is the $50 xbox live/year worth it compared to sonys free online?

  • 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for caleb5050
caleb5050

1298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 caleb5050
Member since 2006 • 1298 Posts
does anybody have some comparisons they would like to shier?
Avatar image for jbz7890
jbz7890

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jbz7890
Member since 2004 • 786 Posts
xbox live is garbage because it uses P2P. But microsoft knows that there is no point in owning a 360 without live so they make people pay. sony online is better because its free and uses dedicated servers for games. (this is coming from a 360 owner)
Avatar image for DuDisNow
DuDisNow

2741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 DuDisNow
Member since 2007 • 2741 Posts
Yes. Xbox Live is great and the PSN has yet to show me a better value.
Avatar image for Mr_Apple_Soup
Mr_Apple_Soup

3580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Mr_Apple_Soup
Member since 2006 • 3580 Posts

ignoring the fact PC gaming destroys all console online

live is clearly better i dont noe how u can say psn is better besides the fact its free

Avatar image for SkullboyX
SkullboyX

6407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 SkullboyX
Member since 2004 • 6407 Posts
Live is alot better.
Avatar image for goodlay
goodlay

5773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 goodlay
Member since 2005 • 5773 Posts
I love the XBL interface, best online system out, its definitely worth 50 bucks a year. PSN is nothing special, but it does a better job then Nintendo WFC.
Avatar image for jbz7890
jbz7890

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jbz7890
Member since 2004 • 786 Posts

ignoring the fact PC gaming destroys all console online

live is clearly better i dont noe how u can say psn is better besides the fact its free

Mr_Apple_Soup

Its because of dedicated servers. Once your in a game, the only thing that matters is that you don't lag.

Avatar image for -PS360FTW-
-PS360FTW-

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -PS360FTW-
Member since 2007 • 628 Posts

live isnt much better then live...just a little

if halo 3 wasnt an exsluive i would use my ps3 for online gaming

Avatar image for Khanezhyray
Khanezhyray

901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 Khanezhyray
Member since 2005 • 901 Posts

Live is a bit better now, but due to the interface, and ability to use it WHILE in game.

Worth the $50? Possibly. That's a good question. But, would my 360 be worth it without live? Probably not, at least not to me.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#10 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?
Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
yeh it is worth it, now stop asking
Avatar image for jessesalinas
jessesalinas

2935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jessesalinas
Member since 2007 • 2935 Posts
one word:YES
Avatar image for caleb5050
caleb5050

1298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 caleb5050
Member since 2006 • 1298 Posts
i have 360 live, so i know all of it's features, what are playstation networks features?
Avatar image for jbz7890
jbz7890

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 jbz7890
Member since 2004 • 786 Posts

i have 360 live, so i know all of it's features, what are playstation networks features?caleb5050

Its main feature is zero lag.

Avatar image for the_h_bomb
the_h_bomb

3182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 the_h_bomb
Member since 2007 • 3182 Posts

no but the PS3 is a pos with no games

buy a PC instead

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

[QUOTE="caleb5050"]i have 360 live, so i know all of it's features, what are playstation networks features?jbz7890

Its main feature is zero lag.

thats a lie

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#17 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

[QUOTE="caleb5050"]i have 360 live, so i know all of it's features, what are playstation networks features?jbz7890

Its main feature is zero lag.

You need to do more research on the online play for the PS3.
Avatar image for -PS360FTW-
-PS360FTW-

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 -PS360FTW-
Member since 2007 • 628 Posts

no but the PS3 is a pos with no games

buy a PC instead

the_h_bomb

you havent played a ps3 have you?

*sigh*

dissing something you havent played....sad

Avatar image for goodlay
goodlay

5773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 goodlay
Member since 2005 • 5773 Posts

Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?musicalmac

No, I do. That isn't even 5 dollars a month, its a great deal for such a great online service.

Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts
I would say that the LIVE service is not worth it since it only offers a more integrated experience that is a bit more cohesive than PSN, but I think the games can justify it. Still I wish MS would make LIVE free.
Avatar image for TheDarkDisciple
TheDarkDisciple

3564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 TheDarkDisciple
Member since 2004 • 3564 Posts
in comparison? i dunno because i don't know what psn is like. but XBL is definately worth it from my expierience with it.
Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?goodlay

No, I do. That isn't even 5 dollars a month, its a great deal for such a great online service.

Try Steam. It's free and is easily comparable to LIVE. Paying for P2P is ridiculous (especially considering MS then charges us for map packs and themes). The only thing MS has going for them is that the individual games are pretty fun. I just try not to think about what kind of nickle and diming I'm endorsing.

