Sweet :) Nice to have R&C on the 360... so does this mean the Cows will have to take Resistance 3 off of their exclusive list? :P
bobcheeseball
Ummm those games aren't going to come to the 360. It would only be new IPs.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sweet :) Nice to have R&C on the 360... so does this mean the Cows will have to take Resistance 3 off of their exclusive list? :P
bobcheeseball
Ummm those games aren't going to come to the 360. It would only be new IPs.
How did this thread go from insomniac going multiplatform to bungie lacking in the talent department?
Eh, as long as its nothing like Resistance, ill be looking forward to it. Would have been cool if EA had've won the Bungie deal too, but no Activision had to ruin it.Anjunaddict
Dang it! Now you've got me dreaming about how awesome a collaboration project would be with Bungie and Insomniac! That would've been sweet!
Sony owns Ratchet and Resistance. that's why Insomniac partnered with EA since Insomniac will get to keep the rights of the new IP. on the same note, they are working on another PS3 exclusive. it's a win-win for ps3 no matter how you look at it. and yes, it's only a one-game deal.
You guys realize that Insomniac is doing this for only one game right?EasyleWhich will lead to more obviously, if it sells well.
[QUOTE="Easyle"]You guys realize that Insomniac is doing this for only one game right?RavensmashWhich will lead to more obviously, if it sells well. Indeed. But everyone is still blowing this out of proportion. It's a single game, and if it bombs, then back to making Sony Exclusives they go. If not, then back to making Sony Exclusives they still go. PS3 wins either way, as they are getting all the games.. lol.
[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]
I really see no problem in this. They already said they still going to commit to PS3, so its really not the same as Bungie leaving MS. This just gives them a chance to earn more money.
theseekar
I dont see how they are commited to PS3, when their games will now be on PS3/360
They said that even if there next game will be multiplatform, there still commiting to PS3 for some games.
[QUOTE="djsifer01"]Insomniac is making one multiplat game, lets not get carried away here. They will still be developing plenty of PS3 exclusives.theseekar
Not really, once it happened, now all their games will be on 360 too, like Square
Thats a big assumption.
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Yeah their "middle of the road" games with ~90 Metacritic averages. :roll:
Insomniac games:
Resistance:Fall of Man 86
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: 89
Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty:76
Resistance 2 :87
Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time:87
To my knowledge none of their games this gen have been a 90 at MC.
How the hell is tools better then crack in time? Crack improved everything in tools. ACiT came out later so it suffers a bit from sequel fatigue but Acit is a much better game. Both are excellent though.I thinking that their next game is still Resistance 3 and I think they like their relationship w/ Sony, thus why they will likely continue to make Resistance and R&C games exclusively for SonyAwesome news. I can't wait to see what they make next.
I just wonder why it took them so long to do this.
BuryMe
[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]
[QUOTE="godzillavskong"]
Good news for 360 only customers, but it's kinda sad to see exclusives, and exclusive franchises becoming less and less. I purchase each particular console for their prize first party titles, and this seems to almost lean towards the future of a one console universe. Hopefully not.
I don't get it what's wrong with having a universal console?I understand that in theory it would be overpriced but in practice I don't think it would be too much of a concern. Do people really believe it's going to be that much more overpriced?If that's the case, some people really underestimate consumer's buying power and their previous knowlege of prices. On top of that, competition will still existed amongst hardware manufacturerspc and console (considering console gamingis becoming more and more like PC gaming) and game devs.1 console would lead to a monopoly. This would mean higher prices and less competition. Basic rules of business.
Yep . Competition is good! Can you imagine having only 1 Bluray player to choose from? Or 1 tv? I doubt very seriously that we will have a one console future any time soon though, but we are seeing game companies that used to be exclusive to one console or the other, shift to developing multiplatform. I know their is more $$ if they do so, but I just don't want the days of certain consoles having their marquee franchises, which get the most out of their system, to disappear. Maybe I'm old school, but I remember having the Sega Master System, while my best friend had the NES. Then I graduated to the Genesis and he picked up the SNES, and so forth. The Sega brand produced games that I loved on its platform, while he preferred the NES, and the games that it provided.[QUOTE="racing1750"]Does this mean Resistance on 360 :PAnjunaddict
No thank god :P Sony owns that one
That's a good game, and I think I'll be adding that one to my PS3's library soon. Sony has a lot of great games now for only 29.99 now! Killzone 2 is one of them. Resistance 2 I think is another. It would be nice if it came out on the 360, mainly because I prefer the 360s controller layout, but like Anjunaddict said, it is a Sony property. Much like the Halo brand for Microsoft.[QUOTE="theseekar"]
[QUOTE="XboximusPrime"]
I really see no problem in this. They already said they still going to commit to PS3, so its really not the same as Bungie leaving MS. This just gives them a chance to earn more money.
I dont see how they are commited to PS3, when their games will now be on PS3/360
They said that even if there next game will be multiplatform, there still commiting to PS3 for some games.
