This topic is locked from further discussion.
Most of you are blind.... Read the thread.... Most of you are missing things I said... And its making you look very foolish commenting and you have no idea what you are talking about...vistamanV5I believe you are the one who does not play games maxed and uses minimal requirements as proof :? Yea, not seeing it.
[QUOTE="vistamanV5"]Most of you are blind.... Read the thread.... Most of you are missing things I said... And its making you look very foolish commenting and you have no idea what you are talking about...millerlight89I believe you are the one who does not play games maxed and uses minimal requirements as proof :? Yea, not seeing it. I give up.... PC wins.. :(
[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="vistamanV5"]Most of you are blind.... Read the thread.... Most of you are missing things I said... And its making you look very foolish commenting and you have no idea what you are talking about...vistamanV5I believe you are the one who does not play games maxed and uses minimal requirements as proof :? Yea, not seeing it. I give up.... PC wins.. :( Ok, i will apologize if you provide a proof that you own a gaming PC.
[QUOTE="millerlight89"][QUOTE="vistamanV5"]Most of you are blind.... Read the thread.... Most of you are missing things I said... And its making you look very foolish commenting and you have no idea what you are talking about...vistamanV5I believe you are the one who does not play games maxed and uses minimal requirements as proof :? Yea, not seeing it. I give up.... PC wins.. :( I could have told you that. It always does in SW. There as yet to be a thread that debunks the PC. I mean what do you expect when you come in here while play on a pretty outdated PC, not playing on max. On top of that, you back up your arguments with minimal graphics requirements. Did you really think that would work?
I've noticed differences in size of RAM usage.
Maybe I used a bad comparison. Games using the same exact resolution textures will look worse on the 360 even when playing at 1280x720 on the PC.
It's like someone smeared Vaselineall over it.
Hakkai007
So I don't mean the file size as you view in from the disc but size in how much ram each texture would take.
Hakkai007
Also some games do use png format for textures.
Hakkai007
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]
I've noticed differences in size of RAM usage.
Maybe I used a bad comparison. Games using the same exact resolution textures will look worse on the 360 even when playing at 1280x720 on the PC.
It's like someone smeared Vaselineall over it.
Teufelhuhn
So I don't mean the file size as you view in from the disc but size in how much ram each texture would take.
Hakkai007
On evga precision it tells me how much gpu video ram and system ram I am using.. Isn't that the ram footprint? :S
http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
[QUOTE="Hakkai007"]
Also some games do use png format for textures.
Teufelhuhn
I like your lamp.http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
vistamanV5
Ok, i apologize. I would ask you to put proof that you've played Crysis maxed out with mods, but i don't have time right now.http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
vistamanV5
http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
I like your lamp. Lol, my mom bought that for me...Why do "I'm not impressed with the PC" threads boil down to "you must be lying about owning a PC?" lowe0Because he was very inconsistent. He said that he ran Crysis moded maxed, but couldn't run BC2 on low. He started posting system requirements as proof, and you gotta love those " I played it at a friends house". Didn't look legit at all.
Why do "I'm not impressed with the PC" threads boil down to "you must be lying about owning a PC?" lowe0That is so true but in the end, this thread is LOL.. TC has been proven that his argument just doesn't have the tangible objectiveness to throw out such a General statement like he did... Needless to say, after people demonstrated this over and over and even the TC recognized it.... it still turned into lolness for pages.
How exactly do you know that the PC version is using the same size texture? It's not something you can just eyeball. And there's no possible way you can know the RAM footprint.
Besides it's much more likely that lower quality texture filtering is causing your perceived bluriness.Teufelhuhn
There is a way to view the console texture size and RAM footprint.
But it involves something that is not quite legal so I will refrain from speaking of it here.
I may not agree with your statements, nor your proof behind such said statements. However, that lamp is kick ass and Micky rules!http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
vistamanV5
There are some games that are so demanding that current consoles could not run them at all. Crysis would be one of them, but another thing to consider is that its 3 yrs old now and ran on DirectX 9. Newer games like Metro 2033, Battlefield Bad Company 2, and DiRt 2 are capable of running DX 11 and look far better than console games. Another game to take a look at is Arma II which is very resource intensive.
http://s1185.photobucket.com/albums/z348/Vistaman89/
I couldnt figure out how to shrink the pics enough to post them on the website... So i started a photobucket... If u want some more pics ask... But it will be a min im on my cell phone now... at the store...
