IGN Review Haze 4.5

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="PS_John"]I am still going to get haze, i dont care about reviews anymore since M$ basically dictates what game is good or bad by paying off the review sites. I am getting sick off itPS_John

My evidence is the fact that haze is more fun than halo 2.5, how can a game that is more fun get 4.5.. Compared to a 9.5 game with a lag fest online and 5 hour campaign

[QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

-Renegade

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

GTA4 is the best game its its genre and Haze seems to be a rather poor FPS so its not going to get rated higher because there are just so many better FPS around these days with very few control or graphical problems.

[QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

-Renegade

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

i knew it was not going to be good but not this bad

jeez cows

[QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

too_much_eslim

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

Exactly. It works on a different scale.

[QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

shearMario

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

GTA4 is the best game its its genre and Haze seems to be a rather poor FPS so its not going to get rated higher because there are just so many better FPS around these days with very few control or graphical problems.

GTA IV is basically a third person shooter with bad controls.

[QUOTE="shearMario"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

-Renegade

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

GTA4 is the best game its its genre and Haze seems to be a rather poor FPS so its not going to get rated higher because there are just so many better FPS around these days with very few control or graphical problems.

GTA IV is basically a third person shooter with bad controls.

[QUOTE="shearMario"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

-Renegade

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

GTA4 is the best game its its genre and Haze seems to be a rather poor FPS so its not going to get rated higher because there are just so many better FPS around these days with very few control or graphical problems.

GTA IV is basically a third person shooter with bad controls.

OMG

Looks like cows have to wait for MGS4 for their AAAE.

BAHAHAHAHAHAH!

i played the demo and i really liked it..does this mean.. i have low standard's:?devious742

yes you do. If haze got a 7 and you really liked it thats fine. But this got a 4.5...so....

lmfao another lair :lol:anshul89

roflcopters. :lol: where the cows at? That's equivalent to a 3.0 here.Bigboi500

LMAO I don't see em anywhere

Hey guys? Why was 6 afraid of 7?

[spoiler] because four point five. [/spoiler]

Im thinking of buying a PS3 or a XBox 360 but let's face the facts

PS3 exclusives, with exception of FF or MGS, suck and the good PS3 games seem to be available on the 360 too + I've seen some good exclusive 360 content... and it's cheaper too.

So if I'm buying, guess what!

[QUOTE="PS_John"]I am still going to get haze, i dont care about reviews anymore since M$ basically dictates what game is good or bad by paying off the review sites. I am getting sick off itEltroz

Im thinking of buying a PS3 or a XBox 360 but let's face the facts

PS3 exclusives, with exception of FF or MGS, suck and the good PS3 games seem to be available on the 360 too + I've seen some good exclusive 360 content... and it's cheaper too.

So if I'm buying, guess what!

KoMaximo

PS3?

How can you pass up the oppotunity to play games like Lair and Haze over Halo, GeOW, Bioshock ect...

Hah damn, I can't believe how hard IGN ripped haze.

Ill still rent it, but honestly almost none of us cows were hyping this thing beyond a 6.

And too whoever made the smart ass remark about the ps3's graphical capabilities.

Don't confuse developers that are inept with a system publisher, thanks.

Seriously Were you guys honestly expecting much? I sensed doom the moment I started seeing the frag doll comercials lol.

[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="PS_John"]I am still going to get haze, i dont care about reviews anymore since M$ basically dictates what game is good or bad by paying off the review sites. I am getting sick off itPS_John

My evidence is the fact that haze is more fun than halo 2.5, how can a game that is more fun get 4.5.. Compared to a 9.5 game with a lag fest online and 5 hour campaign

Developers need to stop using generic marine stereotypes in games. I'm getting ****ing sick of it.Jenova_Flare

At least with the Doom and Quake games the didnt talk

this game was supposed to be multiplatform then sony paid to steal it from 360 and pc i was absolutely gutted, maybe the guy who reviewed it was also gutted for the same reason, you never know and as this appears to be the only low review i would just ignore it.delta3074

*The ONLY review.

:lol: never saw anything special about this game, sucks to be Free Radical and

ubisoft, if they didnt delay it, maybe it would have gotten 7:lol:

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

abdu4

Free Radical have always been amazing developers.

Hardly their fault they dont get enough money to pump research into the cell.

[QUOTE="abdu4"]

:lol: never saw anything special about this game, sucks to be Free Radical and

ubisoft, if they didnt delay it, maybe it would have gotten 7:lol:

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

toxicmog

Free Radical have always been amazing developers.

Hardly their fault they dont get enough money to pump research into the cell.

Don't forget to blame Ubisoft, they are the publishers.

[QUOTE="abdu4"]

:lol: never saw anything special about this game, sucks to be Free Radical and

ubisoft, if they didnt delay it, maybe it would have gotten 7:lol:

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

toxicmog

Free Radical have always been amazing developers.

