It's over, Crysis 2 on 360 is sub hd confirmed.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts

 Credit to the pixel counter Mazingerdude who finally confirmed the native resolution to be 1152 x 720p which is the same as Halo Reach. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=25627851&postcount=1319

Yep, it's running sub HD, but not without a reason. I believe it is mostly due to the 10MB EDRAM limit, as 3 RTs of Crysis 2's deferred renderer would require 3 tiles to fit in with 22MB G-buffer size. (too much loss in performance) 1152 x 720 res will yield 19.9 MB G-buffer. (2 tiles) It'll be interesting to see how PS3 version turns out.

And so this so called graphics king follows the tradition of its predecessor "Alan Wake" "Halo Reach" and ultimately failed to live up to the advertised trailers and Bullshots. Now hope the PS3 version is at least 720p so that it can somewhat put up a decent fight with killzone 3 maybe?

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

Gears 3 is where is at, don't you forget that!! :evil:

Avatar image for fireballonfire
fireballonfire

891

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 fireballonfire
Member since 2009 • 891 Posts

I always thought that you consollers never cared for the amount of pixels.

You want pixels buy a PC.

And MGS4 wasn't HD either, what gives?

Avatar image for deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
deactivated-5bda06edf37ee

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
Member since 2010 • 4675 Posts

what a shocker.

Avatar image for lbjkurono23
lbjkurono23

12544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 lbjkurono23
Member since 2007 • 12544 Posts
Release the le err... I mean kraken.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
Sucks, but nothing to be done about it. The EDRAM giveth, and it taketh away.
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

My world just came crashing down. I don't know if I can handle this.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#8 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

Not only that but it's got incredibly dull/generic multiplayer action and laggy controls. At this point it's gonna need a friggen AMAZING campaign if it wants to be worth a s***. I would be lieing if I said I wasn't expecting this game to fail the second I heard it was going to consoles.

Avatar image for R3FURBISHED
R3FURBISHED

12408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 R3FURBISHED
Member since 2008 • 12408 Posts

The only thing that is important is whether or not the game is any good

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#10 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
System War's War incoming
Avatar image for Randoggy
Randoggy

3497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Randoggy
Member since 2003 • 3497 Posts

I always thought that you consollers never cared for the amount of pixels.

You want pixels buy a PC.

And MGS4 wasn't HD either, what gives?

fireballonfire
Who cares, the game was great. If Crysis 2 turns out to be good no one will care.
Avatar image for deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
deactivated-5bda06edf37ee

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
Member since 2010 • 4675 Posts

omg... i just now looked at the screenshot. it's so... ugly.

Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
It's all over for Microsoft as a company. I don't know how they will recover from this crysis. When people play the game they will immediately know it's 1152X720 instead of 1280X720 and demand a refund on the game and Xbox 360 console because it's not HD gaming as advertised.
Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
It's off by 128 pixels?!?!?!!?!? OMG END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT!!!! If you really care about graphics this much, ditch the consoles and grab a pc. Also, this is basically a beta, plenty of time for them to improve it
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

...anyone with eyes who tried the demo could tell that.

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
i kinda thought it would be looks rather dull in the screens posted here.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
I don't even care about sub HD or whatever, that picture looks like ass.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
[QUOTE="Funconsole"]It's off by 128 pixels?!?!?!!?!? OMG END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT!!!! If you really care about graphics this much, ditch the consoles and grab a pc. Also, this is basically a beta, plenty of time for them to improve it

Just under 100,000 pixels. 92160 to be exact
Avatar image for FatCatPatRat
FatCatPatRat

550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 FatCatPatRat
Member since 2010 • 550 Posts

i was completely unaware the PC version doesnt exist TC.

Avatar image for deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
deactivated-5bda06edf37ee

4675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5bda06edf37ee
Member since 2010 • 4675 Posts

It's all over for Microsoft as a company. I don't know how they will recover from this crysis. When people play the game they will immediately know it's 1152X720 instead of 1280X720 and demand a refund on the game and Xbox 360 console because it's not HD gaming as advertised. Sir_Graham

that sould've been done years ago then... it's not like this is the first time.

both Sony and MS failed to deliver this gen for people playing with their FullHD TVs.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

Well Alan Wake and Reach was sub-HD, and I really enjoyed the visuals of those games, so being S-HD won't kill me.

At the same time the more I see of this game I'm not seeing the for sure best looking game on consoles that it was hyped to be before we even saw it, that was stupid.

Avatar image for Grawse
Grawse

4342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Grawse
Member since 2010 • 4342 Posts

I know I'll be playing it at 1080p.

Avatar image for MIYAMOTOnext007
MIYAMOTOnext007

3061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MIYAMOTOnext007
Member since 2006 • 3061 Posts

I will be playing it at 1680x1050...and most other PC gamers will be playing it at an even higher res than me...

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
and you're going to be the first one to hide when the ps3 version turns out to be the crappies one.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

So does this mean if someone plays solitare on a 12 monitor display that it'll be graphics king?

Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts

I always thought that you consollers never cared for the amount of pixels.

You want pixels buy a PC.

And MGS4 wasn't HD either, what gives?

fireballonfire

it's resoundlingly Cows that care for that stuff-with they're the ones with the most "Teh graphics kings" proclamations.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62013 Posts

Well, that's it... Now i'm not buying, or am even gonna look at the 360 version ever again. Wait... That would be stupid. Never mind.

