Is GameSpot's scoring getting harsher?

  • 119 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

THere are pently of games with in the last year that I have been completely surprised when GS hasb't given them a 8+. Its like they randomly decided to actually use 1-10 scale instead of earlier when it was more like a 5-10 scale with 5 being terribad 7.5 being average 9.5 was very good and 10 was perfect or very near too it. Anyone else feel this way?

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#2 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
It´s true. In fact,didn´t some editor here actually said they were going to be harsher with scores or something like that? Pretty sure I saw several people mentioning that lately.
Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
I'd be glad if they went back to the regular 1-10 scale considering it even says it below the numbers. 7.0 is good, not average you silly gamers.
Avatar image for Inotian
Inotian

274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Inotian
Member since 2012 • 274 Posts

I honestly think they're doing so to get more publicity. Most of their reviews are super controversial.

Avatar image for Slashless
Slashless

9534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#5 Slashless
Member since 2011 • 9534 Posts

Only for Playstation games. Generic Trash like Halo and Gears of War gets 9-9.5's yet new unique experiences like Killzone and Resistance get 8-8.5's

F*cking Gamespot

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

I honestly think they're doing so to get more publicity. Most of their reviews are super controversial.

Inotian
This is why GS scores always come so late. Cause they have to check meta first to give controversial scores.
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

Only for Playstation games. Generic Trash like Halo and Gears of War gets 9-9.5's yet new unique experiences like Killzone and Resistance get 8-8.5's

F*cking Gamespot

Slashless

i was surprise that Max PAyne 3 got the score it did when 8.5 has been a very good score to get lately. I doubt it was 9.5 material.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="Slashless"]

Only for Playstation games. Generic Trash like Halo and Gears of War gets 9-9.5's yet new unique experiences like Killzone and Resistance get 8-8.5's

F*cking Gamespot

inb4uall

i was surprise that Max PAyne 3 got the score it did when 8.5 has been a very good score to get lately. I doubt it was 9.5 material.

Its Rockstar games
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#9 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Only for Playstation games. Generic Trash like Halo and Gears of War gets 9-9.5's yet new unique experiences like Killzone and Resistance get 8-8.5's

F*cking Gamespot

Slashless
lol
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

[QUOTE="inb4uall"]

[QUOTE="Slashless"]

Only for Playstation games. Generic Trash like Halo and Gears of War gets 9-9.5's yet new unique experiences like Killzone and Resistance get 8-8.5's

F*cking Gamespot

viper-kid

i was surprise that Max PAyne 3 got the score it did when 8.5 has been a very good score to get lately. I doubt it was 9.5 material.

Its Rockstar games

So it it deserved it then? or you mean its a big name game?

Avatar image for thom_maytees
thom_maytees

3668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 thom_maytees
Member since 2010 • 3668 Posts

So numbers are important than written reviews here?

Avatar image for UCF_Knight
UCF_Knight

6863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 UCF_Knight
Member since 2010 • 6863 Posts

No, we're just going through a drought filled with deservedly low-scoring games.

Avatar image for Seabas989
Seabas989

13567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#13 Seabas989
Member since 2009 • 13567 Posts

Yes since this gen is 6-7 years old and standards have increased.

Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

So numbers are important than written reviews here?

thom_maytees

not to me but they are to system wars :P

Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#16 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
No. Follow the IGN minus 1 rule and you'll get Gamespot's score.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

Gamespot reviews are incosistent, not in the number, but the actual review themselves range from poor to decent.

I actually hated the Ghost Recon: Future soldier review. Not because I disagreed, but because it started off with a satire of war games that's about as witty as someone from one of these forums and the whole thing in general felt poorly written.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

unique experiences like Killzone and ResistanceSlashless
lol'd

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#19 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Yep, and I'm glad too, tired of games getting free passes.

Avatar image for Slashless
Slashless

9534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#20 Slashless
Member since 2011 • 9534 Posts

[QUOTE="Slashless"]unique experiences like Killzone and ResistanceOverlord93

lol'd

What other game lets you shoot generic enemies with a generic story and awful gameplay?

WHAT GAME?

Avatar image for Masenkoe
Masenkoe

4897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#21 Masenkoe
Member since 2007 • 4897 Posts

Since when is 8 a bad score, Slash?