Yeah. I doubt very seriously that they will give Sony the cold shoulder now, especially seeing as how Sony helped lay the foundation for them. It looks to me like they are just trying to optimize their return dollars. Nothing wrong with thatEA, huh? That's almost as bad as hearing that Activision is publishing Bungie's next game.
I expect nothing great from either of these companies in the future due to the publishers. Additionally, I never really enjoyed either companies stuff before, so I guess nothing's changed.
because Microsoft and Sony guarnateed them great work because of their mad good publishing skills :?EA, huh? That's almost as bad as hearing that Activision is publishing Bungie's next game.
I expect nothing great from either of these companies in the future due to the publishers. Additionally, I never really enjoyed either companies stuff before, so I guess nothing's changed.
Pug-Nasty
How the hell is tools better then crack in time? Crack improved everything in tools.The same reason Devil May Cry 1 scored better than Devil May Cry 3. Who knows? I think its because Time (as in real time) makes it so rehashed parts of the game make it lose points.. Oh Wait Mario?! I have no idea Crack in Time is a GREAT game.[QUOTE="Fightingfan"][QUOTE="opex07"]
Insomniac games:
Resistance:Fall of Man 86
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: 89
Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty:76
Resistance 2 :87
Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time:87
To my knowledge none of their games this gen have been a 90 at MC.
dark-warmachine
Hopefully Insomniac will create a great new IP. I love R&C and Resistance, but it'd be nice if they went in a different direction.
They really aren't that good trust me, r&c was ok but resistance was just meh (btw I own both consoles). There was little to no support at all for resistance 2,its like they just made the game and forgot about it. They didn't even release any dlc for the game, besides the stupid skins.
So now cows dont care about insomniac :?
tupapi006
[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"]The same reason Devil May Cry 1 scored better than Devil May Cry 3. Who knows? I think its because Time (as in real time) makes it so rehashed parts of the game make it lose points.. Oh Wait Mario?! I have no idea Crack in Time is a GREAT game.[QUOTE="Fightingfan"] How the hell is tools better then crack in time? Crack improved everything in tools.Antikyth3ra
well unlike mario R&C does not add anything original to their next installments but implements on what they have and makes it look better. If i reviewed a game like that i would make it lose points too.
Insomniac Exclusive: Yes!!1 they're super awesome!
Insomniac Multiplat: Yeah well...their games weren't that great anyway.
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Yeah their "middle of the road" games with ~90 Metacritic averages. :roll:
opex07
Insomniac games:
Resistance:Fall of Man 86
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: 89
Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty:76
Resistance 2 :87
Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time:87
To my knowledge none of their games this gen have been a 90 at MC.
I had a feeling that he was wrong about the aggregate scores, but like I said, I wasn't really talking about reviews. On SW, Insomniac games are just not the kind of games that incite envy. Insomniac/=/Naughty Dog.
[QUOTE="opex07"]
[QUOTE="Hahadouken"]Yeah their "middle of the road" games with ~90 Metacritic averages. :roll:
GreySeal9
Insomniac games:
Resistance:Fall of Man 86
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: 89
Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty:76
Resistance 2 :87
Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time:87
To my knowledge none of their games this gen have been a 90 at MC.
I had a feeling that he was wrong about the aggregate scores, but like I said, I wasn't really talking about reviews. On SW, Insomniac games are just not the kind of games that incite envy. Insomniac/=/Naughty Dog.
while I would argue that those games didn't deserve some of the scores they got(Resistance and ToD specifically) those aren't exactly "middle of the road" aggregate scores either.[QUOTE="GreySeal9"][QUOTE="opex07"]
Insomniac games:
Resistance:Fall of Man 86
Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction: 89
Ratchet & Clank Future: Quest for Booty:76
Resistance 2 :87
Ratchet & Clank Future: A Crack in Time:87
To my knowledge none of their games this gen have been a 90 at MC.
jg4xchamp
I had a feeling that he was wrong about the aggregate scores, but like I said, I wasn't really talking about reviews. On SW, Insomniac games are just not the kind of games that incite envy. Insomniac/=/Naughty Dog.
while I would argue that those games didn't deserve some of the scores they got(Resistance and ToD specifically) those aren't exactly "middle of the road" aggregate scores either.I agree (they are pretty high aggregate scores), which is why I told Hahadouken that I don't care about averages, that it is simply my opinion that Insomniac's games are middle of the road. Their games on PS1 and the first few on PS2 had a apark for their time, but the Ratchet forumla has gotten stale, especially put up against Mario's recent offerings and the Resistance series is not a stand out in its genre at all.
[QUOTE="Pug-Nasty"]
EA, huh? That's almost as bad as hearing that Activision is publishing Bungie's next game
psn8214
Oh, come now. EA hasn't nearly been as bad this gen, especially compared to Activision.
They haven't been as bad as Activision, but they are still cut from the same cloth, which is why it is kind of vexing to see comments like "Insomniac signed with a better publisher!" They may be better, but they are not all that much better, so such a comment is kind of pointless.
I mean. EA is the company that is trying to take way someone who buys a game used's ability to play online.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment