay for it to seek some value in the service. Perhaps this one of the factors in why Call of Duty is so popular on the 360. Also why so many games are putting in mediocre multiplayer components to games. I know personally, as a person that plays games online on PC and PS3 it is extremely hard to find value in Xbox live when I can play online for free with a better experience on PC without a subscription. I even hate MMOs, not for their gameplay, but for the subscription model that requires me to continually pay for access. In regards to the thread topic? It is very simple. Xbox Live is competition, competition helps innovation and progress. Simple. They both make each other better.
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Bazooka_4ME

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

[QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.AdobeArtist

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensible
Avatar image for jtm33
jtm33

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 jtm33
Member since 2007 • 236 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Ly_the_Fairy

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensible

Every single console generation has brought loads of innovation. It is almost what defines a generation.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="Bazooka_4ME"]And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Ly_the_Fairy

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensible

You mean how they copied from Nintendo, time and again?

Nintendo introduces shoulder buttons - Sony does same but with more
Nintendo introduces rumble pack - Sony adds it to theirs
Nintendo introduces first analog stick on gamepad - Sony follows suit
Nintendo goes with "tv remote" model of motion controller - helloooooo PS move

And then there's Sony's copying.... sorry, "innovation" of their entire online infrastructure that just happens to mirror that of Xbox Live (universal friends contact list, trophies, online store, arcade games, game demos, etc...).

I guess their innovation really IS incomprehensible :roll:

Avatar image for tccavey2
tccavey2

1559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 tccavey2
Member since 2007 • 1559 Posts

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

AdobeArtist

Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensible

You mean how they copied from Nintendo, time and again?

Nintendo introduces shoulder buttons - Sony does same but with more
Nintendo introduces rumble pack - Sony adds it to theirs
Nintendo introduces first analog stick on gamepad - Sony follows suit
Nintendo goes with "tv remote" model of motion controller - helloooooo PS move

And then there's Sony's copying.... sorry, "innovation" of their entire online infrastructure that just happens to mirror that of Xbox Live (universal friends contact list, trophies, online store, arcade games, game demos, etc...).

I guess their innovation really IS incomprehensible :roll:

Complete and utter ownage. Bravo

Avatar image for Ly_the_Fairy
Ly_the_Fairy

8541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Ly_the_Fairy
Member since 2011 • 8541 Posts

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"][QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

Turn back the clock; if it wasn't for Nintendo and it's gaming brand power during the 8bit and 16bit era, Sony wouldn't have created its own gaming division when previously the company was focused on media electronics (TVs, walkmans, CD players, etc...). And what got Nintendo into the business in the first place? That would be Atari.

AdobeArtist

Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensible

You mean how they copied from Nintendo, time and again?

Nintendo introduces shoulder buttons - Sony does same but with more
Nintendo introduces rumble pack - Sony adds it to theirs
Nintendo introduces first analog stick on gamepad - Sony follows suit
Nintendo goes with "tv remote" model of motion controller - helloooooo PS move

And then there's Sony's copying.... sorry, "innovation" of their entire online infrastructure that just happens to mirror that of Xbox Live (universal friends contact list, trophies, online store, arcade games, game demos, etc...).

I guess their innovation really IS incomprehensible :roll:

Now you're getting it :P
Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensibleLy_the_Fairy

You mean how they copied from Nintendo, time and again?

Nintendo introduces shoulder buttons - Sony does same but with more
Nintendo introduces rumble pack - Sony adds it to theirs
Nintendo introduces first analog stick on gamepad - Sony follows suit
Nintendo goes with "tv remote" model of motion controller - helloooooo PS move

And then there's Sony's copying.... sorry, "innovation" of their entire online infrastructure that just happens to mirror that of Xbox Live (universal friends contact list, trophies, online store, arcade games, game demos, etc...).

I guess their innovation really IS incomprehensible :roll:

Now you're getting it :P

Oh shoot, I missed the hyberbole, didn't I? :P :oops:

Avatar image for jtm33
jtm33

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 jtm33
Member since 2007 • 236 Posts

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

[QUOTE="Ly_the_Fairy"] Pfft. The mere existance of the Playstation is more innovation than is comprehensibletccavey2

You mean how they copied from Nintendo, time and again?

Nintendo introduces shoulder buttons - Sony does same but with more
Nintendo introduces rumble pack - Sony adds it to theirs
Nintendo introduces first analog stick on gamepad - Sony follows suit
Nintendo goes with "tv remote" model of motion controller - helloooooo PS move

And then there's Sony's copying.... sorry, "innovation" of their entire online infrastructure that just happens to mirror that of Xbox Live (universal friends contact list, trophies, online store, arcade games, game demos, etc...).

I guess their innovation really IS incomprehensible :roll:

Complete and utter ownage. Bravo

Exactly, Sony's strengths have been mostly in its software library. Not hardware.

Avatar image for todd2r
todd2r

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 todd2r
Member since 2009 • 2615 Posts
And if it wasn't for Sony and it's Playstation brand, MS wouldn't have a complete gaming division that popularized the market that made the 360 today.Bazooka_4ME
And if it wasn't for Nintendo, Sega, Atari, Pacman, Centipede, Pong etc,etc. Seriously, please stop acting like Sony made video games.