I may not agree with your statements, nor your proof behind such said statements. However, that lamp is kick ass and Micky rules! Lol, thanks... I guess...sooo...games built for consoles...that are ported to pc dont look amazingly better then the console versions...ummm...[insert logic]...u cant make a game that will work on a console and make it use the same engine and use all of the same features for the most part and have it run on both...people just wont put the development time into it...most games are just straight ports with aa added and some higher resolutions or somethin...(this is all on a usually happens this way basis)...until crysis 2 comes out...i doubt this will change...especially since consoles dont get better and developers dont want to spend the money and time to make the pc version thaaat much better...compare exclusives if u want graphic comparision...usually pc version looks slightly better for multiplats..but exclusives really show the difference...and the only exception to this rule...metro 2033..max that and then play it on 360...u tell me which looks better...
A 'whole gen' is really pushing it.. consoles are 7800gtx era, then came the 8800, then the 200 series.. now the new 5 series.. I would say at least two gens behind :P Cgi graphics are already being done in real time, tesselation will change games when used properly. Look at nvidia's latest demo's on the 580.. says it all reallyNo TC, just no...
PC's, for all intents and purposes, are a whole gen ahead of consoles...
xYamatox
[QUOTE="xYamatox"]A 'whole gen' is really pushing it.. consoles are 7800gtx era, then came the 8800, then the 200 series.. now the new 5 series.. I would say at least two gens behind :P Cgi graphics are already being done in real time, tesselation will change games when used properly. Look at nvidia's latest demo's on the 580.. says it all reallyNo TC, just no...
PC's, for all intents and purposes, are a whole gen ahead of consoles...
SPBoss
It is VERY late/early for me at this time (6:30am with no sleep). I swear I just read that you said PC's are 2 gens behind consoles....
If this is true, you sir have created many lulz for anyone reading this thread. There is nothing on consoles that look anywhere as good as Crysis maxed out (even unmodded), and I am a huge Killzone fan.
Now, if I misunderstood your post, I apologize. If I'm correct in my assumption however, then :lol:
Lets take another multiplat where the devs did nothing to take advantage of the PC:
VS
Meh, If that proved anything it's that ME2 is'nt really a pretty game at all.
Sorry, I meant consoles are at least two gens behind. you know thats a fact :P 1600p is one gen ahead, tesselation and cgi graphics is another jump forward ;)SPBoss
The world makes sense again. :)
I personally cannot wait to get my gaming PC. My eye has been fixed on Stalker for a few years now, and I can't wait any longer (now that my 360 finally RRoD'd after a few years). Looking to make an $800 rig (tower + OS alone).
Do I really need to show Dragon Age again?
.
.
.
.
.
.
Also Here is a comparison of Mass Effect 2. I am sure you can tell which is the PC and which is the 360.
.
.
.
.
.
.
And here is a random ME 2 screenshot I took.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
And here is a Just Cause 2 screenshot I took.
.
.
Er Hakkai007, I would rather use PNG files, jpg has noticeably worse quality.
mitu123
There is no difference in quality if you capture the screenshot as a PNG file then convert it to JPG with photoshop keeping the quality at 10.
I compared pixel by pixel and there was absolutely no difference.
The file size is many times smaller too so I am sticking with JPG as there is no difference.
.....Unless you capture the screenshot using fraps set to jpg or saved the screenshot as a jpg using windows paint.
Stick with photoshop and you won't have this problem. Heck even GIMP should work.
[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
I think your lying about alot of things.
Why would someone lie on a video game forum to make himself feel better about his choice of gaming system? TC must be very bored if that's so.People do it alot. It seems odd that he can run crysis at max, but bc2 runs like crap.
Yeah because my 8800gt would play crysis on high no AA and my 8800gt played BFBC2 single player completely maxed out.LOL! That's 360 version vs PC version in 720p no AA and no AF settings, and you KNOW THAT. Now, put the PC in 1080p and 8 X AA and 16 X AF and we'll see how the PC version is a gen ahead, LOL.Digital Found RE5 PC vs 360
Boy oh boy guys. Its like.... two COMPLETELY different games! Anyone want to join me for an Xbox burning party? I just cannot get over the difference there.
h575309
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment