This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="grr320"]lol 3d smoke interacting with a dropship moving through it doesnt help killzone2 look better than gears of war 2. i could really give a rats ass about that.67gt500It's not just the cute smoke tricks - it's pretty much everything... Everyone seems to get that but him, no biggie.
no gears of war 2 looks better much better models/textures/artstyle , how come you cant kick around peoples dead bodies in killzone2 like gears of war 2?grr320because thats unrealistic bodies dont weigh 5 pounds.
I just bought KZ2 today. I honestly think it is amazing in the graphics department. GeoW looks incredible as well, but I believe that KZ really takes the crown in this battle.
no gears of war 2 looks better much better models/textures/artstyle , how come you cant kick around peoples dead bodies in killzone2 like gears of war 2?grr320In KZ2, everything has a more realistic 'weight' applied to it... in Gears when you bump a Locust body it behaves as if it weighs about three pounds...
[QUOTE="grr320"]no gears of war 2 looks better much better models/textures/artstyle , how come you cant kick around peoples dead bodies in killzone2 like gears of war 2?67gt500In KZ2, everything has a more realistic 'weight' applied to it... in Gears when you bump a Locust body it behaves as if it weighs about three pounds...
I always thought that was funny. It's like they're made of paper.
In KZ2, everything has a more realistic 'weight' applied to it... in Gears when you bump a Locust body it behaves as if it weighs about three pounds...[QUOTE="67gt500"][QUOTE="grr320"]no gears of war 2 looks better much better models/textures/artstyle , how come you cant kick around peoples dead bodies in killzone2 like gears of war 2?FamiBox
I always thought that was funny. It's like they're made of paper.
Epic admitted that, in pushing the xbox360 'to it's limits' with the graphics that some other things had to be slightly compromised...An older game that took less time to develop is of course going to look worse than Killzone 2. I actually don't understand the argument.
They both look good, but seriously why does this argument exist?
treedoor
1) KZ2 came out just 3 months later (you make it look like it came out 2 yrs later)
2) Geow2 had the GAME ENGINE ready when EPIC started work on the actual game, GG had to build the game engine from scratch.. Sum up the time EPIC took to create the game engine + actual game development and you'll see they dont total to 24 months :)
Back on topic, Geow2 is the best looking game on 360 while KZ2 is the best looking game on PS3... difference is KZ2 is the best looking game currently available on consoles !!
gears of war 2 real time cutscene's look better than killzone2's realtime cutscene's this proves gears of war 2 looks better. reason cut scene's looks better because you can see ur models alot better than gameplay.grr320
ppff yeah right !!!!
Agreed, especially the last level in front of the Visari Palace there are literally hundred of helghasts glowing eyes looking to kill you.as an owner of gears of war, gears of war 2 and killzone 2, I can honestly say Killzone 2 looks quite a bit better....for the simply fact of how much is going on at once. Gears is very barron usually.
Uptown
Whichever game is on the platform with the most fanboys on GameSpot at the time tends to win...SpruceCaboose
So true. All the same though, I think KZ2 is better-looking. Not insanely, leaps-and-bounds, a-whole-gen-apart like some of these folks are claiming, but I definitely think its purtier.
[QUOTE="Panther501"]unreal engine 3 is better at textures atleast on pc.KZ2, anyone who denys it is a lemming with fanboy glasses on.
grr320
Texture pop-in is one of the most well-known problems with the Unreal Engine. You can get them to look fantastic, but I think that is more up to the artists than to the engine. For example, Stranglehold used the Unreal Engine and looked like utter trash. Uncharted doesn't use the Unreal Engine and the rocks, trees, the porous textures are very similar in quality and appearance to Gears.
Killzone 2, easilly. But I prefer the Gears 2 art style, what I have seen from KZ2 was impressive, yet ugly.Master-Thief-09
I hate the character models in Gears. Every dude in this game makes Barry Bonds look like Pauly Shore. Popeye arms, Astroboy legs, guns bigger than their entire torso, and a little teency tiny little head. :lol: The environments in Gears are just amazing though. Great eye candy.
I have no real desire to play KZ2, though I'd give it a go if I walked into a store and they had a demo machine set up....
that said, KZ2 beats Gears 2 easily in everything except for character models. After watching the comparison vid posted yesterday it was clear, but the character models in KZ2 looked like they had been covered in Vaseline, ie: textures were muddy and lacked detail.
