killzone 2 visuals vs Gears of War visuals who wins??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for W1NGMAN-
W1NGMAN-

10109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#201 W1NGMAN-
Member since 2008 • 10109 Posts

[QUOTE="inertk"][QUOTE="NinjaMunkey01"] The first tank bit in tha campaign has more than 10... Also online you get up to 32 players. I was just playing online and it really is incredible, the amount going on, you always see the wind blowing around, bits of paper floating about, lightning in the sky, destructable environments, the lighting, and all with 32 players in close proximity sometimes all throwing grenades, each one affecting your screen 9shakes with explosions) How it does it all with no lag i dont know... And about enemies, when you properly fighting real smart enemies on gears 2 you generally dont face more than 8 or so. And what makes it even more amazing is that the AI in killzone 2 is argubly unparalleled for console shooters, how the flank you, move behind cover, communicate with eachother, flush you out with grenades. Its not just mindless shooting like gears 2, everything they do the devs seem to have tied with a specific desired effect. This coupled with incredible animations when the enemy gets shot, and the brilliant screams of pain when they get hit... God theres just so much going on. You cant even compare gears 2 and Killzone 2, Killzoe 2 is just in its own league. You do face more than 10 enemies, your argument is feeble, like usual. I can quite easily come up with 10 or so reasons why Killzone 2 looks better than gears 2, and yet you fail to make 1 decent reason... Just accept that KZ2 looks much better. Im not saying gears 2 is a bad game, its incredible, but from a graphical standpoint, killzone 2 wins. NinjaMunkey01
Most importantly, when there's more than 10 characters on screen in KZ2 they actually have A.I. unlike Gears 2 where they just run in a uniform fashion.

Exactly. I knew Mcdonaldsguy meant the bits in gears 2 with tons of enemies running around, but theyre all mindless. It looks great, but on a technical level, its not that impressive, Age of empires 2 on the ps2 could have up to 200 untis runnning around all doing different things at once. so I guess that means AOE2 >>>> KZ2 and gears 2...

McdonaIds is still arguing about the graphics of KZ2!?...check it out, I was arguing with him about it yesterday

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#202 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="idontbeliveit"] wat do you mean "wat has that got to do with anything?" do you not pay attention to wat you type? cows dont overrate the graphics cuz its a critically acclaimed fact that the visals in KZ2 are amazing. if YOU dont think it looks good, fair enough. just saying the visuals arent overrated.idontbeliveit
you obviously don't pay attention either WHAT and VISUALS, a lot of people i have spoken too said that killzone 2 has good graphics but they where dissapointed because it wasn't as good as sony said it would be, it may beat gears of war 2, but it does not beat it by the amount you cows claim.

wasnt as good as sony said it would be? lol wat utter BS. sony said it wud look great, and it does. if you dont think KZ2 beats gears 2 by a large margin thats fine, its all subjective. i dont either, but the point is it does have better visuals than gears 2. btw wat do you mean i dont pay attention? where didnt I?

it's WHAT not WAT, that's what i meant
Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#203 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts

KZ2, anyone who denys it is a lemming with fanboy glasses on.

Panther501
I agree. [QUOTE="grr320"]http://image.gamespotcdn.com/gamespot/images/2008/288/938611_20081015_screen006.jpg gears of war 2 looks alot better

Ha good one... wait, were you serious?
Avatar image for def_mode
def_mode

4237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 def_mode
Member since 2005 • 4237 Posts

never a fanboy, i hate them but seriously KZ2 is the console graphics king.

Avatar image for Hockey_Slayer
Hockey_Slayer

3213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 Hockey_Slayer
Member since 2004 • 3213 Posts

Whatever console has the most fanboys atm will win... Looks like its Killzone 2 for now.

Avatar image for deactivated-652663614c5e5
deactivated-652663614c5e5

2271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 deactivated-652663614c5e5
Member since 2005 • 2271 Posts
[QUOTE="idontbeliveit"][QUOTE="delta3074"]you obviously don't pay attention either WHAT and VISUALS, a lot of people i have spoken too said that killzone 2 has good graphics but they where dissapointed because it wasn't as good as sony said it would be, it may beat gears of war 2, but it does not beat it by the amount you cows claim.delta3074
wasnt as good as sony said it would be? lol wat utter BS. sony said it wud look great, and it does. if you dont think KZ2 beats gears 2 by a large margin thats fine, its all subjective. i dont either, but the point is it does have better visuals than gears 2. btw wat do you mean i dont pay attention? where didnt I?

it's WHAT not WAT, that's what i meant

so you're talking about silly typos, I was talking about paying attention to WHAT (doesnt make a difference) he wrote. the guy didnt even remember wat he was talking about.