Avatar image for edwise18
edwise18

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 edwise18
Member since 2008 • 1533 Posts
I'm betting the ps3 version will be the same or an even lower resolution.
Avatar image for AcidSoldner
AcidSoldner

7051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 AcidSoldner
Member since 2007 • 7051 Posts
Its the multiplayer. Everyone knows that multiplayer is scaled down to offer the smoothest performance... Fail
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51580

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51580 Posts

People are way too picky....

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#32 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Still looks better than a lot of PS3 exclusives.=p

I know I'll be playing it at 1080p.

Grawse

Best to have a GTX 580/Radeon HD 6970 for that if you want to go 60FPS+.

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
And thats only MP,who knows if the single player still 720p? remember that multiplayer always takes a big hit when it comes to graphics.
Avatar image for ps3_owns_360Wii
ps3_owns_360Wii

2289

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 ps3_owns_360Wii
Member since 2008 • 2289 Posts

Who thought that Crysis 2 would be HD on consoles?

Avatar image for Strakha
Strakha

1824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Strakha
Member since 2003 • 1824 Posts

Xbox has failed gamers yet again, how sad.

Avatar image for Master_ShakeXXX
Master_ShakeXXX

13361

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 142

User Lists: 0

#36 Master_ShakeXXX
Member since 2008 • 13361 Posts

Xbox has failed gamers yet again, how sad.

Strakha

Xbox 360 - it only does dissapointment.

:)

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#37 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

OMG IT'S NOT IN 1080P!!!!!!

GAME SUCKS!

I'M GOING TO BUY A COPY AND POST A VIDEO OF ME RIPPING THE BOOKLET AND CUTTING UP THE DISC OF THE 360 VERSION AND POST IT ON YOUTUBE BECAUSE OF THIS!!!!

RARRRRRRRRRRR!

:lol:

Seriously guys?

It's just a Resolution.

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
There has never being a case of different resolution between campaign and MP, this is it, the game on 360 will have this sub hd res even though single player would be better looking in other areas. Now the question is whether the ps3 version would suffer the same fate for the sake of platform parity or will crytek actually take advantage of the Cell.
Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts

OMG IT'S NOT IN 1080P!!!!!!

GAME SUCKS!

I'M GOING TO BUY A COPY AND POST A VIDEO OF ME RIPPING THE BOOKLET AND CUTTING UP THE DISC OF THE 360 VERSION AND POST IT ON YOUTUBE BECAUSE OF THIS!!!!

RARRRRRRRRRRR!

:lol:

Seriously guys?

It's just a Resolution.

LegatoSkyheart
Look, it;s entirely reasonable to make such a complain especially for owners of large screen TVs, a 720p game would most definitely appear much crispier on a 46"+ LCD.
Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

For one, I already got the impression it wont be the big gorilla on consoles. Second, it looks great regardless. Lastly, I cant believe were going back to counting pixels.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
lul whut? Ps3 games don't come in at 720p either, most TV is still SD and many "1080p" programs are a butchered 1440*1080 or some odd resolution, what else is new?
Avatar image for mazdero
mazdero

1754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 mazdero
Member since 2002 • 1754 Posts

Not only that but it's got incredibly dull/generic multiplayer action and laggy controls. At this point it's gonna need a friggen AMAZING campaign if it wants to be worth a s***. I would be lieing if I said I wasn't expecting this game to fail the second I heard it was going to consoles.

Master_ShakeXXX

I thought it was pretty awesome. I didn't notice any lag in the controls, and it wasn't very generic or dull. Sneaking up and meleeing someone while cloaked was hilarious. The graphics reminded me of Killzone 2. I dunno, maybe I just like Crysis since the first game was amazing.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

If only it had 28 more pixels! It would have been amazing! Without them, the graphics are horrible and the game is a failure! :cry:

Avatar image for gpuking
gpuking

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 gpuking
Member since 2004 • 3914 Posts
lul whut? Ps3 games don't come in at 720p either, most TV is still SD and many "1080p" programs are a butchered 1440*1080 or some odd resolution, what else is new? X360PS3AMD05
What are you talking about, a lot of games on both 360 and ps3 are native 720p "kz2&3, UC series, GOW3, Gears series, etc".
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Look, it;s entirely reasonable to make such a complain especially for owners of large screen TVs, a 720p game would most definitely appear much crispier on a 46"+ LCD. gpuking


I would bet my entire life savings that you would never ever ever ever ever ever notice the difference between 1280x720 and 1152x720 on an HDTV.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

what resolution is the ps3 version again?

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

what resolution is the ps3 version again?

WilliamRLBaker



I don't think anybody knows for sure yet, since there's no PS3 demo.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

what resolution is the ps3 version again?

Teufelhuhn



I don't think anybody knows for sure yet, since there's no PS3 demo.

I know I was simply being sarcastic and highlighting the fact that till we know what resolution the ps3 version is this really means nothing.

Avatar image for LegatoSkyheart
LegatoSkyheart

29733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

#49 LegatoSkyheart
Member since 2009 • 29733 Posts

I know I was simply being sarcastic and highlighting the fact that till we know what resolution the ps3 version is this really means nothing.

WilliamRLBaker

BU-BU-BU-BUT....TEH GRAFIX KINGZ! :cry:

That's whats going on here man.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

what resolution is the ps3 version again?

WilliamRLBaker



I don't think anybody knows for sure yet, since there's no PS3 demo.

I know I was simply being sarcastic and highlighting the fact that till we know what resolution the ps3 version is this really means nothing.



Oh...right. :P