Hardly their fault they dont get enough money to pump research into the cell.

Well why the heck would they develop on something they don't know how to use?

Oh, wait, I think I know the answer to that one..

Hah damn, I can't believe how hard IGN ripped haze.

Ill still rent it, but honestly almost none of us cows were hyping this thing beyond a 6.

And too whoever made the smart ass remark about the ps3's graphical capabilities.

Don't confuse developers that are inept with a system publisher, thanks.

Seriously Were you guys honestly expecting much? I sensed doom the moment I started seeing the frag doll comercials lol.

SwiftDragon616

I was hyping it a 7.0 here, maybe now 6.0. This company made timesplitter right? That game sucked just as bad as Haze does. I'll probably rent Haze though. And yea developers have nothing to do with the systems graphical power if they are weak sauce I agree.

Seems that was worst than Lair case, PS3 is a real garbage machine imo

I am waiting a 7-8/10 max for those horrible MGS4 visuals too

kostmpekir

wow, that wasn't fanboyish at all :roll:

lmfao another lair :lol:anshul89

you know this game was supposed to be on the 360 as well

[QUOTE="anshul89"]lmfao another lair :lol:Nonstop-Madness

you know this game was supposed to be on the 360 as well

The year of the PS3 continues, 4.5 such a great score. MS and Nintendo must be scared to death of this amazing year of da PS3.Nick_D7

The amount of AA/AAA PS3 exclusives have just blown me away this year.

I am just wondering why everyone thinks Free radical are such great developers. I never checked it out till now but the best they scored was 8.7 on Timesplitters 2. I am not saying that is bad but a bunch of "A" and "AA" games does not make a developer AMAZING. I mean if they scored like blizzard I would understand the hype more but the way people go on and on about how great Free Radical are. I am just not understanding it now.Eltroz

All 3 TS games are underrated imo... if you're a fan of the series, you get hooked on its addictive multiplayer + it has great humour/customisation.

I hyped Haze back when it was first announced solely due to FRD being the devs (back when it was multiplat, and it will still be multiplat)... won't be doing that anymore. :P

It really pisses me off that we could have had TS4 by now if this crap wasn't made.

[QUOTE="toxicmog"][QUOTE="abdu4"]

:lol: never saw anything special about this game, sucks to be Free Radical and

ubisoft, if they didnt delay it, maybe it would have gotten 7:lol:

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

killzones

Free Radical have always been amazing developers.

Hardly their fault they dont get enough money to pump research into the cell.

Don't forget to blame Ubisoft, they are the publishers.

i am balming Ubisoft more, the publisher should of given them more funding to allow more research into the technology.

tssk tssk, this must be very disapointing for free radical, with all those delays. they shouldve made timesplitters 4!

bioshockownzz where are you? :P

[QUOTE="shearMario"][QUOTE="-Renegade"][QUOTE="teh_goonster"][QUOTE="-Renegade"]

Tons of visual issues abound within the game, from texture tears and non-descript environments to pop-in and odd animation problems. 4.5

I love this part. I find it funny how they notice this about Haze but totally overlook these same exact problems in GTA IV. I am sorry but the visuals in GTA IV are horrible compared to this game but they some how overlook that fact.

-Renegade

There's more going on in GTA though so it excuses that doesn't it.

Not really have any of you actually looked around while playing GTA IV?

GTA4 is the best game its its genre and Haze seems to be a rather poor FPS so its not going to get rated higher because there are just so many better FPS around these days with very few control or graphical problems.

GTA IV is basically a third person shooter with bad controls.

This is probably the most Idiotic, the most dumbest, the most supidest, the most ignorant post I have ever,EVER seen on SW. Coming from the Kingofcows guy, where anything that is on the PS3 is the best game to grace the planet. I'm sure if GTAIV had remained a PS3 exclusive, you would have loved the game to death and came here everyday posting a thread about how great GTAIV is. No wonder why most people here seem to dislike you, -Renegade. Not only are you a blind fanboy, but you also seem to have the worst Damage control ever.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]I am just wondering why everyone thinks Free radical are such great developers. I never checked it out till now but the best they scored was 8.7 on Timesplitters 2. I am not saying that is bad but a bunch of "A" and "AA" games does not make a developer AMAZING. I mean if they scored like blizzard I would understand the hype more but the way people go on and on about how great Free Radical are. I am just not understanding it now.the-very-best

All 3 TS games are underrated imo... if you're a fan of the series, you get hooked on its addictive multiplayer + it has great humour/customisation.

I hyped Haze back when it was first announced solely due to FRD being the devs (back when it was multiplat, and it will still be multiplat)... won't be doing that anymore. :P

It really pisses me off that we could have had TS4 by now if this crap wasn't made.

one bad thing, the publisher (if one is already assined) for Time splitters 4 they might think twice about funding them now. I would hope not, as time splitters have always been the most fun.