Avatar image for BlackBaron11
BlackBaron11

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 BlackBaron11
Member since 2004 • 29 Posts
Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?musicalmac
Yeah no kidding. Its the best $50 I spend every year.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#24 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
[QUOTE="goodlay"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?GIJames248

No, I do. That isn't even 5 dollars a month, its a great deal for such a great online service.

Try Steam. It's free and is easily comparable to LIVE. Paying for P2P is ridiculous (especially considering MS then charges us for map packs and themes). The only thing MS has going for them is that the individual games are pretty fun. I just try not to think about what kind of nickle and diming I'm endorsing.

Steam =/= Live. How could you assume at a gaming website someone wouldn't point that out?
Avatar image for SkullboyX
SkullboyX

6407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 SkullboyX
Member since 2004 • 6407 Posts

[QUOTE="caleb5050"]i have 360 live, so i know all of it's features, what are playstation networks features?jbz7890

Its main feature is zero lag.

That's because it sucks so much that nobody is on it.
Avatar image for wemhim
wemhim

16110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 wemhim
Member since 2005 • 16110 Posts
In my opinion the only thing that makes it worth it is the games you get that aren't on the PS3. The actual service is meh, and not worth the money in my opinion.
Avatar image for the_h_bomb
the_h_bomb

3182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 the_h_bomb
Member since 2007 • 3182 Posts

you havent played a ps3 have you?

*sigh*

dissing something you havent played....sad

-PS360FTW-

why would i play a PS3, for resistance and ratchet? :lol:

I'll take good games instead thanks

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#29 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?R-Dot-Yung

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

"But what about.." is an unproductive way to discuss things. I don't see how this is relevant to the thread.
Avatar image for supermanfarr
supermanfarr

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 supermanfarr
Member since 2006 • 888 Posts

does anybody have some comparisons they would like to shier?caleb5050

Yes every good game so far on ps3 has had huge multiplayer problems not experianced on the 360. I have both consoles and if its a multiplait game I buy it for the 360, for online play.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60817 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?R-Dot-Yung

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

To be fair, you can all game under one game tag, having the guest feature.
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#33 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

PSN - I play online multiplayer for free

XBL - I pay 50 bucks for online multiplayer on P2P

explain how XBL is now a better deal

R-Dot-Yung
I don't have to. If you don't find it to be a good deal, don't pay for it. It's really not my job to try and convince someone who is dead set against believing the total opposite. This is not important to me. The thread is about "is it worth it", not a pissing contest of "is it better". I feel an insignificant 50 dollars a year is completely worth the services it provides me.
Avatar image for supermanfarr
supermanfarr

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 supermanfarr
Member since 2006 • 888 Posts

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?R-Dot-Yung

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

You can have a guest play with you for free on xbox live. Thats 2 people..... Do you want 3 xboxes in different rooms all playing aginst eachother at the same time? If you can afford 3 hd tvs, 3 xbox 360'syou shouldnt be worried about a few dollars a month go cry elsewhere

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60817 Posts
[QUOTE="musicalmac"][QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?R-Dot-Yung

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

"But what about.." is an unproductive way to discuss things. I don't see how this is relevant to the thread.

PSN - I play online multiplayer for free

XBL - I pay 50 bucks for online multiplayer on P2P

explain how XBL is now a better deal

The thing available on xbl far outweigh PSN. The PSN networks lacks polish and navigating it is a chore. Free is great, but you do get what you pay for.
Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts
[QUOTE="GIJames248"][QUOTE="goodlay"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?musicalmac

No, I do. That isn't even 5 dollars a month, its a great deal for such a great online service.

Try Steam. It's free and is easily comparable to LIVE. Paying for P2P is ridiculous (especially considering MS then charges us for map packs and themes). The only thing MS has going for them is that the individual games are pretty fun. I just try not to think about what kind of nickle and diming I'm endorsing.

Steam =/= Live. How could you assume at a gaming website someone wouldn't point that out?

Uhm... I did. I pointed it out. Just like you said. Someone did point it out. Me. Man! I swear you guys get smarter every day.

Avatar image for supermanfarr
supermanfarr

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 supermanfarr
Member since 2006 • 888 Posts
[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?supermanfarr

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

You can have a guest play with you for free on xbox live. Thats 2 people..... Do you want 3 xboxes in different rooms all playing aginst eachother at the same time? If you can afford 3 hd tvs, 3 xbox 360'syou shouldnt be worried about a few dollars a month go cry elsewhere

Sorry I speed readed your post expecting another crybaby post but now... I see your point.

Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts

Is 50 dollars a year that much of hole in your pocket :|

Its a better overrall system, in every aspect.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts
I'm not sure I like to think of 50 dollars as "insignificant". For 50 dollars, I can purchase a brand new PC game, i.e. WIC, Crysis, COD4, etc., which is anything but insignificant. If XBL is unable to offer up a service with a discernible difference from its competitors for 50 dollars a year, I think I'll take the game myself.
Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts
[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]

[QUOTE="musicalmac"]Am I the only one who realizes how insignificant 50US$ a year is?musicalmac

But what about when u have multiple people sharing one XBOX a la my household...

it then becomes 150 bucks per 3 unique gamertags...

and 50 bucks was already pushing it too far for one when PS3 offers a perfectly satisfactory experiance for free

"But what about.." is an unproductive way to discuss things. I don't see how this is relevant to the thread.

He's actually on topic so his post is perfectly valid. Fortunately yours is to, but I thought that I would point that out so that you don't call any other valid points "unproductive" just because they raise interesting, if rare, issues.

I just got an xbox LIVE account and my sister plays on the 360 to. I am guessing by the above post that there is no way for here to share my online account on her own gamertag. Bummer.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#43 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

He's actually on topic so his post is perfectly valid. Fortunately yours is to, but I thought that I would point that out so that you don't call any other valid points "unproductive" just because they raise interesting, if rare, issues.

I just got an xbox LIVE account and my sister plays on the 360 to. I am guessing by the above post that there is no way for here to share my online account on her own gamertag. Bummer.

GIJames248
I was pointing out that it wasn't thread-relative. It has nothing to do with the fact that every person who wants a unique gamertag must pay 50 a year to get it.
Avatar image for GIJames248
GIJames248

2176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 GIJames248
Member since 2006 • 2176 Posts
[QUOTE="GIJames248"]

He's actually on topic so his post is perfectly valid. Fortunately yours is to, but I thought that I would point that out so that you don't call any other valid points "unproductive" just because they raise interesting, if rare, issues.

I just got an xbox LIVE account and my sister plays on the 360 to. I am guessing by the above post that there is no way for here to share my online account on her own gamertag. Bummer.

musicalmac

I was pointing out that it wasn't thread-relative. It has nothing to do with the fact that every person who wants a unique gamertag must pay 50 a year to get it.

He's listing an obvious feature (sharing an online connection on single console amongst multiple accounts) that is missing from a paid service that certainly affects its value to a number of users (at least myself and the other poster). I fail to see how that doesn't have some effect upon the relative value of xbox LIVE compared to PSN which is what the thread is about.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60817 Posts
[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]

PSN - I play online multiplayer for free

XBL - I pay 50 bucks for online multiplayer on P2P

explain how XBL is now a better deal

musicalmac
I don't have to. If you don't find it to be a good deal, don't pay for it. It's really not my job to try and convince someone who is dead set against believing the total opposite. This is not important to me. The thread is about "is it worth it", not a pissing contest of "is it better". I feel an insignificant 50 dollars a year is completely worth the services it provides me.

I think that sums it up perfectly, if you dont want it, you dont have to buy it. If you do decide to purchase it, you can leverage your moneys worth out of it in a short amount of time.
Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
its $50 for a better service
Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#47 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

He's listing an obvious feature (sharing an online connection on single console amongst multiple accounts) that is missing from a paid service that certainly affects its value to a number of users (at least myself and the other poster). I fail to see how that doesn't have some effect upon the relative value of xbox LIVE compared to PSN which is what the thread is about.

GIJames248
Breaking that down like that doesn't have much bearing on the bigger picture. The question- is the price worth the service when compared to PSN. I say yes. If you say no, and the reason is you can't pay 50USD for multiple gamertags, that's your opinion. Even then it's not really relevant.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60817 Posts
He's listing an obvious feature (sharing an online connection on single console amongst multiple accounts) that is missing from a paid service that certainly affects its value to a number of users (at least myself and the other poster). I fail to see how that doesn't have some effect upon the relative value of xbox LIVE compared to PSN which is what the thread is about.GIJames248
I explained you CAN share an XBL account. LIVE uses a guest feature that allows up to 3 additional people playing on the same account. You see it in Halo3 all the time.
Avatar image for jimm895
jimm895

7703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 jimm895
Member since 2007 • 7703 Posts

One reason I will never own a 360. If M$ is going to charge the consumer to play games they can keep the system.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#50 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts

One reason I will never own a 360. If M$ is going to charge the consumer to play games they can keep the system.

jimm895
Assuming you didn't read the rest of the thread, I'll sum it up for you. 50 dollars a year to play games online (plus the other services) is insignificant if you can afford to buy the console itself.