Avatar image for 23Jarek23
23Jarek23

2647

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 23Jarek23
Member since 2009 • 2647 Posts

I don't think they're being harsher at all. I think they're now finally being fair after a few years of being way too generous for almost every game they reviewed.

Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

Harsher in some aspects, big name games will always get good scores however, or low depending if it will bring in more hits.

Avatar image for Slashless
Slashless

9534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 0

#24 Slashless
Member since 2011 • 9534 Posts

Since when is 8 a bad score, Slash?

Masenkoe
When a AAAAE PS3 Exclusive like R3 and KZ3 gets it. I base my purchases off of scores of course, I can no think 4 myself. moo moo moo moo moo
Avatar image for famicommander
famicommander

8524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 famicommander
Member since 2008 • 8524 Posts
I think it's funny that people actually still care about professional review outlets.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

[QUOTE="Overlord93"]

[QUOTE="Slashless"]unique experiences like Killzone and ResistanceSlashless

lol'd

What other game lets you shoot generic enemies with a generic story and awful gameplay?

WHAT GAME?

Killzone is a dark and grity game with grat graphix. the better graphix mean the plauer can get emmeresed in the story. much better than kiddy shooter halo.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
No reviewers are just getting worse. See how they give the next rehashed overhyped game a 9 or above contradicting everything they whine about on non-overhyped games.
Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts

I don't look at GameSpot scores. I look at Metacritic and GameRankings.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
...... I don't even understand why Gamespot still goes by a % system of .5 increments.. 9 out of 10 people are not going to get a game rated lower than a 7.0.. So why do we have so many different shades of crap to tell us on just how bad it is?
Avatar image for NYrockinlegend
NYrockinlegend

2025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 NYrockinlegend
Member since 2008 • 2025 Posts
Standards change as the gen goes by and expectations rise. That doesn't stop overhyped games and big name titles from pulling in 9s however.
Avatar image for MercenaryMafia
MercenaryMafia

2917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MercenaryMafia
Member since 2011 • 2917 Posts
Gamespot's reviews are piss poor. They haven't been good since 06.
Avatar image for thom_maytees
thom_maytees

3668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 thom_maytees
Member since 2010 • 3668 Posts

I think it's funny that people actually still care about professional review outlets. famicommander
It is funny that those who claim they care little of scores are often the ones who are most emotionally attached to them, crying "bias!" or "I'll buy the game anyways." If they care little about professional reviews, why they post in review threads and take pot shots at the reviews and their authors? Why not ignore these threads in the first place?

I personally believe we are beating a dead horse on this topic.

Avatar image for WTA2k5
WTA2k5

3999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 120

User Lists: 0

#33 WTA2k5
Member since 2005 • 3999 Posts

They aren't getting harsher, they're just one of the few sites out there that doesn't inflate scores anymore. 8.5s and 9.0s seem to be average scores at most other sites, so it's good to see one actually fully use the scale.

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13840 Posts

I'm happy they are harsh. Forget about the system wars, how can you make a purchase based on an ign review for example.

Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts

They aren't getting harsher, they're just one of the few sites out there that doesn't inflate scores anymore. 8.5s and 9.0s seem to be average scores at most other sites, so it's good to see one actually fully use the scale.

WTA2k5

Right but I feel Big Publish games are still going to get high scores or *the average score* while others games are going to get beaten down harsher, just feels like their gonna do what they always do except maybe drop a big games score by 0.5 then completly rip apart other games.

Avatar image for TwistedShade
TwistedShade

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 TwistedShade
Member since 2012 • 3139 Posts

I'm still annoyed at 6.5 Gravity rush, easily 8.5 in my book maybe more.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#37 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50214 Posts
Are you upset at a score they gave out or something?
Avatar image for inb4uall
inb4uall

6564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 inb4uall
Member since 2012 • 6564 Posts

Are you upset at a score they gave out or something?Stevo_the_gamer
no I'm just surprised, at all of the low scores lately. Especially Handheld games. What will upset me is if Black Ops II is mor eof the same and it doesn't get knocked big time after they knocked big points of recent games for not doing anything new.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#39 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Are you upset at a score they gave out or something?inb4uall

no I'm just surprised, at all of the low scores lately. Especially Handheld games. What will upset me is if Black Ops II is mor eof the same and it doesn't get knocked big time after they knocked big points of recent games for not doing anything new.

The lowest I see BOII getting is 8.5.
Avatar image for Kell_the_Gamer
Kell_the_Gamer

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Kell_the_Gamer
Member since 2012 • 885 Posts
This was something that needed to be done. A couple years ago there were games getting 9/10 left and right that when some very hyped game (don't remember) got an 8.5 it caused a huge reaction, half of the people were fans that were upset that the game scored 'terrible' and the other half were baffled at these people wondering "why is 85 percent out of a 100 terrible now?" The truth is review scores have always been horrible; http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FourPointScale
Avatar image for Kell_the_Gamer
Kell_the_Gamer

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Kell_the_Gamer
Member since 2012 • 885 Posts
This was something that needed to be done. A couple years ago there were games getting 9/10 left and right that when some very hyped game (don't remember) got an 8.5 it caused a huge reaction, half of the people were fans that were upset that the game scored 'terrible' and the other half were baffled at these people wondering "why is 85 percent out of a 100 terrible now?" The truth is review scores have always been horrible; http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/FourPointScale
Avatar image for dracolich55
dracolich55

2343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 dracolich55
Member since 2010 • 2343 Posts
Reviews are supposed to be informal opinions, at this point GS is just like "lulz were so bada$$ cuz we rate games lower than the score they dererve"
Avatar image for joel_c17
joel_c17

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 joel_c17
Member since 2005 • 3206 Posts
The only thing that pisses me off about gamespot reviews is their contradictions, and how some games get a free pass while others get nit picked to death. One game will b lowered for lack or originality while a another game will get a free pass and a 9. Really makes you wonder about the integrity of this gaming site.
Avatar image for Kell_the_Gamer
Kell_the_Gamer

885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Kell_the_Gamer
Member since 2012 • 885 Posts
The only thing that pisses me off about gamespot reviews is their contradictions, and how some games get a free pass while others get nit picked to death. One game will b lowered for lack or originality while a another game will get a free pass and a 9. Really makes you wonder about the integrity of this gaming site.joel_c17
All gaming websites do this and I have never trusted a 'professional' review in years. Actvision actually gives them trips to 5 star resorts for them to review Call of Duty. Mass Effect killed off one of their characters to put an IGN cast member into the game. You wonder why marketing budgets are so high? It's because of stuff like this... the so real (not) honest reviews are just part of their marketing; that's why very mind numbing RPGs like Skyrim will get a pass on having a lot of bugs but am innovative grand strategy/RPG game like Mount and Blade will lose tons of points for having bugs even though it was made on a budget next to nothing with a team of round ten people.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#45 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50214 Posts
What will upset me is if Black Ops II is mor eof the same and it doesn't get knocked big time after they knocked big points of recent games for not doing anything new.inb4uall
That would be very disappointing.
Avatar image for chilly-chill
chilly-chill

8902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#46 chilly-chill
Member since 2010 • 8902 Posts
I don't follow their reviews anyways.
Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
Not really. Standards increasing accounts for most of the average drop in scores. If they started giving out 3's to AAA-hyped games, on a regular basis, then I might think they are getting harsher.
Avatar image for HaloPimp978
HaloPimp978

7329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#48 HaloPimp978
Member since 2005 • 7329 Posts

GS is so inconsistent when it comes to their reviews.

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#49 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

I thought I was the only one to have noticed this.

Avatar image for Zeviander
Zeviander

9503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 Zeviander
Member since 2011 • 9503 Posts
GS is so inconsistent when it comes to their reviews.HaloPimp978
>implying that parroting the same opinion as everyone else is a good thing. I'd rather they be more inconsistent with the "average". That would tell me that they are probably being more truthful about whether or not they enjoyed the game. A review should contain two things: 1. An objective report of game elements; this is the story, this is the gameplay, this is the music, etc. 2. Tell me if the reviewer enjoyed it or not, and how it compares, in their opinion, to other games in the series and/or genre. No score. No BS. Just the hard facts and their personal opinion regarding their enjoyment. KevinV's review of Dark Souls is a good example of this. He reports on the various game elements and how they integrate into the whole package, and expresses in a nicely detailed manner why it consumed his life. Even after reading the review AND playing Demon's Souls, I still had no idea that I would love the game as much as I do. Edit: Fixed autocorrections.