Just as long I can still have fun playing games and watching blu ray movies on the last place console I'm fine with it.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
same can be said about both the ps1 and ps2 in their time ,, face palm ,,
and ps3 is selling slower then xbox 1 in the same time frame ,,
wii is the fastest selling console in the same time frame as ps2 ,
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]You got it. SW logic 101. I'm calling SW illogical then. When I play my games for consoles I look for the BEST quality that's most fun to play. I don't waste money with A or AA games. I go straight up for the high quality Super Mario Galaxy, Smash Bros Brawl, Okami, Resident 4, MK Wii, etc. These games have more replay value and fun than any A or some AA games could bring. If I have an Xbox 360, and I want a good FPS, I'm not going to waste my time and money with Perfect Dark Zero when I can get a better game like Call of Duty 4. I'm not going buy Ninja Blade, when I can get Ninja Gaiden games. This notion of number of single A rank games being better is broken. Quality > Quantity.You guys just don't get it! It's not how many AAAA, AAA, AA games a console has. It's all about the single A rank games! Wii has more, so i'ts better.
Oh and multiplats don't count, of course. :roll:
nmaharg
The "battle" is waged on a number of fronts: sales, graphics, recent exclusives, upcoming exclusives, online, overall library. The problem with all the fronts besides "sales" and to a certain extent "online",is that they are very subjective fronts (graphics being the most blatantly subjective and therefore criteria of all). Still, I'd say:
SALES: Wii.
GRAPHICS: PS3 wins slightly over the 360.
RECENT EXCLUSIVES: PS3 wins easily over the 360.
UPCOMING EXCLUSIVES: Pretty even. Maybe PS3 by a hair.
ONLINE: 360 still wins by a very considerable margin.
OVERALL LIBRARY: 360's library wins slightly, mostly due to being larger and more genre-balanced. The PS3 is not far behind. The Wii is the weakest in this category IMO.
In the real world, however, there's no question that the PS3 is losing.
[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.Supa__Mariolol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no..... SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives.
lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no..... SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives. well exclusives directly effect the gamer. Sales don't, not this gen anyway, none of the consoles are going the way of the dreamcast quite yet.[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.LOXO7
[QUOTE="nmaharg"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]You got it. SW logic 101. I'm calling SW illogical then. When I play my games for consoles I look for the BEST quality that's most fun to play. I don't waste money with A or AA games. I go straight up for the high quality Super Mario Galaxy, Smash Bros Brawl, Okami, Resident 4, MK Wii, etc. These games have more replay value and fun than any A or some AA games could bring. If I have an Xbox 360, and I want a good FPS, I'm not going to waste my time and money with Perfect Dark Zero when I can get a better game like Call of Duty 4. I'm not going buy Ninja Blade, when I can get Ninja Gaiden games. This notion of number of single A rank games being better is broken. Quality > Quantity.You guys just don't get it! It's not how many AAAA, AAA, AA games a console has. It's all about the single A rank games! Wii has more, so i'ts better.
Oh and multiplats don't count, of course. :roll:
mD-
It most definetly is.
[QUOTE="LOXO7"]SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives. well exclusives directly effect the gamer. Sales don't, not this gen anyway, none of the consoles are going the way of the dreamcast quite yet.[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....clembo1990
But in a forum called System Wars, sales have to matter. Sales is one of the major battlefronts.
And in the real world, the consoles are competing for sales.
I don't know why people try to downplay them so much. Well, actually, I do. :lol:
lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no..... SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives.[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.LOXO7
Exclusives is a major battlefront here.
well exclusives directly effect the gamer. Sales don't, not this gen anyway, none of the consoles are going the way of the dreamcast quite yet.[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="LOXO7"] SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives.
Tragic_Kingdom7
But in a forum called System Wars, sales have to matter. Sales is one of the major battlefronts.
And in the real world, the consoles are competing for sales.
I don't know why people try to downplay them so much. Well, actually, I do. :lol:
They don't matter for us. Would you buy a console based solely off how well it sold? No, I should think you wouldn't. You're more likely to buy the one with the most games that interest you, no?[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"][QUOTE="clembo1990"] well exclusives directly effect the gamer. Sales don't, not this gen anyway, none of the consoles are going the way of the dreamcast quite yet.clembo1990
But in a forum called System Wars, sales have to matter. Sales is one of the major battlefronts.
And in the real world, the consoles are competing for sales.