[QUOTE="Lto_thaG"]Just like every other person who says that the graphics are amazing. Once you play it you realize that the graphics are nothing special. But I don't think Gears of War's graphics look better.I haven't played kz2 yet,but I can already say it looks better.
_Pinbot_
gears of war 2 realtime cutscene's blow away killzone2's realtime cutscene's. plus gears of war 2 cutscene's the models/textures/levels look exact same as the gameplay that's no bs. gow2 wins grr320do u have a ps3? have u seen kz2? 60 inch hdtv? ive played gears2 for quite sometime now and i gotta tell you KZ2 tops gears2 anyday of the week, twice on sundays. Gears2 DOES look good dont get me wrong but KZ2's visuals is something never seen before in consoles.
Surely everyone can see how superior Killzone 2's graphics are... Seriously, this shouldn't even be a debate -- both excellent looking games, but Killzone 2 definitely takes the candy. If you want a real debate, you should argue about which game is the better of the two.Stumpt25
Hey Stumpt, I would like you to meet my friend, _Pinbot_L
Gears of War 2 no question about it. Anyone one who says KZ2 looks better is either:
a) blind
b) a fanboy who can't accept a better game on another console
c) both 'a' and 'b'
_Pinbot_
Play nice!
[QUOTE="treedoor"]
An older game that took less time to develop is of course going to look worse than Killzone 2. I actually don't understand the argument.
They both look good, but seriously why does this argument exist?
Malta_1980
1) KZ2 came out just 3 months later (you make it look like it came out 2 yrs later)
2) Geow2 had the GAME ENGINE ready when EPIC started work on the actual game, GG had to build the game engine from scratch.. Sum up the time EPIC took to create the game engine + actual game development and you'll see they dont total to 24 months :)
Back on topic, Geow2 is the best looking game on 360 while KZ2 is the best looking game on PS3... difference is KZ2 is the best looking game currently available on consoles !!
Does KZ2 even attempt to do organic matter such as in the conservatory on GeOW? No and why not? Because it's hard too and would cripple the engine so instead you have bland brown game and people are saying oh it looks sooo good. It's just making the most out of the engine.
[QUOTE="Malta_1980"]
[QUOTE="treedoor"]
An older game that took less time to develop is of course going to look worse than Killzone 2. I actually don't understand the argument.
They both look good, but seriously why does this argument exist?
Nomad0404
1) KZ2 came out just 3 months later (you make it look like it came out 2 yrs later)
2) Geow2 had the GAME ENGINE ready when EPIC started work on the actual game, GG had to build the game engine from scratch.. Sum up the time EPIC took to create the game engine + actual game development and you'll see they dont total to 24 months :)
Back on topic, Geow2 is the best looking game on 360 while KZ2 is the best looking game on PS3... difference is KZ2 is the best looking game currently available on consoles !!
Does KZ2 even attempt to do organic matter such as in the conservatory on GeOW? No and why not? Because it's hard too and would cripple the engine so instead you have bland brown game and people are saying oh it looks sooo good. It's just making the most out of the engine.
It's things like this that really give it away that you haven't played the game.
Gears of War 2 no question about it. Anyone one who says KZ2 looks better is either:
a) blind
b) a fanboy who can't accept a better game on another console
c) both 'a' and 'b'
lol. get a ps3 and see it urself. dont depend on gametrailers too much.[QUOTE="Nomad0404"]
[QUOTE="Malta_1980"]
1) KZ2 came out just 3 months later (you make it look like it came out 2 yrs later)
2) Geow2 had the GAME ENGINE ready when EPIC started work on the actual game, GG had to build the game engine from scratch.. Sum up the time EPIC took to create the game engine + actual game development and you'll see they dont total to 24 months :)
Back on topic, Geow2 is the best looking game on 360 while KZ2 is the best looking game on PS3... difference is KZ2 is the best looking game currently available on consoles !!
Chutebox
Does KZ2 even attempt to do organic matter such as in the conservatory on GeOW? No and why not? Because it's hard too and would cripple the engine so instead you have bland brown game and people are saying oh it looks sooo good. It's just making the most out of the engine.
It's things like this that really give it away that you haven't played the game.
oh you must have forgotten. Helghan is the planet, not earth. dont expect rainbows, flowers and anything green. Have you played the game? if you have, you can tell that the setting of this game is very brutal, non-human, not earth has feelings. its very dusty.i talk because i have a PS3 and i own the game, i also own gears2 and i still play it from time to time.
gears of war 2 looks better grr320no... lol killzone 2 looks a lot better, i get a feeling you havent played it or you wouldnt be saying that
[QUOTE="grr320"]gears of war 2 realtime cutscene's blow away killzone2's realtime cutscene's. plus gears of war 2 cutscene's the models/textures/levels look exact same as the gameplay that's no bs. gow2 wins def_modedo u have a ps3? have u seen kz2? 60 inch hdtv? ive played gears2 for quite sometime now and i gotta tell you KZ2 tops gears2 anyday of the week, twice on sundays. Gears2 DOES look good dont get me wrong but KZ2's visuals is something never seen before in consoles. ignore "grr320" that comment alone just goes to show you hes never played or seen killzone 2 aside from the internet lol
[QUOTE="grr320"]gears of war 2 looks better PCgamer687no... lol killzone 2 looks a lot better, i get a feeling you havent played it or you wouldnt be saying that agreed. I won both games and and visually kz2 blows gears away, in terms of graphics, as far as gameplay goes, they are really close but i like gears better. if killzone didnt have some sensitive control it would be alot better
KZ2, anyone who denys it is a lemming with fanboy glasses on.
Panther501
I've been playing alot of K2 and its a great game, but I do think its graphics are way overreated, it looks good but I do think other games look better
[QUOTE="def_mode"][QUOTE="grr320"]gears of war 2 realtime cutscene's blow away killzone2's realtime cutscene's. plus gears of war 2 cutscene's the models/textures/levels look exact same as the gameplay that's no bs. gow2 wins PCgamer687do u have a ps3? have u seen kz2? 60 inch hdtv? ive played gears2 for quite sometime now and i gotta tell you KZ2 tops gears2 anyday of the week, twice on sundays. Gears2 DOES look good dont get me wrong but KZ2's visuals is something never seen before in consoles. ignore "grr320" that comment alone just goes to show you hes never played or seen killzone 2 aside from the internet lol
I've played alot of K2 and I agree with grr320
ignore "grr320" that comment alone just goes to show you hes never played or seen killzone 2 aside from the internet lol[QUOTE="PCgamer687"][QUOTE="def_mode"] do u have a ps3? have u seen kz2? 60 inch hdtv? ive played gears2 for quite sometime now and i gotta tell you KZ2 tops gears2 anyday of the week, twice on sundays. Gears2 DOES look good dont get me wrong but KZ2's visuals is something never seen before in consoles.onewiththegame
I've played alot of K2 and I agree with grr320
so i take it you beat the game? and i take it you've played things like the trian level were the wind effect everything you do , including move speed, shooting, and tossing nades? and i take it you played the last level which looks dam amazing and puts all other console games to rest?[QUOTE="PCgamer687"][QUOTE="onewiththegame"]
I've played alot of K2 and I agree with grr320
so i take it you beat the game? and i take it you've played things like the trian level were the wind effect everything you do , including move speed, shooting, and tossing nades? and i take it you played the last level which looks dam amazing and puts all other console games to rest?Start a new account just to engage in this argument... "PC gamer"? .... lol no, you havent seen my thread yesterday did you? about best FPS, you should go read it, and tbh i just dont like grr340 :P:P:P he thinks quake is better than BF2, even htough BF2 is the best game[QUOTE="onewiththegame"][QUOTE="PCgamer687"] ignore "grr320" that comment alone just goes to show you hes never played or seen killzone 2 aside from the internet lolPCgamer687
I've played alot of K2 and I agree with grr320
so i take it you beat the game? and i take it you've played things like the trian level were the wind effect everything you do , including move speed, shooting, and tossing nades? and i take it you played the last level which looks dam amazing and puts all other console games to rest?did I hurt your feelings?
I can't be bothered to play the sp (the story is just bad) the mp is great but I do think the graphics are way way overrated
imo Gears2 bests it in almost every way when it comes to the graphics
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment