[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="kuu2"]
Iwata coming out and saying that 3d games on a 3d console are no longer mandatory pretty much proves it. Not to mention the poor sales and the $80 price drop 4 months after the system launches as well.
Do you have a different take on the 3DS?
kuu2
Yes, since being like the Virtual Boy would mean the console is doomed to a failed, ten month long lifespan. Iwata had already stated, even before the 3DS was released, that the feature is optional, that a developer can choose to not utilize it. He is just reiterating that stance. The 3D is what was supposed to sell the 3DS to the masses- but it's a purely cosmetic feature, that can be easily disabled at no cost which Nintendo recognizes. In cases, it can be detrimental to the experience, which means there are games where it should rather not be used. Which is just what Iwata said. He never said Nintendo would be ditching the 3D entirely, just for games where it didn't make sense. A better analogy would be the touch screen on the DS, which was not used in so many games.No, because the DS was successful out of the gate and the pad did not hamper a gamers experience like 3d does (headaches, eye straing, upset stomachs). 3d was doomed to fail as it has done previously, and wearing glasses has little to do with its demise.
The 3DS is suffering the same problems the Virtual Boy did almost to a tee. Lack of 3rd party games, check. Over priced, check. Makes people ill, check. Nintendo back tracking on it, check. I have called this befor the 3DS launched and I have been right the entire time. Outside of a graphics upgrade which is not a leep in visuals there is not a redeeming quality about the 3DS.
Sorry to burst bubbles but that is how I see it.
the ds was not successful out the gate you really dont know what your talking about
Log in to comment