[QUOTE="Demonjoe93"]
[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]
Well, if anything, it's probably not going to be the campaign or multiplayer that make them want to return to Killzone 3. :)
Admit it, you're probably playing CoD on your PS3 right now.
You probably also helped make Black Ops become the best-selling PS3 game in history, destroying all exclusives.
SHR3DD3D
The reviews praised the multiplayer. You fail.
But can we agree it's worse than Black Ops?
No. I have Black Ops; it's good, but it's no AAA game and it's certainly not better than Killzone 3, or Killzone 2 for that matter. Killzone 3 may not have a dozen different kind of perks for kill streaks and to equip but what it does have is the Warzone mode which is fantastic, an Operations mode with cutscenes featuring players who do objectives, more balanced maps (at least more so than the last game where ISA would always win) that don't seem like they're designed to camp like some of the maps I've played in Black Ops cough*WMD*cough, maps have a large variety and strategic uniqueness to them like that one place with the jet-packs, the other place with the mechs, a snow place that emphasises the ability to snipe and to avoid getting sniped and other nice places. Of course Killzone 3 is far from perfect, I hate how everyone now gets proximity mines, brutal melee is just cheap and unfair at times, I'll be right on top of them and try to use it and won't work, but they'll by like five feet away from me and manage to pull it off and it really gets excessive when people do itwith the Infiltrator **** and I miss custom games. Despite some of those dumb changes to Killzone the multiplayer I stillfindbetter than Black Ops because due tomap designthere's more camping, more cheap ways to die(my favorite example is when somebody will get a machine gun in a chopper and start spawn-camping us), anda lower skill ceiling due to perks.
So no, I really can't say Killzone 3's multiplayer is worse than Black Ops.
Log in to comment