I don't know why people try to downplay them so much. Well, actually, I do. :lol:
They don't matter for us. Would you buy a console based solely off how well it sold? No, I should think you wouldn't. You're more likely to buy the one with the most games that interest you, no?It doesn't matter at all in that respect. Of course people shouldn't make their purchases based on that criteria. I certainly didn't.
What I'm saying that in this little System Wars game, sales is one of the major fronts on which the participants make war.
[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"][QUOTE="clembo1990"] well exclusives directly effect the gamer. Sales don't, not this gen anyway, none of the consoles are going the way of the dreamcast quite yet.clembo1990
But in a forum called System Wars, sales have to matter. Sales is one of the major battlefronts.
And in the real world, the consoles are competing for sales.
I don't know why people try to downplay them so much. Well, actually, I do. :lol:
They don't matter for us. Would you buy a console based solely off how well it sold? No, I should think you wouldn't. You're more likely to buy the one with the most games that interest you, no? You just said "most". That has nothing to do with exclusives "few". What I'm talking about if one were a "gamer" exclusives don't exsist.SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives.[QUOTE="LOXO7"]
[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....Tragic_Kingdom7
Exclusives is a major battlefront here.
Yes, but to only use exclusives when comparing two libraries is foolish. It would make sense if this was a topic on exclusive lineups, although the PS3 would still be winning. But this is supposed to be a topic comparing the lineups as a whole. And of course, sales are also another battle. But its important to distinguish battles from each other.
I disagree 4AAA, 10AA, and 26A > 1AAAA, 4AAA, 6AA, 10A Look someone has an opinion!!!Remember your in titled to your opinion but it is not fact. Why would you try to hold mediocre games like 26A titles against anyone? Its amazing how some people constantly whine about the PS3 when the 360 isn't doing anything spectacular either. Congrats on being second place really, I would hate to see how arrogant MS and their fanboys would be if they were first. They might of even surpassed the Cows during the PS2 era. But thank goodness we wont have to see that until maybe next gen the Wii has won this gen.[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"]http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=3" title="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pc5oLqpenpT78W87pMfgvBA&gid=3">Wii looks dead last in games to me...nmaharg
[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.Supa__Mariolol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....
Actually Honda's are better. Sorry to break it to ya ;)
[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]
[QUOTE="LOXO7"] SW isn't even about games. Exclusive is a buisness term. There is no need for a gamer to talk about exclusives.
hakanakumono
Exclusives is a major battlefront here.
Yes, but to only use exclusives when comparing two libraries is foolish. It would make sense if this was a topic on exclusive lineups, although the PS3 would still be winning. But this is supposed to be a topic comparing the lineups as a whole. And of course, sales are also another battle. But its important to distinguish battles from each other.
I pretty much agree, which is why I made a seperate sections in my initial post for recent exclusives, upcoming exclusives and overall library.
lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.dream431ca
Actually Honda's are better. Sorry to break it to ya ;)
He actually meant to say -- it's like saying Mc'Donalds is better than five-star restaurants simply because more people eat there.[QUOTE="dream431ca"][QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....Stevo_the_gamer
Actually Honda's are better. Sorry to break it to ya ;)
He actually meant to say -- it's like saying Mc'Donalds is better than five-star restaurants simply because more people eat there.That's a bit of a better analogy.
If they wanted a ps3, they would've sold their Xbox360 and gotten one.Considering it started at $600.because people bring up the fact that the 360 has been out for a year longer then PS3 and the PS3 has had more AAAe's in the last year?
zarshack
actually WII is in last place in games WAAAAAYYYYYY last place they just have more salesAs far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
nmaharg
lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....[QUOTE="Supa__Mario"][QUOTE="clembo1990"]Sales are irrelevant. Completely..... Nope, not even slightly fun to play sales.dream431ca
Actually Honda's are better. Sorry to break it to ya ;)
spoken like someone who has never driven oneYou cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway.As far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
nmaharg
ps3 of course in last due to high pricing lol * hope that price drops to 300 lol*
but as fars games ps3 has alot of quality exclusives ALOT so there exclusives are solid if u dont own a ps3 or is a fanboy of 360 iam sure u havent rlly bothered to check them out . plus sonys releasing 35 exclusives i here i say bout 20 of those will be sweet aaa's . and most of 360 games are third party games thats on ps3 and wii dude .
[QUOTE="nmaharg"]You cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway. How is the library MOSTLY garbage? It has a lot to offer with the multiplats + exclusives. Remember, quality>quantityAs far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
djsifer01
[QUOTE="dream431ca"][QUOTE="Supa__Mario"] lol....its like trying to say....more ppl bought hondas then ferraris......so honda must be a better car.......lol....no.....i-rock-socks
Actually Honda's are better. Sorry to break it to ya ;)
spoken like someone who has never driven one Super reliable and great engines. But they aren't as fun as a Ferrari :P[QUOTE="nmaharg"]You cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway.As far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
djsifer01
360 and PS3 share the bulk of their libraries so it doesn't really make sense to say that the 360's library is mostly garbage.
What if I was to dismiss that PS3 has better games since that is nothing more than your opinion? That would make more sense than you dismissing sales on the basis of not being able to play them.
Sales and games are both things thatare discussed here and sales is a legitimate way of gauging which console is "winning" (it's actually a superior criterion as the other ones are more or less subjective). That might hurt your fanboy heart (since your favorite console is last in sales), but you're just going to have to deal with it.
[QUOTE="nmaharg"]You cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway. Mostly garbage, you've played all of those 360 exclusives and 360/PC games?As far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
djsifer01
You cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway.[QUOTE="djsifer01"][QUOTE="nmaharg"]
As far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
Tragic_Kingdom7
360 and PS3 share the bulk of their libraries so it doesn't really make sense to say that the 360's library is mostly garbage.
What if I was to dismiss that PS3 has better games since that is nothing more than your opinion? That would make more sense than you dismissing sales on the basis of not being able to play them.
Sales and games are both things thatare discussed here and sales is a legitimate way of gauging which console is "winning" (it's actually a superior criterion as the other ones are more or less subjective). That might hurt your fanboy heart (since your favorite console is last in sales), but you're just going to have to deal with it.
So, you do know that there is only one winner right? Hint: It's not the 360, nor will it ever be.you make up your own rules and be happy with your own results. I am tired of posting evidence that is ignored in SW because i have learned that nobody here cares about anything but their own opinion.As far as system wars goes we go by either sales or games. And in both catagories PS3 is in dead last place. Why is it people forget this?
nmaharg
[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]
[QUOTE="djsifer01"]You cant play sales so who cares? The PS3 has better games. The 360 has a large library but it mostly garbage. There is no war the PS3 wins its the superior console in almost everyway.furomaster_99
360 and PS3 share the bulk of their libraries so it doesn't really make sense to say that the 360's library is mostly garbage.
What if I was to dismiss that PS3 has better games since that is nothing more than your opinion? That would make more sense than you dismissing sales on the basis of not being able to play them.
Sales and games are both things thatare discussed here and sales is a legitimate way of gauging which console is "winning" (it's actually a superior criterion as the other ones are more or less subjective). That might hurt your fanboy heart (since your favorite console is last in sales), but you're just going to have to deal with it.
So, you do know that there is only one winner right? Hint: It's not the 360, nor will it ever be.Did I say that the 360 is winning? Did I say there was two winners? No. I didn't.
I own an xbox but admittedly i hardly ever play it because i refuse to shell out 100 dollars for a wireless adapter, and my modem is upstairs and the videogames are relegated to the basement. I dont see how anyone can just blindly follow microsoft on anything and everything they do. They willingly and knowingly put out a product that is almost certain to break down after awhile. I dont see how xbox owners cannot be pissed at that fact, but still they come to system wars and bash on everything that doesnt have a microsoft logo on it. Its one thing to play your xbox and still enjoy it because of the games and what not but dont tote it and microsoft like they are the best thing since sliced bread. They obviously dont give a flying f*ck about you fanboys so why should you waste your time singing their praises? doesn't make much sense.
I own an xbox but admittedly i hardly ever play it because i refuse to shell out 100 dollars for a wireless adapter, and my modem is upstairs and the videogames are relegated to the basement. I dont see how anyone can just blindly follow microsoft on anything and everything they do. They willingly and knowingly put out a product that is almost certain to break down after awhile. I dont see how xbox owners cannot be pissed at that fact, but still they come to system wars and bash on everything that doesnt have a microsoft logo on it. Its one thing to play your xbox and still enjoy it because of the games and what not but dont tote it and microsoft like they are the best thing since sliced bread. They obviously dont give a flying f*ck about you fanboys so why should you waste your time singing their praises? doesn't make much sense.
BlancoBX
And I suppose Sony is just so caring? I suppose that cows don't bash anything without a Sony logo? Give me a break.
[QUOTE="BlancoBX"]
I own an xbox but admittedly i hardly ever play it because i refuse to shell out 100 dollars for a wireless adapter, and my modem is upstairs and the videogames are relegated to the basement. I dont see how anyone can just blindly follow microsoft on anything and everything they do. They willingly and knowingly put out a product that is almost certain to break down after awhile. I dont see how xbox owners cannot be pissed at that fact, but still they come to system wars and bash on everything that doesnt have a microsoft logo on it. Its one thing to play your xbox and still enjoy it because of the games and what not but dont tote it and microsoft like they are the best thing since sliced bread. They obviously dont give a flying f*ck about you fanboys so why should you waste your time singing their praises? doesn't make much sense.
Tragic_Kingdom7
And I suppose Sony is just so caring? I suppose that cows don't bash anything without a Sony logo? Give me a break.
Ok nowhere in my post did i say that and obviously im posting this here because of the name of the topic. I dont think Sony is some company that cares so much about its customers and never does any wrong, and i never implied that. But for xbox fanboys to constantly make threads such as this one and the countless others they do just doesnt make sense to me. What microsoft did (releasing hardware known to be extremely faulty) is one of the worst possible slaps in the face to the consumers. Its one thing for xbox owners to love the x box regardless because they like the games and the Live, but it doesnt make much sense to me that they come here singing the praises of the all might Microsoft Corporation when they knowingly tried to screw them over by releasing faulty hardware.[QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"][QUOTE="BlancoBX"]
I own an xbox but admittedly i hardly ever play it because i refuse to shell out 100 dollars for a wireless adapter, and my modem is upstairs and the videogames are relegated to the basement. I dont see how anyone can just blindly follow microsoft on anything and everything they do. They willingly and knowingly put out a product that is almost certain to break down after awhile. I dont see how xbox owners cannot be pissed at that fact, but still they come to system wars and bash on everything that doesnt have a microsoft logo on it. Its one thing to play your xbox and still enjoy it because of the games and what not but dont tote it and microsoft like they are the best thing since sliced bread. They obviously dont give a flying f*ck about you fanboys so why should you waste your time singing their praises? doesn't make much sense.
BlancoBX
And I suppose Sony is just so caring? I suppose that cows don't bash anything without a Sony logo? Give me a break.
Ok nowhere in my post did i say that and obviously im posting this here because of the name of the topic. I dont think Sony is some company that cares so much about its customers and never does any wrong, and i never implied that. But for xbox fanboys to constantly make threads such as this one and the countless others they do just doesnt make sense to me. What microsoft did (releasing hardware known to be extremely faulty) is one of the worst possible slaps in the face to the consumers. Its one thing for xbox owners to love the x box regardless because they like the games and the Live, but it doesnt make much sense to me that they come here singing the praises of the all might Microsoft Corporation when they knowingly tried to screw them over by releasing faulty hardware.Nowhere did the TC sing the praises of Microsoft and this thread is not about RROD. Please take this irrelevant response elsewhere.
huh..ps3 isn't killing anything noffencei love bringing this up:
on IGN, PS3 is killing wii and 360 put together.
SilverChimera
Ok nowhere in my post did i say that and obviously im posting this here because of the name of the topic. I dont think Sony is some company that cares so much about its customers and never does any wrong, and i never implied that. But for xbox fanboys to constantly make threads such as this one and the countless others they do just doesnt make sense to me. What microsoft did (releasing hardware known to be extremely faulty) is one of the worst possible slaps in the face to the consumers. Its one thing for xbox owners to love the x box regardless because they like the games and the Live, but it doesnt make much sense to me that they come here singing the praises of the all might Microsoft Corporation when they knowingly tried to screw them over by releasing faulty hardware.[QUOTE="BlancoBX"][QUOTE="Tragic_Kingdom7"]
And I suppose Sony is just so caring? I suppose that cows don't bash anything without a Sony logo? Give me a break.
Tragic_Kingdom7
Nowhere did the TC sing the praises of Microsoft and this thread is not about RROD. Please take this irrelevant response elsewhere.
ok anything you say momI dont play sales. Only hardcore fanboys ever bring it up. (sheep)
As for quality games. Thats completely subjective. The scores on this site is subjective.
As for me i love my 360's librar. Hell, i havent even played all of its library yet. Why are people saying that 2009 is a bad year for 360??????
I already played Ninja blade, velvet assassin and Battlestations pacific. Really fun games. And yet, cows play the "scores" arguement. I've had more fun with games that were given a low score on this site than high ranking one's. (haze, folklore are better than LBP, Uncharted.... imo) So why shouldnt these games count?
360/PC lineup looks very promising, as well as PS3 (GOW3 OMG)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment