This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Deadly_Fatalis"]If you really think a Mac is "hack-proof". I am sorry to say, you are misinformed. If you have ever heard about the Pwn2Own Challenge, The Mac has been called the easiest to hack, it has few viruses because of the low market share. http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2917tirralirraMac is easiest to hack because Apple don't need to make it hack-proof whereas MS need to make windows as hack-proof as possible and it still gets hacked loads.
That response made absolutely no sense. Apple doesnt need to make it hack-proof because no one cares enough to attempt to write a Virus on Mac, because it wont effect enough users.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9072959/Mac_easiest_to_hack_says_10_000_winner?taxonomyId=89&intsrc=kc_top&taxonomyName=operating_systems
If you have no idea what you are talking about its best to keep your mouth shut, or in this case refrain from hitting the submit button.
Look at the specs of my MAC i listed because they are superior to the ones you listed and that is in an Apple Imac, which is the all in one MAC you were trying to name.[QUOTE="RPG-explorer"][QUOTE="DoomZaW"]
At the local apple store i can get one of those worktops or whatever they called, those with the hardware in the monitor, for 2000$, and that was with a 9200 geforce, 2gb ddr2 of ram 120gb HDD, and 2.2 intel duo i think, one quick at the internet and i can get a rig with a 1tb 7200rpm hdd, 6gb ddr3 kingston, a intel core i7 2,66ghz x 4, an ATI 5870. Heck my laptop costs half the price of the mac and it has better hardware... do i REALLY need to explain any further why i think macs are obsolete?
DoomZaW
3.2 ghz Intel Core Duo processor
4GB DDR3 RAM
1 Terabyte Hard Drive
24 inch screen, resolution 1920x1200
Nvidia GE Force GT 130 512-ram video card
Super drive DVD Burner
You are kidding right? THAT is superior? to what i just listed? Besides, good luck finding that on the danish market with a 2000$ pricetag
all that and it only cost him 2300 haha:lol: i spend 850 and build a pc that puts his to shameMac is easiest to hack because Apple don't need to make it hack-proof whereas MS need to make windows as hack-proof as possible and it still gets hacked loads.[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="Deadly_Fatalis"]If you really think a Mac is "hack-proof". I am sorry to say, you are misinformed. If you have ever heard about the Pwn2Own Challenge, The Mac has been called the easiest to hack, it has few viruses because of the low market share. http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2917Fizzman
That response made absolutely no sense. Apple doesnt need to make it hack-proof because no one cares enough to attempt to write a Virus on Mac, because it wont effect enough users.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9072959/Mac_easiest_to_hack_says_10_000_winner?taxonomyId=89&intsrc=kc_top&taxonomyName=operating_systems
If you have no idea what you are talking about its best to keep your mouth shut, or in this case refrain from hitting the submit button.
You said exactly the same thing as me but just explained it better. It made sense, just in a very obvious way so that SW can understand.No...for the price of an apple you can buy a comparable PC. Let me know if you need clarification.For the price of an apple computer I could build a much better PC.
Ragnarok1051
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]No...for the price of an apple you can buy a comparable PC. Let me know if you need clarification.please do explainFor the price of an apple computer I could build a much better PC.
Zero_epyon
[QUOTE="Deadly_Fatalis"]If you really think a Mac is "hack-proof". I am sorry to say, you are misinformed. If you have ever heard about the Pwn2Own Challenge, The Mac has been called the easiest to hack, it has few viruses because of the low market share. http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=2917tirralirraMac is easiest to hack because Apple don't need to make it hack-proof whereas MS need to make windows as hack-proof as possible and it still gets hacked loads.
Your bad english is not something anyone should ever get on to you about. However.
To say that apples dont need to be hack proof just because apple does not need to make them hack proof is bad.
Your logic is like saying.
There are 100 white people and 3 black people in a room. 10 of the white people get sick and only 2 of the black people get sick.. but its still clearly a white person sickness because more white people got sick than black. (not having anything to do with race just an example)
This annalogy provided to those that do not grasp an understanding of the term "low market share"
[QUOTE="Fizzman"][QUOTE="tirralirra"] Mac is easiest to hack because Apple don't need to make it hack-proof whereas MS need to make windows as hack-proof as possible and it still gets hacked loads.tirralirra
That response made absolutely no sense. Apple doesnt need to make it hack-proof because no one cares enough to attempt to write a Virus on Mac, because it wont effect enough users.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9072959/Mac_easiest_to_hack_says_10_000_winner?taxonomyId=89&intsrc=kc_top&taxonomyName=operating_systems
If you have no idea what you are talking about its best to keep your mouth shut, or in this case refrain from hitting the submit button.
You said exactly the same thing as me but just explained it better. It made sense, just in a very obvious way so that SW can understand.umm no you implied that MS deliberately tries to make its OS less easy to exploit, but they fail. Apple on the other hand doesnt have to because its somehow special, and It doesnt have to do anything and it wont get hacked. Clearly thats a very wrong, and horribly misinformed idea.
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]No...for the price of an apple you can buy a comparable PC. Let me know if you need clarification.For the price of an apple computer I could build a much better PC.
Zero_epyon
My computer costed me 1800.00 to build, and now lets see you put all the parts in my PC or equivelent from Apple because Apple only lets you put certain parts in a computer. If your total comes out to 1800.00 I will buy a Mac right now, and post pics on SW.
Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. RPG-explorer
Yeah dude totally guess how many years that prophecy has been said by Linux users? At Mac's current pace they will be the dominant OS in the year 2400. MS isnt going anywhere, and Windows will be the dominant OS well after we are dead based on current trends. Keep on touting the Mac fanboy company line, whatever lets you sleep at night.
You said exactly the same thing as me but just explained it better. It made sense, just in a very obvious way so that SW can understand.[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]
That response made absolutely no sense. Apple doesnt need to make it hack-proof because no one cares enough to attempt to write a Virus on Mac, because it wont effect enough users.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9072959/Mac_easiest_to_hack_says_10_000_winner?taxonomyId=89&intsrc=kc_top&taxonomyName=operating_systems
If you have no idea what you are talking about its best to keep your mouth shut, or in this case refrain from hitting the submit button.
Fizzman
umm no you implied that MS deliberately tries to make its OS less easy to exploit, but they fail. Apple on the other hand doesnt have to because its somehow special, and It doesnt have to do anything and it wont get hacked. Clearly thats a very wrong, and horribly misinformed idea.
Haha, my comment is too simple to understand. Let me explain. You're all totally right about Macs low market share, hence less reason to make Mac hack-proof. MS on the other hand, high market share, plenty of reason to make windows hack-proof. Get it now? Or am i completely missing the point.[QUOTE="RPG-explorer"]Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. Fizzman
Yeah dude totally guess how many years that prophecy has been said by Linux users? At Mac's current pace they will be the dominant OS in the year 2400. MS isnt going anywhere, and Windows will be the dominant OS well after we are dead based on current trends. Keep on touting the Mac fanboy company line, whatever lets you sleep at night.
Oi! Linux will take over Windows tomorrow!Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. RPG-explorer
No apples market share has increased over the past few years because of ingenious advertising campaigns.
Thats one end I gotta admit apple beats the hell out of microsoft. Microsoft cannot compete with how great of a marketing division apple has.
I mean.. without ever saying that apple is immune to viruses... they have you hook line and sinker beleiving they are with the power of suggestion.
again.. they never say apples are immune. They just suggest it to the point that when the advertisement says "less" you think "none"
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]can you provide an example Go to any website where you could customize a gaming rig..ibuypower, cyberpower. Set yourself up with the budget of whatever Apple computer you would buy, and build the best PC you can, and there is your example.For the price of an apple computer I could build a much better PC.
kolkov01
[QUOTE="RPG-explorer"]Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. stereointegrityhahahahahaha good way to pass ur opinion off as anything factual....PC is only used for business people? wtf haha pc bogged down with anti virus? pc users cant find mac equivalent programs?
Funny story more people use Microsoft Office, and MS had to go out of there way and make Office Mac compatible because IWork is a joke, and no serious business person would use Iwork for spreadsheets, or basic document use such as Word.
Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. RPG-explorer
Apple's marketshare has fallen off since the Windows 7 launch, just as their marketing campaign has as well.They have dropped from almost10% in 2006back to almost 6%.
hahahahahaha good way to pass ur opinion off as anything factual....PC is only used for business people? wtf haha pc bogged down with anti virus? pc users cant find mac equivalent programs?[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="RPG-explorer"]Look this is an age old battle, but the truth is Apples market share has increased over the past 5 years because, not only are people seeing that MAC's are more aesthetically pleasing to the eye but there also easier to use, and are not bogged down with gigs worth of useless software such as spyware and antivirus. PC users today consist of either business men and women who are forced to use PC's because there isn't yet an Apple equivalent program available, or the other type of PC user who has just been using PC's so long and so blindly there afraid of trying anything else. Some you to will realize the truth about which is better...it's just a matter of time. Fizzman
Funny story more people use Microsoft Office, and MS had to go out of there way and make Office Mac compatible because IWork is a joke, and no serious business person would use Iwork for spreadsheets, or basic document use such as Word.
Irony? Mac normally recommended as specialist software PCs. The fact that there is a demand for a better word processor on Macs hints at a lot.Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.kittyloaf69the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.stereointegritythe only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny Actually the Snow leopard Upgrade was priced at $30.00
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.stereointegritythe only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny I believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time.
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.stereointegritythe only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny
Windows 7 Ultimate cost me $10 and I got a copy of Professional upgrade for $30.
But my whole stance on the PC vs Apple issue is this: I used to have a Macbook Pro that I got a couple years ago, but my screen just randomyl died one day, my warranty was up, and apple wanted something ridiculous like $700 to fix it, which i opted not to do because that's BS. I loved my macbook though, especially since I already had a gaming PC. So my final stance is this..if I were to get a laptop, I would get a MAc, if I were to get a Desktop, then it would be a PC.kittyloaf69Wow that is unfortunate but Apple does offer every Applecare member a chance to renew there plan coverage for another 3 years for like $99.00 when your original plan runs out.
But my whole stance on the PC vs Apple issue is this: I used to have a Macbook Pro that I got a couple years ago, but my screen just randomyl died one day, my warranty was up, and apple wanted something ridiculous like $700 to fix it, which i opted not to do because that's BS. I loved my macbook though, especially since I already had a gaming PC. So my final stance is this..if I were to get a laptop, I would get a MAc, if I were to get a Desktop, then it would be a PC.kittyloaf69This is how I see myself getting a Mac one day. As a laptop. Not sure why, I guess it cos i can't build my own laptop and i hate getting rid of pre-installed software on normal laptops. I find most people that have problems with PCs just don't know how to keep their computer running smoothly. THey should teach linux at schools.
the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.tempest91
Windows 7 Ultimate cost me $10 and I got a copy of Professional upgrade for $30.
May I ask how. I only reason i'm not running W7 atm is the price and also i don't want to download a copy because downloaded OS are usually buggy and Vista has actually be treating me quite well, not problem with it at all. touch wood.[QUOTE="Fizzman"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]hahahahahaha good way to pass ur opinion off as anything factual....PC is only used for business people? wtf haha pc bogged down with anti virus? pc users cant find mac equivalent programs?tirralirra
Funny story more people use Microsoft Office, and MS had to go out of there way and make Office Mac compatible because IWork is a joke, and no serious business person would use Iwork for spreadsheets, or basic document use such as Word.
Irony? Mac normally recommended as specialist software PCs. The fact that there is a demand for a better word processor on Macs hints at a lot.not really im just making a point to RPG explorer's delusional idea that the only reason Windows is dominant because there isnt a mac version. Mac's are not used in any large scale business. I honestly dont think there is a single company on Earth which uses exclusively Macs as there Computer/OS of choice. Im not talking about small businsses, before any idiot tries to jump down my throat.
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]But my whole stance on the PC vs Apple issue is this: I used to have a Macbook Pro that I got a couple years ago, but my screen just randomyl died one day, my warranty was up, and apple wanted something ridiculous like $700 to fix it, which i opted not to do because that's BS. I loved my macbook though, especially since I already had a gaming PC. So my final stance is this..if I were to get a laptop, I would get a MAc, if I were to get a Desktop, then it would be a PC.RPG-explorerWow that is unfortunate but Apple does offer every Applecare member a chance to renew there plan coverage for another 3 years for like $99.00 when your original plan runs out. I realize that, I just didn't have $100 to throw towards my laptop at the time, it's too bad Apple left a bad taste in my mouth because I Really loved that laptop. Oh well...
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.tirralirrathe only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny I believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time. I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet.
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]can you provide an example Search for the HP m9500t (~$600). It's a fairly old prebuilt PC, but if you upgrade the PSU and graphics card, you would be spending far, FAR less than an Apple PC.For the price of an apple computer I could build a much better PC.
kolkov01
the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty penny[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]Definitely true. Apple computers are WAY overpriced for what you get.tempest91
Windows 7 Ultimate cost me $10 and I got a copy of Professional upgrade for $30.
student price?[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty pennyRPG-explorerI believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time. I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet.
ok you are definitely trolling at this point. Not even the most die-hard Steve Jobs loving maniac would make such absurd statements.
[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty pennyRPG-explorerI believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time. I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet. It's an OS upgrade. Those who bought a preinstalled vista computer got a chance to upgrade it to win7.
[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty pennyRPG-explorerI believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time. I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet.are u being serious now i feel like ur just looking for reactions
Irony? Mac normally recommended as specialist software PCs. The fact that there is a demand for a better word processor on Macs hints at a lot.[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]
Funny story more people use Microsoft Office, and MS had to go out of there way and make Office Mac compatible because IWork is a joke, and no serious business person would use Iwork for spreadsheets, or basic document use such as Word.
Fizzman
not really im just making a point to RPG explorer's delusional idea that the only reason Windows is dominant because there isnt a mac version. Mac's are not used in any large scale business. I honestly dont think there is a single company on Earth which uses exclusively Macs as there Computer/OS of choice. Im not talking about small businsses, before any idiot tries to jump down my throat.
I bet i know one. Apple? ... You're right there, but its not because they don't want to. It's down to price here and compatibility. Large scale companies, means many different workers which means they all have to knwo how to use Macs. Trust me, if companies could, they would use Macs because they are less hassle. But don't quote me on this.[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty pennyRPG-explorerI believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time. I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet.
Rofl
[QUOTE="RPG-explorer"][QUOTE="tirralirra"] I believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time.C-is-for-CookieI would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet. It's an OS upgrade. Those who bought a preinstalled vista computer got a chance to upgrade it to win7. So im guessing that my stand alone Vista cannot be upgraded to W7?
Oh, and at mac fanboy comment about an article.
An article is just another opinion, no different to mine. If you wanted to be objective, you could have said something like evidence from tom's hardware at least.
Wait, hardware...hardware...yeah that place doesn't test software does it?
[QUOTE="kittyloaf69"]But my whole stance on the PC vs Apple issue is this: I used to have a Macbook Pro that I got a couple years ago, but my screen just randomyl died one day, my warranty was up, and apple wanted something ridiculous like $700 to fix it, which i opted not to do because that's BS. I loved my macbook though, especially since I already had a gaming PC. So my final stance is this..if I were to get a laptop, I would get a MAc, if I were to get a Desktop, then it would be a PC.tirralirraThis is how I see myself getting a Mac one day. As a laptop. Not sure why, I guess it cos i can't build my own laptop and i hate getting rid of pre-installed software on normal laptops. I find most people that have problems with PCs just don't know how to keep their computer running smoothly. THey should teach linux at schools. I agree. I built my PC as a sophomore in highschool a long time ago, (Im now 21,) and I've been teaching myself all about computers ever since. If people just took the time to learn how computers work they most liekly wouldnt have problems, and then wouldnt get ripped off by takeing a virus ridden PC to geek squad and paying them $100 just to reformat :p
[QUOTE="Fizzman"][QUOTE="tirralirra"] Irony? Mac normally recommended as specialist software PCs. The fact that there is a demand for a better word processor on Macs hints at a lot.tirralirra
not really im just making a point to RPG explorer's delusional idea that the only reason Windows is dominant because there isnt a mac version. Mac's are not used in any large scale business. I honestly dont think there is a single company on Earth which uses exclusively Macs as there Computer/OS of choice. Im not talking about small businsses, before any idiot tries to jump down my throat.
I bet i know one. Apple? ... You're right there, but its not because they don't want to. It's down to price here and compatibility. Large scale companies, means many different workers which means they all have to knwo how to use Macs. Trust me, if companies could, they would use Macs because they are less hassle. But don't quote me on this.Im gonna go ahead, and not trust you because this question is based on so many hypothetical "what if's" that its not even worth discussing any further. You would have to make Mac's more secure in the office place, blah blah blah just so many things would have to change for your idea to somewhat believable.
[QUOTE="tempest91"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]the only thing not overpriced is there OS.....snow leopard was like 60 bucks while W7 cost me a pretty pennytirralirra
Windows 7 Ultimate cost me $10 and I got a copy of Professional upgrade for $30.
May I ask how. I only reason i'm not running W7 atm is the price and also i don't want to download a copy because downloaded OS are usually buggy and Vista has actually be treating me quite well, not problem with it at all. touch wood.You can get it for $30 if you are any kind of student, and they give many people involved in IT or the software industry free or nearly free copies. Mine cost $10 for personal use.
[QUOTE="Fizzman"][QUOTE="tirralirra"] Irony? Mac normally recommended as specialist software PCs. The fact that there is a demand for a better word processor on Macs hints at a lot.tirralirra
not really im just making a point to RPG explorer's delusional idea that the only reason Windows is dominant because there isnt a mac version. Mac's are not used in any large scale business. I honestly dont think there is a single company on Earth which uses exclusively Macs as there Computer/OS of choice. Im not talking about small businsses, before any idiot tries to jump down my throat.
I bet i know one. Apple? ... You're right there, but its not because they don't want to. It's down to price here and compatibility. Large scale companies, means many different workers which means they all have to knwo how to use Macs. Trust me, if companies could, they would use Macs because they are less hassle. But don't quote me on this.If apple gave companies a 30% mass purchase discount and pcs were each set at retail price... Most companies.. would still use pcs because of cost.
One of the thing that pisses me off is our state is having budget issues and many of the classes at my college had to be dropped because of lack of funding.
Yet one of our computer labs is filled with Imacs... And all I could think to myself was.. no wonder were having budget problems.
I would like to see an article or link that says that Windows 7 beat Snow Leopard because last i heard Snow Leopard was the most advanced operating system on the planet.[QUOTE="RPG-explorer"][QUOTE="tirralirra"] I believe most of Macs OS are built up from the old ones whereas W7 was developed from the ground up. I'm not sure so anyone can correct me on this. oh and W7 beats Snow Leopard so MS wins the OS round this time.Fizzman
ok you are definitely trolling at this point. Not even the most die-hard Steve Jobs loving maniac would make such absurd statements.
Infact i did hear Steve Jobs say those exact words, i know he's the most biased of them all, but after that statement and after Leopard and Snow Leopard were released, a bunch of websites and magazines backed him up.I bet i know one. Apple? ... You're right there, but its not because they don't want to. It's down to price here and compatibility. Large scale companies, means many different workers which means they all have to knwo how to use Macs. Trust me, if companies could, they would use Macs because they are less hassle. But don't quote me on this.[QUOTE="tirralirra"][QUOTE="Fizzman"]
not really im just making a point to RPG explorer's delusional idea that the only reason Windows is dominant because there isnt a mac version. Mac's are not used in any large scale business. I honestly dont think there is a single company on Earth which uses exclusively Macs as there Computer/OS of choice. Im not talking about small businsses, before any idiot tries to jump down my throat.
Fizzman
Im gonna go ahead, and not trust you because this question is based on so many hypothetical "what if's" that its not even worth discussing any further. You would have to make Mac's more secure in the office place, blah blah blah just so many things would have to change for your idea to somewhat believable.
Yeah i know. But i like hypothesis'. Is there a plural to that word? Ok, so perhaps one day everyone will use Linux?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment