This topic is locked from further discussion.
Very surprised at the score, I was convinced the devs. put a lot of work into this in the past few months; a shame it received the score it did.
There are some posters here comparing it to LAIR, which is reasonable in terms of the score; but I don't think Haze comes close in regards to 'hype'.
First Factor Five now Free Radical... wtf
aka_aj03
Thats what happens when you are too worried about bashing a game and not developing yours. Free Radical should be ashamed of themselves. From that review it seems like the visuals are ps2 or original xbox visuals which is unacceptable by todays standards on the consoles. I'll say it again but its pretty bad when a 2005 title in perfect dark zero looks better than a 2008 title in Haze.
[QUOTE="aka_aj03"]First Factor Five now Free Radical... wtf
sirk1264
Thats what happens when you are too worried about bashing a game and not developing yours. Free Radical should be ashamed of themselves. From that review it seems like the visuals are ps2 or original xbox visuals which is unacceptable by todays standards on the consoles. I'll say it again but its pretty bad when a 2005 title in perfect dark zero looks better than a 2008 title in Haze.
the res. is like 580p
thats just too unexceptible....COD4 did it at 600p and that was fine because that was an actual good game (same with halo 3)
but to sacrifice everything that makes a fps stand out in an already crowded genre, and they still cant do HD res. thats just too much for me
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"]So it's fair to say Mass Effect is a flop?
vicmackey39
yes, and rightfully so
crappy KOTOR wannabe was a glitchy disaster
A flop doesn't mean its a bad game, just that it sisn't hit its predicted score. I loved ME and 8.5 means a game is "Great"[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="aka_aj03"]First Factor Five now Free Radical... wtf
hyperboy152000
Thats what happens when you are too worried about bashing a game and not developing yours. Free Radical should be ashamed of themselves. From that review it seems like the visuals are ps2 or original xbox visuals which is unacceptable by todays standards on the consoles. I'll say it again but its pretty bad when a 2005 title in perfect dark zero looks better than a 2008 title in Haze.
the res. is like 580p
thats just too unexceptible....COD4 did it at 600p and that was fine because that was an actual good game (same with halo 3)
but to sacrifice everything that makes a fps stand out in an already crowded genre, and they still cant do HD res. thats just too much for me
The thing is that COD4 and Halo 3 have detailed textures and look like a next gen game. While those games aren't native 720p they still look like a next gen game. Haze looks like a last gen game. FR should have stuck with the Timesplitters series. Instead they tried to copy Halo blatantly and ruined any great ideas they originally had with Haze.
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]:lol: I knew this game stunk.SOedipus
Are you still getting it?
Ugh, I don't know. I wanted to give it a try, but with this kind of rating -- I may just have to Gamefly it.
Anyways, what do we think Gamespot will give it? I'm thinking 6.5, because Kevin is usually pretty fair.
[QUOTE="SOedipus"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]:lol: I knew this game stunk.BioShockOwnz
Are you still getting it?
Ugh, I don't know. I wanted to give it a try, but with this kind of rating -- I may just have to Gamefly it.
Anyways, what do we think Gamespot will give it? I'm thinking 6.5, because Kevin is usually pretty fair.
Gamespot usually rates lower than IGN. I think 6.5 is too generous.
Wow, i thought 7.0 or more. cows = pwned. i guess 'teh cell' has yet to prove its worth, "pretty weak visuals" :lol:
lair 4.4
Haze 4.5
hmmm.... is anyone else starting to see a trend? :lol:
i can't beleive some people hyped this, if this were a multiplat then no one would have hyped one bit.
[QUOTE="waynehead895"]YES! Not saying I wanted Haze to flop horribly but this makes work less boring.ogvampire
LoL! same here. im usually only on GS at work, so im in the same situation. threads like these seem to make work go by faster
also: Go Lakers! Hell Yeah!
Reminds me I gotta update the status in my sig.I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:Cooldude224
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
TEH GOLDENEYE DEVS!!!!
cows were so hyped for this piece of crap just because it's from a well known devs who know how to make a great FPS, it's pretty weird that they failed, I think I'd blame Ubisoft, they're not that friendly with the PS3
[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="waynehead895"]YES! Not saying I wanted Haze to flop horribly but this makes work less boring.waynehead895
LoL! same here. im usually only on GS at work, so im in the same situation. threads like these seem to make work go by faster
also: Go Lakers! Hell Yeah!
Reminds me I gotta update the status in my sig.heh. nice. im guessing 4-2 Lakers
Where do we place the blame for this one? Free Radical knows how to make a good game, so I don't feel right placing all the blame on them. Did Ubisoft rush them to get it out the door? Doubt it, seeing as they delayed the game one. Maybe the PS3 was just too difficult for them to develop for?Sooshy
[QUOTE="Ilived"]Lol stupid gamespot. "HTML is not well-formed." My god this site has a problem with EVERYTHING.angelkimne
I know, i hate the HTML is not well formed thing, that happens to me every time i write a pound sign.
i get the same with the euro symbol. the dollar sign seems to work though.
anywho....wow thats a beating. ive always considered IGN to be a bit lenient. the demo didnt impress me but i wouldn't call it a 4.5. assuming 5 is average...i probably would have rated it 5.5 based on the demo.
anywho thats one review. itll be interesting to see how others rate it.
[QUOTE="Cooldude224"]I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:ReverseCycology
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.
Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
Where do we place the blame for this one? Free Radical knows how to make a good game, so I don't feel right placing all the blame on them. Did Ubisoft rush them to get it out the door? Doubt it, seeing as they delayed the game one. Maybe the PS3 was just too difficult for them to develop for?Sooshy
The game didnt fail on complete graphics alone, IGN said it was the controls and bland storyline, something they could have done better "without the cell".
If Infinity Ward could do it, so could Free Radical. It's not the machine, it's the devs.
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="Cooldude224"]I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:carljohnson3456
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.
Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
Why would they bring it on the 360? It wont sell good on that either.
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="Cooldude224"]I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:carljohnson3456
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.
Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
No don't say that. I would am sad for the entire June.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
carljohnson3456
[QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="Cooldude224"]I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:Cooldude224
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.
Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
Why would they bring it on the 360? It wont sell good on that either.
Well for one, I've read time and time again how it's possibly a "timed exclusive" so I figured it was always going to go to the 360 eventually anyway. And after it tops out at 80,000 units on the PS3 they'll want to squeeze a lil more money out of it and port it to the 360 if nothing else. I dont know, you might be right really, if they dont think it will sell on the 360 they might not do it either.Oh be quiet. Eveybody with a PS3 who played Haze demo said it sucked. Trying to dig up some kind of ownage. Failed attempt.Wow....I mean....wow. Where to start?
I remember seeing the first trailer for this game some time ago, and was pumped. Looked awesome. Then, the gameplay vids started to stream in. The instant I saw that clunky gunplay, I lost all interest. I knew this would happen. Yet, it was still one of the major titles in the PS3 library, being touted by both PS3 fans and its maker. Granted, we didn't see any 'ZOMG, best FPS game evar!!' posts, or 'AAA for sure!' ones either, but you get my meaning. I was expecting a 6.0 range score. It looks like it'll be even lower. Ladies and gentlemen, what we have here is another...
Verge_6
[QUOTE="Cooldude224"][QUOTE="carljohnson3456"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="Cooldude224"]I was expecting a 5 or 6 but a 4.5? Lol :lol: The new Lair has arrived lol:carljohnson3456
And what are cows gonna blame now, cant be teh sixaxis again, Lair used that excuse already.
First of all Reverse, Lair and Haze are two different situation. Lair was pretty much hyped by everyone and was an in-house Sony exclusive. Haze is a third party game developed for the PS3. Haze can still come to the 360 ya know, and with these scores, Free Radical will probably bring it to the 360 because it's not going to sellon the PS3.
Lair could be blamed on Sony, Haze cannot.
Cross your fingers Reverse, maybe MGS4 will flop too!!!
Why would they bring it on the 360? It wont sell good on that either.
Well for one, I've read time and time again how it's possibly a "timed exclusive" so I figured it was always going to go to the 360 eventually anyway. And after it tops out at 80,000 units on the PS3 they'll want to squeeze a lil more money out of it and port it to the 360 if nothing else. I dont know, you might be right really, if they dont think it will sell on the 360 they might not do it either.Thats just a big waste of time and money IMO.
GOTDAMN! thats embarassing :lol:
mann I feel bad for devs when their games tank, so I will play Haze somehow, without buying the game or downloading the demo ever again :|
AC-360
Just rent it. Usually it's no joke when a game gets a 4.5...it really means it sucks.
[QUOTE="AC-360"]GOTDAMN! thats embarassing :lol:
mann I feel bad for devs when their games tank, so I will play Haze somehow, without buying the game or downloading the demo ever again :|
Ilived
Just rent it. Usually it's no joke when a game gets a 4.5...it really means it sucks.
Not even a rent :x. I will never spend money on any horrible games after Sonic the Hedgehog on PS3.[QUOTE="AC-360"]GOTDAMN! thats embarassing :lol:
mann I feel bad for devs when their games tank, so I will play Haze somehow, without buying the game or downloading the demo ever again :|
Ilived
Just rent it. Usually it's no joke when a game gets a 4.5...it really means it sucks.
Agreed.I find it hillarious that both Free Radical and Factor 5 are two developers that has an excellent track reckord and both their flagship games crashes and burns. Now I'm not blaming Sony or the PS3, I just find it to be a strange coincidence.
And yet again I learn to always trust my guts. I'm never wrong when it comes to games :P Haze looked bland from beginning.
[QUOTE="Ilived"][QUOTE="AC-360"]GOTDAMN! thats embarassing :lol:
mann I feel bad for devs when their games tank, so I will play Haze somehow, without buying the game or downloading the demo ever again :|
AC-360
Just rent it. Usually it's no joke when a game gets a 4.5...it really means it sucks.
Not even a rent :x. I will never spend money on any horrible games after Sonic the Hedgehog on PS3....I still want to buy/try that game... despite reading reviews.... at $20. lol.
Mgs4 = 10.0 or 9.5 at very least. But where is Haze-unit?Lol, thats horrible, the PS3 is horrible. Oh well, MGS4 you're next, lol.
ReverseCycology
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment